After reading Chapter Seven in Thinking for Yourself, discuss the following guide questions by posting comments and responses on this forum. Feel free to share your thoughts of each topic. Use all available resources to aid you. NOTE: Post your answers to these questions prior to taking the module quiz or assignment points will be lost.

1. How can word choice convey bias?
2. How is the term viewpoints defined?
3. Why is the term viewpoint far more than a synonym for the word opinion?
4. Explain the difference between a conscious and unconscious viewpoint.
5. Explain the difference between egocentrism and ethnocentrism. (Do Discussion Questions one through four on pages 202-203)
6. Viewpoints may be hidden in news framing. How are we able to discern the viewpoint of a publication or television station or program? Why is it valuable, as a critical reader or TV viewer, to be able to characterize or label their viewpoints?
7. Define propaganda and describe some propaganda that you were able to recognize. How did you recognize it?

After posting your answers to the discussion questions, take the chapter quiz, then remember to return and respond to at least two other classmate’s posts. When you post your responses, remember to identify the individual whom you are addressing in the response, include a thought-provoking question (not answered with a mere “yes” or “no”.) about their comments and demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the discussion, not mere superficial comments.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

using Times New Roman (size 12, double-spaced) font.

Course Learning Outcomes-Covered

1	Apply Organizational behavior knowledge and skills to manage diversified culture in the organizational settings (Lo 2.2).
2	Recognize the impact of organizational culture on shaping values, attitudes and behavior (Lo 1.9).

• These assignments are an individual assignment.
• All students are encouraged to use their own words.

• Be three to five pages in length (800-1000 words), which does not include the title page, abstract or required reference page, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
• Use proper referencing (APA style) to reference, other style will not be accepted.
• Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles unless the assignment calls for more.
• It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the safe assignment Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading.
• Write a three-part essay (i.e., an essay that includes an introduction paragraph, the essay’s body, and a conclusion paragraph) that address the questions using a question and answer format.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Annotated Bibliography

the annotated bibliographies have be five articles on the same topic within corrections.

• student shall locate and read five (5) peer-reviewed journal articles from the TAMUCT online library databases, related to the general topic: COURTS.

• The topic of courts are very broad – the student should identify a more specific area within each general topic and make that the focus for the annotated bibliography. I am including some examples below – these are just a few of the many areas the student could focus on

Courts (e.g., judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, juries, sentencing)

• Once the student has read the articles, he/she will summarize them, succinctly, in one page each (no more than one page, no less than ¾ of a page). Thus, each annotated bibliography should not exceed 5 pages. The student will not receive credit for articles that are not peer-reviewed. These are to be summaries, not critiques of the articles.

Reaction Essays 1page

These essays will be written in reaction to the content included in the annotated bibliographies. The reaction essays should reflect a careful consideration about what you think about what you have read and written in the annotated bibliography assignments.

The topic was rejected the annotateds needed to more along the lines of one of these topics:

Judicial decision-making

Sentencing disparities

Prosecutor discretion

Specialized courts

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The final paper will be due in Unit 8. The paper shall be posted in the appropriate area as a Word attachment. The body of the papers shall be 2000-2,200 words excluding cover page and reference page, double spaced in 12-pitch font, with numbered pages, and must contain a title page and reference page. At least 5 academic references, must be cited in APA documentation style. Appropriate references may include books, journal articles, magazine articles, other online references, and court case citations. The body of the paper should contain an identifiable introduction, analysis and discussion on the given topic, and a clear conclusion. The papers should be written in the third person.

The topic for the Final Paper will be on the Federalist Papers No. 10 and 51. Points of interest which your paper should be based on are as follows:

1. What are Federal Papers about?
2. What is the view point of the author
3. In your opinion, how does the theory of what was written into these papers compare and contrast from public administration then to public administration now?
4. Does public involvement play into the thoughts and writings of the Federalist Papers?
5. Was public involvement a consideration in the Federalist papers when written?
6. Conclusion, what is your view point on these writings?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

• Read: “A Minimum Wage Equals Minimum Jobs” at http://abcnews.go.com/2020/Stossel/story?id=8195418&page=1 (Links to an external site.), and/or

• Watch: “Stossel on the Minimum Wage”Stossel: Minimum Wage Hurts Beginners (Links to an external site.)
• Post your response to the following: Do you agree with the following statements? Using positive and normative reasoning, carefully explain why or why not. Be sure to identify whether you are using positive or normative reasoning in your response. (Part of your score will be determined by whether you understand the difference between normative and positive reasoning)

1. Increasing the minimum wage is the fairest way to benefit low wage workers.
2. Increasing the minimum wage is the most economically efficient way to benefit low wage workers.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"