EDF5622 Developing Learning & Learners.
Assessment Task 2A
GUIDE TO WRITING YOUR REFLECTIVE LEARNING EPISODE Overview
• You do not need any academic references or links to theories for this task.
• All you need is to write up a learning episode from your past learning experience, or
your teaching experience, or your mentorship experience, or your team work within
your own working or study setting.
• We are looking for an episode that involves learning. The learner could be yourself –
or it could be a learner, or group of learners, you have observed.
• This is essentially a descriptive (NOT analytical or theoretical) writing task.
• This is the first step towards critically reflecting on learning – first we need the story
itself.
• In the previous assignment we gave you a ‘case’ to consider. Now we want you to be
framing your own ‘case’ or episode for analysis.
• Make sure that you use up the whole 800 words to write up a story that involves a
learning episode (+/- 10%)
1. Choose one particular episode that will allow you to link to a particular theory, or
theories, to explicate the “why” question to your story …
2. Describe who, when, where, how, learning happened, or did not happen.
3. Include sufficient detail in the story to provide ‘hooks’ that will allow you to attach, or
connect the theory later when you complete Assignment 2B. Then you will be linking your
learning episode to theory/theories and associated strategies for improvement
4. But for now, tell it as a story.
5. You can write using the first person “I” …
6. However, use pseudonyms (false names) for the ‘characters’ in your story. Your story
should not identify any particular persons or places explicitly (other than yourself).
GO ON AND WRITE YOUR REFLECTIVE LEARNING EPISODE
You may find it helpful to share your story with a few classmates – and provide constructive
comments on their stories …
We look forward to reading about your experiences.
Regards, Peter
(on behalf of the teaching team)

Attachments:

20190516-2116….jpgA-Short-Guide….pdfEDF5622-Devel….pdfEDF5622-Assig….pdf

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Describe how the busy-wait implementation of a semaphore can cause starvation.

2. In addition to deadlock and starvation, concurrent processes can experience livelock, where no process is blocked, all processes get to execute, but each continually repeats the same code without possibility of success. Write a simple program in (a) Java or (b) Ada that is an example of livelock.

Q

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Define “stage-gate process” and explain what the concept of “stage gates” adds to Crawford’s conceptualization of the new products process.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Define the elements of the following equation: P = a0 ? a1 × Qd. 2. Given P = $150 ? 0.005 × Qd as the demand for a professional sports team: a. If P = $60, what is Qd? b. If P = $40, what is Qd? 3. Imagine these two possible changes from the demand curve listed in Question 2: a. P = $175 ? 0.005 × Qd b. P = $125 ? 0.005 × Qd For each, identify whether Question 3(a) or 3(b) would be consistent with the following stated changes: iii.increase in the size of the market where the team plays iv.decrease in the per-capita income in the market where the team plays v.move to a newer stadium vi.decline in the quality of players employed by the team

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

1. Demonstrate critical understanding and application of relevant theories associated with global corporate policies and strategies. 2. Understand the holistic nature of strategy and apply analytical techniques to solve complex problems in real life organizations. 3. Demonstrate knowledge of the strategic decision making process through critical analysis of how strategic decision making enables an organisation to relate to its global business environment. 4. Critically evaluate and monitor the business mission, objectives and policies of international organisations. 5. Use critical reflective skills to reflect on the impact of their understanding on the problem solving process. Please note: 1. All work must adhere to the University regulations on ‘Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism’ which are provided as an Appendix in your Programme Handbook. You are encouraged to use ‘Harvard Referencing Style’ and avoid ‘Plagiarism’. 2. A hard copy and an electronic copy on CD Rom or DVD of the assignment must be handed to the Study Centre on or before the appointed date under cover of the Sunderland Business School (SBS) Feedback Sheet. Please include a Turnitin Report were possible. 3. Issue Date: Friday, 07 February 2014 4. Submission Date: 2014 Task Your task is to carry out a critical analysis and evaluation of the strategies adopted by global telecommunications providers, using the information provided and other materials researched. You will be expected to select and apply appropriate theories, techniques and models studied during the module whilst having regard to the practical aspects of strategy development. Your assignment should be presented in a business report format and should be within the range 3,500 ± 10% words (excluding executive summary/abstract, references and relevant appendices). The report should include a title page and abstract and be fully and consistently It is recommended that you research information additional to the case study to support your lication of THEORETICAL CONCEPTS studied in the module to the ‘practical’ case study presented. In other words, you should proceed beyond a DESCRIPTION of the company and its actions. You should be analysing ‘why’ rather then describing ‘what’. The assignment will be assessed and moderated by two members of staff in accordance with the marks allocated to each of the questions detailed below. 10% of the marks are set aside for the ‘presentation’ criteria. Academic Rigour • your ability to isolate the key strategic issues • the coherence and depth of the analysis of those issues • the ability to analyse the strategy context within which companies operates • the ability to critically review and evaluate strategic decisions made by companies Methodology • the use of relevant evidence, from material provided and personal research to support any statements made • the appropriateness of the methods used and theoretical models and frameworks applied • the breadth and depth of research undertaken Evaluation of data • the ability to make sound recommendations or conclusions arising from the analysis • the soundness of arguments put forward Presentation • the summary of arguments • report layout and format

Attachments:

pgbm16–globa….doc

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"