In The Whole Psychology Subject What Material According To You Could Be Applied

/in /by

in the whole psychology subject. what material according to you could be applied to your everyday life. Ask a question concerning how you could use an idea discussed in the text to enhance/improve your everyday life.

  • Ask your question

  • Succinctly describe the idea/evidence relevant to your question
  • Discuss how you could use the idea/evidence in your own life,
for example, you might ask, “How could I use this idea in order to study more efficiently? How could I use this idea in order to feel more optimistic about my future?” Be sure to be as specific as possible when discussing how you could apply an idea to your life.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In The Week Before And The Week After Holiday There Were 10000 Total Deaths And

/in /by

In the week before and the week after holiday, there were 10000 total deaths, and 4966 of them occurred in the week before the holiday. 

a. Construct a 90% confidence interval estimate of the proportion of deaths in the week before the holiday to the deaths in the week before and the week after the holiday.

b. Based on the result, does there appear to be any indication that people can temporarily postpone their death to survive the holiday?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In The Week 3 Assignment You Engaged In A Case Analysis Of A Current Business Pr

/in /by

In the Week 3 Assignment, you engaged in a case analysis of a current business problem using some of the components of an argumentative essay. In this written assignment, you will write a complete argumentative essay as described in Sections 9.1 and 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Foster, Hardy, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). This essay will include a revised and polished version of your Week 3 Assignment, an objection to your thesis, a rebuttal, and concluding remarks. In order to benefit the most, you should start working on your Final Project from the time you receive your Week 3 Assignment back with comments from your professor.

Your assignment should include the following:A revision of your Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment. Your revision should represent a substantial edit of your work that fully incorporates feedback from your professor and goes well beyond correcting any grammatical or APA errors.

The strongest possible objection to your thesis. After the final paragraph of your Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment, start a new paragraph that introduces the strongest possible objection to your thesis. The considerations for this are detailed in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). Make sure to employ the appropriate language to introduce the objection, such as “some may object to my thesis as follows” or “according to [so and so] the thesis presented here fails to account for X” [whatever he or she finds problematic]. You can find other language to do this, of course, but the key point here is to make sure that you indicate that someone else is speaking when presenting this objection.

It is also important to remember that you do research to discover good objections and not merely objections that are weak and thus easily rebutted. Look for peer-reviewed journal articles in the Ashford University Library, full-text articles in Google Scholar, or articles in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Present the opposing position fairly and in detail. This may take more than one paragraph.

A rebuttal. This is a refutation of the objection that you have just presented. Start this in a new paragraph following the objection paragraph(s). Once again, follow the indications of Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015). You may point out an error in the objection. Or you may show that, while it is an important objection, it does not apply squarely to your argument, or does not account for facts that make it irrelevant. Above all, make sure to maintain philosophical decorum in your rebuttal. Toward this end, you should apply the principles of charity and of accuracy, first introduced in the Week 1 course material. See “Confronting Disagreement” in Section 9.4 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo, 2015).

Closing remarks. End your argumentative essay with a paragraph of closing remarks. Provide some reflections of what you have attempted to achieve by means of your essay. You could, for example, explain how your essay sheds light on the broader controversy that it addresses. Or you could point out how your essay addresses a frequently ignored point or the unpopular side in the controversy. You could also reflect on the related matters in the broader controversy that would be useful to examine by others. Do not merely summarize what you have done in the body of your essay, and do not add new information here that would support or contradict your essay since the body of your essay should have addressed all the relevant points. See “Closing Your Essay” in Section 9.2 of With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking (Hardy, Foster, & Zúñiga y Postigo (2015).

Requirements for your Assignment:

  • Your assignment should be between 1500 to 1700 words in length, excluding the cover and references pages.
  • Your examination should be both thorough and succinct. This is a combination that demands time and thought, so give yourself sufficient time to draft and revise.
  • Your assignment should include citations, as well as a list of references. Both must be in APA form.
  • Your references should include at least four peer-reviewed articles in addition to those that you will be carrying over from our Week 3 Case Analysis Assignment. These references should be drawn from the Ashford University Library, Google Scholar, or the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Your assignment should be submitted no later than the end of Monday (midnight, U.S. Mountain time).
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In The Wake Of The Collapse Of Enron And Worldcom Corporations And The Widesprea

/in /by

In the wake of the collapse of Enron and WorldCom corporations, and the widespread misstatements and omissions in corporate financial statements of a number of other SEC reporting companies, Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in 2002.  The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) is a conglomeration of a number of acts adopted to promote the financial stability of the United States by improving accountability and transparency in the financial system, ending the idea of “too big to fail,” protecting the American taxpayer by ending bailouts, and protecting consumers from abusive financial services practices.  Both SOX and Dodd-Frank have been either applauded as landmark legislation which expand investor and consumer protections, or criticized as anti-competitive and over-burdensome governmental regulation. 

Compose an essay which gives an overview of some of the major provisions of SOX and Dodd-Frank, focusing on those areas which would be of import to you as a CPA.  In the course of your discussion, explore some of the arguments from “both sides of the aisle” (the pros and cons) for some of the provisions targeted by the legislation (your choice on which provisions you would like to discuss in-depth).  Where do you stand—personally and professionally—on those issues?  Be sure to address the recent developments (December, 2014 and January, 2015) regarding amendments to Dodd-Frank in your essay.

The essay is supposed to be roughly 6-8 pages in length. Anything would help,

Thank you!

[Date] Assignmentwork Name [COMPANY NAME] The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform (“Dodd-Frank”) and Sarbanes-Oxley Act(“Sarbanes-Oxley”) Whistleblower anti-retaliation provisions have been the…

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In This 500 700 Word Paper Use The Movies My Family And De Nadie And The 30 Da

/in /by

In this 500 – 700 word paper, use the movies My Family and De Nadie, and the 30 Days episode Immigration, to describe their experiences and the rationale for coming to America.  Describe some of the Hispanic cultural definitions that show how they are a diverse group of cultures while also sharing commonalities.

Surname 1 Name of studentName of tutorCourseDateImmigrationDe Nadie is a movie that talks about immigration problem people of Central Americans tat wantto migrate and cross the United States…

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In This 3 4 Page Written Assignment Select A Multi System Complex Health Alterat

/in /by

In this 3-4 page written assignment, select a multi-system complex health alteration of your choice such as diabetes with kidney involvement, an autoimmune disorder with system involvement, or COPD with hypertension and discuss the following:

  1. The physiological factors associated with the selected multi-system complex health alteration.
  2. The psychological factors associated with the selected multi-system complex health alteration. Review and include the factors described in the reading for this module.
  3. Provide one evidence-based source that supports “best practice” care for this client. Include the source in your submission.
  4. Include a discussion of key issues that would be faced by the client”s family/significant others.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In Theory Which Of The Following Meets The Conditions In Which Specific Pd Toler

/in /by

In theory, which of the following meets the conditions in which Specific PD tolerance would occur?

a) Tolerance to analgesic effect of morphine: a person must be in pain to experience the analgesic effect of morphine

b) Tolerance to hypothermic effect of alcohol: a person mus experience hypothermia under the influence of alcohol

c) Tolerance to anorectic effect of amphetamine: a person must be hungry and in the presence of food after the stimulant effect of amphetamine has worn off

d) All of the above

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In Theory In Order For Specific Pd Tolerance To Occur What Must Happen

/in /by

In theory, in order for Specific PD Tolerance to occur, what must happen?

a) The drug must disrupt functioning of the organism in order for the “homeostatic mechanism” to kick in

b) A person must be experiencing disruption in homeostatic before taking the drug

c) A person must self-administer the drug in frequent intervals with increasing doses

d) B and C

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In This Assignment Students Will Pull Together The Change Proposal Project Compo 1

/in /by

In this assignment, students will pull together the change proposal project components they have been working on throughout the course to create a proposal inclusive of sections for each content focus area in the course. At the conclusion of this project, the student will be able to apply evidence-based research steps and processes required as the foundation to address a clinically oriented problem or issue in future practice.

Students will develop a 1,250-1,500 word paper that includes the following information as it applies to the problem, issue, suggestion, initiative, or educational need profiled in the capstone change proposal:

  1. Background
  2. Problem statement
  3. Purpose of the change proposal
  4. PICOT
  5. Literature search strategy employed
  6. Evaluation of the literature
  7. Applicable change or nursing theory utilized
  8. Proposed implementation plan with outcome measures
  9. Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome
  10. Appendix section, if tables, graphs, surveys, educational materials, etc. are created

Review the feedback from your instructor on the Topic 3 assignment, PICOT Statement Paper, and Topic 6 assignment, Literature Review. Use the feedback to make appropriate revisions to the portfolio components before submitting.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

RUBRIC:

Background

Background section is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Problem Statement

Problem statement is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Change Proposal Purpose

Purpose of change proposal is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

PICOT

PICOT is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Literature Search Strategy

Literature search strategy is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Literature Evaluation

Literature evaluation is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Utilization of Change or Nursing Theory (2.2)

Theory utilization content is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Proposed Implementation Plan with Outcome Measures (3.2)

Implementation plan is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation, and a discussion of how these could be overcome (2.3)

Identification of potential barriers to plan implementation with a discussion component is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Appendices Inclusive of Practice Immersion Clinical Documentation (1.2)

Appendices are present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.

Evidence of Revision

Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

In Their Seminal Work Mastering Virtual Teams 2011 Duarte And Snyder Identify Se

/in /by

In their seminal work, Mastering Virtual Teams (2011), Duarte and Snyder identify seven critical success factors in virtual team collaboration:

  1. Human resource policies.
  2. Training and development.
  3. Standard organizational processes.
  4. Communication and collaboration technology.
  5. Organizational culture.
  6. Leadership.
  7. Competence (p. 10).

Note: A custom text containing pertinent excerpts from the Duarte and Snyder text is one of the suggested readings listed in the Resources. If you choose not to purchase the text, you should be able to find a number of resources that address these critical success factors through your research for this assessment.

To prepare for this assessment, research the seven critical success factors in virtual team collaboration. Consider your own real-world experiences with these factors in the workplace.

Deliverable

This assessment incorporates multiple elements. Be sure to thoroughly address each before submitting the assessment.

Use the seven critical success factors to analyze how the practices of your own organization (or another organization with which you are familiar) influence the success of its virtual teams. Base your analysis on your own experience of being a member of a virtual team within the organization.

Note: If you have not participated in a virtual team, base your analysis on a hypothetical virtual team experience, using what you know of your organization’s practices.

In developing this case, it is helpful to assume that you have been tasked by executive management to conduct an audit of your organization’s ability to support virtual team collaboration. Your audit will include a detailed report in each of the seven critical success factors. Go beyond a description of the “as-is” state for each of these factors in your audit to evaluate and analyze each of the factors to identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that the current state presents to the organization in terms of its ability to support virtual team collaboration.

Remember that the executive management of your company is not interested in a report about the criteria themselves—they are not interested in reading about human resource policies in the abstract, for example—but about how the organization measures up to the criteria. Use the success factors to analyze the organization—do not fall into the trap of writing about the criteria. Use the criteria to describe, analyze, and evaluate the organization.

Explain how organizational practices influenced (or might influence) the virtual team’s performance. Address all of the following:

  1. Human resource policies: Do the organization’s career development resources address the needs of virtual team members? Does the organizational reward system recognize the efforts and successes of those who work virtually? Are rewards given only for results, or are they also given for effort? Does the organization actively support work arrangements such as telecommuting?
  2. Training and development: Is there access to technical training for virtual team members? Is there access to training in the area of working across cultures? Is there a program of ongoing training as needed? Is there a system for sharing what has been learned, such as a database?
  3. Standard organizational processes: Are there standard technical processes used throughout the organization (with regard to virtual teams)? Are there standard soft processes used throughout the organization? Does the organization support the ability to adapt processes when necessary? Does the organizational culture support shared ways of doing business across teams?
  4. Communication and collaboration technology: Are there consistent standards for electronic communication and collaboration tools across the organization? Does the organization possess or provide enough resources to purchase and support state-of-the-art electronic communication and collaboration technology? Do all employees (across departments and geographic location) have equal access to electronic communication and collaboration technology?
  5. Organizational culture: Is there trust between the organization, its partners, and other external stakeholders? Are teamwork and collaboration standard practices? Are people from different cultures valued?
  6. Leadership: Do leaders allocate enough resources for the training and technology needed by virtual teams? What level of expectation do leaders set for virtual team performance? Do leaders model exemplary behavior by working across boundaries and using technology effectively?
  7. Competence: Are team leaders experienced with working in virtual environments? Are team members experienced with working in virtual team environments? Are team leaders experienced in working across both organizational and cultural boundaries? Are team members experienced in working across both organizational and cultural boundaries?

Support your analyses with real examples, as well as evidence from your research and readings.

Additional Requirements

  • Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message and quality.
  • Your report should be 7–10 content pages, in addition to a title page and references page.
  • Use 12-point, Times New Roman.
  • Use at least three scholarly resources.
  • Follow APA rules for attributing sources that support your analysis and conclusions. As a reminder related to using APA rules to ensure academic honesty:
    • When using a direct quote (using exact or nearly exact wording), you must enclose the quoted wording in quotation marks, immediately followed by an in-text citation. The source must then be listed in your references page.
    • When paraphrasing (using your own words to describe a nonoriginal idea), the paraphrased idea must be immediately followed by an in-text citation and the source must be listed in your references page.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW