Assignment Instructions:   reflect on what you learned from the NIH materials about protecting the rights of human research participants. 

Discuss at least three of the following in your paper: 

•Describe the circumstances that influenced the need for a policy to protect human research subjects. Give examples of specific ways human research subjects can be harmed by researchers. 

•Identify three vulnerable populations and the special restrictions associated with human research among these groups. Evaluate the requirements and restrictions. Do you think they are adequate? Why or why not? 

•The Belmont Report summarizes the ethical principles and guidelines for research involving human subjects. Three core principles are identified: respect for persons, beneficence, and justice. Even though these principles are considered equal, prioritize them in order of importance to you. Explain your decisions. 

•Although you are not implementing a change project at this time, and you may not be directly involved in research as part of your professional responsibilities, explain the reasons why it is important for you to know about these rights and protections.  Your reflective paper should be two pages and written in current APA Style.

LINKS YOU MIGHT NEED FOR THIS ASSIMENT:

https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2017/01/19/2017-01058/federal-policy-for-the-protection-of-human-subjects

https://grants.nih.gov/policy/hs/faqs.htm

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

  

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to continue work on a previously identified area or phenomenon of interest related to their MSN specialty track. Week Two’s assignment builds upon the identified area of interest by developing an overview of the evidence-based practice (EBP) project and the PCIOT/PICo question.  This assignment initiates the evidence-based practice proposal that is continued throughout the entire course with each assignment adding components of the research process. 

My topic is CAUTI. Must use QUANTITATIVE APPROACH. MUST USE AND FIX MY PICOT QUESTION. MUST USE THE INFORMATION FROM MY POST ON THE PAPER. MAKE CORRECTIONS AS NEEDED. 

FOLLOW RUBRIC AS IS. MINUMUM 6 SCHOLAR PAPERS WITHIN 5 YEARS AT LEAST. USE EASY LANGUAGE DON’T GO TOO FANCY. 

TWO FILES ONE IS THE RUBRIC FOR THIS PAPER AND OTHER IS CONTENT OF MY POST THAT MUST BE INCLUDED.  

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

 

Reflect on the analysis of the sin of suicide and, thus, euthanasia from the topic readings. Do you agree? Why or why not? Refer to the lecture and topic readings in your response

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Complete this week’s assigned readings, chapters 7,8,9. After completing the readings, post a short reflection, approximately 2 paragraph in length, discussing your thoughts and opinions about one or several of the specific topics covered in the textbook readings.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

 Please guide by the questions down below. writing needs to cover all 5 questions. do not skip questions. 

Write a 300 word message in which you:
1.Reflect upon what you have learned about evidence-based practice during the past eight weeks. 

2.Describe how your understanding has changed. 

3.Comment on how the literature search process that you have used in this course differs from the rules for systematic reviews. 

4.Locate one systematic review or clinical guideline using the  AHRQ  website https://www.guideline.gov/

5.Identify the guideline’s purpose.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"