Instructor’s Comment
I think you might have misunderstood the assignment. None of the theories from class were used to analyze the case study. As it is, I cannot award many points. Can you please redo this with the 5 theories from the lecture included?
I have uploaded assignment named Reflection.
Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:
- What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
- Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
- How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
- What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Rubric
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the connection between them. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 30%
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples. 15%
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 15%
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful. 10%
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Here is a link to the Khan video on Moral Status. It will help explain the five theories discussed in the lecture:
https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi/wiphi-value-theory/wiphi-ethics/v/moral-status
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Recommending An Evidence Based Practice Change 19490127
/in Uncategorized /by developerThe collection of evidence is an activity that occurs with an endgame in mind. For example, law enforcement professionals collect evidence to support a decision to charge those accused of criminal activity. Similarly, evidence-based healthcare practitioners collect evidence to support decisions in pursuit of specific healthcare outcomes.
In this Assignment, you will identify an issue or opportunity for change within your healthcare organization and propose an idea for a change in practice supported by an EBP approach.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 5: Recommending an Evidence-Based Practice Change
Create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you do the following:
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Recommending An Evidence Based Practice Change
/in Uncategorized /by developerTo create an 8- to 9-slide PowerPoint presentation:
· Briefly describe your healthcare organization, including its culture and readiness for change.
· Describe the current problem or opportunity for change. Include in this description the circumstances surrounding the need for change, the scope of the issue, the stakeholders involved, and the risks associated with change implementation in general.
· Propose an evidence-based idea for a change in practice using an evidence-based practice approach to decision making. Note that you may find further research needs to be conducted if sufficient evidence is not discovered.
· Describe your plan for knowledge transfer of this change, including knowledge creation, dissemination, and organizational adoption and implementation.
· Describe the measurable outcomes you hope to achieve with the implementation of this evidence-based change.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Reconstruction And The Compromise Of 1877 19361599
/in Uncategorized /by developerRequired Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity:
Initial Post Instructions For the initial post, craft a response comparing the three (3) Reconstruction plans:
Then, address the following for your selections:
Follow-Up Posts Compare your selections and analysis of selections with those of your peers. If they chose different events, examine how yours are similar and/or different. If they chose the same events, build on their posts by providing additional information about the events that you have not already noted in your own post.Writing Requirements
Professor’s post: If only President Lincoln had lived so he could implement Reconstruction. If John Wilkes Booth thought he did a favor for the South in assassinating Lincoln, he was mistaken. Lincoln, as you’ve seen, was more lenient on the South than others in Congress. And the two remaining viewpoints were held by the new President, Andrew Johnson, and the Radical Republicans, who were virtually at war with each other over these reconstruction ideas (McPherson, 1982, ch. 27).
So let’s talk about how Reconstruction was implemented, and these three different plans that were offered.
Reference
McPherson, J. M. (1982). Ordeal by fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Recreation Assignment
/in Uncategorized /by developerPlease read carefully the attached file which is include direction of how to do this assignment and the table that must be filled out as a work
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Recruitment Matrix Worksheet
/in Uncategorized /by developerInclude the following in the matrix:
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Redo Assignment
/in Uncategorized /by developerInstructor’s Comment
I think you might have misunderstood the assignment. None of the theories from class were used to analyze the case study. As it is, I cannot award many points. Can you please redo this with the 5 theories from the lecture included?
I have uploaded assignment named Reflection.
Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and other required topic study materials, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:
Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.
Rubric
Explanation of the Christian view of the nature of human persons and the theory of moral status that it is compatible is clear, thorough, and explained with a deep understanding of the connection between them. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 30%
The theory or theories that are used by each person to determine the moral status of the fetus is explained clearly and draws insightful relevant conclusions. Rationale for choices made is clearly supported by topic study materials and case study examples. 15%
Explanation of how the theory determines or influences each of their recommendations for action is clear, insightful, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the theory and its impact on recommendation for action. Explanation is supported by topic study materials. 15%
Evaluation of which theory is preferable within personal practice along with how that theory would influence personal recommendations for action is clear, relevant, and insightful. 10%
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Here is a link to the Khan video on Moral Status. It will help explain the five theories discussed in the lecture:
https://www.khanacademy.org/partner-content/wi-phi/wiphi-value-theory/wiphi-ethics/v/moral-status
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Reducing Malpractice Claims
/in Uncategorized /by developerYou are the risk manager of a hospital and have been asked to make a speech to doctors and nurses about how to prevent malpractice claims.
For your initial post, draft a short speech outlining the most important guidelines and best practices for healthcare providers to limit medical mistakes and reduce potential liability. Provide specific steps they can take to protect themselves and the organization from malpractice and other kinds of claims against providers. If you use resources in your speech, remember to cite them according to APA guidelines.
In your response to your peers, consider whether you agree with the guidelines they considered to be most important. Explain why or why not.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Reducing The Risk Of Harm That Caused By Medication Mistakeserrorseducation Program 3 Page Dnp Admission Paper
/in Uncategorized /by developerPsych nurse practicioner
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Reexamine The Six Rules Of Creating Synergy Why Is It Critical That All Members Of A Team Understand And Enact All The Various Rules Why Is It Necessary For All Members To Value The Purpose Of An Endeavor Or Project
/in Uncategorized /by developerReexamine the six rules of creating synergy. Why is it critical that all members of a team understand and enact all the various rules? Why is it necessary for all members to value the purpose of an endeavor or project? one page and references
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Ref 19323713
/in Uncategorized /by developerReflection Journal
Reflect on your final project and how you incorporated your evidence-based resources to support your recommendations.
Final Project Topic – Pressure Ulcers and vulnerable population (elderly)
Final Project attached below
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"