Reducing Malpractice Claims
/in Uncategorized /by developerYou are the risk manager of a hospital and have been asked to make a speech to doctors and nurses about how to prevent malpractice claims.
For your initial post, draft a short speech outlining the most important guidelines and best practices for healthcare providers to limit medical mistakes and reduce potential liability. Provide specific steps they can take to protect themselves and the organization from malpractice and other kinds of claims against providers. If you use resources in your speech, remember to cite them according to APA guidelines.
In your response to your peers, consider whether you agree with the guidelines they considered to be most important. Explain why or why not.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Redo Assignment
/in Uncategorized /by developerInstructor’s Comment
I think you might have misunderstood the assignment. None of the theories from class were used to analyze the case study. As it is, I cannot award many points. Can you please redo this with the 5 theories from the lecture included?
I have uploaded assignment named Reflection.
Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:
- What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
- Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
- How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
- What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Rubric
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the connection between them. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 30%
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples. 15%
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 15%
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful. 10%
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Here is a link to the Khan video on Moral Status. It will help explain the five theories discussed in the lecture:
https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi/wiphi-value-theory/wiphi-ethics/v/moral-status
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Recruitment Matrix Worksheet
/in Uncategorized /by developerInclude the following in the matrix:
- Five recruitment strategies or methods
- Strategies might include job fairs, online résumé submission, or planned networking events.
- Internal or external strategy identification
- A detailed 200-word description of the strategy and why the strategy is appropriate for health car
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Refection Paper 19418579
/in Uncategorized /by developer
Refection Paper
The IOM published report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” makes recommendations for lifelong learning and achieving higher levels of education.
In 1,000-1,250 words, examine the importance of nursing education and discuss your overall educational goals.
Include the following:
- Discuss your options in the job market based on your educational level.
- Review the IOM Future of Nursing Recommendations for achieving higher levels of education. Describe what professional certification and advanced degrees (MSN, DNP, etc.) you want to pursue and explain your reasons for wanting to attain the education. Discuss your timeline for accomplishing these goals.
- Discuss how increasing your level of education would affect how your competitiveness in the current job market and your role in the future of nursing.
- Discuss the relationship of continuing nursing education to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics.
- Discuss whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory. Provide support for your response.
You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Reflection Paper
No of Criteria: 10 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0 Job Options Based on Educational Level10.0Options in the job market based on educational level are omitted.Options in the job market based on educational level are incomplete. Options listed are not realistic for educational level.Options in the job market based on educational level are summarized. Most options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates a general awareness of job options based on educational level.Options in the job market based on educational level are discussed. Generally, options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates an awareness of job options based on educational level.Options in the job market based on educational level are thoroughly discussed. All options listed are realistic for educational level. The response demonstrates an awareness of job options based on educational level.Goals for Professional Education15.0Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are omitted.Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are incomplete.Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are summarized. Reasons for wanting to attain the education are unclear.Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are described overall.Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are thoroughly described. Clear and compelling reasons for wanting to attain the education are discussed.Increase in Level of Education and Effect on Competitiveness in Job Market and in Role in the Future of Nursing15.0Discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is omitted.Summary of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented but is incomplete.Goals and timeline for professional certification and advanced degrees are summarized. Reasons for wanting to attain the education are unclear.Overall, a general discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. Some claims are not accurate or require further support or rationale.Discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. There are inaccuracies. Some support or rationale is needed.A well-developed discussion of how increasing level of education would affect competitiveness in current job market and personal role in the future of nursing is presented. The claims are substantiated and realistic for the current job market.Relationship of Continuing Nursing Education to Competency, Attitudes, Knowledge, and ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics20.0A discussion establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is omitted.An incomplete discussion establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. A relationship has not been established.A summary partially establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. More evidence or rationale is needed.A discussion generally establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. Some minor evidence or rationale is needed.A well-supported discussion clearly establishing the relationship of continuing education in nursing to competency, attitudes, knowledge, and the ANA Scope and Standards for Practice and Code of Ethics is presented. The discussion demonstrates insight into the importance of education to the nursing profession.Criteria 5Mandatory Continuing Education Nursing20.0A discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is omitted.An incomplete summary of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. The rationale and support for argument fail to support its claims.A summary of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. The summary lacks some rationale or evidence-based support for the argument.A discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. Overall, rationale and evidence-based support for the argument is provided.A well-developed discussion of whether continuing nursing education should be mandatory is presented. Compelling rationale and evidence-based support for the argument is provided.Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0 Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic and Construction5.0Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage 100
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Ref Week 8
/in Uncategorized /by developerRefinement Of A Nursing Concern Into An Evidence Based Practice Proposal Using The Research Process 19293927
/in Uncategorized /by developer
Purpose
This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue work on a previously identified area or phenomenon of interest related to their MSN specialty track. Week Two’s assignment builds upon the identified area of interest by developing an overview of the evidence-based practice (EBP) project and the PCIOT/PICo question. This assignment initiates the evidence-based practice proposal that is continued throughout the entire course with each assignment adding components of the research process.
My topic is CAUTI. Must use QUANTITATIVE APPROACH. MUST USE AND FIX MY PICOT QUESTION. MUST USE THE INFORMATION FROM MY POST ON THE PAPER. MAKE CORRECTIONS AS NEEDED.
FOLLOW RUBRIC AS IS. MINUMUM 6 SCHOLAR PAPERS WITHIN 5 YEARS AT LEAST. USE EASY LANGUAGE DON’T GO TOO FANCY.
TWO FILES ONE IS THE RUBRIC FOR THIS PAPER AND OTHER IS CONTENT OF MY POST THAT MUST BE INCLUDED.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Reference Must Include Doi Or Retrieval Url
/in Uncategorized /by developerEthical Leadership in Nursing Class, As ethical considerations are part of your final paper, please read the following and then make your comment in a response to this post. Thank you. Read “Searching for Ethical Leadership in Nursing,” by Marakoff et al., from Nursing Ethics (2014). URL: https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=2012703773&site=eds-live&scope=site
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Refelctive Paper 2 Pages
/in Uncategorized /by developerAssignment Instructions: reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants.
Discuss at least three of the following in your paper:
•Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers.
•Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not?
•The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions.
•Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections. Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style.
LINKS YOU MIGHT NEED FOR THIS ASSIMENT:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjects
https://grants.nih.gov/policy/hs/faqs.htm
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

About Us
Academhelper.com is a pioneering academic writing service with a customer base comprising of thousands of students. We have hundreds of expert writers aboard working in collaboration with a diligent quality assurance team.
Contact Info
Email: [email protected] Phone: +1 (929) 416 5389 or +1 985-412-8942