Comment 1
Creation: God’s creation of everything that exist. Shalom is the Hebrew word used to sum up the picture of Genesis 1 and 2. Shalom is described as “the human being dwelling at peace in all his or her relationships: With God, with self, with fellows, with nature” (GCU, 2018). The world was created for human flourishing when everyone could live in joy on the presence of our “Maker”, worshipping God by loving Him and one another.
Fall: The fall is described as the disobedience of Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit. Adam and Eve’s disobedience to God show “their rejection of God’s rule over them and it resulted in a break in Shalom” (GCU, 2018). Spiritual and physical death entered the break in Shalom allowing in diseases, suffering, and the “estrangement from God” (GCU, 2018).
Redemption: God plans redemption after the break in Shalom. God saw was the wrath of diseases and sins was causing the world. There was so much evil and suffering that he knew he has to redeem the world. God sent his only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to redeem the world. Jesus Christ was sacrificed by dying for our sins and on arose on the third day (Christianity, 2012).
Restoration: The end goal of restoration is to restore all creation to a state of Shalom. The Bible states that God will be coming back to judge sin and evil and restore righteousness and peace while eliminating the world of evil once and for all (Christianity, 2012).
I would find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative in all four parts of the narrative as God always has a reason and purpose for any suffering that he allows as do. God will not let you suffer more than you can handle.
Comment 2
The four parts of the Christian Biblical Narrative include: creation, fall, redemption, and restoration. Creation encompasses the belief that “God is the creator of everything that exists” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 3). Fall entails the introduction of sin into society as depicted by the story of Adam and Eve who ate from the tree that God told them explicitly not to eat from. For those who have sinned, God presents the option of redemption by making “available forgiveness and salvation by grace alone, through faith alone” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 5). Restoration is the last part of the Christian Biblical Narrative which has yet to come to fruition. “The return of Jesus, the final judgment of all people, and the restoration of all creation will inaugurate final restoration” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 6).
In terms of creation, the Christian Biblical Narrative states that we are created not only in the image of God, but according to His plan. Moreover, “the act of creating by God was intentional… and everything is how it ought to be” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 3). In relation to the reality of sickness and disease, what happens to us is meant to be and part of His grand design. The Fall caused a break in Shalom or peace by introducing sin into the world. Sin’s impact on the reality of sickness and disease is that it has the potential to cause death or illness that otherwise could have been prevented. Redemption is God’s offering to allow us to right our wrongs and enter back into His good grace (i.e. repent). In relation to sickness and disease, redemption can restore our hope and faith and strengthen our spiritual health which could help in the healing process. Restoration encompasses the commitment that God has made to judge all of us based on our faith and belief in His word. He promises those who have maintained their faith in Him and obeyed Him, that they will be restored to their original state (one of purity and goodness).
According to the Christian Biblical Narrative, one would find comfort and hope in light of illness by simply having faith in God, obeying His commands, and following His plan to salvation. Understanding that God’s act of creation was not random or accidental but planned and purposeful, allows us to accept those things (both good and bad) that befall us. To increase our comfort and hope in light of illness, “God has made available a way to salvation, [where] the end goal is the restoration of all creation to a state of Shalom” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 6).
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (20)
/in Uncategorized /by developerThe page you’re looking for is not found!Blog ArchiveCopyright © 2019 HomeworkMarket.com Read More
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (21)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Creation: God’s creation of everything that exist. Shalom is the Hebrew word used to sum up the picture of Genesis 1 and 2. Shalom is described as “the human being dwelling at peace in all his or her relationships: With God, with self, with fellows, with nature” (GCU, 2018). The world was created for human flourishing when everyone could live in joy on the presence of our “Maker”, worshipping God by loving Him and one another.
Fall: The fall is described as the disobedience of Adam and Eve eating the forbidden fruit. Adam and Eve’s disobedience to God show “their rejection of God’s rule over them and it resulted in a break in Shalom” (GCU, 2018). Spiritual and physical death entered the break in Shalom allowing in diseases, suffering, and the “estrangement from God” (GCU, 2018).
Redemption: God plans redemption after the break in Shalom. God saw was the wrath of diseases and sins was causing the world. There was so much evil and suffering that he knew he has to redeem the world. God sent his only begotten son, Jesus Christ, to redeem the world. Jesus Christ was sacrificed by dying for our sins and on arose on the third day (Christianity, 2012).
Restoration: The end goal of restoration is to restore all creation to a state of Shalom. The Bible states that God will be coming back to judge sin and evil and restore righteousness and peace while eliminating the world of evil once and for all (Christianity, 2012).
I would find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative in all four parts of the narrative as God always has a reason and purpose for any suffering that he allows as do. God will not let you suffer more than you can handle.
Comment 2
The four parts of the Christian Biblical Narrative include: creation, fall, redemption, and restoration. Creation encompasses the belief that “God is the creator of everything that exists” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 3). Fall entails the introduction of sin into society as depicted by the story of Adam and Eve who ate from the tree that God told them explicitly not to eat from. For those who have sinned, God presents the option of redemption by making “available forgiveness and salvation by grace alone, through faith alone” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 5). Restoration is the last part of the Christian Biblical Narrative which has yet to come to fruition. “The return of Jesus, the final judgment of all people, and the restoration of all creation will inaugurate final restoration” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 6).
In terms of creation, the Christian Biblical Narrative states that we are created not only in the image of God, but according to His plan. Moreover, “the act of creating by God was intentional… and everything is how it ought to be” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 3). In relation to the reality of sickness and disease, what happens to us is meant to be and part of His grand design. The Fall caused a break in Shalom or peace by introducing sin into the world. Sin’s impact on the reality of sickness and disease is that it has the potential to cause death or illness that otherwise could have been prevented. Redemption is God’s offering to allow us to right our wrongs and enter back into His good grace (i.e. repent). In relation to sickness and disease, redemption can restore our hope and faith and strengthen our spiritual health which could help in the healing process. Restoration encompasses the commitment that God has made to judge all of us based on our faith and belief in His word. He promises those who have maintained their faith in Him and obeyed Him, that they will be restored to their original state (one of purity and goodness).
According to the Christian Biblical Narrative, one would find comfort and hope in light of illness by simply having faith in God, obeying His commands, and following His plan to salvation. Understanding that God’s act of creation was not random or accidental but planned and purposeful, allows us to accept those things (both good and bad) that befall us. To increase our comfort and hope in light of illness, “God has made available a way to salvation, [where] the end goal is the restoration of all creation to a state of Shalom” (Grand Canyon University, 2015, The Christian Narrative section, para. 6).
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (22)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Principalism has really evolved into a practical approach for ethical decision-making which concentrates on common ground moral principles for autonomy, justice, beneficence, as well as non-maleficence (Döring, 2011). Principalism is also referred to as four-principal approach because of the four ethical principles which entail bioethics. Let us look at these four principals.
The first one is respect for autonomy. This involves respect for what happens to person’s own bodies. This implies that patients may decide the kind of treatment one want as well as their right to refuse medications, treatment, and surgeries and this decision must be respected by caregivers (Döring, 2011). A good example is blood transfusion in a patient who is a Jehovah Witness believer. Even though the patient totally in need of blood, we must respect the fact that Jehovah Witness followers refuse blood transfusions. The other principle is nonmaleficence. This means doing no harm (Döring, 2011). It implies making of best medical decision as well as abiding by rules and regulations to ensure that patients are safe. This can even be small assignments such as hand hygiene as a way of preventing various infections. The other ethical principle beneficence which involves promoting all that is good (Döring, 2011). It involves striving to improve patient’s health based on the situation. The last principle is justice. This means that fairness within treatment and patient care need to be practiced to carry out justice. Distribution of resources should also be given equally.
These principles should be ranked the way I have written them, i.e., respect for autonomy, nonmaleficence, beneficence, and justice with the first one being the most important. Allowing patients to participate in their treatment and making their medical decisions is very important (CİVANER, 2016). This allows for an equal diplomatic approach to healthcare where both parties are involved. Even when we bring in Christian biblical narrative of creation, redemption, fall, and restoration, autonomy is important because it allows patients to choose what they want (CİVANER, 2016). Eve when God brought a human into the world, He enabled them to choose what is right for them and what is wrong for them.
Comment 2
The four principal approaches consist of four universal ethical principles, it consists of respect of autonomy which states to make autonomous decision that people can take and that should be respected. The other principal is non-maleficence states about an obligation to not harm anyone; beneficence is the action to benefit others and to simply improve any situation. Lastly, justice is the principle that works on the distribution of benefits which also engage risks and costs (Page, 2012). Thus, the principle of biomedical ethics claims that no one principal is more important than the other. Above all it is the justice that should be given to all. We should be just towards others and always respect others, their decision and autonomy.
It is first the justice, and then respect after that comes non-maleficence and then beneficence. On the biomedical ethical grounds in the United State, it merges all the other grounds in one sphere and also differentiates one from the other in certain aspects. Justice trumps over all other values or principals and it is the one above all. Therefore, in the case study autonomy has been held above all. The doctor did not pressurize the family to take any decision instead gave Mike and his wife full autonomy to decide the right path and take the call.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (23)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
The pillars of principalism represent the four areas of consideration that must be weighed when faced with an ethical dilemma. I would rank the four ethical principles in the following order:
1.) Nonmaleficence
2.) Beneficence
3.) Respect for autonomy
4.) Justice
I believe that nonmaleficence, or the principle of not causing harm or purposeful wrongdoing onto others should be the highest ranking ethical principle (Grand Canyon University, 2015). Nonmaleficence is a core medical ethical standard but can also be applied on a broader spectrum throughout society. In a Christian, biblical narrative I believe nonmaleficence to be one of the strongest ethical pillars as well. Numerous biblical teachings and several the 10 commandments of Christian faith relate to the core concept of nonmaleficence (“Bible List Of The Ten Commandments,” 2017). Any consideration of nonmaleficence is likely to involve an examination of beneficence since they can often be considered inseparable. Beneficence is the principle of providing benefits to others. Respect for autonomy is the patient’s right to choose what happens to their body. Though this seems pretty straight forward, there is possibility for dilemma in cases where an individual is unable to make autonomous decisions. Autonomy can be seen as the limiter on how far a clinician can medically intervene for a patient. Justice is the principle of fair and equal benefits and treatment among all people. Justice may require an analyzed approach and comparison and is therefore in the lowest ranking but nonetheless a significant and crucial pillar.
Comment 2
Similar to how the U.S. has placed the respect for autonomy as the highest of the four principles, I too rank autonomy as the most important biomedical ethics principle. I believe that first and foremost, what happens to the body of an individual is the decision of that individual, assuming that those decisions do not cause harm to anyone else.
I rank nonmaleficence as my second most important principle of ethics because I don’t believe anyone should intentionally cause harm to others.
The ranking of the last two principles, for me, is slightly less clear. Beneficence and justice are tied in third. When I see the term “prevent” as in prevent harm, I want to rank beneficence higher on my list, but I need further consideration. In consideration of justice, the fair distribution of benefits is of extreme importance and is no small issue. It is of huge importance, but it is not what I think of when I initially think of ethics.
In relation to the Christian biblical narrative, I believe the order of importance for the principles would be: beneficence, justice, nonmaleficence, and respect for autonomy. I believe this would be the order because in the beginning, God provided benefits that were balanced and distributed fairly to all (beneficence and justice). This resulted in Shalom, a peaceful and orderly state. Nonmaleficence I believe would be ranked third because we were (are) not to cause harm to others. Finally, I believe respect for autonomy would be last in the Christian biblical narrative because all living things had what they needed, and they believed and trusted in God to provide all their needs.
Writing that autonomy would be ranked last in the Christian biblical narrative when I ranked it first really surprised me and is making me think about how these principles of ethics can be interpreted and determined to be more or less important based on the approach.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (24)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Imago dei means the image of God. It is a Christian concept of how man or human being was created in the image of God, and it bestows honor and dignity of each person irrespective of their social, mental and physical status (Shelly, 2006). Imago dei or the image of God is a theological term, and it applies to a human being only. The concept has its roots in Genesis. The concept of imago dei does not imply that we reflect the image of God in the real or literal sense but His intellectual, spiritual and moral nature.
Mother Teresa was driven by the concept of imago dei to care for the poor, the sick and also dying in Calcutta. This concept has motivated many Christians to care for the sick, the poor and the disenfranchised. Having an understanding that other human beings are created in the image of God is an important aspect that drives healthcare employees to care for a sick patient and also give those who are about to die a comforting and peaceful death (Shelly, 2006). The concept also help people in the societies to help each other in times of need. There is a saying in the healthcare sector that for the caregiver (nurse, physician, psychologist, social worker, etc.) the client or patient no longer remain a fellow human being in distress but the likeliness of eternal God. This awareness transform relationship between patients and caregivers to the recognition of the sanctity of other (Grove, 2015). The concept of imago dei is important in healthcare because it is the basis of the Western society’s comprehension of human rights as well as undergirds of the legal system. It also helps them understand the social service and healthcare agencies.
Comment 2
The readings from Meilaender made an interesting distinction between procreation and reproduction as well as between that of being begotten and being made. Procreation refers to the world as designed or given by the Creator, whereas Meilaender defines reproduction as the work of humans to, “master and reshape our world” (2013, p.10) or, stated another way, by conceiving through man-made technologies (2013).
The term “begotten” goes along with procreation. If one is begotten, they have been naturally conceived. The child who is begotten is the union of his father and mother in physical, bodily form. This child has not been reproduced by human means. Their parents’ act of love has resulted in life being given to the child. Our text describes the begotten child as being different but equal to his parents because he is created of their flesh. To quote Meilaender, “The Father gives all that he is and has to the son. He begets him” (2013, p.15).
Conversely, “made” refers to a child who is conceived through human means, such as in vitro fertilization, surrogacy, artificial insemination, or some other technology developed by humans. This child is described as being created through our own reason and will, as opposed to God’s reason and will. The “made” child is not conceived through the human act of love, and thus, the most foundational component of human equality is absent (Meilaender, 2013).
I had not considered the difference between either procreation and reproduction or begotten and made, and I can very much see the validity in the argument put forth my Meilaender. However, I do not know that I completely agree or disagree. Like so many topics in ethics, I see a grey area. I do not think it’s as simple as agreeing or disagreeing. I feel that if I agree, I’m saying that the parents who love and cherish their children who were conceived through technological means were “wrong” in doing so, but the parents who had children through naturally conception but do not love and care for their children are “right.” To me that doesn’t seem right. At the same time, I also understand that, if this is truly God’s plan, I need not completely understand it in order to have faith in it.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (25)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Procreation is the bringing forth of an offspring while reproduction is Meilaender stated in his writing that “we should not hesitate to regard reproduction that makes use of third parties collaborators as wrong- even when collaboration seems to be in a good cause” (Meilaender, 2013). Meilaender referred to begotten as a child that is born in marriage and by natural means. In contrast to being made, which was presented as any child produced outside the of the traditional setting which being born from a marriage between man and woman by natural means. Being born out of wedlock, cloning, and other means of producing a child is seen as “being made.” I do not agree with his descriptions. An individual should not be made to feel like a failure in God’s eyes for wanting to become a parent using alternative methods and or for reproducing out of wedlock. If the child is loved and cared for, then how they came to be should not matter or have a name to describe it. For example, a cousin of mine couldn’t conceive a child through natural means so instead she had to use IVF. She and her husband are caring people who love their daughter very much.
Comment 2
In this religious and scientific world, procreation and reproduction and being begotten or being made all are quiet complex questions. Procreation is the bringing your offspring to this world and reproduction is the process in which organisms are produced by their parents. However, with different schools altogether with different views they would have various different ways of approaching the same topic. Generally, cloning is replicating genetically identical organisms and replication is the power of science. However, all these issues are based on morality. According to Meileander, by following the Christian theology a child is the gift of God therefore, it holds a lot of importance and is valued a lot (Middletown, J.Richard. (1994)). Basically, I would tend to agree with the description on the basis of its analysis and precision but from the moral point of view it lacks its value.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (26)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Imago dei is the view of Christians as the human is made in the image of God (Shelly & Miller, 1999). This is important to healthcare as we should treat our patients as they are a gift from God and everyone has a purpose in life. The complexity of a human body is a miracle in its self when a human being is created with cells and the multiplication of all those cells to create different organs, blood, and a body to house everything. As we treat our patients medically and spiritually, we do it for the love and devotion we must aid in healing those that are sick or make a person comfortable at the end of life. Every person has a place on this earth with a duty to perform, but it is up to that individual to create a compassionate or hateful life. “The fundamental goal of health care and medicine is healing and caring that results in physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being” (Clark, 2018). This holds truth as to how healthcare and religion play a factor in caring for God’s people. As nurses we are not to judge a person and the choices they have made and any events leading up to the reason for the hospital admission. We are there to promote a better future and offer a hand to aid them in the right direction. Nurses are never to cause harm and to view each individual as a miracle that has been created, will give a more nurturing care for each individual patient.
Comment 2
The concept of imago dei is the Christian understanding that we, and all human beings, are created in the likeness and image of God himself. Since we are created in the His image, every person no matter their mental, physical, social, or any other marker of status, has been bequeathed a certain dignity and honor (Allen-Shelley & Miller, 2006).
This concept is the foundation of how Western society views and approaches human rights. It is present in our legal, health care, and social service systems. Thus, it is important in health care because it forms the basis for how we approach others. It is also important because it tells us that every human being is deserving of our care, no matter what their diagnosis may be, whether they have the ability to pay, or for any other reason (Allen-Shelley & Miller, 2006).
It is relevant because, in health care we frequently experience situations in which medical care seems futile, like the example in Allen-Shelley & Miller (2006) of the infant born with a poor prognosis of life. We also frequently come across people who do not have the means to pay for their health care and/or do not have adequate health insurance. Per imago dei, these people are still deserving of care despite their inability to pay or their social status.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (27)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Scientism may be described as the belief that science is a mean of acknowledging reality and a philosophical thesis which concentrates on facts. Spirituality and religion belief in science but embraces God’s creation ideas. The tension between religion and science falls on the fact that science does not explain everything absolutely. This provides religion an opportunity to fill the gap concerning the ethics and morals (Grove, 2015). A human being is usually terrified of unknown. People want to have an absolute explanation of everything. So both religion and science are important since they offer similar and different explanations people desires. Both acts like a complement of the other one.
Combination of both religion and scientism is ideal in healthcare. Scientism may explain physical technicalities of illness and with evidence based on medication. However, religion plays its role for the patient in case science fails to explain their feeling. For instance, when a patient is hospitalized, they feel hopelessness, and scientifically there is no such explanation. No medication that exists that can make the feeling of hopelessness to disappear. But, patient prayers can help eliminate the feeling of hopelessness (Kanopy, 2014). The fact is that the patient will not get healed since prayer alone may not cure the patient in case there is no absolute factual, scientific probability.
Comment 2
From our assigned readings, one of the topics I found very interesting was the distinction made between medicine and nursing as two separate entities. Medicine focuses on scientific dimensions of the human body; nursing is caring with emphasis on the whole person as embodied (Shelly & Miller, 2006). I think this distinction is important because while medicine is generally based in science and explains the body as an object of function, nursing focuses on the person as a whole and examines and aids the individual’s function through their body. In other words, nursing doesn’t only fixate on the diagnosis or curing of disease or on the progression of healing. Nursing compassionately encompasses the person as a whole to help assist their performance in activities contributing to their individualized health and recovery status. Nursing doesn’t just relate to diagnostic tests and lab values, it takes into consideration a person’s support system, their coping mechanisms, their need for resources, their teaching needs, their cultural and religious backgrounds, etc. This is why nursing is often referred to as both ‘a science and an art’. The application of both scientific medical knowledge and empathetic, compassionate care at the most basic level is what makes nursing a unique profession.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (28)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
The reading that I found most interesting was the research presented by Puchalski on the role of spirituality in health care. Up to this point in my nursing career, I have leaned toward the scientific approach especially working in the ER and dealing with a lot of acute and severe medical emergencies. In these cases, I have realized that the religious approach is essential when it comes to providing care and comfort to the friends and family members of patients who are experiencing life-threatening injury or illness. The statistics that Puchalski presented on the effectiveness of spirituality on mortality, coping, and recovery were eye opening. When you consider how spirituality can increase life spans, help relieve pain and stress, and improve recovery from illness and surgery, its benefits cannot be denied (Puchalski, 2001, p. 353).
The difference between disease and healing is discussed briefly in Gilbert Meilaender’s book, Bioethics: A primer for Christians. My view of his analysis is that doctors aim to cure disease which sometimes is not possible (i.e. terminal cancer), and their approach may have little to no effect on the loved ones of the sick and injured. Healing, on the other hand, is always possible for patients and their loved ones who have faith and trust in God. Meilaender (2013) argues, “they [medical caregivers] are lordly and awesome in their technical prowess, but they are not the Lord whom death could not hold” (p. 9).
Comment 2
The aspect that I found most interesting in the reading is the polarity between the older and the newer nursing theories. The older nursing theories are associated with taxonomies and quantitative measures, whereas the newer more holistic nursing theories are more qualitative measures and softer phenomena (Shelly, J., 2006). The revolution in the approach of how we think about nursing and nursing interventions in association to ethical decision making relates to a belief that nursing as a profession is both a science and an art-based profession, and the the new theories expand upon the concept. The other aspect that is interesting to me is using world views to challenge contemporary ethos by using philosophical clarity, religious sensitivity, and proportionate level of care for the sick and others who may need other forms of physiological and psychological interventions and/or wellbeing.
As medicine is traditionally considered a healing profession, and modern medicine claims legitimacy to heal through its scientific approach to medicine (Starr, P., 1982), the marriage of science and medicine has generally empowered nurses and physicians to intervene actively in the course of disease, to effect cures, to prevent illness, and to eradicate disease Hauerwas, S. (1990). In the wake of such success, nurses and physicians trained as biomedical scientists, have focused on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of disease. In the process, cure, not care, became the primary purpose of medicine; as nurses and physician’s role have transformed to the “curer of disease” rather than “healer of the sick (Starr, P. (1982). Thus, healing in a holistic sense has faded from medical attention and is rarely discussed in the medical literature.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Please Do A Comment Base In This Answers Write At Least 140 Words In Each Answer Take Reference From 2013 2018 If Is Possible Academic References Please Because The Teacher Check It Out One By One Sustantive Pos (29)
/in Uncategorized /by developerComment 1
Science and religion is ongoing controversy that will remain in society as people’s beliefs are tested and trialed. Science is a belief that if it cannot be proven, then it does not exist, and that all other beliefs that cannot be proven are merely false (Clark, 2015). This can create many tense moments when someone’s loved one is in a hospital and maybe the end of life for them. Their faith is tested and many turn away from God and ask, “Why are doing this to me, what did I do to deserve this?” As stated, doctors are not saviors and they cannot heal all people, therefore to accept and understand the process may bring religion closer to the individuals (Meliaender, 2013). Medicine has been more scientific than it has been religious in modern day, but more like older days, medicine has made a come around to become a more holistic approach to caring for individuals, which also includes religion in the practice. I believe that there is a balance between science and religion when caring for patients. If a patient or family member wishes to have a sentimental item or belief within a picture, rosary, or specific items, then the medical staff should honor those wishes as it will create a calming effect over the family to allow the medical professionals to care for the patient.
Comment 2
The perceived tension between science and religion stems from William Passavant’s description of the differences between the roles of deaconesses and nurses in 1899. Passavant defined the care provided by a deaconess as eternal service, providing care through love, and caring for the body to reach the soul (Shelly & Miller, 2009, p. 21). He defined the care provided by a nurse as service for financial compensation, with a motive based on a system rather than love, and a concern for the present welfare of a patient instead of their eternal future (Shelly & Miller, 2009, p. 21). The tension between these two concepts with regards to nursing care is ironic because regardless of the foundational discipline under which a provider has earned or accepted the responsibility to care for the ill or injured, the primary goal is the same; return the patient to the best state of well-being as physically, emotionally, mentally, and spiritually possible. Although the primary goal is the same, the philosophical and cultural differences between science and religion have the capability of pushing each discipline further from the other. With a scientific approach lacking a spiritual focus and a religious approach lacking a pathophysiologic focus, it is evident that a combination of the two is necessary to achieve the best possible outcome for our patients.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"