This is revision work. 

Revision Comments:

“1) Meet the word count within the sections: 

i) Introduction – 700 (currently delete approx 600 w without losing the main idea). ii) Literature Review – 3100 w (add 800 w)

iii) Methodology 1600 

iv) Results 1600 

v) Discussion 5300 

vi) conclusion 700. 

[Please ensure that you meet the word count but also, do not exceed the word count]. 

2) In literature review, besides your content also add the points required by the client:

 i. Effectiveness of PrEP; 

ii. Obstacles to uptake and adherence to PrEP

iii. Benefits of PrEP

iv. The effectiveness of PrEP in preventing HIV infection – with referencing to the authors (Cohen; Galea; Golub; Marcus). 

3) Finish QUALITY ASSESSMENT; DATA ABSTRACTION; and DATA ANALYSIS. 

4) There should be sufficient amount of reading used with utilizing c’s articles from the “BABA” file [Please strictly follow all the instructions given in the BABA file attached].

5) Harvard referencing required exact page indication – revise in-text citations accordingly. No comma between Author(s) and page is required. (Surname, Surname and Surname 11, 2012) 

6)It seems that you have not seen the feedback from the client regarding the content in the messaging system because you did not do what was required for the Methodology section. 7)Please, use these as the paper’s Research Objectives: 

i. To determine the efficacy of PrEP in the transmissions of HIV virus among the heterosexual sero-discordant sexual couples. 

ii. To measure gender differences in the uptake of Prep. 

iii. To measure the safety of PrEP. 

8. Please use this as the paper’s Research Question:

i. Is the usage of PrEP effective in reducing HIV transmission amongst individuals of different gender

9) The methodology written is too narrative. Please revise it and follow steps outlined in the attached document [BABA file].

10)There is no explicit inclusion or exclusion criteria, no evidence table showing quality assessment or data abstraction. Add a table showing this evidence and also include an explicit inclusion/exclusion criteria. Please. 

11) Add an automated Table of Contents [and also a List of Tables/Figures if need be].

12) Please use this as the aim of the study:

i. The study’s aims to examine the means through which PrEP is used to reduce the transmission of HIV virus among sero-discordant heterosexual couples   

13) It was noted that the methods of statistical analysis were not highlighted. Please ensure that you highlight them very clearly so I can see easily

14) It was also noted that that the majority of the papers used were on MSM can you source heterosexual related papers? 

15) Please delete the following queries/research objectives (if they still appear in the paper). Just use the ones above: 

i.  Is the use of PrEP harmless in humans? 

ii.  Does the gender difference affect the outcome of the prep application? 

iii. Are the approaches presently employed for PrEP utilization safe to humans? alongside the specific objective section. 

[I would appreciate if the draft is amended throughout to reflect this].

16) Lastly, proofread the paper very carefully removing any grammatical errors as well as plagiarism (Check the file titled ‘Originality Report 3’ and revise the highlighted red areas to remove the marked plagiarism).

Please follow all these instructions and do a good job at it. Thank you in advance.  

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Let’s use the keywords you brainstormed in the MIND MAP in the module to conduct three separate searches in the Opposing Viewpoints or Academic Search Ultimate or other similar database. When conducting these searches, pay close attention to what types of sources pop up. Are they written by professionals or academics in the field? Are they articles from one of the 24-hour news networks? What formats appear (article, journal, essay, news story, video, podcast, etc.)? How old are the sources? Why does the age of different sources matter?

Take brief notes on what you see, and experiment with your keywords to broaden or narrow your search when appropriate. Jot down the titles and authors of a couple of sources from your search.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Persuasive Esay Topic: Physician Assisted-Suicide

After you find a credible source that can be used for your persuasive essay, identify it. Then, explain how the source fared with the C.R.A.A.P test by answering the following questions in one fully developed paragraph:

1. What were the total points the source earned on the test?
2. Where did it earn the most points? How did it earn these points?
3. Where did it earn the least points? Why did it lose points here?
4. How will this source help support the main argument (or counterargument) of your essay?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

 Imagine you are working at a doctor’s office. You are approached by the office manager, who asks you to develop an effective way of storing patient information.

Write a 350- to 700-word summary to your office manager informing her of the advantages of using electronic health records (EHRs) to store patient information. Be clear and concise, use complete sentences, and use examples to support your responses.

Include the following in your response:

• Discuss the functions and advantages of using EHRs.
• Discuss three to four forms used to keep patient information in EHRs.
  • What is the purpose of each form?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"