In the last few years, colleges and universities have signed exclusive agreements with a variety of private companies In the last few years, colleges and universities have signed exclusivity agreements with a variety of private companies. These agreements bind the university to sell that company’s products exclusively on the campus. Many of the agreements involved food and beverage firms. A large university with a total enrollment of about 50,000 students has offered Pepsi-Cola an exclusivity agreement, which would give Pepsi exclusive rights to sell their products at all university facilities for the next year and an option for future years. In return, the university would receive 35% of the on-campus revenues and an additional lump sum of $200,000 per year. Pepsi has been given 2 weeks to respond.The management at Pepsi quickly reviews what they know. The market for soft drinks is measured in terms of the equivalent of 12-ounce cans. Pepsi currently sells an average of 22,000 cans or their equivalents per week (over the 40 weeks of the year that the university operates). The cans sell for an average of 75 cents each. The costs, including labor, amount to 20 cents per can. Pepsi is unsure of its market share but suspects it is considerably less than 50%. A quick analysis reveals that if its current market share were 25%, then, with an exclusivity agreement, Pepsi would sell 88,000 cans per week or 3,520,000 cans per year (calculated as 88,000 cans per week * 40 weeks).gross revenue= 3,520,000 cans x $75 revenue/can= $2,640,000 This figure must be multiplied by 65%since the university would rake in 35% of the gross. Thus,65% X $2,640,000 = 1,716,000The total cost of 20 cents per can(or $704,000 and the annual payment to the university of $200,000 is subtracted to obtain the net profit.Net profit = $1,716,000$704,000 – $200,000 = $812,000Their current annual profit isCurrent profit = 40 weeks X22,000 cans/week X $.55/can= $484,000If the current market share is 25%, the potential gain from the agreement is$812,000 – $484,000 = $328,000the only problem with this analysis is that Pepsi does not know how many soft drinks are sold weekly at the university. In addition, Coke is not likely to supply Pepsi with information about it’s sales, which together with Pepsi’s line of products constitutes virtually the entire market.A recent graduate of a business program believes that a survey of the university students can supply the needed information. Accordingly, she organizes a survey that asks 500 students to keep track of the number of soft drinks they purchase on campus over the next 7 days. perform a statistical analysis to extract the needed information from the data. Estimate with 95% confidence the parameter that is at the core of the decision problem. Use the the estimate to compute estimates of the annual profits. Assume that Coke and Pepsi drinkers would be willing to buy either product in the absence of their first choice.a. On the basis of maximizing profits from sales of soft drinks at the university, should Pepsi agree to the exclusivity agreement?b. Write a report to the company’s executives describing your analysis . Please note: all answers and responses must be comprehensive in nature and very!!! very!!! detailed and explainable. Looking for a great product. Thanks

a. Yes, Pepsi should agree to the exclusivity agreement. As per the Survey it has beenrevealed that the Estimate is having 95% Confidence for Decision Problem whichmeans that total cans will be…

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In the last federal election, 38% of voters in Poule-les-Écharmeaux in Quebec voted for NDP, 29% for Conservatives, 17% for Liberals, 11% for Bloc Quebecois, and 5% for Green Party. On March 25, 2019, a random sample of 100 Poule-les-Écharmeaux residents was selected, and they were asked what party they would vote for now. The results were: 35 would vote for NDP, 25 for Conservatives, 24 for Liberals, 13 for Bloc Quebecois, and 3 for Green Party. At 1% significance level, does it mean that the voters’ preference has significantly changed? Use Goodness-of-fit test and  2 distribution.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In the last close reading of a scene from a movie you were asked to consider films that explore character development. Such works tend to be more brooding and contemplative than those from the action and comedy genres. They invariably constitute some variation of the “Dude with a Problem” format discussed in the second chapter of Blake Snyder’s book on Hollywood scripts Save the Cat: The Last Book on Screenwriting You’ll Ever Need (available in the online course materials for review, if needed). Any outward journey undertaken by the protagonist in such films tends to be mirrored by an interior one. Growth manifests in either subtle or dramatic forms.

Disability, whatever its exact expression, certainly poses challenges. It is a “problem” in that it complicates barriers that able-bodied individuals do not face, not, at least, unless they themselves become injured, infirm, and/or old.

But sometimes the problem isn’t so much the disability as the social, physical, attitudinal, and economic environment in which persons with disabilities find themselves trapped. It isn’t, for instance, the wheelchair operator’s fault that the restaurant entrance has a step and no ramp. It isn’t the blind student’s fault that none of the elevator buttons have braille patterns next to them or that paper money of varying denominations doesn’t come in different sizes. It isn’t their fault that if they become gainfully employed that social security (in this country) will take away benefits necessary to their survival. At such moments, wherein lies the disability? In the individual? Or in the rest of us, oblivious to the myriad ways in which we daily block and deny accessibility? 

The problem of disability is even more pronounced in the impoverished nations of the so-called Third World. Oftentimes, it is made central to a character’s story. Less often, it is peripheral. Either way, focus on the growth (or lack thereof) of the protagonists in two of the films below.

• The Color of Paradise / Rang-e khoda (Iran, 1998)
• *The Girl Who Sold the Sun / La petite vendeuse de soleil (Senegal, 1999)
• *The Intouchables / Intouchables (France, 2013)
• *Margarita, with a Straw (India, 2015)
• *Oasis / Oasiseu (South Korea, 2002) 

Assignment: Introduce the main character(s). Describe the problem(s). Summarize the plot. Do close readings of a scene from each–no more than three-to-five minutes long–that you consider pivotal to the outcome of the movie and/or your response to it. What effect or impact on the audience is intended? Why do you think so? What techniques are deployed towards that end? In what ways are the narrative arcs and treatment of disability in these disparate works similar, and in what ways, different? Which, in the final analysis, did you find more compelling, if either, and why? Or why were they both equally powerful in their own way?

(For more on narrative arcs, consisting of three parts, namely, (1) problem, (2) complication, and (3) resolution, go to the chapter excerpt from Andrew Glassner’s Interactive Storytelling: Techniques for 21st Century Fiction immediately following this assignment.) 

Concision is key to your success. Make every word count. Your introduction, description, and summaries need not total more than 150 words apiece (300 words for both). Your close readings ought likewise to be 150 words apiece (again, 300 words). Finally, the comparison and contrast section should come to another 150 words. (This break-down is approximate.) Altogether, your post should be about 750 words long. 

Copy and paste the writing prompt above into a word-processed document for easy reference. Work offline. When you are finished, click “reply,” and then copy and paste your work into the field (box) that opens. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In the last 10 years, many economists have been signaling that the next market frontier will be the continent of Africa. This assumption has been justifiable by the attention the continent is getting frontier market analysts. McKinsey & Company conducted a micro level of its consumer markets. Their study was to find whether the African continent demonstrates adequate economic growth to consider it for economic expansion for investment. The result of their study, demonstrated that the continent in the year 2009 was growing fast. As a result, the economic size of the continent reached 1.6 trillion U.S. dollars. The African countries, beyond being agrarian base nations, have become attractive for retailing, telecommunication, banking and construction sectors. Of course, the growth has just begun and many countries which are seeking resources for their growth have begun to invest in the African continent in many sectors, but mainly in natural resources.

After reading the full article provided, discuss how you would convince foreign investors, especially an American, that the region is ready for investment? In order to come up with a comprehensive and acceptable report, conduct:

a)    Risk analysis

b)   Choose market entry strategy

c)    Identify the sectors that are attractive and less risky

d)   Forward suggestion on how multinationals can minimize their risks

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In the Keynesian-cross model, if the MPC equals 0.75, then a $1 billion increase ingovernment spending increases planned expenditures by ______ and increases theequilibrium level of income by ______.A) $1 billion; more than $1 billionB) $0.75 billion; more than $0.75 billionC) $0.75 billion; $0.75 billionD) $1 billion; $1 billion

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"