Week 3 Discussion Comment

Comment using your own words but please provide at least one reference for each comment.

Do a half page for discussion #1 and another half page for discussion #2 for a total of one page.

Provide the comment for each discussion separate.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Project 19405195

 

Professional Practice Paper

Based on the AP role of the person that you interviewed in W1 Project, in a 3- to 5-page paper (excluding the title page, references, and appendices) describe the role, the type of organization, and address all the interview questions, and include:

  • List the type of organization. For example: Primary care office, ED, Specialty, cardiology GI etc.
  • List the type of and how many clients it serves. FP would see all ages. Research in your area the number of visits in a local office per year or # of visits seen local ED, specialty office etc. 
  • the professional fit for advanced nursing role. “Fit” refers to the Qualifications in order to be an AP provider at that agency/organization. What license, credentialing (accrediting agency, and other expectations NPI, CMS)?
  • Include a brief job description
  • Discuss board of nursing NPA or scope of practice of the state. Include what the NPA in the state allows and restrictions.

QUESTIONS FROM WEEK 1 PROJECT 

  

1. What is the difference between the role you play, and the role played by other nurses? 

2. How long have you served a family nurse practitioner and what position were you serving before? 

3. What is the major challenge faced when serving as a family nurse practitioner? 

4. In which ways do you participate in the patient’s experience? 

5. How do you handle a situation when a patient request for a certain type of medication such as antibiotics which you feel is not necessary? 

6. In your line of duty, have you ever experienced a situation or an action happening which was unethical? 

7. What was the situation and what response did you offer as a solution? 

8. In a situation where one of your patients is not giving a positive response to the medication you have administered and request for more that the set amount, what do you do to solve this? 

9. Is there any one given time when you went far above in providing patient care which was exceptional? Explain the scenario and the result?

10.  Is there any time in your life when you and the physician disagreed on how to diagnose or treat a given patient? How did you deal with this situation?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Discussion Advance Practice

Apply information from the Aquifer Case Study to answer the following discussion questions:

  • Discuss the Mr. Rodriquez’s history that would be pertinent to his gastrointestinal problem. Include chief complaint, HPI, Social, Family and Past medical history that would be important to know.
  • Describe the physical exam and diagnostic tools to be used for Mr. Rodriguez. Are there any additional you would have liked to be included that were not? 
  • Please list 3 differential diagnoses for Mr. Rodriguez and explain why you chose them.  What was your final diagnosis and how did you make the determination?
  • What plan of care will Mr. Rodriquez be given at this visit, include drug therapy and treatments; what is the patient education and follow-up?

Do 2 pages

Provide references.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Project 19234383

Instructions    

Research Proposal Draft  

By the due date assigned write a 2 page paper addressing the sections below of the research proposal.  

Introduction 

•Background and Significance of the Problem 

•Statement of the Problem and Purpose of the Study  

Research Questions, Hypothesis, and Variables with Operational Definitions 

•Research Question 

•Hypothesis: Research and Null 

•Identifying and Defining Study Variables 

•Operationalize Variables

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Discussion 2 19488099

The following questions refer to your experience in this week’s exercise as a Case Manager, Conducting Moral and Ethical Dialog in Clinical Practice.  Describe your overall experience with the moral and ethical dialog exercise, and address at least three (3) of the following:

  • Did you find any of the scenarios more difficult to deal with than others?  
     
  • Did you feel any internal conflict with any of the scenarios?  
     
  • How did your personal and professional background impact how you decided to interact with the patient?  
     
  • Do you feel the responses the patient gave to the practitioner’s response were reasonable or typical?  
     
  • Were you taken aback by any of the patient reactions?  
     
  • How might this activity contribute to your role as a nurse advocate in a moral and ethical practice?  
     
  • Did you utilize an ethical decision making model to explore a systematic way to evaluate any of these ethical dilemmas? If so, describe the effectiveness.  
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Project 19201723

This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governor’s office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation.  The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations. (See Rubric)

State of Florida

One Page

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Discussion 19461351

Week 3 discussion.

Tasks: Respond to the following two questions with two pages answer for each one. Separate responses from each question.

Q1. Choose a theory that finds practical application in critical care/pediatric/psychiatric nursing and discuss the origins of the theory based on the following criteria:

· How did the happenings of the nursing profession impact the origin of this theory?

· What values, evidence, or existing knowledge did the theorist cite to support the theory?

· What was the theorist’s motivation behind writing the theory? 

Q2. Compare the nursing philosophy of Benner and Henderson on the basis of the following criteria.

· Main ideas of the theory

· Main concepts

· Relationships between concepts

· How different concepts affect each other.

Cite an example or case study from your field where both these philosophies find practical utility. 

Directions:

Guidelines: Support your responses with scholarly academic references using APA style format. Assigned course readings and online library resources are preferred. Weekly lecture notes are designed as overviews to the topic for the respective week and should not serve as a citation or reference. In your discussion question response, provide a substantive response that illustrates a well-reasoned and thoughtful response; it is factually correct with relevant scholarly citations, references, and examples that demonstrate a clear connection to the readings. 

Course resources.

Nursing Theory Sources

Ideas, questions, and phenomena within the domain of nursing are the sources of ideas for theory development.

Past

Initially, nursing was almost completely dependent on other disciplines for sources of theoretical content to provide the underpinnings of nursing practice. This allowed other disciplines, particularly medicine, to dictate the problems of nursing instead of allowing nursing to generate its questions. In the early days of nursing education, theoretical content was derived from the domain of medicine, as the medical paradigm was far more powerful and better developed. Thus, medicine-controlled nursing theory and, as a result, the domain of its knowledge. At the same time, nursing practice was also taking the first tentative steps toward becoming a source of theory. The patient, as the recipient of care and actual nursing acts, formed the focus of early theory development, and this change in focus reflects the initial efforts to differentiate nursing and medicine. Consequently, nurses’ experience became a major source of theory because nursing care knowledge was based on personal experiences, transmitted through apprenticeship, teaching, and texts.

Present

In recent times, the nursing theory has originated from:

Role Proliferation: Conceptualization of nursing as a set of functions became the focus of the investigation, with theory evolving on how to prepare nurses for various roles.

· Basic Sciences: PhD education of nurses in sociology, psychology, anthropology, and physiology introduced ideas from other disciplines and stimulated new ways of looking at nursing phenomena.

· Nursing Process: Examination of processes in nurse-patient relationships and patient care triggered ideas and questions related to problem-solving, priority setting, and decision making.

· Nursing Diagnosis: Labels were given to, and a universal nomenclature was developed for problems that fall within the domain of nursing. These are actually conceptual statements about the health status of patients and, therefore, the first step in theory development.

· Concept Identification: Theory development encouraged the identification of concepts central to nursing. Identification of relationships between concepts (propositions) defined a new nursing perspective.

Nursing Philosophies:

The identification of nursing theory sources that are compatible with nursing work and accommodate the nursing perspective paved the way for the emergence of nursing philosophies. Nursing philosophy consists of assumptions and beliefs that guide the framework of nursing practice. This philosophy encompasses societal and individual human experiences (Salsberry, 1994)1, and addresses two central areas of commonality: the nature of human beings and the focus of nursing. Inherent fundamental assumptions provide the foundation of nursing philosophy. These philosophies help nurses to identify the focus of nursing as something quite different from that of the biomedical sciences. Nursing philosophies also initiate reflective practice and encourage nursing professionals—from the novice to the expert—to explore their values regarding health, nursing, and interaction with clients. Though there are numerous philosophies and conceptualizations which have been developed over the past few decades, in this course, we’ll be focusing on only a select few who have guided nursing endeavors.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Project 19112057

 This written assignment requires the student to investigate his/her local, state and federal legislators and explore their assigned committees and legislative commitments. The student is expected to investigate current and actual legislative initiatives that have either passed or pending approval by the house, senate or Governor’s office. The student will draft a letter to a specific legislator and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation.  The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence based primary citations. (See Rubric)   

Based upon the research week one and two, you will draft a pretend letter to a specific legislator on legislation being considered, passed, or tabled and offer support or constructive argument against pending policy or legislation.  The letter must be supported with a minimum of 3 evidence-based primary citations and written in business letter format.

Do not start the letter with your name since you will be signing your name at the end. Identify the issue and why you support or do not support the issue. Thank you legislator for his/her support of your position. Closing salutation and then your name. Use business letter format. Do not mail this letter. It is a scholarly exercise only. 

Submission Details:

  • Support your responses with examples.
  • Cite any sources in APA format.
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Picot Statement Paper

 

Formulate a PICOT statement for your capstone project.

A PICOT starts with a designated patient population in a particular   clinical area and identifies clinical problems or issues that arise   from clinical care. The intervention should be an independent,   specified nursing change intervention. The intervention cannot require   a provider prescription. Include a comparison to a patient population   not currently receiving the intervention, and specify the timeframe   needed to implement the change process.

Formulate a PICOT statement using the PICOT format provided in the   assigned readings. The PICOT statement will provide a framework for   your capstone project.

In a paper of 500-750 words, clearly identify the clinical problem   and how it can result in a positive patient outcome.

Make sure to address the following on the PICOT statement:

  1. Evidence-Based Solution
  2. Nursing Intervention
  3. Patient Care
  4. Health Care Agency
  5. Nursing   Practice

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Rubric:

  

1. Clinical problem/issue is identified based on key concepts that define evidence-based practice or clinical experience. Articles are cited to support the need for change in nursing practice. The identified problem/issue can be resolved, or a patient outcome can show a marked improvement through a nursing intervention. 

2. Clinical problem/issue description includes a developed and thorough explanation of the problem/issue, the setting, the patient population, and the rationale for why it is a problem/issue. The identified clinical problem/issue explains the following elements with detail and clarity: evidence-based solution, nursing intervention, and improved patient care consistent with specific health care agency resulting in nursing practice change. Sound rationale is provided in the discussion of the clinical problem/issue resolution. 

3. PICOT statement clearly focuses on the resolution of a clinical problem/issue and aims at improving patient care through the application of an evidenced-based nursing intervention.

4. Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, and Time are comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details. 

5. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 

6. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

7. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 

8. All format elements are correct.

9. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Personality Disorders

  

Week 3: Personality Disorders

Discussion: Treatment of Personality Disorders – Schizotypal Personality Disorder

Explain the diagnostic criteria for your assigned personality disorder.

Explain the evidenced-based psychotherapy and psychopharmacologic treatment for your assigned personality disorder.

Describe clinical features from a client that led you to believe this client had this disorder. Align the clinical features with the DSM-5 criteria 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW