New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings. 

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
• Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
• Identify and select 5 peer-reviewed articles from your research.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

• Identify the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
• Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples. 

Resources:

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

• Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
• Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
• Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
• Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)
• Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)

Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002

Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40. doi:10.3390/informatics4030032

https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr

https://www.himss.org/library/ehr/

https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201970_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5051_WC/artifacts/USW1_NURS_5051_Dykes.pdfhttps://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201970_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5051_WC/artifacts/USW1_NURS_5051_Dykes.pdf

Rurbic:

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

·   Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.–

Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)    Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)    Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)   

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)   

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)   

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement:  Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)    Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)    Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)    Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

 

New technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.

Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.

In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and reflect on the impact of clinical systems on outcomes and efficiencies within the context of nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
• Conduct a search for recent (within the last 5 years) research focused on the application of clinical systems. The research should provide evidence to support the use of one type of clinical system to improve outcomes and/or efficiencies, such as “the use of personal health records or portals to support patients newly diagnosed with diabetes.”
• Identify and select 5 peer-reviewed articles from your research.

The Assignment: (4-5 pages)

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

• Identify the 5 peer-reviewed articles you reviewed, citing each in APA format.
• Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.

Rubric

 

In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:

·   Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
·   Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.–

Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)The responses accurately and clearly identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses accurately and thoroughly summarize in detail each study reviewed, explaining in detail the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Specific, accurate, and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)The responses identify 5 peer-reviewed research articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described.

Accurate examples are provided which support the responses provided.Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)The responses vaguely or inaccurately identify 5 or less peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment.

The responses summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described that is vague or inaccurate.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague or inaccurate.Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)The responses vaguely and inaccurately identify less than 5 peer-reviewed articles for the Assignment, or are missing.

The responses vaguely and inaccurately summarize each study reviewed, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described, or are missing.

Examples provided to support the responses are vague and inaccurate, or are missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.Total Points: 100 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

_______________________________

Assignment:
Locate a nursing study that examines the effects of an intervention

Describe Your task

New task 
Type of Service

coursework
Urgency 8 to 12 hours 
No. of Pages/Wordcount 6 page(s)/1650 Words

Citation Style

APA Style

Sources must be within the last five years only

2015, 2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019

Detailed Description/Explanation

Assignment:
Locate a nursing study that examines the effects of an intervention. Provide a summary of the study, focusing primarily on the intervention. 

Was the development and implementation of the intervention described in detail? Based on a theoretical framework? Did the design of the study promote investigation of the effects of the study—for example, was there comparison of experimental and control groups? Were there variables that could have impacted the findings that were not part of the intervention? Was there evidence of efforts to monitor the safety of participants? Are there any ways that the study could have been improved?

Locate a nursing study that utilizes some aspect of the internet (for instance, for recruitment, delivery of an intervention, or completing online assessments. What challenges did the researchers face, and how were these challenges overcome (or not)? How could future research efforts be improved?
Using your computer’s office tools, develop a pie, bar, or plot chart to represent the following population estimates:
Population Percentage
European American 20
African American 30
Native American 20
Hispanic American 30
The assignment should be between 1500 and 2000 words in length and contain at least two scholarly sources, in addition to the textbook and provided material. Please submit your assignment in one APA formatted document.

********
these are examples of feedback I received on my other previous assignments, as well as several low grades. Please send me a paper that is original, has references that are within five years, and a really great formatted paper with a clear Introduction, clealr labled and a organized conlusion, thanks,

1.) Thank you for your submission. I’ve provided feedback and scoring. All required content was discussed, minus a clearly labeled and discussed conclusion. The introduction was brief and did not provide a clear purpose. See all comments to improve.

Organization Weight: 25%: Introduction is brief and requires a purpose statement. There is no clearly labeled and discussed conclusion as required. See all comments.
Support Weight: 20%: Multiple errors. See comments. 
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%: All papers written within this course need to be in third person.  

2.) Thank you for your submission. I’ve provided feedback and scoring. There are many areas to work on and improve. Please see all of my comments. 

*******
Please make sure this assignment is ORIGINAL and REFERENCES ARE WITHIN FIVE(5) years.
This is some feed back I received on some previous assignments, as well as low grades. Please make sure the assignment is correct, thanks

-Thank you for earlier submission. I’ve provided feedback and scoring on previous tasks and you need to read them . All required content was discussed, minus a clearly labeled and discussed conclusion. The introduction was brief and did not provide a clear purpose. See all comments to improve.
Organization Weight: 25%: Introduction is brief and requires a purpose statement. There is no clearly labeled and discussed conclusion as required. See all comments.
Support Weight: 20%: Multiple errors. See comments. 
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%: All papers written within this course need to be in third person. 

 -Thank you for your submission. I’ve provided feedback and scoring. There are many areas to work on and improve. Please see all of my comments. 
Content Weight: 30%: It appears that some of the topics are discussed. Each paper requires a properly labeled heading to help organize the information presented as well as lets me know as the reader that you covered all required content. This was put out within course announcements. 
Organization Weight: 25%: The introductory paragraph needs a purpose statement. see comment. In addition, there is disorganization as there are no other headings organizing the required content being discussed. 
Support Weight: 20%: Errors present. See comments. 
Quality of Written Communication Weight: 10%: All papers are to be written in third person and no reference to “I”.

_______________________________

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Only for tutors – Nursing / paramedics 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"