Db Medical

  It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format ( 

A 43-y.o. female presents with the complaint of weight gain and fatigue over the past 4 mo. She states that she is always cold and just can’t get warm. She states that she is sleeping really well through the night but does not wake feeling refreshed. She denies shortness of breath, chest pain, or dyspnea on exertion.

  1. What additional questions should you ask the patient and why?
  2. What should be included in the physical examination at this visit?
  3. What are the possible differential diagnoses at this time?
  4. What tests should you order and why?
  5. How should this patient be managed?
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Medical Reply 2 2 Apa References

 reply candace

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease in which the body’s own immune system attacks the joints on both sides of the body including the hands, wrist and knees. Early stages of RA include:

  • Joint pain, tenderness, swelling or stiffness for 6 weeks or longer
  • Morning stiffness for 30 minutes or longer
  • More than one joint is affected
  • Small joints ( wrists, certain joints of the hands and feet) are affected
  • The same joints on both side of the body are affected

The history would include complaints of the above systems along with deformities of the affected areas depending on the severity. Rheumatoid nodules are commonly observed over the olecranon process or other extensor surfaces of the limbs and may be tender (Dunphy, Winland-Brown, Porter, & Thomas, 2015). The patient may present with a low grade fever. A thorough history of other systems is elicited because of the involvement of other extra-articular organ systems. Physical exam would include inspection and palpation of the joints on both sides of the body. Passive and active range of motion may be limited due to the swelling and tenderness to the affected area. The initial diagnostic test is the presence of Rheumatoid factor (RF) in the blood. This test alone is not diagnostic and specific test such as circulating anti-CCP autoantibodies. Other test include a ESR, CRP, CBC, platelet count and joint fluid analysis. Studies for a more progressive diagnosis include ANA and comprehensive autoantibody panel. Management of RA progresses from conservative interventions to aggressive symptom management. Initial management would include heat/cold applications, exercise, rest, OT/PT, assistive devices, splints, and weight loss. Subsequent management for a more progressive version of the disease include drug therapies such as NSAIDs, analgesics, corticosteroids and DMARDs.Patient education focuses on medication therapy and control of pain and inflammation. Both primary and secondary medication nonadherence may be affected by low levels of health literacy and patient education (Joplin, Zwan, Joshua, & Wong, 2015). Emotional, spiritual and social education is advised due to disability and pain.

References

Joplin, S., Zwan, R., Joshua, F., & Wong, P. (2015). Medication adherence in patients with rheumatoid

arthritis: the effect of patient education, health literacy, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. BioMed

Research International, 2015, 10. 

Dunphy, L., Brown, J., Porter, B., & Thomas, D. (2015). Primary Care: The Art and Science of

Advanced Practice Nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis Company.

 reply vivian

Rheumatoid arthritis is a condition that is chronic and consists of inflammation to different joints. RA in the hands is very common. This condition is related to an autoimmune response where the patient’s immune system ends up attacking its own body tissues. This condition can be very painful and requires certain testing for diagnoses and treatment (Mayo Clinic, 2018).  

       I would get a health history on this patient to determine if she has RA and what she has done for treatment of it. If this patient has a “flare up” then this patient most likely is educated and familiar with her condition. Risk factors for this condition include being female, age 40-60, having a family history of RA, smoking or other environment exposures like asbestos, and being obese (Mayo Clinic, 2018).  

       Some testing for this patient would include a blood test looking for elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein. Imaging could be helpful to see how this condition is progressing for the patient. Medication to help include NSAIDs, steroids, antirheumatic drugs, and biological agents. The goal is to decrease inflammation and slow the progression of the disease. Physical therapy is also an option to help the patient maintain joint flexibility (Mayo Clinic, 2018).  

       For patient education, it could be helpful to make sure the patient has signs to be aware of a flare up starting. It can be easier to prevent flare ups than treat them. Some signs of a flare up include an increased stiffness to the joints, entire body pain, swelling that may cause shoes not to fit, a change in fatigue that is intense, and even flu-like symptoms. Some foods or medications could be the cause of a flare up and this is something for the patient to be aware of (Healthline, 2019).  

Reference 

Healthline. (2019). Signs of rheumatoid arthritis exacerbations and how to prevent them. Retrieved from https://www.healthline.com/health/rheumatoid-arthritis-exacerbations 

 Mayo Clinic. (2018). Rheumatoid arthritis. Retrieved from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/rheumatoid-arthritis/symptoms-causes/syc-20353648 (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Kidney Stones

     

Unit 7 Discussion – Nephrolithiasis

2     2 unread replies.    4     4 replies.    It is anticipated that the initial discussion response should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. This is not the only criteria utilized for evaluation; substantive content is imperative. All questions in the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments. All responses need to be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citation and reference must adhere to APA format (6th Ed.).Classroom ParticipationStudents are expected to initially address the discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forums is expected with a minimum total of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial posting and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days per week. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion, you aren’t just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion and should be correlated to the literature.All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion you will not receive these points, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above. Due to the nature of this type of assignment and the need for timely responses for initial posts and posting to peers, the Make-Up Coursework Policy (effective July 2017) does not apply to Discussion Board Participation.Discussion Prompt [Due Wednesday]Nephrolithiasis is the third most common problem of the genitourinary system. Identify and discuss risk factors for kidney stones including cultural considerations.Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:Do you agree with your peers’ assessment of kidney stones?Take an alternate view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate perspective.Present new references that support your opinions.Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

Discussion Prompt [Due Wednesday]Nephrolithiasis is the third most common problem of the genitourinary system. Identify and discuss risk factors for kidney stones including cultural considerations.Discussion Peer/Participation Prompt [Due Sunday]Please respond to at least 2 of your peer’s posts.  To ensure that your responses are substantive, use at least two of these prompts:Do you agree with your peers’ assessment of kidney stones?Take an alternate view to a peer and present a logical argument supporting an alternate perspective.Present new references that support your opinions.Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format. Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Resolution Guidelines

 

Ms. Brown comes into the emergency department to secure treatment for a head injury, plus minor bruises and abrasions she reportedly received during an assault that happened about 20 hours ago. Ms. Brown is 34 years old and accompanied by her boyfriend, Roy. She indicates they were sleeping in a protected entrance to an elevator in the city parking garage when two young men began beating and kicking them. The two men took Ms. Brown’s purse, a sack of food she and Roy had accumulated, and Roy’s wallet which contained $5.00.

Ms. Brown indicates she has been homeless for more than a year. She occasionally stays in city shelters but spends most of her time roaming the city and walking to procure meals at the various programs that feed the poor. She is tall and thin, with a variety of skin lesions. She came to the hospital due to dizziness that prevented her from walking to the church, where she could eat. She and Roy occasionally work odd jobs but use the bulk of their income to support Roy’s drug habit. She is trying to get Roy to quit using.

The nurse practitioner (NP) cleans Ms. Brown’s scalp and tapes the traumatic lesion. A contusion is suspected, and the NP suggests Ms. Brown rests for a few days and goes to the neurological clinic if the dizziness worsens. Ms. Brown points out that she has no place to rest and cannot get to the clinic without public transportation. The NP realizes this but indicates it is beyond her control. Because the contusion is not definitively diagnosed, the NP must discharge Ms. Brown with follow-up orders to seek help if things get worse.

Using the Resolution Guidelines with the mnemonic ETHICAL, consider the following questions:

  • E—Examine what other data are needed to make informed choices.
  • T—Think about who should be involved in the decision-making process and who should make the ultimate decision. Should Roy be involved? What agencies are available in your community to assist Ms. Brown?
  • H—Humanize Reflect on all the possible options with resulting consequences and humanize them by constructing a decision tree.
  • I—Incorporate the ethical principles (autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, veracity, confidentiality, fidelity, and justice) when appropriate. Are there any legal statutes that apply? What standards of care should be incorporated
  • C—Choose an option.
  • A—Act on your ethical choice.
  • L—Look back and evaluate your option to see if you need to make any other choices. This also will be a guide for the next time a similar situation arises.

Peer Responses/Participation [Due Sunday]   

  • Make sure to respond to at least two of your fellow classmates postings as well and challenge each other to go beyond just the surface.
  • Share your thoughts on how you support their ideas and explain why.
  • Present new references that support your opinions.

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response To Sage With 2 New References In Apa Format

In this discussion we will talk about out expected change outcomes and implantation process outcomes. We will focus on our outcome’s management. “The principles supporting outcomes management (OM) ascribed by Ellwood included emphasizing practice standards that providers can use to select interventions, measuring patient functional status, well-being, and disease-specific clinical outcomes, pooling outcome data on a massive scale, analyzing and disseminating outcomes, in relation to the interventions used, to appropriate decision makers and stakeholders” (LoBiondo-Wood, Haber, 2014, pg. 225)

Expected Change Outcomes

Our expected outcome would be patients with COPD who practice relaxation techniques versus not using relaxation techniques would see an improvement in their dyspnea and anxiety in a years’ time. Our goal would to be better control our patient’s COPD and decrease exacerbations and dyspnea. Also, to decrease the scores on the patients PHQ-9 and GAD-7 questionnaires. In doing so we would have less re-admissions to hospitals and a better quality of life. Our measurable goal would to have a decrease in admission to the hospital for COPD exacerbations. This would be measured by looking at how many times a patient was admitted to the hospital in the previous year and try to decrease this number. Then we would compare it to how many times she was hospitalized after educating them on relaxation techniques to see if the number of admissions decreased

Implementation Process Outcomes

           The implementation process will be that every nurse will be doing both the education and screenings by the first week once we make the change in practice. The nurse manager will ensure that all nurses are educated on the relaxation techniques and screenings, and that they are being done with every COPD admission. By the second appointment for the COPD patients, our patients will be screened on performing the relaxation techniques correctly, PHQ-9, GAD-7 questionnaires, and if the patient has been to the hospital for a COPD exacerbation. We will continue to do these screenings at every appointment. We will see our COPD patients every 3 months to evaluate. We will see them at the end of the year and compare their current numbers to their numbers in the beginning of the year. Our nurses will have quarterly meetings to ensure everyone is teaching their relaxation techniques correctly and are doing their questionnaires. Specific barriers that we could run into is nursing staff rushing through the demonstration of the relaxation techniques and rushing the patients during their PHQ-9 and GAD-7questionsairs. This will be eliminated by giving the nurses more time when checking in COPD patients. 

Reference

LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for   evidence-based practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier. ISBN-13: 978-0-323-      10086-1

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response To Megan With 2 References

Critical Appraisal   

           As advanced practice nurses, it is vital to critically appraise research studies.  Barr-Walker (2017) discusses that critical appraisal is the practice of systematically analyzing research to evaluate its trustworthiness, value, and pertinence in a specific situation (p. 71).  When critically appraising quantitative studies, it is imperative to assess three factors.  

Quantitative Studies 

Validity, reliability, and applicability are three essential components of quantitative studies that must be assessed.  Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) discuss that the validity of a study addresses whether the results of the specific study were acquired from valid scientific resources (p. 93).  If confounding variables are identified in the study, one can conclude that the findings are in jeopardy.  Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) explain that quantitative studies utilize statistics to release their conclusions (p. 96).  As a provider, one must evaluate the statistics in order to gain an understanding of the reliability of the reviewed study.  Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) point out that the primary considerations are the breadth of the intervention’s effect and how accurately that effect was predicted.  Combined, these decide the reliability of the study findings (p. 97).  In order to properly assess for accountability, providers must exhaustingly evaluate if the quantitative study is directly applicable to the specific patient population.  Melynyk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) discuss that each study addresses explicit questions that, when addressed, help providers in critically appraising the study in order to determine its worth in the practice setting (p. 107).  

Although each of these three factors are vital components to assess, applicability is the most important.  If the quantitative study results cannot be directly applied to the specific patient population, the results can simply not be utilized.  Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) emphasize that analysis of quantitative study results requires the provider to consider the clinical significance of the findings (p. 93).  Consequently, if the quantitative study findings are not directly applicable to one’s specific practice setting, the study results lack pertinence.  

Conclusion 

LoBiondo-Wood and Haber (2014) explain that it is essential to initially examine the level of evidence that is supported by the design and how the promising strength and quality of the findings can be utilized to improve or alter practice (p. 177).   As advanced practice nurses, it is key to consistently critically appraise studies in order to boost patient outcomes.  Furthermore, consistent appraisal of quantitative studies will assist in expanding one’s clinical knowledge base.  

References 

Barr-Walker, J. (2017). Evidence-based information needs of public health workers: A 

              systematized review. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(1), 69-79. 

LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing research: Methods and critical appraisal for 

evidence-based practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: 

A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.  

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response To Marie With At Least 2 References

 In a perfect world, research studies would be flawless however, that is not typically the case.  Inherently, flaws exist related to study design, how the study is conducted, and also the manner in which research is reported.  “Given that research is not perfect, users of research must learn to carefully evaluate research reports to determine their worth to practice through critical appraisal” (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 92-93).  Factors that need to be assessed when critically appraising quantitative studies include validity, reliability and applicability (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).  

       The validity of a study relates to obtaining results from utilizing sound methods which are scientific.  Bias and confounding variables can compromise validity of a study.  Bias can occur at any stage of the process but while assessing the reliability of the results one must look at if the study was systematic, grounded in theory, and criteria was followed for all of the processes.  If so, then the study, more than likely, is valid and reliable.  Clinicians need the ability to interpret the results so they can implement EBP into their practice (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014).  “Whether we are interpreting the research studies of others, or designing our own, we need a good understanding of research design and an ability to recognize weaknesses in intervention studies which may reduce the reliability of study findings” (Ebbels, 2017, p. 229).      Although each factor is important to quality research, I feel the most important factor is the applicability to practice.  Having the ability to appraise research, which is evidence-based, and implement EBP interventions with our patients is essential in promoting optimal patient outcomes.   

References

Ebbels, S. H. (2017). Intervention research:  Appraising study designs, interpreting findings and creating research in clinical practice. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 218-231. https://doi.org/https://doi-org.arbor.idm.oclc.org/10.1080/17549507.2016.1276215

LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing research:  Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare:  A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Retrieved from Amazon Kindle App

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response To Marie With 2 New References In Apa Format

Measuring expected change outcomes is crucial in research to ascertain effectiveness of planned change into real-world clinical practice.  Outcome evaluation is important at all levels including patient, clinician, and organization level.  Outcomes need to be measured throughout the process including at the beginning, short-term, and long-term (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).  Cultivating change mentors and champions can help improve outcomes and provide ongoing training with clinicians including “circulate information, encourage peers to adopt the innovation, arrange demonstrations, and orient staff to the innovation” (LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, 2014, p. 434). 

Expected Change Outcomes

The expected outcome from this change will be a decrease in surgical site infections (SSI) with postoperative patients.  Many factors come into play when measuring outcomes which include measurement tools, validity of instruments and tools to measure outcomes, as well as accurate self-reporting in regard to clinician compliance (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015).  Outcomes can be measured by tracking statistics on postoperative patients regarding type of preoperative bathing solution used prior to surgery, the incidence of postoperative SSI, clinician compliance with intervention at point-of-care, 30-day hospital readmission data as well as patient satisfaction surveys (HCAHPS) over a 6-month period.  The results will determine if the change will be translated into practice.  

Implementation Process Outcomes

       Utilizing EBP leaders (mentors) can help with all aspects of the change process.  Mentors give guidance, encouragement, help foster self-confidence in clinicians as well as reinforce values to the team.  The ARCC change model stresses the importance of utilizing change mentors and champions to improve quality of care as well as patient outcomes.  Assigning a change leader and unit champions will help to provide support such as ongoing organizational assessment, conduct EBP workshops and provide ongoing education, encouragement with clinicians and staff focused on a culture of EPB, institute EBP implementation strategies (EBP rounds, newsletters, journal clubs, etc.), assess for and focus on overcoming barriers, facilitate involvement of staff and point-of-care clinician compliance, and implement a culture of multidisciplinary collaboration to promote and sustain EBP (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2015, p. 378).

References

LoBiondo-Wood, G., & Haber, J. (2014). Nursing research:  Methods and critical appraisal for evidence-based practice (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare:  A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Retrieved from Amazon Kindle App

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response Apa Format With At Least 2 References To Megan

Today, it is clear that evidence-based practice continues to result in tremendous patient outcomes.  Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) discuss that as with any scope of the healthcare field, evidenced-based practices heighten ethical concerns.  Some of the ambitions hidden in the advancement of evidence-based practice are, at the core, ethical (p. 515).  However, it is critical to consistently ensure the protection of personal rights in those subjects involved in research studies.  

Methods  

In order to protect the personal rights of human subjects involved in research studies, it is vital for providers to be aware of the federal regulations and policies that are in place.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that the research with human subjects is funded by federal agencies and is controlled by a set of regulations and methods that were created in order to protect study participants while facilitating the advancement of research (p. 784).  These federal regulations assist in protecting basic human rights, such as beneficence, and help in defending vulnerable populations from experiencing harm.  Furthermore, the Institutional Review Board must grant approval for the research study to commence.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that the Institutional Review Board must meticulously review the ethics and appropriateness of a proposed research project and the participation of the enlisted human subjects (p. 786).  

It is also essential to identify vulnerable human subjects that are involved in a research project.  Clark and Preto (2018) discuss that vulnerability has emerged and is identified in research as one’s inability to defend one’s own best interests, awareness to harm, and various determinants to one’s determinants of health (p. 308).  Providing patients with a thorough education and pertinent handouts regarding the details of the study is key.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that individuals that are registered in a research study must be given a comprehensive understanding of the risks, benefits, and other pertinent information (p. 784).  

Conclusion 

It is critical to consistently ensure the protection of personal rights of those individuals enlisted in a research project.  Davis (2018) emphasizes that in order to protect human participants in research, organizations must follow policies for the protection of human research subjects.  Regardless of whether research takes place in medical or private facilities, human subject protection can only be guaranteed if the Institutional Review Board closely oversees the research it has approved (p. 92).  

References 

Bierer, B. E., Barnes, M., & Lynch, H. F. (2017). Revised ‘common rule’ shapes protection for 

              research participants. Health Affairs, 36(5), 784-788. 

Clark, B., & Preto, N. (2018). Exploring the concept of vulnerability in healthcare. Canadian 

Medical Association Journal, 190(11), 308-309. 

Davis, S. (2018). Monitoring of approved studies: A difficult tightrope walk by ethics 

              committees. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 9(2), 91-94. 

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: 

A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.  

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Db Response Apa Format With At Least 2 References To Dawn

here are several definitions available for the term “vulnerable population”, the words simply imply the disadvantaged sub-segment of the community requiring utmost care, specific ancillary considerations and augmented protections in research (Shivayogi, 2013).  The risk of a vulnerable population is the decreased freewill to inability to make informed choices.  The vulnerable populations refers to but not limited to “children, minors, pregnant women, fetuses, human in vitro fertilization, prisoners, employees, military persons and students in hierarchical organizations, terminally ill, comatose, physically and intellectually challenged individuals, institutionalized, elderly individuals, visual or hearing impaired, ethnic minorities, refugees, international research, economically and educationally disabled and healthy volunteers” (Griffith, 2015). Ethical dilemmas are widely prevalent in research involving these populations with regard to communications, data privacy and therapeutic deliberations (Shivayogi, 2013).  In this discussion board, I will focus on the avoidance of paternalism in healthcare. 

Misuse of Power

The word paternalism also alludes to patriarchal power structures. Paternalism reduces the patient to a passive recipient of care and forces the patient to depend on the integrity and self-regulation of the providers (Cody, 2003).  Certain persons are far more likely than others to be treated in a paternalistic manner.  In regards to research, with respect to research involving children, incompetent adults, and other arguably vulnerable populations such as prisoners, there can be a misuse of power.

The Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects or the “Common Rule” was published in 1991 to protect women, fetuses, children, and prisoners (Miller & Wertheimer, 2007).  Common Rule outlines the basic requirements for IRBs, informed consent, and Assurances of Compliance.  Last year, the Common Rule was revised for the first time since its publication in 1991 in order to strengthen protections for study participants.  High on the list of priorities is helping people make better decisions about whether to participate in a clinical trial. One key goal: ensuring the risks and benefits of participation are clear. The need for the revision was because participant consents have become documents that protect the agency performing the procedure more than outlining the risks and benefits to the potential participant. 

Conclusion

Nurse advocacy plays an important role in helping patients understand their rights and exercise their autonomy; protecting those who are vulnerable and advocating conscientious clinical and ethical research systems.  A lack of informed consent (IC), with coercive, guileful, forceful influences and methods to secure potential participants results in deficient evidence-based health care (Griffith, 2015).  NP’s are held to professional standards for professional practice and behavior in all areas of medicine.

                                                               References

Cody, W. K. (2003). Paternalism in Nursing and Healthcare: Central Issues and their Relation to

Theory. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16(4), 288–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318403257170

Griffith, R. (2015). Understanding the Code: safeguarding vulnerable adults. British Journal Of

Community Nursing, 20(11), 564–566. https://doi-org.arbor.idm.oclc.org/10.12968/bjcn.2015.20.11.564

Miller, F. G., & Wertheimer, A. (2007). Facing up to paternalism in research ethics. The

Hastings Center Report, 37(3), 24–34. Retrieved from http://arbor.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=17649900&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Shivayogi P. (2013). Vulnerable population and methods for their safeguard. Perspectives in

clinical research, 4(1), 53-7.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW