Hi, need to submit a 250 words paper on the topic Question 1 of 1: Attitudes Introduction: The attitudes you espouse may change in a few years due to the influence of peers, education, the passage of time, insight, and other factors. Choose a topic on which you are most likely to have a viewpoint, s. Attitudes Introduction I grew up in a highly conservative family that valued the sanctity of marriage in relation to religious beliefs. Although I grew up with happily married parents, I could never say the same for my cousins who came from divorced families or single parent homes. As a young person, I was taught by my parents to shun my elders who divorced or chose to “live in sin” by simply moving in together. This was a way of thinking that was further reinforced when I started attending a religious private school for my early and high school education.

The school further made the thought of living in without marriage seem morally wrong because of the religious connotation of marriage and its supposed relevance in the history of man. Needless to say, this was something that I strongly believed in and espoused because I knew nothing else and had not had a chance to actually mingle with anyone who was actually not married but living the life of a married couple anyway.

However, I got the exposure to such a lifestyle when I went off to college. I had classmates who were living with their boyfriends and girlfriends off campus in order to save on expenses, aside from the fact that they truly loved and were committed to each other. Commitment, that was the turning point for me. It was that solitary word that helped me realize that moving in together was not something bad. Rather, it was something good because it signified a commitment to each other and the relationship that was entered into. That was something that no priest or licensed government officer can forced unto a couple. Looking around me, I saw that the longest relationships, both in my family and out that I knew about, where actually those couples who were not married. This was positively reinforced in my adult thoughts by the likes of Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russel, Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie, and other Hollywood live in couples. Then in my family, I had 4 happily together couples who were living together. So guess what, I no longer think that living in is such a bad thing. In fact, I would strongly suggest it to anybody who values a committed relationship more than any religious hullabaloo being fed to us by the church. Marriage is outmoded and that, is my personal attitude on the marriage.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, need to submit a 2500 words essay on the topic Air pollution.

Download file to see previous pages…

From this research it is clear that air pollution has become a major environmental health problem affecting both developed and developing countries throughout the world. The consequence has been that air pollution is causing human health problems as well as damage to vegetation, crops, wildlife, materials, buildings and even the climate. In the U.S., the largest sources of air pollution, in order of importance, are: 1) transportation, mainly automobiles and trucks. 2) electric power plants that bum coal or oil. and 3) industry, for which the major sources include steel mills, metal smelters, oil refineries, and paper mills. The most common air pollution problem resulting from these emission sources is ground-level ozone (O3), According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), non-attainment of EPA requirements for O3 is the most common air pollution problem facing large cities in the U.S. It is estimated that, 160 million people in the U.S. lived in areas that are in non-attainment of healthful O3 levels (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. In the past, efforts to reduce air pollution have consisted primarily of “command and control” programs that involve enforcement of government regulations designed to reduce toxic emissions. Such programs have proven highly effective in reducing industrial, point source pollution and causing auto manufacturers to produce cleaner burning automobiles….

The stratospheric level of the earth’s atmosphere lies directly above the troposphere, which extends from sea level to approximately 8-9 miles above the earth’s surface. It is in the troposphere that nearly all forms of life on earth reside. Within the stratosphere lies a highly concentrated level of ozone, commonly referred to as the ozone layer. The highest concentrations of O3 within the stratosphere occur between 11-15 miles above the earth’s surface. This stratospheric ozone layer is essential to the maintenance of life on earth, protecting the earth’s inhabitants from the sun’s harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation (Buchholz 1). Thus, free of human interference, the stratospheric ozone layer is continually maintaining a dynamic equilibrium between ozone production and ozone destruction that maintains the earth’s protective ozone layer. While O3 also occurs naturally in very small amounts at ground level in the troposphere, in urban areas throughout the U.S., tropospheric O3 levels are rising to unhealthful levels (Buchholz 1). In affected urban areas, O3 air pollution reaches its highest level between the months of May and September when temperatures are high and sunlight abundant. O3 forms at ground level when volatile organic compounds (VOC’s) combine with nitrogen dioxides (NOx) in the presence of heat and light (Buchholz 1). NOx is formed via the burning of fossil fuels at high temperatures, and is the primary precursor to O3, NOx and VOC’s, are emitted into the air by motor vehicles, electrical power plants and other industrial plants. Because the O3 molecule is highly reactive, it acts as a powerful oxidant.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, need to submit a 2500 words essay on the topic 6.The act of voting out of a sense of duty is not a utility maximising act (Stephen Parsons 2006: 295). Do you agree with Parsons.

ational and utility maximising choices made by the prospective voters, and if the costs outweigh the benefits, it is considered rational ignorance (Rowley and Schneider, 2008, p. 121). On the other hand, they might decide not to take part in an election because the costs outweigh the benefits, in what can be considered rational abstention (Cooter, 2000, p. 22). Other problems may develop from the voting itself, where, for instance, the median voter decides the result in majority-rule elections, and this creates a situation where the preferences of other voters are ignored. In this case, a voting paradox develops, since when three or more people vote, a consistent ranking of their preferences cannot be achieved. Based on rational choice theory, therefore, voting is considered an irrational act, since the possibility of a single vote affecting an election is negligible, but voting still incurs costs and people continue to vote. Keith Dowding attempted to solve this paradox by making modifications to the rational choice framework, arguing that people vote based on a sense of duty. The modification reserves the notion that people achieve utility maximisation. Stephen Parsons (in the paper quoted above in the question) does not agree with this claim, and is of the opinion that, in order to have any explanatory backing, “duty must be modelled as a modified lexicographic preference” (Parsons, 2006, p. 295). Therefore, I agree with Parsons since, these preferences are proscribed by the continuity axiom that is needed so that a preference ordering can be represented by a function of utility which supports the statement, “The act of voting out of a sense of duty is not a utility maximizing act” (2006, p. 295).

Maximising utility is an economic concept, denoting that, when deciding what to buy, a consumer tries to attain the biggest possible value while spending the smallest amount. In this case, the goal of the consumer is maximisation of the total value that can be

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, need to submit a 250 words paper on the topic Theories behind the Construction of the Giza Pyramid. &nbsp.A spiral ramp constructed internally was twisted inside the outer edge f the core masonry. In stage two, a Grand Gallery design used in controlling the mechanisms helped in moving the heavy blocks of granite blocks (Gary & Talcott, 2006). These blocks were placed into the ceiling. Stage three involved the removal of the blocks on the outside ramp one by one through the internal spiral ramp and using them to construct the top two-thirds of the pyramid. The monument grew skywards while the internal spiral ramp also lengthened to the apex. When it was completed the outer straight ramp dismantled, and the inner one was sealed.

Another theory is the limestone concrete hypothesis by material scientist. Joseph Davidovits that stipulates that the pyramid blocks are not carved stones (Davidovits & Margie, 1988). It proposes that soft limestone of high kaolinite content the in Wadi, south of Giza Plateau was quarried. The Nile fed pools were used to dissolve the limestone till it became watery slurry, then left to evaporate. The resultant wet concrete was taken to the construction site and packed into reusable blocks. New blocks are cast on top of the old blocks and pressed.

From the theories above, I support the limestone hypothesis because it utilizes natural resources like limestone and the Nile River. It was discovered that mineral compounds and air bubbles in samples of the limestone pyramid blocks do not occur in natural limestone. This supports the kaolinite limestone theory.

&nbsp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, need to submit a 250 words paper on the topic The Parole Board. Victim Impact Statement would be better than the parole because it gives the opportunity for the victim and family to participate in the criminal justice process. This is the reason the victim impact statements refers to printed or verbal information concerning the results of a transgression on the casualty and relatives. These statements are popular greatly appreciated because they give the court an opportunity to continually focus its attention on the individual life cost of the crime.

The court has the power to ensure that the statement is unlimited afar from the straight casualty to murder survivors, the parents, or guardians of a lesser victim. In addition, it is better than the parole because statements are allowed at the sentencing hearing. During reporting, the victim impact statements are to be incorporated in the pre-sentence report. Although the statements should be either written or oral, there is room for videotape, audiotape, or any other electronic device. This gives great opportunities for the victim to provide information to the court.

The board confirms the rehabilitative progress and guarantees the offender freedom if they have passed all the tests.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"