Need help with my writing homework on Tebate from the point of view of a FDA Therac-25 based on Analysis with Rawls theory. Write a 250 word paper answering; Analysis with Rawl’s theory The FDA is not responsible because they responded to the information provided to us regardingthe accidents of the case. The machine was declared defective and ordered it not to be in service (Pogge 69). FDA is a USA department of health and human services whose responsibilities included receiving information from the AECL that the machine would have such features, upon testing we found the machine returning emissions within the safe levels of radiation The manufactures were the once who were responsible for the implementation of the features which protect patients against exposure to radiations. According to John Rawls theory of the original position from which agents overdue a veil of ignorance, which means that anybody is reliable for anything he or she does despite the situation they may find themselves.

The management is reliable for the accidents which occurred because they were neglected in providing all the necessary information regarding the reliability of their machine. ACEL most fulfill the causal condition because manufactured product was responsible for the death of several patients (Pogge 149). The reports which were obtained by AECL management, the company reported that the death due to an over dose of radiations administered to patients, which was as a result of THERAC-25 failure. According to the second formulation of the categorical imperative, AECL used public as merely a means to end because they were benefiting at the expense of people’s lives.

From a social contract theory perspective, it is in the best interest of group. self-interested, rational individuals who are epitomized by the government of the United States. The responsibilities were assigned to the ACEL to make sure they are eventually accountable for the engagements of their employees, and that norms and procedures are put to avoid similar issues from medical devices in the future.

Work cited

Pogge. John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need help with my writing homework on Supreme Court and Rights. Write a 250 word paper answering; In the case of Weeks v. the United States, Weeks’ property was searched by the state agents without a lawful warrant and some papers and other possessions were seized by the agents which led to the conclusion that the defendant was an illegal gambler. However, this constituted a violation of the Fourth Amendment because otherwise the evidence that was collected in this unlawful manner should not have been used in the federal criminal prosecution.

By the 20th century, however, the Court came to recognize the fact that the Fourth Amendment was of no use if this kind of a search and seizure practice was carried on without any warrant. This Amendment carries a certain amount of protection that is to be given to citizens and states that evidence produced in such an unlawful manner cannot be held against the defendant. Thus, the Court had finally decided the case to be in favor of Weeks and classifies a certain right of privacy to be provided to other citizens under the same category in order to abide by the guidelines set in the Fourth Amendment.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need help with my writing homework on The Impact of Globalisation over Criminal Offences. Write a 2000 word paper answering; Due to globalization, the economic structures of developing countries are experiences competitive advantages. More specifically, due to the progress in economic as well as financial context, development in information technology has been witnessed leading to the circulation of goods, money as well as information around the world. However, most of the people are identified to be having the perception that due to globalization, the criminal offense has increased in a worldwide context. It will be worth mentioning that international crime has spread over the world that also affected the economic progress of every country (Shaw & et. al., 2003).

Currently, crime has become one of the most important factors affecting the social structure of the globe. It will be worth mentioning that from the past two decades, the global governances has been experiencing numerous failures in maintaining continuous growth in economic terms due to imbalanced social structure. It has been observed that the recent phenomenon i.e. globalization has increased criminal activities within the world. With the increase in cross border business activities within the global economy, the rate of criminal offenses has also increased gradually. More specifically, the crime rate is increasing day-by-day. In this context, changes in societal structures, political structure as well as other social aspects are recognized as vital reasons for building criminal behavior within the society (Newburn, 2013).

The involvement of the youth within the prospect of globalized crime is recognized to be a vital reason for the increasing rate of criminal activities. Globalization has provided a platform for the crime world for performing illegal activities on a global basis. Most of the people are involved in criminal activities due to a large number of circumstances that include ineffective criminal regulations in other countries and the rate of unwanted activities.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need help with my writing homework on The government of the United States. Write a 500 word paper answering; The system of politics in the United Kingdom

Part 1

The United States of America is a democratic nation whose government is headed by the president collectively elected by the citizens (Johnson, 2002). On the other hand, a prime minister elected by parliamentarians heads Her Majesty’s government of the United Kingdom. Of the two figures, the president of the United States of America has a higher decision making power. The prime minister of the united Kingdom is elected by a select few members of the society after being elected to the parliament by the citizens. He, thereafter, appoints other ministers to form the cabinet which is the top decision making organ of the country. Every decision that the prime minister makes is subject to approval of the cabinet and the parliament by extension. This limits the decision making powers of the prime minister unlike in the United States of America where the constitution vests power on the president, the federal courts, and the congress to oversee the function of the executive, judiciary as well as the legislative arms of government.

The system of politics in the United Kingdom vests more power on the citizens. This is reflected on the progressive nature of representation in the form of leadership that constitutes the top governance of the country. This form of government develops progressively since the people initiate every change directly or through representation. The powers of the prime minister are subject to the constitutional reviews carried out in the parliament and other state commissions and seek the approval of the citizens in the form of referendums. This gradual political development is still rife in the country. For a long time, the country has not initiated any constitutional change in its political structuring despite the numerous constrains in the functionality of the prime minister and the longing for an executive president.

Part 2

The government of the United States is based on a constitution first developed in 1789 making it the first constitutional state in the world. The constitution relies on the principles of federalism which provides for a mechanism of power sharing between the federal states and the central government. The fact that the country has fifty semi-autonomous states coming together under one central government influenced the formation of an effective and concrete constitution that captures the interests of all the states.

Additionally, the racial segregation later in the history of the country and the subsequent abolition of the slave trade resulted in the formation of the American bill of rights to safeguard the interest of every citizen (Jonathan, 2005). The bill of rights provides for the respect of human life and to oversee this is the judicial arm of the government constituted of independent courts which exercise their powers thus ensuring obedience to the laws of the land. The constitution defines powers of both the executive and the congress which are crafted in a way to defend the interest of the citizens and uphold the values of equality among all Americans irrespective of their diverse backgrounds (Davis, 2008).

Wood (1998) asserts that the American government has three arms namely the judiciary, the executive, and the legislature all of which are independent in their operations. The three tires approach to governance protects the citizens from exploitation thus resulting in a more responsive form of governance over time.

References

Davis, S. (2008). Political thought of Elizabeth Cady Santon: Women’s rights and the Americanpolitical transition. New York: New York University Press.

Jonathan, K. (2005). The Shame of the Nation: The Restoration of Apartheid Schooling inAmerica. New York: crown.

Johnson, M. (2002). Reading the American Past: Selected Historical Documents. Boston:Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Wood, G. (1998). The creation of the American Republic. Williamsburg: Gordon S. Wood,Institute.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need help with my writing homework on The French Revolution: Impact of the Reign of Terror. Write a 2500 word paper answering; The revolution, among other things, also highlights the result of the ignorance of the nobles and clergy of France. It all begins with Louis XVI, was one of those nobles, who was during that point in time facing a financial crisis and decreasing popularity among the people. In order to salvage some of the support of the masses he gave representation to the people of France and called upon the Estates General for the first time in two hundred years, but regardless of the fact that it was a step forward in a positive direction, the Third estate (consisting of more than ninety percent of the population) had less representation than what would have been fair. The Third Estate was not given proper power in the assembly and the few next series of events saw the masses get fed up with the oppression and claimed that the only ones representing France would be them with complete power. These events which occurred have great significance to the revolution as it was when the Third Estate that was locked outside the assembly when the revolution took a different direction. The Courtyard Oath was taken that day and the National Assembly was formed. The King did not approve of the formation of the National assembly and this was what leads to serious consequences for him. A vote of four hundred ninety three to ninety four decided that serious action was to be taken against the King and it was hard to undermine the power that the National Assembly possessed as it had won over a significant portion of the population. With such a resounding opposition, on June 27th, 1789, Louis XVI gave into their demands (Jean & Edgeworth, 1961). This decision proved to be slightly too late for the King as a young twenty six year old educated in Paris laid down the seeds of revolution in people. People were looking for a leader and quickly embraced this new soul as their own voice. Soon riots erupted and the military quickly acted to stop this movement but then again France only had six thousand soldiers to defend them from internal problems. An insignificant amount as seen in the Place Vendome, where the cavalry attempted to control the riot, only to find their horses surrounded and unmovable through the dense crowd. It was this event which saw the formation of the Paris Commune, drawing from the electoral populace of each section. four thousand and eight hundred men were given the task of protecting Paris. Unfortunately for the King and the nobles the riots just increased in intensity and the Bastille was the next to fall. The Bastille was the prison where political prisoners were kept, though rumors were that it was a torture cell where prisoners sent were never seen again and was reserved for the worst prisoners in France. The people laid siege to the Bastille and the prison just holding enough food for two days had to surrender quickly. The morning of July 14th eight hundred people grew more and more impatient and when talks broke down between both sides resulting in the Bastille being attacked. Shots were fired from both sides and the guards eventually surrendered. The violence that followed was so intense that it could not have been predicted. The guards were rounded up and their heads were cut off, decapitated, and then paraded on pikes like the wax busts of French heroes. De Lunay who was hosting the talks for the Bastille was shot, rolled into a gutter and his head was kept as a trophy. The King was losing control and even the church was slowly refusing to support the King as they did not endorse the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in 1791 simply because it was not in their best interests and furthermore the revolution itself was frowned upon by the Church. This left the King with very few options.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"