Hi Please Help Me Make This Weekly Discussion I Ve Posted A Sample Of A Response

Hi, Please help me make this weekly discussion, I’ve posted a sample of a response as a guide or for a little bit of paraphrasing.

Rules-based standards prescribe for the preparer what to do in contrast to a principles-based approach that emphasizes how to decide what to do. 

One concern about a principles-based system is whether an economic substance over form concept might lead preparers of financial statements to try and justify a specific accounting outcome with reference to commercial drivers in an attempt to manage earnings.  Some believe a principles-based system would lead to even more earnings management than has existed in our current rules-based system.

One lesser known provision of SOX is for a study to be conducted of the need to adopt a principles-based approach to standard setting in the United States to replace our more rules-based system.  IFRS is a principles-based system.  US GAAP as promulgated by FASB is a rules-based system.

There are benefits and concerns to a principle-bases system.  Discuss some of the benefits and concerns.  Do you believe a rules-based or principles-based system will work better in achieving more useful information in audited financial statements?  What role do ethics play in the effectiveness of each type of system? 

Example of response:

In the United States, our standards of U.S. GAAP are set by using a rules-based approach, while in many other countries IFRSs are set by means of a principles-based approach. It’s important to understand the difference between the two when discussing both approaches. A rules-based approach is an approach based on the laws and regulations in place. A principles-based approach is based on professional judgement. In other words the rules-based approach is concerned with “form over substance”, while the principles-based approach is concerned with “substance over form”. 

There are benefits and concerns for both approaches. The rules-based approach follows the standards and thus sets structure that can leave little room for interpretation. The main benefit of this approach is the enforceability by accountants and auditors of the standards. A concern that has presented itself is that the “rules-based standards often provide a vehicle for circumventing the intention of the standard.” Examples of those who circumvented the rules would be Enron and WorldCom. The principles-based approach allows for the use of one’s professional judgement under a facts-based circumstance. Benefits for this approach are that it allows for the use of professional judgement, the handling of rapid changes in business, and changes in the same old checking of boxes routine. Concerns with this approach include that difficulties may arise for enforcement of the standards, as well as, the comparability of information from one period to the next. There would be a lack of guidance and structure available if professional judgement is the main deciding factor. This lack of guidance and structure could lead to more earnings management, which can be viewed as the cause for some frauds in recent years, such as Waste Management and HealthSouth.

In review of the recent fraud cases, it is clear that a rules-only approach or a principles-only approach would be opening our standards to the same weaknesses of the past. I believe a hybrid approach would be the best solution when setting standards. As we discussed in chapter 8, there is a need for both quantitative and qualitative information when we need to make an informed decision about materiality. The same discussion could be applied here with the rules vs. principles-based approaches. The use of both approaches is beneficial for all. We need the structure of the rules as well as the freedom to use our professional judgement to properly report the most useful financial information. Whether we can implement this by adopting IFRS is still yet to be seen, if ever. As daunting as this task may prove to be, it is imperative.

One way of executing a hybrid of the two approaches would be adding ethics. Ethics is a key factor when implementing both approaches. Ethics brings both approaches together and allows for the approaches to coincide with one another. In effect, the rules should support the principles.

Whether following U.S. GAAP or IFRS, there is one thought that we should all consider. “While ethical standards may vary, one truth does not: Honesty, integrity, and trust are the bases for sound business relationships.”

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Recently I Have Completed An Course This Is The Below Task Given To Me Provid 1

Hi, recently I have completed an course, this is the below task given to me

“Provide a reflection of at least 500 words (or 2 pages double spaced) of how the knowledge, skills, or theories of Business Continuity and disaster recovery  have been applied, or could be applied, in a practical manner to your current work environment.”

Course syllabuis includes learning objectives related to:

Identify activities that occur duringthe project initiation phase of business continuity planning

Recognize considerations for business continuity and disaster recovery planning.

Perform a business impact analysis on given business functions.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Please Help In The Follwing This All Should Be In The Poster Poster Completio

Hi,

please help in the follwing this all should be in the poster:

*Poster Completion 

o Introduction  300 words 

· This is the essay (please see the attached file)

o Methodology & Method 

 200 words 

· Why did you chose a Quantitative methodology? 

· What was your method/instrument/tool (survey)? 

o Include your Survey Questions 

i have the first Qs. is:

Consent to take part in my research: 

I am doing research on _________________, and this survey is part of that research. 

All your answers will treated confidentially and no one will see them except me, you do not have to provide your name so all answers will be anonymous so cannot be linked to you. 

By answering YES to the below question you are giving your consent for me to use your answers in my data analysis. 

Thank you 

1. Do you agree to taking part in the research survey? 

a. YES 

b. No

the other 9 Qs. should be:

3 yes or No

3 multi-choise

3 range Qs (12345)

o Results 

9 x Graph/Bar Chart/Chart 

· Eash question from your survey should be illustrated with a chart etc 

· One or two sentences describing the chart for each survey question 

o Findings & Discussion 

 200 words 

· What have you discovered through your research? 

· Have you answered you ‘big’ research question? 

o Conclusion & Recommendations 

100 – 200 words

(I Have ATTACHED ALSO THE TEMPLATE SAMPLE FOR THE POSTER)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Ravi

I need help with two pages per case) on how an Humn Resource Director should handle both people CG (Grievance person) and the employee’s supervisor, PAUL in this case:

Hi, Ravi. I saw the grievance form for Barbara Stone. Isn’t she the woman who held the picket sign in the County Courier’s front page coverage of the strike? 

Ravi:   Yes, she is. Nice photo. The paper used a fair shot this time.

GC:     Well, what about this? In the first step, what did they tell you?

Ravi:   Hawkman took over from Dick Fleming when he retired. I don’t know why they appointed him. He hasn’t been with the company very long; he has no experience working with unions is what I hear. When I talked to him, he was arrogant—said he was fully within his rights to dismiss her.

GC:     So what happened? What does Barbara say?

Ravi:   Barbara had borrowed a company moving dolly. She said Dick had given her permission to use it. She was relocating across town and needed it to move some boxes to her new house. The dolly was in the back of her Chevy truck in the parking lot. It was covered up, for protection, but the handle, with the company tag, was sticking out. Hawkman saw it when he came to work. He couldn’t find any written permission slip on file for her to have it. Barbara said Dick didn’t ask for one this time. She had used it before to help with a community food drive that both she and Dick had volunteered to assist. She was bringing it back but just hadn’t unloaded it yet. Hawkman said she was stealing it and fired her.

The GC pulled out the contractual provisions for termination again. He also flipped to the section about company property. It read:

Article 17 – Section 8

Employees in good standing may occasionally borrow non-essential company equipment, provided they complete the authorization form and have it signed by their supervisor. A specific timeframe must be stipulated and failure to return the property in good condition by that deadline will be grounds for reprimand.

GC:     How long has she been here? What does her performance record look like?   

Ravi:   About 2 years. Dick wasn’t one to record an issue unless it was something really serious. So, there isn’t anything during his time. Hawkman has marked her for being late twice in the last month, but there isn’t any formal warning.  

Thank you!!!!

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Rachel Why Didn T You Mention That From The Beginning

Hi RAchel,Why didn’t you mention that from the beginning ???? You notified me that you were working on the homework before!!! Why you changed just NOWI sent the first attachment 2 days ago and you didn’t say anything about it. This is not acceptable at all , I wasted my time with you

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Rachel One Page Should Be Good Enough Here Is The Case Study For Your Referen

Hi Rachel,One page should be good enough. Here is the Case study for your reference. IKEA’s Global Strategy:Furnishing the WorldPaul KolesaIKEA is a furniture manufacturer and retailer, well known throughout the world for itsknockdown furniture. Its large retail stores in the blue-and-yellow colors of the Swedishflag are located on the outskirts of major cities, attracting shoppers who are looking formodern designs at good value. The low-cost operation relies on buyers with automobiles tocarry the disassembled furniture in packaged kits and assemble the pieces at home.The IKEA case is interesting because it shows how even retailers can go global once thekey competitive advantages of the offering are standardized. The case focuses on the Americanentry, which posed barriers IKEA had not encountered before and which forced adaptationof some features.IKEA, the Swedish furniture store chain virtually unknown outside of Scandinavia 25years ago, has drawn large opening crowds to its stores as it has pushed into Europe, Asia,and North America. Along the way it has built something of a cult following, especiallyamong young and price-conscious consumers. But the expansion was not always smoothand easy, for example, in Germany and Canada, and it was particularly difficult in theUnited States.Company BackgroundIKEA was founded in 1943 by Ingvar Kamprad to serve price-conscious neighbors in theprovince of Smaland in southern Sweden. Early on, the young entrepreneur hit upon aCaseCaseGroup Dwinning formula, contracting with independent furniture makers and suppliers to designfurniture that could be sold as a kit and assembled in the consumer’s home. In return forfavorable and guaranteed orders from IKEA, the suppliers were prohibited from sellingto other stores. Developing innovative modular designs whose components could be massproduced and venturing early into eastern Europe to build a dedicated supplier network,IKEA could offer quality furniture in modern Scandinavian designs at very low prices.By investing profits in new stores, the company expanded throughout Scandinavia inthe 1950s.Throughout the following years, the IKEA store design and layout remained the same;IKEA was basically a warehouse store. Because the ready-to-assemble “knockdown” kitscould be stacked conveniently on racks, inventory was always large, and instead of waitingfor the store to deliver the furniture, IKEA’s customers could pick it up themselves. Storeswere therefore located outside of the big cities, with ample parking space for automobiles.Inside, an assembled version of the furniture was displayed in settings along with otherIKEA furniture. The purchaser could decide on what to buy, obtain the inventory tag number,and then either find the kit on the rack, or, in the case of larger pieces, have the kitdelivered through the back door to the waiting car.This simple formula meant that there were relatively few sales clerks on the floor to helpcustomers sort through the more than 10,000 products stocked. The sales job consistedmainly of making sure that the assembled pieces were attractively displayed, that clear instructionswere given as to where the kits could be found, and that customers did not haveto wait too long at the checkout lines. IKEA’s was a classic “cash-and-carry” approach, exceptthat credit cards were accepted.This approach, which trims costs to a minimum, is dependent on IKEA’s global sourcingnetwork of more than 2,300 suppliers in 67 countries. Because IKEA’s designers workclosely with suppliers, savings are built into all its products from the outset. Also since thesame furniture is sold all around the world, IKEA reaps huge economies of scale from thesize of its stores and the big production runs necessary to stock them. Therefore, IKEA isable to match rivals on quality while undercutting them up to 30 percent on price.To draw the customers to the distant stores, the company relies on word-of-mouth,limited advertising, and its catalogues. These catalogues are delivered free of charge inthe mailboxes of potential customers living in the towns and cities within reach of a store.The catalogues depict the merchandise not only as independent pieces of furniture butalso together in actual settings of a living room, bedroom, children’s room, and so on.This enables the company to demonstrate its philosophy of creating a “living space,” notjust selling furniture. It also helps the potential buyer visualize a complete room and simplifiesthe planning of furnishing a home. It also shows how IKEA’s various componentsare stylistically integrated into a complete and beautiful whole. Even though furniture ishardly high-tech, the philosophy is reminiscent of the way high-tech producers, such asmobile phone makers, attempt to develop add-on features that fit their particular brandand not others.As the company has grown, the catalogue has increased in volume and in circulation.By 2003, the worldwide circulation of the 360-page catalogue reached over 130 million,making it the world’s largest printed publication distributed for free. In 2003 the cataloguewas distributed in 36 countries and 28 languages, showing more than 3,000 itemsfrom storage solutions and kitchen renovation ideas to office furniture and bedroomfurnishings.Sales totaled about 12.2 billion U.S. dollars in 2003, with a net profit margin around 6–7percent. Of this, Europe accounted for over 80 percent of revenues, with Asia accountingfor 3 percent, and North America 15 percent. The huge stores are relatively few innumber—only 175 worldwide but growing rapidly—and the company employs aboutCase 15 IKEA’s Global Strategy: Furnishing the World 40576,000 people around the world (see Exhibits 1 and 2). Many of the stores have only oneexpatriate Swedish manager at the top, sufficient to instill the lean Ingvar Kamprad andIKEA ethos in the local organization.Although the firm remains private, it continues to innovate and reorganize itself. For instance,fast decision making is aided by a management structure that is as flat as the firm’sknockdown furniture kits, with only four layers separating IKEA’s chief executive from itscheckout workers. In 1992 IKEA abolished internal budgets and now each region mustmerely keep below a fixed ratio of costs to turnover.European ExpansionIn the 1960s and 70s, as modern Scandinavian design became increasingly popular, expansioninto Europe became a logical next step. The company first entered the Germanspeakingregions of Switzerland, thereby testing itself in a small region similar toScandinavia. Yet expansion so far away from Sweden made it necessary to develop new suppliers,which meant that Kamprad traveled extensively, visiting potential suppliers and convincingthem to become exclusive IKEA suppliers. Once the supply chain was established,the formula of consumer-assembled furniture could be used. After some resistance from independentfurniture retailers who claimed that the furniture was not really “Swedish,” sincemuch of it came from other countries, IKEA’s quality/price advantage proved irresistibleeven to fastidious Swiss consumers.The next logical target was Germany, much bigger than Switzerland, but also culturallyclose to IKEA’s roots. In Germany, well-established and large furniture chains wereformidable foes opposed to the competitive entry and there were several regulatory obstacles.The opening birthday celebration of the first store in 1974 outside Cologne wascriticized because in German culture birthdays should be celebrated only every 25years. The use of the Swedish flag and the blue-yellow colors was challenged becausethe IKEA subsidiary was an incorporated German company (IKEA GmbH). The celebratorybreakfast was mistitled because no eggs were served. Despite these rearguardactions from the established German retailers, IKEA GmbH became very successful,406 Section V Marketing Management CasesEXHIBIT 1IKEA Sales DataTurnover for the IKEA Group:Sales for the IKEA Group for the financialyear 2003 (1 September 2002 – 31 August 2003)totaled 11.3 billion euro (12.2 billion USD).3.60246810127.79.510.411.0 11.31993 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003and was thus accepted, being voted German marketer of the year in 1979. The acceptanceof IKEA’s way of doing business was helped by the fact that IKEA had enlargedthe entire market by its low prices, and some of the established retailers adopted thesame formula in their own operations.To get the stores abroad started, Kamprad usually sent a team of three or four managerswho could speak the local language and had experience in an existing IKEA store. Thisteam hired and trained the sales employees, organized the store layout, and established thesales and ordering routines. Although the tasks were relatively simple and straightforward,IKEA’s lean organizational strategies meant that individual employees were assignedgreater responsibilities and more freedom than usual in more traditional retail stores. Althoughthis was not a problem in Europe and Japan (where its Japanese-sounding name alsowas an advantage), it was a problem in the United States.Case 15 IKEA’s Global Strategy: Furnishing the World 407Top Four Purchasing CountriesChina 18%Poland 12%Sweden 9%Italy 7%Top Five Sales CountriesGermany 20%United Kingdom 12%USA 11%France 9%Sweden 7%Sales by RegionAsia 3%North America 15%Europe 82%Purchasing by RegionNorth America 3%Asia 31%Europe 66%Co-workers by FunctionRange, purchasing/trading, wholesaleand others: 8,000Industrial production: 11,000Retail: 57,000Co-workers by RegionAsia + Australia 3,000North America 11,000Europe 62,000The IKEA group employs a totalof 76,000 co-workers in 43 countriesCanadian EntryTo prepare for eventual entry into the United States, IKEA first expanded into Canada. TheCanadian market was close to the U.S. market, and creating the supply network for Canadawould lay the foundation for what was needed for the much larger U.S. market. Drawingupon a successful advertising campaign and positive word-of-mouth, and by combiningnewly recruited local suppliers with imports from existing European suppliers, the Canadianentry was soon a success. The advertising campaign was centered around the slogan,“IKEA: The impossible furniture store from Sweden,” which was supported by a cartoondrawing of a moose’s head, complete with antlers. The moose symbol had played very wellin Germany, creating natural associations “with the north,” and also creating an image offun and games that played well in the younger segments the company targeted. The Canadiansresponded equally well to the slogan and the moose, as well as to IKEA’s humorouscartoonlike ads poking fun at its Swedish heritage (“How many Swedes does it take to screwin a lightbulb? Two—one to screw in the lightbulb, and one to park the Volvo”), which becameoften-heard jokes.The United States presented a much different challenge, as it offered a much larger marketwith a dispersed population, great cultural diversity, and strong domestic competition.The initial problems centered around which part of the United States to attack first. Whilethe east coast seemed more natural, with its closer ties to Europe, the California market onthe west coast was demographically more attractive. But trafficking supplies to Californiawould be a headache, and competition seemed stronger there, with the presence of establishedretailers of Scandinavian designs.Then, there was the issue of managing the stores. In Canada, the European managementstyle had been severely tested. The unusually great independence and authority of each individualemployee in the IKEA system had been welcomed, but the individuals often askedfor more direction and specific guidance. For example, the Swedish start-up team wouldsay to an employee, “You are in charge of the layout of the office furniture section of thestore,” and consider this a perfectly actionable and complete job description. This seemedto go against the training and predisposition of some employees, who came back with questionssuch as, “How should this piece of furniture be displayed?” IKEA’s expansion teamsuspected that the situation would be possibly even more difficult in the United States. Theteam also wondered if the same slogan and the moose symbol would be as effective in theUnited States as it had been in Germany and Canada.Entry Hurdles in the United StatesFrom the outset IKEA had succeeded despite breaking many of the standard rules of internationalretailing: enter a market only after exhaustive study; cater to local tastes as muchas possible; and tap into local expertise through acquisitions, joint ventures, or franchising.Although breaking these rules had not hurt IKEA in Europe, the firm got into some troublein America with its initial seven stores; six on the east coast and one in California. Manypeople visited the stores, looked at the furniture, and left empty-handed, citing long queuesand nonavailable stock as chief complaints.IKEA managers believed that their most pressing problem in entering the U.S. marketwas the creation of a stable supply chain. By taking an incremental approach, starting witha few stores on the east coast including an initial one outside Philadelphia, IKEA managersbelieved that they had ensured a smooth transition from the eastern United States,with its relative proximity to European suppliers, and its Canadian beachhead. Althoughthe store in southern California was much farther away, its large market and customer408 Section V Marketing Management Casesdemographics—young and active—favored IKEA’s modern designs and assemble-it-yourselfstrategy. The California entry was also precipitated by the emergence of a local imitator,“Stør,” which had opened ahead of IKEA, capitalizing on the word-of-mouth generated byIKEA’S new concept.IKEA’s early effort had problems because of less adaptation to the American market thancustomers desired. For example, IKEA decided not to reconfigure its bedroom furniture tothe different dimensions used in the American market. As a result, the European-style bedssold by IKEA were slightly narrower and longer than standard American beds, and customers’existing mattresses and sheets did not fit the beds. Even though IKEA stockedEuropean-sized sheets in the stores, bed sales remained very slow. IKEA ended up redesigningabout a fifth of its American product range and sales immediately increased byaround 30–40 percent.The American suppliers, whom IKEA gradually recruited to reduce the dependenceon imports, also proved in need of upgrading and instruction in IKEA’s way of producingfurniture. IKEA sent its people to the suppliers’ plants, providing technical tipsabout more efficient methods and helping the suppliers shop around for better-qualityor lower-price materials. Now IKEA produces about 45 percent of the furniture soldin its American stores locally, up from 15 percent just a few years earlier. In turn thishas helped the firm cut prices in its American stores for three years running. TheAmerican difficulties also highlighted how growth could lead to quality problems inmanaging its increasingly complex global supply chain, so IKEA began conductingrandom checks.Other adaptations to the American market proved just as successful. For instance, newcash registers were installed to speed throughput by 20 percent, with the goal of eliminatinglong checkout lines. Store layout was altered to conform more with American aestheticsand shopping styles. A more generous return policy than in Europe was instituted and anext-day delivery service was implemented.PromotionWhile some managers helped establish the supply side of the stores, IKEA’s marketing staffwas busy with the promotional side of the business. Store locations had generally disadvantagedIKEA relative to competitors. Because of the huge size of the stores (typicallyaround 200,000 square feet), the need to keep a large inventory so that customers could getthe purchased furniture immediately, and the amount of land needed for parking aroundeach store, most stores were located in out-of-the-way places—next to the airport in NewJersey in one case and in a shopping mall 20 miles south of Washington, DC, in another.Thus, advertising was needed to make potential customers aware of store locations. It wasthought that lower prices and selection would do the rest—positive word-of-mouth hadproven the best advertising in most other markets.But in the United States’ competitive retail climate IKEA found that more focused mediaadvertising was needed. As one manager stated: “In Europe you advertise to gain business;in the United States you advertise to stay in business.” The diversity of the consumersmade word-of-mouth less powerful than in ethnically more homogeneous countries. Managementdecided that a strong slogan and unique advertising message were going to be necessaryto really bring awareness close to the levels in other countries.The Moose symbol of IKEA (see Exhibit 3), although successful in Germany andCanada, was considered strange and too provincial for the U.S. market and would projectthe wrong image especially in California. Instead IKEA, in collaboration with its NewYork–based advertising agency Deutsch, developed a striking slogan that combined theCase 15 IKEA’s Global Strategy: Furnishing the World 409EXHIBIT 3down-home touch of the company philosophy with the humorous touch of the Moose: “It’sa big country. Someone’s got to furnish it” (see Exhibit 4).Following the success of this advertising strategy, the company ventured further to establishitself as a pioneering store and to attract new kinds of customers. IKEA andDeutsch developed a series of eight TV advertising spots that featured people at differenttransitional stages in their lives, when they were most likely to be in the market for furniture.One spot featured a young family who had just bought a new house, another a couplewhose children had just left home, and so on. IKEA even developed one spot thatfeatured a homosexual couple, two men talking about furnishing their home. It was a daringstep, applauded by most advertising experts and impartial observers. The campaignhad a positive impact on IKEA’s image—and on IKEA’s sales. The company has continuedthe trend. One 30-second TV spot showed a divorced woman buying furniture for thefirst time on her own.410 Section V Marketing Management CasesEXHIBIT 4The privately held company won’t reveal income figures, but it is successful in each ofthe market areas where it has located its U.S. stores. It is credited with being partly responsiblefor a shift in furniture buying behavior in the United States. Choosing furniture hasbecome a matter of personality, lifestyle, and emotions in addition to functionality. IKEA’smanagers like that—they want IKEA to be associated with the “warmest, most emotionalfurniture in the world.””

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Rachel I Am Offering 75 And If The Answer Is Outstanding And Plagiarism Free

Hi Rachel,I am offering $75, and if the answer is outstanding and plagiarism-free, i will give more bonuses. Let me know if that works for you. Please answer these 2 questions, and do not plagiarize as it will be submitted to SafeAssign. Thank you for your help!1. A discussion of the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) chosen for Honda Ltd. –why were these particular factors selected? Why are they important in accessing the success of the company? (3 pages double spaced APA format)2. An evaluation of the organization to determine if it is achieving each of the CSFs. Analyze each CSF and use data from the measures indicated in the balanced scorecard as support for the conclusions. (3 pages double spaced APA format)

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Prostatistician You Helped Me Solve An Exercice With State On October 29 2016

Hi ProStatistician, you helped me solve an exercice with state on October 29, 2016. If you have time, I would like to ask you some explanations. For the questions 8- Add YPC to the model you’ve selected in task 7 and re-run it.  and 9-Re-run the model in task 8 by including the supply-side measures as additional explanatory variables, since the ask me to select the model in task, should we still use the command “no constant” for these questions? Could you very that for me please? Thanks in advance.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Professor

Hi, Professor. Could you please tell me how to correctly finish such statistics (whole process)

Thank you very much!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Hi Professor Nov 20 2010 Please Read Instructions Carefully Writing Assignment P

Hi Professor! The following assignment DUE DATE: NOV 20/2010Please read instructions carefully! Writing Assignment: Prepare a report (3 pages long) on the topic of: How the Sabarnes-Oxley Act relates to Internal Control? Please include an INTRODUCTION (Abstract), CONCLUSION, and a REFERENCES PAGE (Minimum of 3 sources). DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA as a research source.Citations must be in Apa format. (do not worry about APA format)Use plain English. PLAGIARISM IS NOT ACCEPTED. Check your papers to correct and avoid plagiarism at: www.grammarly.com/plagiarism_checks You can look for this website at GOOGLE if can’t get access directly.

How the Sarbanes-Oxley Act relates to Internal Control? Introduction:After the Enron debacle in the year 2001 which was followed by many corporatefrauds like WorldCom, Anderson, Global Crossing,…

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW