Need an argumentative essay on Give each page of a fallacy topic that are related to it. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Adolf Hitler once said that people can be easily influenced if you use some psychological formulas in order to persuade them. A formal fallacy, on the other hand, is one which involves an error in the technical arrangement or the structure of an argument. The conclusion of such argument could be true but the argument, itself, is invalid.

An ad hominem argument is one in which a person attacks the other party rather than addressing the argument and the question itself. It is an effective way of ignoring the question asked and answering by blaming or criticizing the other party ( Top Ten Logical Fallacies In politics, Web). This is a fallacy not because people claim that the argument is wrong but because the negative characteristics of people making the argument. This is a means through which people try to discredit the argument of the counter party by disclosing their negative traits. This type of a fallacy is highly common among politicians who, rather than commenting on the issue at hand, try to blame the other party in order to create hype especially among the media. This successfully distracts the opponent as well as the audience and media from the question or issue at hand. These personal comments might even affect a voter`s opinion about the opponent`s political position.

Ad hominem is further divided into two categories: abusive and circumstantial. Abusive fallacy is when a person comments on the personal character or qualities of the opponent. This is an effective disruption as the opponent tries to defend himself and is distracted from the topic. Circumstantial fallacy is when certain circumstances involving the opponent are brought up in order to divert the attention of the audience or the opponent himself. (Argumentum Ad Hominem, Web). One recent example of this fallacy is when President Obama, during his speech, said that “Gov. Romney “would ask the middle class to pay more in taxes to

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Gothic Architecture. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Gothic architecture is mainly renowned as the architecture of a majority of the great cathedrals, churches and abbeys of Europe (Burckhardt 2). The style of architecture is also the architecture that is prominent with a majority of palaces, castles, town halls, universities, guild halls and to a less private dwellings or prominent extent. From then, a lot of scholars, Burckhardt (1966) and Simson (1912), have come up with publications, which give people insight on this type of architecture. The two authors, Burckhardt (15) and Simson (4) focused on these structures with Titus Burckhardt putting his focus on the great Chartres Cathedral. Burckhardt (1966) and Simson (1912) books, Chartres and the Birth of the Cathedral and The Gothic Cathedral: Origins of Gothic Architecture and the Medieval Concept of Order respectively, are a must read if a person wants to know about these Gothic structures. This paper will analyze the gothic aspects of these two writings basing on the instructions provided. The aspects include the elements of gothic architecture discussed in each book, the central thesis, as well as issues, and whether the books address their topics thoroughly among other factors.

Burckhardt’s book talks about how Chartres cathedral is the most stunning and momentous Christian artifact (Burckhardt 15). The book discusses how the cathedral has testified to numerous miracles and has lost not a bit of its power to inspire reverence, wonder and inspirational knowledge in individuals who experience it past a superficial acquaintance. Also, other scholars have remarked the spiritual implications of the Gothic styles, but Burckhardt usefully summarizes and expounds their interpretation. Simson (16), on the other hand, went deep into the Gothic architecture. The author also commands people’s respect of these structures by his rare capacity to comment enlighteningly and convincingly on the distinctions of spiritual content of

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Googles Organisation Culture, Power and Control. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.

According to the report&nbsp.Google Inc. is a US based company headquartered at Mountain View, California. It was founded in the year 1998 by Larry Page and Sergey Brin. They were students at Stanford University then. Google is specialised in online advertising and internet searching. It became a public company in 2004. The mission statement of Google is: “Google’s mission is to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”.From this discussion it is clear that&nbsp.Google is well known for its unconventional, informal, and distinct organisational culture. Organisational culture can actually be thought of or analysed at three different levels, namely Artefacts, Espoused Values, and Beliefs and the Basic Assumptions. The main belief of Google is that its organisational structure and its associated values are the representatives of spirits, assumptions, beliefs, performances, and attitudes followed by the employees of the company. Integrity of the values of the Google’s employees, which include commitment and loyalty, is an important aspect of the Google’s culture. This results in Google trying to create an organisational culture which is innovative in nature so as to provide motivational incentives for its employees to achieve the goals and objectives of the company.&nbsp.For Google’s employees, money is not as important as their passion to work for the company. Everyone enjoys and feels happy about working for Google.&nbsp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Hamlet: A Guide to the Play. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.

According to the research findings, it can, therefore, be said that Hamlet simply did not act when it was required that he acted and the consequence is tension and confusion that reigns throughout the play, resulting in at the end of the ply that creates even more uncertainties. Thus, confusion and uncertainty is a major lens through which one can look at the play Hamlet, considering the fact that the whole story revolves around the uncertainties and confusion that keeps building up at every stage of the story until finally, virtually everybody in the story has perished. The major confusion that the inaction of Hamlet has contributed in the play is the confusion that surrounds the character Gertrude, the Queen of Denmark and Hamlet’s mother. Hamlet’s inaction has caused the character of Gertrude to raise more questions than answers in the play. This is because, it is not immediately clear whether she cooperated or contributed to the death of her husband who was the former king of Denmark, and neither is it clear whether she loved her former husband nor whether she betrayed her son to Claudius. All this uncertainty regarding Gertrude has been caused by Hamlet’s inaction since if he had decided to act immediately after the ghost informed him to avenge his father’s death, he would have confronted Gertrude immediately, and the whole truth would have come out. On the contrary, Hamlet does not swing to action immediately, rather opting to take time and investigate the cause of his father’s death, despite the fact that he never had any doubt that it is Claudius who had killed his father. His delayed action enables the villain in the play, Claudius, to buy all the necessary time that is required to plan for the elimination of Hamlet as well.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Gun Control/ Argumentative paper against Gun Control. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

During this period, most of the murders were committed with handguns. Second, since 1911, New York had imposed a handgun licensing law, which proved unequal to the task of reducing violent crime in this city. Third, the federal Gun Control Act of 1968 imposed stringent restrictions on the possession and bearing of firearms, throughout the US (Preface to “Deterring Gun Violence”). However, this measure was ineffective, as is borne out by the fact that in comparison to the five years preceding the enactment of this act, the murder rate of the US, after the enactment of this act, showed a 50% increase. In the five years following this period, the murder rate showed a 75% increase, and in the 5 year period after that the increase was 81% (Preface to “Deterring Gun Violence”). As such, in the US crime rate was enhanced much, when gun control laws were in operation. Gun control laws were unsuccessful in controlling the crime in the US.

The case of District of Columbia v Heller, dealt with the right to own firearms in the US. In this case, a special policeman attempted to register a handgun in the District of Columbia. However, his application was rejected on the grounds that handguns could not be possessed in the home. The case was brought before the Supreme Court, which ruled that individuals had the right to own firearms. In addition, the Court clarified as to who could own a firearm, namely whether a state supported militia or individuals (District of Columbia v Heller ).

The Supreme Court ruled that the individual was entitled to own a firearm. While providing this ruling, the Court detached the practice of individual gun ownership from the service of that individual in a state militia. The ban on handguns by the District of Columbia was held to be in violation of the Second Amendment to the US Constitution (District of Columbia v Heller ). With this decision, it became very clear as to who was entitled to bear firearms. The Court stressed that

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"