Submit a 4-page paper, using the Diaz article as well as additional resources about culture, in which you do the following:

• Describe the skills or techniques you used to engage your partner during the CFI.
• Explain which aspects of the CFI were the most helpful in learning about your partner’s personal view of the problem and situation from a cultural perspective.
• Describe the cultural components (e.g., race/ethnicity, religion, geographic region, socio-economic status, etc.) that may influence your partner, and analyze how those cultural components influence their mental health experience.
• Identify which relevant subsections of the CFI you used. Explain why you did (or did not) use a subsection as part of your assessment.
• Analyze how you, as a social work treatment provider, might adjust interventions for the client (your partner), their individualized circumstances, and culture of origin. Be specific and demonstrate critical thought through application of concepts in resources.
• Recommend a specific evidence-based measurement instrument to validate the diagnosis and assess outcomes of treatment. Explain any cultural considerations you made when determining an appropriate instrument, including whether or not the instrument was validated with diverse populations.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Reinforcement Thread Prompt: “Reinforcement is the process in which a behavior is strengthened by the immediate consequence that reliably follows its occurrence” (Miltenberger, 2012, p. 61). Reinforcers can include food, blessings, attention, protection, and many other things. Compare an instance of reinforcement that you find in the Bible with the description of reinforcement in your textbook.

Follow the prompts for each discussion board assignment. Create a 300-500 word thread, fulfilling all the required elements on the grading rubric. Respond to at least two classmates’ threads with a 150-250 word response including a biblical world view in addition to any empirical support desired. When responding to the prompt, be sure to use empirical support such as the textbook and/or a peer reviewed article with APA formatted in-text citations and reference citations after your thread as it calls for within the prompt. Include a quote from the Bible using a relevant verse. As well, be sure to cite not only Book chapter and verse, but with the first Bible quotation, also cite the version of the Bible you used. Include the word count for each post. Follow good grammar in your writing. The discussion board prompt for each assignment will remind you of that module’s deadline for DB submission.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

All posts should be thoughtful and well researched. In other words, you will cite all sources to which you refer in your post according to APA guidelines .

QUESTION 1

Of all the experiments described in De Waal’s chapter 7 (“Time Will Tell”), which one (or ones) do you feel are the most and least convincing in terms of what they are intended to show about animal cognition?

QUESTION 2

Please answer the questions below. Your answers should be given in essay form. There are no specific, quantitative requirements for the length of your responses. Some questions will not require lengthy answers; others will be truly challenging and will require a few hundred words’ worth of writing. The best way of thinking about how you will answer the question sets is to write as if you are trying to convince me that you are an expert on the matter (which, if you take all of this advice seriously, you will be!).

1. How do Cheng’s and Gallistel’s data support the idea that there is a geometric module in the mammalian brain? (20 points)

2. Name and briefly describe the various navigational cues animals use for long-distance navigation. (20 points) **Please note the point value of this question and prepare your answer commensurately!

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

This is book analysis essay on the book “Parallel Worlds” by Michio Kaku

Here are the guidelines:

– 12-point Times New Roman font

– Title page with just the title of your paper in 16-point font bold with your name below in12-point font italics centered in the middle of your page.

-Double-spaced.

-Minimum 1,000 words.

Those are the questions that have to be all answered:

– Who is the author and what is his/her general background? Why might they have written this book?

– An explanation of the author’s thesis: What is the focus of this book? What was he trying to say?

– What struck you or stood out in this book and why? Be as reflective and thoughtful as you can. This is the soul of the paper. (Focus on this question)

– How does this book change/challenge the way you look at or think about some previously held belief about the world? If it did not change or challenge anything for you, then carefully explain why.

Please make sure to answer each questions thoughtfully and go in depth at analyzing the book. I will be mostly graded on the depth of my paper and my answers and the sincerity with which you reflect upon it.

This paper is for a physics class so I would like you to please mention some college level physics but not extremely complex ideas.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"