Forward the topic of the health policy paper to faculty at the end of Week One,

Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the US. The student will investigate current policies or legislation underway for a specific health-related issue. The Student will develop a scholarly APA formatted paper supported by evidence. The policy paper rubric:

Introduction to population or problem (incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden etc)

Description of how the policy is intended for a specific population, program or organization

Specific legislators involved in the policy development and dissemination

Identify the role of the APRN in assisting with the policy or refuting the policy – this requires the evidence to support opinion, ideas and/or concepts.

Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes

Examine how the policy can be used by the interprofessional team to ensure coordinated and comprehensive care for the specific population

Conclusion – summarize findings

APA format – use of primary peer-reviewed references as much as possible

Submission Details:

• Support your responses with examples.
• Cite any sources in APA format.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

GUIDELINES FOR THE FIELD EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENT:
You must “attend” 1 policy event, at least approximately 1 hour in length. 

You must “attend” 1 policy event, at least approximately 1 hour in length. 

The event may be online and it must have a health policy focus. Online health policy events/ webinars will be posted from which you may choose.  Event must be health-related. 

GENERAL GUIDELINES:
1.  At the event, take notes, and then write up an account and analysis of the event, using the template for field experience logs (below), and the Field Experience Rubric.

1.  At the event, take notes, and then write up an account and analysis of the event, using the template for field experience logs (below), and the Field Experience Rubric.

FIELD LOG GUIDELINES:

As a way of demonstrating completion of this course requirement, you must submit, in writing, field logs that detail certain aspects of the event. The template for field experience logs is below.

·  Each event log should be three to five double-spaced pages of text.

·  Provide only a brief summary of the event itself.

·  The analysis section should be 550 to 800 words, and be the most developed component of the report. In the analysis section, you can write about the process of policy being made at this event, and/or you can write about the actual health policy issue being discussed/considered.

·  Your analysis should reference at least two sources. They can be from the learning materials in this course or other sources, but should be current (within the last 3 months).

·  Use APA format for citations and references.

TEMPLATE FOR FIELD EXPERIENCE LOGS :
·  The name of the event/meeting and who has sponsored it.

·  The name of the event/meeting and who has sponsored it.

·  Describe the steps taken in preparation for the event (beyond listening or attending the event).

·  Place, date, time, and length of hearing/meeting/event.

·  Topic under discussion.

·  Names of participants and their titles (to the extent you can get them).

·  Brief description of the testimony/meeting/event. (If more than one issue is presented, discuss a sampling of issues.)

·  Analysis of the health policy issue and its implications for healthcare. Integrate course content and readings in your analysis. This section should be approximately 500 to 750 words.

TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT (FREE OF PLAGIARISM)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Reply to the following two classmates’ posts. (See attached word doc with posts). Reply to each one separately.

In your reply, compare and contrast the peer response to yours (also attached in word doc.), introduce new questions, and/or present new information. 

Each reply should contain at least from 200 – 300 words.

FREE OF PLAGIARISM (TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

ASSIGNMENT: Article Critique

Instructions

1.  Review the Overview of Research on ACO Performance and select one research study at: 

https://www.naacos.com/overview-of-research-on-aco-performance#estimates

2.  Submit an article critique of your selection.

Article Critique Instructions

Length: Your paper should be three-to-four (3–4) double-spaced pages.

Format your article critique by starting with the following:

·  The name of the author

·  The title of the article

·  The title of the journal, volume number, date, month, and page numbers in APA format

·  Brief statement of the issue or problem the article addresses

·  Brief statement of the purpose, hypothesis, and methods

·  Major conclusions

Compose Your Critique

After the opening summary, compose your critique. For this course, your critique needs to address the 1) technical components of the article and 2) your analysis and opinion of the article.

1.  The technical components must include your assessment of:

– The accuracy of the title

– The specificity and accuracy of the abstract

– The clarity of the purpose

– The relevance and clarity of the literature review 

– Absence or error in facts or interpretation (This last item requires you to look at some of the author’s cited references when they seem to be in error or misused.)

2.  Your analysis and opinion are the bulk of this critique and must address:

– The relevancy of the topic and why it is important (or not)

– Are the author’s assumptions stated clearly and located helpfully on the article?

– Does the methodology seem appropriate for the issue and hypotheses? Could the work be replicated based on the description?

– Is the data presented clearly, and is it error free? You do not need to do in-depth calculations, but evaluate the integrity in tables and charts; you may catch surprising errors.

– Does the author provide a balanced focus on the most important and relevant ideas or weaken the article by over- or under-emphasizing certain ideas?

– Does the author write clearly? Are there ambiguous statements that should have been clarified or more fully supported with evidence?

– Does the author seem biased or have clear evidence of objectivity?

– Are there gaps in the author’s work and conclusions that you believe warrant follow up?

FREE OF PLAGIARISM (TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Reply to the following posts. In your reply, include new information about the attributes you utilized in your original assignment (The one you did for me). 

– Each post reply should be at least 200 to 300 words.

– FREE OF PLAGIARISM (TURNITIN ASSIGNMENT)

– SEE ATTACHEMNTS

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"