Hi, I need help with essay on Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure, A Play Misunderstood. Persuasive. Paper must be at least 1750 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

Download file to see previous pages…

First, the Duke decides to hide under a friar’s identity and resolves several issues after disclosing his true identity. Second, the Duke plans two situations that entail mistaken identity — Mariana pretending to be Isabella, and a pirate’s head instead of Claudio’s. The Duke creates intrigue unraveled towards the end of the play. The Duke, under disguise, plays the role of a master manipulator despite the fact that he appoints Lord Angelo to take his place during his absence. Compared to other Shakespeare lead characters, the Duke proves himself to be smart enough not to be outwitted by the other characters. He mainly uses Lord Angelo to fill in for his failure to maintain order in his jurisdiction. Due to this, despite Lord Angelo’s defects, the Duke pardons him in the end (Levin 21-3). Aside from the genre, there are other aspects of the play that can easily earn questions particularly from modern readers. For one, discussions on each character’s beliefs on morality, sexual relationships, justice, or freedom are not thorough (Watson 242). One particularly fascinating fact is the lack of exploration on the fact whether Isabella should commit a moral crime to save her brother’s life. Isabella thinks it is not right to do so. Her brother thinks it is fine and asks her to save his life. The Duke disregards the two choices and proceeds on giving Isabella a new plan. This gives the story a chance to prove that the Duke is again wise and correct in being suspicious of Angelo’s proposal to Isabella. Due to this, Isabella comes out without sin, and although people may think of her as cold-hearted because she does not save her brother, they would eventually realize that if Isabella exerted efforts, they would still be futile and she would have sinned for nothing (Levin 25-6). Another aspect is the bed trick, which appears to be a foolish ploy planned by a supposedly wise Duke (Desens 11). People today clamor for realistic plots — the more true-to-life, the better. This mindset alone can put this scene under scrutiny that could add to the many questions thrown at the play due to misunderstanding. This paper aims to some issues that will help even the ordinary reader understand one of Shakespeare’s masterpieces, and how each of these issues is necessary to make the other issues emerge, thus lead the play towards its happy ending. Comedy or Tragedy As stated above, despite being generally classified as comedy, several critics consider “Measure for Measure” as allegory, satire, tragicomedy, and even tragedy (Clark 21). It seems that not only the characters’ hidden identities are confusing in the play, but its form as well. Some scholars point out that the play is comedy merely due to its forced happy ending, however, the actions, characters, and even the themes are tragic (Levin 37). This is proven by the fact that if not for the Duke’s manipulations, there would be no happy ending in the play. Even the play’s poetic lines that discusses the humans’ fleeting stay on earth and the fear of death’s mystery indicates style commonly used in tragedy (Hadfield 71). To better understand this, one has to look at how the play relates to Shakespeare’s life. At the time the play is written, Shakespeare is said to be going through a tragic streak. It is said that this very streak causes him to author several other tragedies like Macbeth, King Lear, Othello, and Hamlet. Additionally, it is said that he is going through revulsion to sex at this time.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Shakespeare in love. Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The film revolves around the basic fact that how love changed the life of Shakespeare. once when he was betrayed by his lover and the time, when he was unable to complete his comedy play as the tragedy of Romeo Juliet and at the other time, when Viola de Lesseps brought happiness and inspiration in his life and he completed his project under the influence of love. Love can leave a huge impact on the life of a person. either negatively or positively.

After watching this movie, I felt that William Shakespeare, the greatest writer as known to the entire world, had same emotional feelings like any of us. He was no different from a common man. Love was the greatest inspiration in his life which made him a successful man and an emotional playwright.

During the Elizabethan age, theater and literature rose to a great height. Queen Elizabeth was very much fond of Shakespeare’ plays and supported the theaters. However, during this period women were not allowed to participate in plays and theaters due to societal norms and restrictions. In this movie, Viola de Lesseps went against the rules of society and disguised herself as a man to participate in Shakespeare’s play but the theater had to pay the heavy price for her involvement in the play as soon as the officials came to know about the truth. The movie highlights the era when women were deprived of their rights and involvement in arts and literature much broadly.

After watching the movie, I realized that William Shakespeare had the same feelings like an ordinary man who derived his inspirations from living examples, more particularly, his own ones. Love has played a key role in giving a romantic and emotional touch to his work. In the movie, he has appeared as a sensitive man to whom love meant everything and a divine inspiration which helped him to achieve new heights in the world

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Shakespeare-How would Machiavelli (or a Machiavellian) understand the character of Volumnia in Coriolanus Would he approve or disapprove of her behavior in the play Why. Paper must be at least 1250 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The philosophy of Machiavelli has a great deal to day about deception and its use in politics. He thinks that in order to maintain power rulers have to use deception and force to move everyone in the direction they want. In this essay we will close read the play using Machiavelli and will try to answer the question whether Machiavelli would approve of Volumnia’s behavior in the play or not. This is the question we will attempt to answer.

The play starts in Rome where there are riots going on because Coriolanus, the deputy of commander of the Roman army has hold grains from ordinary citizens. Coriolanus is a man who believes that ordinary people should not be given grain because they are not taking part in the military service. He is a great fighter but he has contempt for the common people. His attitude towards common people is that of an arrogant soldier.

The character of Volumnia now plays an active role to make her son consul. She persuades Coriolanus to run for consul even though her son is not willing to do so. But when he couldn’t win the support of the commoners he became angry and talks badly about the plebeians. He is in turn condemned as a traitor and banished from Rome. After his exile he goes to his fierce enemy Aufidius, the commander of the Volscian army. They accept him and allow Coriolanus to lead an attack on Rome. All generals of Rome become worried and try to persuade him not to attack Rome. After all efforts are gone in vain Volumnia is sent to dissuade her son from attacking Rome. She is successful and Coriolanus spares Rome but later is killed by Aufidius for conspiracy.

Volumnia is an important character of the play. She plays a great role in changing the mind of her son twice in the play and both times the outcome is in her benefit. She portrays role of a women who cannot seek power personally but tries to attain power by making her son powerful. She tried to gain power and popularity through her son Coriolanus

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Sexual selection. Paper must be at least 1000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

highest number of young ones to inherit their superiority while those that protect or nourish their young and will leave their young ones to inherit weak powers (Darwin 1882, p209).

The males’ modifications are generally more than the female. The male is more modified and the female almost retains a close similarity to the young of her species and the other adult members of similar group. The male is usually more eager than the female and in most cases it is the male that pursues the female and displays plumage characteristics (Darwin 1882, p221).

The male’s great vigour during the love season tends to frequently intensify the individual’s colours that are entirely different from those of the female (Darwin 1882, p224). For example, most of the birds that inhabit the northern and the southern United States, the bird specimens that come from the south are dark in colour in comparison to the ones from the north. This is attributed to the direct differences in the light, temperature and other factors of the two geographical regions. The males of Ageloeus phoeniceus have their colours more intensified while in the south and the females of Cardinalis virginianus are the ones affected. In the species of Quiscalus major, the colour of the male remains uniform while the female have variations in the tint (Darwin 1882, p225).

There are isolated cases where the females have pronounced sexual characters such as great size, brighter colours, pugnacity and strength. In the birds, there can be a complete transposition of the normal characters that are proper to each of the sex. In such a case, the females become more fervent in courtship and the males remain passive. Although the males are passive, they perform the role of selecting the most attractive females. There are certain hen birds that are highly ornamented and more pugnacious and powerful than the cocks. these types of characters are transmitted to the female progeny alone (Darwin 1882, p225).

Double process

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Sex offenders in Australia. Paper must be at least 1750 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

Download file to see previous pages…

It is thus reasonable to expect society to consider and undertake all possible viable solutions against sex offenses. In the United States, the passage of Megan’s Law has is widely known for making legal the naming of sex offenders after they have been released from prison, as a means by which the community they are reintegrated in are made aware of the risks. In our country, Australia, there is the Australian National Child Offender Register (ANCOR) targeting sex offenders of minor children, and monitoring them for a certain duration of time. However, this is altogether different from the “naming and shaming” of these individuals, which Australia has still not allowed. The issue of the naming of sex offenders has hit the headlines in recent months, with Melboune broadcaster Derryn Hinch lost his court battled against suppression orders to protect child abusters. Victoria’s Sex Abusers Monitoring Act, he said, was unconstitutional for not explicitly stating that court proceedings must be held publicly. He also said that suppression orders are unconstitutional. Deciding against him, the courts held that suppression orders are unconstitutional and he was guilty of contempt for divulging the names of the sex offenders. And yet, there is growing public support around the idea of naming and shaming, such support built upon populist sentiments condemning sexual offenses, demonizing sezual offenders and rousing fears that communities will not be safe in the presence of these sex offenders. In my paper, I will use two criminological theories to examine and critique this notion of naming of sex offenders. These are the conflict theory of criminology and the classical theory of criminology. A. Conflict Theory In order to discuss Conflict theory, it is incumbent to compare it with the consensus theory. The sociological theories that underpin our understanding of crime and punishment, as well as the justice system have long been the subject of debate by opposing ideological camps. The divergent approaches of “consensus” and “conflict” and what approach is the most appropriate lens with which to understand crimes remains to be discussed today, with the debates evolving to meet more modern and complex contemporary problems. It is imperative to begin by defining the concepts. Reid (119) defined the consensus approach as one that “views the emerging norms and laws of society as representative of the common feeling about what is right and proper. that is, they represent a consensus of views—a mechanism for maintaining social order.” It looks at society as a homogenous whole, without factions or frictions, and making a collective determination on what is right and what is wrong. For example, taking a very recent incident, the harsh punishments meted against the London street rioters might be deemed appropriate among proponents of the consensus theorists: indeed, the destruction of private property and petty larceny go against collective values and the State must bear down heavily upon those who seek to trample those values. In contrast, the proponents of the conflict theory look at society not as a homogenous whole, but as one wracked by class fault lines.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"