Week 6 Signature Assignment Paper: Culminating Argument

The culminating argument paper is a reordering of the first two papers with the addition of an abstract, introduction, and conclusion.

• This paper should include a newly composed introductory section and a new final conclusion section that presents your discussion of (and argument for) the solution. Your argument, or rationale, for the solution that you propose is the focus of this paper.

Your paper must:

• Be 15–20 pages in length 
  • Title page (1 page)
  • Introduction (1–2 pages)
  • Reworked informative papers (10–15 pages)
  • Conclusion (1–2 pages)
  • References (1–2 pages)
• Reference 12–15 scholarly, peer-reviewed resources (compiled by combining all of the references from your Perspective of Inquiry papers and any additional resources you use in this final paper.)
• Follow all APA Style formatting guidelines.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Search and Evaluate Resources  

For this paper, you will find three scholarly, peer-reviewed research articles on your topic. The articles may be from any research perspective: scientific, mathematical, ethical, cultural, or a combination. For each article, provide the following:

• The APA reference
• A brief 3–4 sentence summary of the article
• An explanation as to what makes this source credible (in the WCU Library go to Libguides > Research Help > Evaluating Resources)
• An evaluation of whether or not the article would be useful in addressing your problem statement or issue

Your paper should be 1–2 pages. Adhere to APA Style formatting throughout.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Present and discuss a topic that you are interested in researching for this course. Explain why this topic interests you. Provide a brief background of the topic and speculate on arguments you could pose or problems you could solve. Additionally, draft a potential problem statement. Pose ideas and solicit feedback from your peers on your ideas.

In your responses, provide your peers with constructive criticism. Identify topics that might seem too broad or too narrow in focus. Identify possible challenges and offer ideas and solutions for improvement. 

Comment to a minimum of two peers. Remember that your feedback and support are important! 

You can download this document for more information: What makes a good peer review? 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

This week, post your final video presentation here for peer and instructor Question and Answer. There are three requirements and three deadlines: 

1. Post your video no later than Monday 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time). Title your video post with your name and a brief topic description (e.g., Jenny Smith: Sepsis Training). Along with your video, provide the following information:

• Briefly explain your healthcare issue and your proposed solution to the issue.

2. No later than Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time), watch at least two peers’ videos and post thoughtful questions related to the content and conclusions of their study. Your instructor may assign you specific peers to review. Otherwise, select at least two peers to review (do not pose the same questions to both peers).

• You must ask 3 thoughtful questions of each peer. 
• Keep in mind that this is not a peer review of the presentation, although positive feedback is encouraged when appropriate. Your goal is to ask your peers questions that dig deeper into their problem and their proposed solution.
• Your questions may address some of the following topics: research sources, perspectives, the proposed solution, and obstacles related to the solutions.

3. No later than Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time), you must formally address the questions posed by at least two peers and/or the instructor (address a total of 6 questions)in which you must cite evidence from your presentation/ final paper using APA Style.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"