Info Mil 2

 

Required Assigned Topic for the focus of your paper.

• Person with Asthma OR breathing issues. Note: You will use the same scenario you developed and same mHealth app you identified in Week 2.

Requirements and Guidelines

  • Download the required Milestone 2 Template. (Links to an external site.) Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR361 Milestone 2.docx.
  • Briefly state the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment.
    • Include revisions, if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.
  • Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes.
    • Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety, guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided.
  • Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.
    • Remember to cite when appropriate
  • You are required to complete the form using the productivity tools required , which is Microsoft Office Word 2013 (or later version), or Windows and Office 2011 (or later version) for MAC. You must save the file in the “.docx” format. Do NOT save as Word Pad. A later version of the productivity tool includes Office 365, which is available to Chamberlain students for FREE by downloading from the student portal at http://my.chamberlain.edu (Links to an external site.)
  • Carefully review the grading rubric criteria for Milestone 2 and type directly on your saved Milestone 2 Template.
  • Complete all rubric areas for a superior Milestone 2.
  • Use instructor feedback from Milestone 1 to improve your statements regarding the patient scenario in Milestone 2.

NR361 Milestone 2NR361 Milestone 2CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefine: Approved Patient Scenario from Milestone 1Brief statement of the patient scenario from the Milestone 1 assignment, including revisions if required by Milestone 1 faculty feedback.30.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including excellent details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).26.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario from Milestone 1 including good details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).24.0 ptsDefines (states) the brief patient scenario approved from Milestone 1 including fair details in revisions (if required by Milestone 1 instructor feedback).12.0 ptsDefinition of brief patient scenario is poorly done and/or revisions did not adhere to feedback from instructor on Milestone 10.0 ptsDoes not define (state) the nursing issue.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeach:Identify (3) teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Information to be taught to patient should include information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines, and how to interpret and act on the information that is provided. Remember to use bullet points.75.0 ptsIdentifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Excellent details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.66.0 pts

Identifies 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Good details includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Written in bullet points.60.0 ptsIdentifies 2 or 3 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Fair data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, and/or how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points or information is not clear.29.0 ptsIdentifies 1-2 teaching areas to improve patient outcomes. Poor data includes information about the mHealth app, safety guidelines for mHealth application, OR how to interpret and act on the information of the mHealth application. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.0.0 ptsDid not identify teaching measures to improve patient outcomes.75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate:Describe 3 ways you would determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Cite when appropriate. Remember to use bullet points.75.0 ptsDescribe in excellent detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.66.0 ptsDescribes in good detail 3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Written in bullet points.60.0 ptsDescribes in fair detail 2-3 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. May not use bullet points or information is not clear.29.0 ptsDescribes in poor detail 1-2 ways to determine and evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app. Does not use bullet points AND information is not clear.0.0 ptsDid not identify ways to evaluate the success of the patient’s use of the mHealth app.75.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCitations and References:Include citations and references for the mHealth application in APA format and a scholarly peer-reviewed journal article related to the patient scenario published within the past 5 years.30.0 ptsExcellent citations and references in APA format for both the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old26.0 ptsGood citations and references with minor errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old24.0 ptsCitations and references with some errors in APA format for both/either the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal that is less than 5 years old12.0 ptsCitations and references with numerous errors in APA format for the mHealth application and the scholarly peer-reviewed journal.0.0 ptsDid not cite or reference in APA format.30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritingcontains no spelling or grammatical errors. Reading level is appropriate for patient described.15.0 ptsGrammar, punctuation, and spelling are correct; Reading level appropriate for patient.13.0 ptsGood mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column12.0 ptsFair mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column.6.0 ptsPoor mechanics considering the elements listed in the first column0.0 ptsVery poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read.15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Topic and correct Template Use0.0 pts0 points deductedCorrect topic and correct template used for the assignment0.0 pts22.5 points deducted (10%)Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 22.5 point deduction (10%).0.0 pts

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Info 8

 Prior to posting your answer, complete the Week 8 AACN Essentials Self-Assessment (Links to an external site.) linked here. Compare your scores from Week 1 to Week 8. How far have you come? How will you apply this information to continue to improve your informatics knowledge in nursing practice? 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Info 5

Select ONE of the following trends and discuss your understanding of this trend in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice as a nurse. What are the legal, privacy, and ethical considerations of this trend? (Everyone attempt to choose a different topic so that we will learn about the many advancements in technology).

Nanotechnology

Consumer health informatics (CHI)

Social media healthcare applications

Health-focused wearable technology

eHealth

Artificial Intelligence

Simulation

Computerized provider order entry (CPOE)

Bar Code Medication Administration (BCMA)

Creative measures in healthcare for use with 3D printers

Smart Pumps

Smart Rooms

Robotics in healthcare

Mobile technology in outpatient care

Web-based tools and software technology

Risk Management tools

Chatbots or Bots in healthcare

Telenursing

Telemedicine

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Info 4 19432015

Case Study: A 65-year-old woman was just been diagnosed with Stage 3 non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. She was informed of this diagnosis in her primary care physician’s office. She leaves her physician’s office and goes home to review all of her tests and lab results with her family. She goes home and logs into her PHR. She is only able to pull up a portion of her test results. She calls her physician’s office with this concern. The office staff discussed that she had part of her lab work completed at a lab not connected to the organization, part was completed at the emergency room, and part was completed in the lab that is part of the doctor’s office organization.

The above scenario might be a scenario that you have commonly worked with in clinical practice. For many reasons, patients often receive healthcare from multiple organizations that might have different systems.

As you review this scenario, reflect and answer these questions for this discussion.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Info 3 19423305

 

Standardized Terminology and Language in Informatics is an important part of healthcare. Nurses and healthcare workers need to understand and be able to communicate clearly. Please select one of the following options and discuss your understanding of the role in healthcare and its potential impact on your practice.

  • Usability
  • Integration
  • Interface
  • Interoperability
  • Meaningful Use
  • Reimbursement from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment
  • NANDA
  • NIC/NOC
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Informatic 19446397

  

Topic 3: HIPAA’s influence on medical research

Affirmative (Pros): HIPAA should be amended to allow greater access of medical information to medical researchers. (Group 4A)

Negative(Cons): HIPAA should NOT be amended to allow greater access of medical information to medical researchers. (group4N)

  

In your paper: Identify and define the issue. Include information for BOTH sides of the argument. Whom does it affect? What are the pros and cons? Discuss both sides of the issue. What does the public need to know? 

CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntro

25.0 to >19.0 ptsHigh Proficiency
Deliberate, creates interest Gives title/author if needed Clear, concise and specific thesis statement
19.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency
Adequately introduces topic Thesis statement may be lacking specificity.
14.0 to >9.0 ptsProficient
Intro is too short – does not introduce topic Thesis statement is vague- should be more narrow
9.0 to >4.0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency
Some intro components missing Thesis statement is poor or unidentifiable
4.0 to >0 ptsNon-Proficient
Thesis missing Introduction does not introduce topic25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody: Organization

25.0 to >19.0 ptsHigh Proficiency
Organized throughout Logical, clear sequence Completely supports thesis Exhibits critical thinking Has consistent transitions Proper in-text citations Excellent transitions
19.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency
Well organized Easy to follow Thesis could use more support (adequate but not extended) Majority of citations are correct Shows some original thought Has several transitions Majority of citations are correct
14.0 to >9.0 ptsProficient
Some org. problems Some gaps in flow Not enough thesis support Shows little original thought Some transitions Citations are incorrect
9.0 to >4.0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency
Difficult to follow May jump topics Does not prove/support thesis Citations incorrect Very few transitions
4.0 to >0 ptsNon-Proficient
No sequence Jumps topics frequently No in-text citations No transitions25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody: Fluency & Mechanics

25.0 to >19.0 ptsHigh Proficiency
Uses excellent vocabulary Stays on topic/meets assignment Correct tense/point of view Has sentence variety Correct spelling/punctuation Writes in scholarly style
19.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency
Attempts higher level vocabulary with some success Stays on topic/meets assignment Mostly correct tense/point of view A few sentences lacking in variety Few spelling errors Writes in scholarly style
14.0 to >9.0 ptsProficient
Range of vocabulary Some tense/point of view errors Occasionally strays off topic Some sentence fragments/run-ons Proper spelling Quality of formal language
9.0 to >4.0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency
Vocabulary level Some tense/point of view errors Does not meet assignment requirements Many sentence fragments/run-ons Many spelling errors Majority of writing is informal
4.0 to >0 ptsNon-Proficient
Improper word choices Many tense and point of view errors Fails to meet assignment Many mechanical errors Writes informally25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion

25.0 to >19.0 ptsHigh Proficiency
Deliberate closing strategy Does not introduce new material Paraphrases thesis, but does not merely repeat introduction
19.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency
Adequate closing Does not introduce new material Re-states thesis in same words, but does not completely repeat introduction
14.0 to >9.0 ptsProficient
Weak closing Does not introduce new material Merely repeats introduction
9.0 to >4.0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency
Weak closing Introduces new material Does not refer to thesis
4.0 to >0 ptsNon-Proficient
No formal closing New material introduced Does not refer to introduction25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppearance

25.0 to >19.0 ptsHigh Proficiency
No APA errors in margins, font type and size, spacing, headers, references, and citations
19.0 to >14.0 ptsModerately High Proficiency
Has 1-4 APA formatting errors
14.0 to >9.0 ptsProficient
Has 5-7 APA formatting errors
9.0 to >4.0 ptsLow-Level Proficiency
Has more than 7 APA formatting errors
4.0 to >0 ptsNon-Proficient
No evidence of APA in paper25.0 pts
Total Points: 125.0

PreviousNext

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Informassgnmod2wk3

Please read the instructions attached carefully for the assignment. Thanks.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Inforassgn68

See the attached Assignment. Please follow the Rubric in answering the questions. Thanks.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Infomwk6disc

Please see attached for  Informatics Discussion

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Infomaticsand Evbased Practicewkrespond

Urgent 

One half page response needed for Informatics with 2 references

One half page response needed for Evidence based practi with 2 references

Please see attachment for details and remember to check for plagiarism. Thank you.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW