Critical Thinking Stroke

 Write a 250 word (double spaced) paper on strokes only.

 Include the following topic heading:

  • Epidemiology 
  • Etiology
  • Pathology
  • Symptoms
  • Treatment

APA FORMAT

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critical Thinkingresearch Critique Final

Fill the M5 table:

 This week, for your Module 5 FINAL Critical Thinking/Research Critique Assignment, you will must  complete answers on the final Module 5 section by merging all of your final revisions for a complete paper WITHOUT the REFERENCE LIST.  The Reference List will be submitted as a separate Assignment (See Module 5 Reference List Assignment).  

DUE DATE:  BEFORE 8am on Friday, of Module 5.  this FINAL assignment submission is a Safe Assign Assignment, that will report your FINAL Similarity Index score.  Please read ALL of the following assignment directions BEFORE completing and submitting your FINAL Module 5 Critical Thinking AssignmentWITHOUT your Reference List. The References will be submitted to a separate dropbox and do not submit your list to SafeAssign. his FINAL score that must meet the course requirement of 45 % or less.  

 

Important information to help you with the Module 5 Critical Thinking Assignment: in preparing your final paper, please note each of the following points:

 

  • The M5 Answer Sheet has the questions, page numbers, directions removed to allow for lower originality scores when your final paper is submitted. Only use the provided worksheet for your final submission. 
  • -Answers to ALL previous worksheet questions for ALL previous sections of the Critical Thinking Assignment must be included in the final paper (See note below for exception).
  • -Questions 4b and 6c have a N/A designation. For these 2 questions only, you will NOT resubmit correct answers on the Module 5 papers.  Students will NOT be penalized for missing answers for these 2 questions only.
  • -Do NOT include the “stems” for the questions.
  • Previously accepted answers may need to be expanded or improved to reflect the additional knowledge you gained over the past few weeks. Each group/team is responsible to correct and refine their answers, applying information from:
  • -the selected research article,
  • -course content, readings, and presentations for ALL course modules,
  • -the standard research review criteria.
  • -guidance and feedback from course instructors
  • APA expectations/deductions will apply to the Final Module 5 Critical thinking paper and Reference List.
  • Before making your final revisions and BEFORE submitting your final paper, obtain a DRAFT “originality score and report
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critical Thinkingresearch Critique Part 3

 

Hi,

I need the attached table to be filled out based on the article i provided. PLEASE answer all questions very carefully, be concise and make sure your answer perfectly cover the question. instruction is in the attached table, this assignment is really important and has lots of points, please make sure you can handle it well, before accepting the deal.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critical Thinkingresearch Critique

Hi,

I need the attached table to be filled out based on the article i provided. PLEASE answer all questions very carefully, be concise and make sure your answer perfectly cover the question. I had problem to attach article, if you copy and paste the link below in google, you will be able to to see the article, instruction is in the attached table, this assignment is really important and has lots of points, please make sure you can handle it well, before accepting the deal.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tpGg5VUQEI8zxcAkGUwUGiW4vyng1RwB/view?usp=sharing

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critically Analyse The Human Factors That Influence The Successful Implementation Of Electronic Health Record Systems

Critically analyse the human factors that influence the successful implementation of electronic health record systems

This is a ‘standard’ academic essay which should be based on wide reading. The subheadings will make themselves known as you read.  They are likely to include factors such as 

·  staff acceptance

·  management support

·  leadership

·  selecting ‘champions’ or influential users

Maximum 2,000 words 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Criticl Thinking

defined critical thinking and apply it evidences base practices

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critique 19492563

Instructions:

  1. Write your evaluation in the Word document provided (Critique 1 answer sheet).  You can insert the cursor after each question, and type in your answers.  Use full sentences, with paragraph breaks, to describe each point.  Double space all writing; number pages.
  2. Provide rationales for your decisions (citing sources). For example, if you write that the theory framework is strong, describe how it is strong with at least one citation (Author, year) to a theory book, research book, or article.
  3. List all sources at the end of the answer sheet, following APA format for a reference list.  Remember to cite the article you are evaluating at least once in the text, and put it in the reference list as well.
  4. Remember to type your NAME at the top of the answer sheet to get credit for it!

Critique #1 Content:

Authors, Title, and Abstract

  1. Discuss author(s) qualifications to conduct the study, including educational preparation and clinical experience of author[s].
  2. Discuss the clarity of the article title (type of study, variables, and population stated).
  3. Discuss the quality of the abstract (purpose, design, sample, intervention, and key results presented). (10 pts)

Literature Review/Background

  1. Briefly describe the clinical problem that prompted the study.  This is not the research question, but the clinical issue that needed investigation.
  2. Discuss the data provided for the significance of the clinical problem, and whether or not you believe it is an important problem for nursing science.
  3. Identify the major topics discussed in the background section and evaluate whether there were any missing ideas or topics.
  4. Briefly explain whether the background section included sources current at the time of the study (ie. within 5 years of publication).
  5. Discuss whether the studies were critically evaluated and synthesized to provide a clear summary of the current knowledge about the problem of interest.
  6. Evaluate whether or not the background section provided support for the current research study. In other words, whether a gap(s) in research knowledge was/were clearly described.  (20 pts)

Research Problem, Purpose, Research Questions/Hypotheses

  1. State the study purpose and evaluate whether or not the purpose clearly addresses the gap in nursing knowledge identified in the background section.
  2. If there are research questions and/or hypotheses, list them, and discuss whether they logically follow from the research problem and purpose. If questions/hypotheses were only implied, rather than explicitly stated, describe that. (10 pts)

Theoretical Framework

  1. Describe the theory/framework that supported the study, and list the important concepts in the theory framework. 
  2. Evaluate the clarity of the presentation of the framework. If it was vague or had missing elements, describe those.
  3. Discuss how well the theory’s concepts were linked to the study variables.  (10 pts)

Writing Style & Format

  1. Grammar: full sentences, precision, clarity, spelling, and punctuation.
  2. Use APA format throughout this paper, specifically citations and a reference list. (10 pts)
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critique A Research Article 19231589

  

Critique a Research Article

A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. 

The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:

Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA

Introduction:

· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. 

· Explain what the author initial  objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. 

Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:

· Does the author provide a literature review? 

· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?

· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. 

· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? 

·  How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? 

·  Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. 

·  Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?

·  Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain

Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below

See Rubric Below for assignment

  

Title Page: Title of   article, journal information and your name and date

1 point

Your score

 

Abstract: Brief summary of   article (1-2 paragraphs)

1 points

 

The Problem: (2 or 3   paragraphs)

Is the problem clearly stated?

Is the problem practically important?

What is the purpose of the study?

What is the hypothesis?

Are the key terms defined?

3 points

 

Review of Literature: (1   -2 paragraphs)

Are the cited sources pertinent to the study?

Is the review too broad or too narrow?

Are the references recent?

Is there any evidence of bias?

2 points

 

Design and Procedures:   (3-4 paragraphs)

What research methodology was used?

Was it a replica study or an original study?

What measurement tools were used?

How were the procedures structures?

Was a pilot study conducted?

What are the variables?

How was sampling performed?

3 points

 

Data analysis and   Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs)

2 points

 

How was data analyzed?

Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose?

Were weaknesses and problems discussed?

 

Conclusions and   Implications: (2-3 paragraphs)

3 points

 

Are the conclusions of the study related to the   original purpose?

Were the implications discussed?

Whom the results and conclusions will affect?

What recommendations were made at the conclusion?

What is your overall assessment of the study and   the article?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critique A Research Article 19265549

  

Critique a Research Article

A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. 

The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:

Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA

Introduction:

· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. 

· Explain what the author initial  objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. 

Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:

· Does the author provide a literature review? 

· Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?

· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. 

· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? 

·  How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? 

·  Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. 

·  Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?

·  Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain

Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below

See Rubric Below for assignment

  

Title   Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date

1 point

Your   score

 

Abstract:   Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs)

1 points

 

The   Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs)

Is the problem clearly stated?

Is the problem practically   important?

What is the purpose of the study?

What is the hypothesis?

Are the key terms defined?

3 points

 

Review of   Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs)

Are the cited sources pertinent   to the study?

Is the review too broad or too   narrow?

Are the references recent?

Is there any evidence of bias?

2 points

 

Design   and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs)

What research methodology was   used?

Was it a replica study or an   original study?

What measurement tools were used?

How were the procedures   structures?

Was a pilot study conducted?

What are the variables?

How was sampling performed?

3 points

 

Data   analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs)

2 points

 

How was data analyzed?

Did findings support the   hypothesis and purpose?

Were weaknesses and problems   discussed?

 

Conclusions   and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs)

3 points

 

Are the conclusions of the study   related to the original purpose?

Were the implications discussed?

Whom the results and conclusions   will affect?

What recommendations were made at   the conclusion?

What is your overall assessment   of the study and the article?

 

Total

15 points   

(100%)

 

Grade 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Critique A Research Article 19479277

 The assignment must be a minimum of five pages, excluding title page and references.  

 Title page -Give the name of the article, the author’s name(s)  Following APA. 

  

Introduction:

· Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. 

· Explain the author’s initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such a conclusion. 

Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:

· Does the author provide a literature review? 

· Is the research current and relevant to today’s existing health issues?

· Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi-experimental, etc. 

· Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? 

·  How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? 

·  Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. 

·  Is the writing in the article clear straightforward?

·  Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain

Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW