Develop A 3 4 Page Plan To Identify The Causes Of Organizational Conflict Explain How Conflict Affects An Organization And Select A Conflict Resolution Style To Use Explain Conflict Negotiation Strategies And Determi

 

Introduction

Disagreements occur because we have differences of opinions, values, and goals. Solutions to disagreements require negotiation skills. While negotiating, the parties involved have to “generate options, brainstorm ideas, give and take, and attempt to get their mutual goals met” (Hocker & Wilmot, 2014, p. 249).

Reference

Hocker, J., & Wilmot, W. (2014). Interpersonal conflict (9th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Identify variables within an organizational structure that can promote conflict.
    • Identify the factors responsible for conflict within an organization.
  • Competency 3: Apply appropriate strategies to reduce or resolve conflicts.
    • Describe a conflict resolution style appropriate for a conflict situation within an organization.
    • Explain conflict negotiation strategies appropriate for a conflict situation within an organization.
  • Competency 4: Analyze the impact of conflict on relationship building in face-to-face, virtual, cyber, and group communication.
    • Explain how conflict affects an organization.
  • Competency 5: Evaluate the outcome of proposed strategies of conflict resolution.
    • Determine the outcomes of conflict negotiation strategies for an organization.
  • Competency 6: Communicate effectively in a variety of formats.
    • Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate APA format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Preparation

Use the Capella library and the Internet to research conflict negotiation strategies and conflict resolution styles. Find at least three resources to use in this assessment to support your plan.

Instructions

You volunteer with an organization whose executive leadership has conflicted for almost a year in deep, fairly public ways, on a variety of topics. At first the conflict seemed to center on the types of events the organization sponsored, but more recently some members of the leadership team have been making accusations of bias based on race, culture, social status, and religion against other leadership members, including the director. The conflict is making it difficult for anyone to continue working with the organization.

The leadership team is composed of seven members. Six of the members, including the director, are women. There are two African-American members, including the only man on the team. There is one Hispanic member. The other four members, including the director, are Caucasian.

You have successfully handled small conflicts among the volunteers and staff in the past, and now they have asked you to step in and see if you can help resolve the conflict before it destroys the organization. Leadership has already agreed to bring you in to try and help the situation, but you know you need to have a solid plan for this undertaking.

Include the following in your conflict resolution plan:

  • Identify the factors that may be responsible for causing the conflict.
  • Explain how the conflict is affecting the rest of the organization.
  • Describe the conflict resolution style you will use in this situation.
  • Explain the conflict negotiation strategies you will try.
  • Based on your chosen strategies, determine the likely outcome.

To facilitate the evaluation of your plan, format your plan according to APA guidelines.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Determining Sample Size 4 Dq 2

 

Assume you want to do a project that compares the survey results before an intervention to those after an intervention in the same sample (the same people will take both surveys). You plan to use a paired t-test to analyze your results. Using the “Determining the Appropriate Sample Size,” Topic Material, perform a sample size calculation to determine how large your sample should be. Justify your sample size calculation with citations. Discuss how your sample size may affect the validity of your study. I plan to use Qauntitative descrptive design. 1 page, APA. My topic is on  “the use of Advanced Practice Providers in triage in improving waiting times in Emergency departments”. 

https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSCVKV_9.1.1/Campaign/CampaignProcesses/To_use_the_sample_size_calculator.html. 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop An Interview Questionnaire

This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The   information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for   the second assignment in Topic 3.

Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused   functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three   open-ended, family-focused questions to assess functional health   patterns for each of the following:

  1. Values/Health Perception
  2. Nutrition
  3. Sleep/Rest
  4. Elimination
  5. Activity/Exercise
  6. Cognitive
  7. Sensory-Perception
  8. Self-Perception
  9. Role Relationship
  10. Sexuality
  11. Coping

Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the   family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions   complied in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused   functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.

Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper.   Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an   appendix with your assignment.

Include the following in your paper:

  1. Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any     relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity,     social class, spirituality, and environment.
  2. Summarize the     overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health     of the family.
  3. Based on your findings, describe at least     two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the     findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers     to health were identified.
  4. Describe how family systems     theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in     turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over   time.

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete   this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years   and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the   rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the   expectations for successful completion. 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop A Teaching Plan W6

  

Develop a Teaching 

Teaching Plan

Select one class period from your course syllabus***se attachement*** and develop a teaching plan for your chosen class. Following the assignment guidelines below, develop and submit your teaching plan for the class period.

 
 

Your teaching plan should serve as a road map of what you think students need to learn as well as how you will effectively deliver your instruction and evaluate what the students learned during the class period. While there are many formats for a teaching plan, the following sections should be included in your plan:

 
 

· The subject or topic that you plan to teach: Your topic should be selected from one of the class periods listed in your syllabus that you developed for an undergraduate nursing course.

· Level of instruction: The placement of the course in the nursing program curriculum (i.e., freshman, junior, sophomore, senior; beginning, mid-program, or end-of-program level)

· Method/mode of delivering your teaching presentation: Form of audio-visual delivery, PowerPoint presentation, or similar method

· Learning objectives: Include 4–5 outcome statements that define what you expect the students to learn or accomplish by the end of the class period. Your learning objectives should be clear and measurable, and appropriate to the information you are teaching, and the level of instruction.

· Content outline: Develop an outline of the central points and/or skills you plan to cover. Your content should be logically structured.

· Teaching strategies and learning activities: List the approach, techniques, and methods you will use to drive your instruction and engage your students to reach the learning objectives (e.g., lecture, active learning, discussions). Provide a rationale supporting your selected teaching strategies, as well as their advantages and disadvantages.

· Plans for individual learning differences: How you plan to adapt your teaching to meet individual learning needs of various students. Explain how individuals with different learning styles will be supported by your teaching strategies and activities.

· Evaluation process: List the methods you plan to use to assess student learning and evaluate the effectiveness of your teaching strategies (how you will determine if students met the outcome objectives).

o Include formative (questioning, discussion, games, etc.) and summative (assignment, test, presentation, etc.) evaluation strategies.

o Include at least one written assignment and develop a rubric that clearly describes your expectations for the assignment. Your rubric should:

§ List the criteria that will be assessed (a breakdown of the assignment parts).

§ Include some type of scale that measures the levels of quality for the criteria being assessed (e.g., from excellent to poor, from exceeds expectations to does not meet expectations).

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop A Solution To A Specific Ethical Dilemma Faced By A Health Care Professional By Applying Ethical Principles Describe The Issues And A Possible Solution In A 3 5 Page Paper

Develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional by applying ethical principles. Describe the issues and a possible solution in a 3-5 page paper.

Apply academic peer-reviewed journal articles relevant to an ethical problem or issue as evidence to support an analysis of the case.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. 

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in a case study.

Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.Write following APA style for in-text citations, quotes, and references.

For this assessment, you will develop a solution to a specific ethical dilemma faced by a health care professional. In your assessment:

Access the Ethical Case Studies media piece linked in the Resources to review the case studies you may use for this assessment and select the case most closely related to your area of interest and use that case study to complete the assessment.      

Note: The case study may not supply all of the information you may need. In such cases, you should consider a variety of possibilities and infer potential conclusions. However, please be sure to identify any assumptions or speculations you make.

Identify which case study you selected, briefly summarize the facts surrounding the case study, and identify the problem or issue in the case study that presents an ethical dilemma or challenge and describe that dilemma or challenge.      

Use the three components of the ethical decision-making model (moral awareness, moral judgment, and ethical behavior) found in the Ethical Decision-Making Model media piece in the Resources to analyze the ethical issues.

Analyze the factors that contributed to the problem or issue.      

Identify who is involved or affected by the problem or issue.

Describe the factors that contributed to the problem or issue and explain how they contributed.

Cite and apply the journal article as evidence to support your critical thinking and analysis of the case.

Assess the credibility of the information source.

Assess the relevance of the information source.

Discuss the effectiveness of the communication approaches present in the case study.      

Describe how the health care professional communicated with others.

Describe the communication and communication strategies that were applied, both in creating and in resolving the problems or issues presented.

Assess instances where the professional communicated effectively or ineffectively.

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by the professional related to any problems or issues involving ethical practice in the case.      

Describe the actions taken in response to the ethical dilemma or challenge presented in the case study.

Summarize how well the professional managed professional responsibilities and priorities to resolve the problem or issue in the case.

Discuss the key lessons this case provides for health care professionals.

Apply ethical principles to a possible solution to the proposed problem or issue from the case study.      

Describe the proposed solution.

Discuss how the approach makes this professional more effective or less effective in building relationships across disciplines within his or her organization.

Discuss how likely it is the proposed solution will foster professional collaboration.

Needs to be original; no plagiarism.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop A Professional Product To Improve Care Or The Patient Experience Related To The Identified Health Problem With A 2 4 Page Summary Of Intervention Findings Evidence And Best Practice Basis For The Professional

 

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.
    • Explain the ways in which leadership of people and processes was utilized while designing an intervention and its implementation.
  • Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.
    • Justify decisions related to developing a professional product with relevant research, evidence, and best practices.
  • Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.
    • Demonstrate process improvements in the quality, safety, or cost of care resulting from an intervention and related professional product.
  • Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.
    • Demonstrate improvements in the quality of care and patient experience resulting from an intervention and related professional product.
  • Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    • Communicate professionally in clear, logically organized writing, using correct grammar, spelling, and APA style.

Important: You must complete all of the assessments in order for this course.

Preparation

Before submitting this assessment, you must have logged at least three direct-contact hours in CORE ELMS. These hours will include only the time that you spent working directly with patients, families, and/or community members to implement your intervention, collect and analyze data, and deliver your professional product to your target audience.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop and deliver a professional product to address the health problem defined in your first assessment to improve care and the patient experience. This will be delivered face-to-face to the individual or group that you have identified. Appropriate examples include development of a community education program focused on a particular health issue or a handout to help the elderly and their families understand their Medicare and Medicaid options. The product must be useful in a practice setting, relevant to your project, and designed to improve some aspect of care or the patient experience that can be used in your own practice, with your family or community.

Relevant products include but are not limited to:

  • Patient education handout (such as a medication sheet).
  • Patient safety plan.
  • Process improvement in-service.
  • Medicaid/Medicare patient coverage and finance guide.
  • Teaching plan.

Your submission will consist of two parts: an APA-formatted paper providing your rationale and supporting evidence, and the professional product.

For the brief APA-style paper, one organizational option is:

  • Summary of intervention and implementation:
    • What did you do?
    • How did you lead in terms of the processes used in the project?
      • With what participants?
    • Who were your interprofessional collaborators?
      • How did you lead them in this project?
      • What were your key findings?
  • Evidence-based rationale for professional product development:
    • What professional product did you develop?
    • Why did you choose this type of product?
    • How does it align with your intervention?
    • How will the product help improve outcomes?
    • How will the product enhance the patient experience?
    • How does the product improve a process related to quality, safety, and/or cost of care?
    • How do relevant research, evidence, and best practices support your choice of professional product and approach?

For your professional product, you may choose to develop a deliverable that could be used in your care setting to communicate and sustain relevant improvements related to the intervention you carried out. The key is that the professional product is useful to the target audience (such as a large-print Medicaid/Medicare patient coverage and finance guide that is easy for the elderly and their families to use, or an easily implemented process improvement in-service for home care nurses).

Your brief paper and professional product will be assessed according to the following scoring guide criteria:

  • Explain the ways in which leadership of people and processes was utilized while designing an intervention and its implementation.
  • Demonstrate process improvements in the quality, safety, or cost of care as a result of a direct clinical intervention and newly developed professional product.
  • Demonstrate improvements in the patient experience resulting from a direct clinical intervention and newly developed professional product.
  • Justify decisions related to developing a professional product using relevant research, evidence, and best practices.
  • Communicate professionally in writing that is clear and logically organized, with correct grammar, spelling, and use of APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: APA-style paper should be 2–4 pages of content plus title and reference pages. There is no length requirement for your professional product. The type of deliverable you choose will determine its length and format.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your decisions and rationale in your APA-style paper. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Use appropriate APA citations (in-text and reference list) in the paper and professional product.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop A Professional Product To Improve Care Or The Patient Experience Related To The Identified Health Problem With A 2 4 Page Summary Of Intervention Findings Evidence And Best Practice Basis For The Professi (1)

 

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Lead people and processes to improve patient, systems, and population outcomes.
    • Explain the ways in which leadership of people and processes was utilized while designing an intervention and its implementation.
  • Competency 2: Make clinical and operational decisions based upon the best available evidence.
    • Justify decisions related to developing a professional product with relevant research, evidence, and best practices.
  • Competency 3: Transform processes to improve quality, enhance patient safety, and reduce the cost of care.
    • Demonstrate process improvements in the quality, safety, or cost of care resulting from an intervention and related professional product.
  • Competency 7: Implement patient-centered care to improve quality of care and the patient experience.
    • Demonstrate improvements in the quality of care and patient experience resulting from an intervention and related professional product.
  • Competency 8: Integrate professional standards and values into practice.
    • Communicate professionally in clear, logically organized writing, using correct grammar, spelling, and APA style.

Important: You must complete all of the assessments in order for this course.

Preparation

Before submitting this assessment, you must have logged at least three direct-contact hours in CORE ELMS. These hours will include only the time that you spent working directly with patients, families, and/or community members to implement your intervention, collect and analyze data, and deliver your professional product to your target audience.

Instructions

For this assessment, you will develop and deliver a professional product to address the health problem defined in your first assessment to improve care and the patient experience. This will be delivered face-to-face to the individual or group that you have identified. Appropriate examples include development of a community education program focused on a particular health issue or a handout to help the elderly and their families understand their Medicare and Medicaid options. The product must be useful in a practice setting, relevant to your project, and designed to improve some aspect of care or the patient experience that can be used in your own practice, with your family or community.

Relevant products include but are not limited to:

  • Patient education handout (such as a medication sheet).
  • Patient safety plan.
  • Process improvement in-service.
  • Medicaid/Medicare patient coverage and finance guide.
  • Teaching plan.

Your submission will consist of two parts: an APA-formatted paper providing your rationale and supporting evidence, and the professional product.

For the brief APA-style paper, one organizational option is:

  • Summary of intervention and implementation:
    • What did you do?
    • How did you lead in terms of the processes used in the project?
      • With what participants?
    • Who were your interprofessional collaborators?
      • How did you lead them in this project?
      • What were your key findings?
  • Evidence-based rationale for professional product development:
    • What professional product did you develop?
    • Why did you choose this type of product?
    • How does it align with your intervention?
    • How will the product help improve outcomes?
    • How will the product enhance the patient experience?
    • How does the product improve a process related to quality, safety, and/or cost of care?
    • How do relevant research, evidence, and best practices support your choice of professional product and approach?

For your professional product, you may choose to develop a deliverable that could be used in your care setting to communicate and sustain relevant improvements related to the intervention you carried out. The key is that the professional product is useful to the target audience (such as a large-print Medicaid/Medicare patient coverage and finance guide that is easy for the elderly and their families to use, or an easily implemented process improvement in-service for home care nurses).

Your brief paper and professional product will be assessed according to the following scoring guide criteria:

  • Explain the ways in which leadership of people and processes was utilized while designing an intervention and its implementation.
  • Demonstrate process improvements in the quality, safety, or cost of care as a result of a direct clinical intervention and newly developed professional product.
  • Demonstrate improvements in the patient experience resulting from a direct clinical intervention and newly developed professional product.
  • Justify decisions related to developing a professional product using relevant research, evidence, and best practices.
  • Communicate professionally in writing that is clear and logically organized, with correct grammar, spelling, and use of APA style.

Additional Requirements

  • Length of submission: APA-style paper should be 2–4 pages of content plus title and reference pages. There is no length requirement for your professional product. The type of deliverable you choose will determine its length and format.
  • Number of references: Cite a minimum of 5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your decisions and rationale in your APA-style paper. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
  • APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Use appropriate APA citations (in-text and reference list) in the paper and professional product.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Developing A Change Project Part Ii

 

Developing a Change Project – Part II

Develop six SMART goals an effective leader would need to successfully complete a change project.

All submissions must have a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work. 

Examples of work to show mastery:

  • 1-2 page paper – APA format
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Developing A Change Project Part I

 

Developing a Change Project – Part I

Identify the change project topic and identify why it is a problem (provide details). Identify the stakeholders (both internal and external) and summarize the benefits of the change project as well as the benefits and challenges associated with internal and external stakeholders.

All submissions must have a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work. 

Examples of work to show mastery:

  • 1-2 page paper – APA format
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Develop Understanding Of Apa Formatting Conventions

Evaluation Title: APA Formatting: You’re the Instructor 

Let’s imagine you are a college instructor! Congratulations! Now it’s time to get to work.
Your students have submitted research papers in APA style. Using the Purdue OWL website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., the APA Style website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and/or the Herzing library APA resources, identify at least 8 APA formatting errors in the student paper below.

Explain each error in a numbered list, using full sentences for each.

After you complete your assignment in a Word document, save your work, and then you will need to attach the completed document to your submission. The process will be similar to making an attachment to an e-mail:

  • Click Submit Assignment (upper right corner)
  • Under Attach File, click on “Browse My Computer.”   
  • Look up your saved document, and click “Open.”    
  • Click “Submit.”

Your assignment submission should be a Word document that fully adheres to the instructions listed above.  Be sure to proofread your assignment. 

Assignment File(s)

  • Unit 1 Assessment – Student FilePreview the document [PDF]

Rubric

EN111 Unit 1 Assessment – APA Formatting: You’re the InstructorEN111 Unit 1 Assessment – APA Formatting: You’re the InstructorCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentEN111-CO142.0 ptsLevel 5Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.38.0 ptsLevel 4Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.34.0 ptsLevel 3Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses these area.29.0 ptsLevel 2Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.25.0 ptsLevel 1Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions42.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology18.0 ptsLevel 5Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.16.0 ptsLevel 4Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.14.0 ptsLevel 3Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.12.0 ptsLevel 2Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.10.0 ptsLevel 1Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.18.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting10.0 ptsLevel 5The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.9.0 ptsLevel 4The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling  with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.8.0 ptsLevel 3The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication7.0 ptsLevel 2The assignment exhibits a  limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.6.0 ptsLevel 1The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.10.0 pts
Total Points: 70.0PreviousNext

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW