1) **********minimum 4 full pages ( not words)**************************** (cover or reference page not included) 

2)¨**********APA norms 

3)********** It will be verified by Turnitin and SafeAssign 

__________________________________________________________

Read well. I need you to answer the same question 4 times (copy and paste is not accepted) you must answer the question four times on different pages in the same document (Word).

______________________________________________________________-

  

1) Name the DSM-IV-TR indicators necessary for a diagnosis of PTSD ? (full criteria for diagnosis) (five of condition/symptoms, with at least two in each category. Please, include specific symptoms in children (PTSD symptoms in children that are different than in adults). Note: (DSM-5 will be accepted)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Compare the Adaptive grieving model (Martin & Doka, 2000) and the Dual Process model (Stroebe & Schut, 2001). 

What are the similarities and differences? Which seems to fit best to your style of counseling? Why is that so? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

For this first milestone, you will select an issue or topic in diversity to analyze through the four general education lenses. You will also analyze the issue or topic’s relationship to culture and society. 

Remember to keep your sites trained on diversity. For example, it’s not enough to do your paper on opioid addiction but not also address issues relating to differential access depending on, for example, race and socio-economic status. 

If you need help deciding on a topic below are topics to name a few to choose from:

Opioid addiction, treatment, and access to healthcare comparing diverse populations (race, gender, class)

Conflicts in the intergenerational workplace

The [mis]representation of women in the media (i.e., sexual objectification)

White privilege, Male privilege, Heterosexual privilege, Class privilege

Women exercising power over their own bodies ( or not); reproductive justice

The vilification of the poor

The War on Drugs in Black Communities 

These are just a few ideas, but you no doubt have some of your own. Reach out to me and share your vision with me, and I’ll let you know if it’s a go. The main thing is that no matter what topic you decide to go with, you make sure that it’s Diverse. Try to pull in two to three different categories relative to the four dimensions of diversity introduced in Module One (and also included as easy reference in Module Two).  

Attached is the rubric (PLEASE FOLLOW THE RUBRIC!!) and the resources needed to be used to complete this assignment. YOU MUST USE THE RESOURCES ATTACHED BELOW FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

  

Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Critical Appraisal Tools document. Be sure to include:

1. An evaluation table
2. A levels of evidence table
3. An outcomes synthesis table

Part 4B: Critical Appraisal of Research

Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

   

Evaluation Table

Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

  

Full   citation of selected article

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4

 

Dubin, J (2018)

Pediatric obesity in primary practice. Pediatric   Nursing .44(4), 202-206.

Hargreaves, m., Orfield, C., Honeycutt, T., Vine,   M., Cabili, C., Coffee- Boden, B., Fisher, S. (2017). Addressing childhood   obesity through multisector collaboration: Journal of community health, 42   (4) 656-663

Kitson, S (2018). Intervention for weight in   obesity to improve survival in women with endometrial cancer. Retrieved from https//www.waldenulibrary.org

Ruopeng An, Mengmeng Ji, & Zhang.   (2017). Effectiveness of social media intervention on weight related behavior   and body weight status. American Journal of health behavior 41(6), 670-682

 

Conceptual Framework 

Describe the theoretical basis for the study

 

Design/Method Describe the design

and how the study

was carried out

 

Sample/Setting 

The number and

characteristics of

patients,

attrition rate, etc.

 

Major   Variables Studied

List and   define dependent and independent variables

 

Measurement

Identify   primary statistics used to answer clinical questions

 

Data   Analysis

Statistical   or

qualitative

findings

 

Findings   and Recommendations

General   findings and recommendations of the research

 

Appraisal

Describe   the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and   limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of   the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility   of

use in   your practice? 

 

General Notes/Comments

   

Levels of Evidence Table

Use this document to complete the levels of evidence table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

  

Author   and year of selected article

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4

 

 

Study Design

Theoretical basis for the study

 

Sample/Setting 

The number and

characteristics of

patients

 

Evidence   Level *

(I, II, or III)

 

Outcomes

 

General Notes/Comments

* Evidence Levels:

• Level I

Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis

• Level II

Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis

• Level III

Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis

• Level IV

Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence

• Level V

Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence

   

Outcomes Synthesis Table

Use this document to complete the outcomes synthesis table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research

  

Author   and year of selected article

Article #1

Article #2

Article #3

Article #4

 

 

Sample/Setting 

The number and

characteristics of

patients

 

Outcomes

 

Key   Findings

 

Appraisal   and Study Quality

 

General Notes/Comments

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"