I need to write 4-5 pages MLA format poetry analysis on 3 poems. I have attached the word documents with the 3 poems and the instructions. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I need to work a project about marketing course. It’s need to be one page.

Mural contests: Work with school

districts and public works departments to have a contest to create crosswalk murals encouraging physical activity.

a. What are the target implementation date(s)?

b. What are the measureable objectives of campaign (including time frame)?

c. Describe how the objectives of your campaign may help improve the quality of life among the residents in Reading and Lebanon.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I need to use the outline attached and continue from unit 2 which is attached.  This is for my capstone project 

This Assignment will help you define who your customers are (and specificity is the key to success here), define why your company has a competitive advantage over others to attract and retain your customer base, and research regulations you will need to understand to get started as well as to maintain your enterprise.

Assignment checklist:

3.3: Competitors (from business plan outline in course resources)

1. Explanation
2. Table

3.4 Competitive advantage

3.5 Regulations

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I need to translate the following into FOL, in LPL Logic, Phil 110.

Unfortunately, the first tutor’s answers were wrong.

Thanks in advance

1. b is in the same column as e, which is in the same row as d, which in turn is in the same column as a.

2. Neither e nor a is to the right of c and to the left of b.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I need to summarize it to 3~4 sentences

Privatizing the Military

The voluntary US military is, in many ways, a social engineer- ing project. The public understands the military as a service organization, dedicated to protecting the country’s interests. Yet, when recruits sign up, they are promised training and job opportunities. Individual motivations vary tremendously, but many are enticed by the opportunity to travel the world, partici- pate in a cause with a purpose, and get the heck out of Dodge. Everyone expects basic training to be physically hard, but few recognize that some of the most grueling aspects of signing up have to do with the diversification project that is central to the formation of the American military.

When a soldier is in combat, she must trust her fellow sol- diers with her life. And she must be willing to do what it takes to protect the rest of her unit. In order to make that possible, the military must wage war on prejudice. This is not an easy task. Plenty of generals fought hard to fight racial desegregation and to limit the role of women in combat. Yet, the US military was desegregated in 1948, six years before Brown v. Board forced desegregation of schools. And the Supreme Court ruled that LGB individuals could openly serve in the military before they could legally marry.

Morale is often raised as the main reason that soldiers should 10 not be forced to entrust their lives to people who are different than them. Yet, time and again, this justification collapses under broader interests to grow the military. As a result, commanders are forced to find ways to build up morale across difference, to actively and intentionally seek to break down barriers to teamwork, and to find a way to gel a group of people whose demographics, values, politics, and ideologies are as varied as the country’s.

In the process, they build one of the most crucial social infrastructures of the country. They build the diverse social fabric that underpins democracy.

Tons of money was poured into defense after 9/11, but the number of people serving in the US military today is far lower than it was throughout the 1980s. Why? Starting in the 1990s and accelerating after 9/11, the US privatized huge chunks of the military. This means that private contractors and their employees play critical roles in everything from providing food services to equipment maintenance to military housing. The impact of this on the role of the military in society is significant. For example, this undermines recruits’ ability to get training to develop critical skills that will be essential for them in civilian life. Instead, while serving on active duty, they spend a much higher amount of time on the front lines and in high-risk battle, increasing the likeli- hood that they will be physically or psychologically harmed. The impact on skills development and job opportunities is tremen- dous, but so is the impact on the diversification of the social fabric.

Private vendors are not engaged in the same social engi- neering project as the military and, as a result, tend to hire and fire people based on their ability to work effectively as a team. Like many companies, they have little incentive to invest in helping diverse teams learn to work together as effectively as possible. Building diverse teams—especially ones in which members depend on each other for their survival—is extremely hard, time-consuming, and emotionally exhausting. As a result, private companies focus on “culture fit,” emphasize teams that get along, and look for people who already have the necessary skills, all of which helps reinforce existing segregation patterns.

The end result is that, in the last 20 years, we’ve watched one of our major structures for diversification collapse without anyone taking notice. And because of how it’s happened, it’s also connected to job opportunities and economic opportunity for many working- and middle-class individuals, seeding resent- ment and hatred.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"