Assignment: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum.
Patients are frequently uncomfortable discussing with healthcare professional’s issues that involve the genitalia and rectum; however, gathering an adequate history and properly conducting a physical exam are vital. Examining case studies of genital and rectal abnormalities can help prepare advanced practice nurses to accurately assess patients with problems in these areas.In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
To Prepare
Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.Based on the Episodic note case study:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Refer to Chapter 3 of the Sullivan resource to guide you as you complete your Lab Assignment.
Search the Walden library or the Internet for evidence-based resources to support your answers to the questions provided.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition.
How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
The Lab Assignment
Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.
Analyze the subjective portion of the note.
List additional information that should be included in the documentation.Analyze the objective portion of the note.
List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not?
Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient.
Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
Case Study
Subjective:
•CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.”
•HPI: AB, a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had more than one partner during the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago. She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed.
•PMH: Asthma•Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg
•Allergies: NKDA
•FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer, Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD
•Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)
Objective:
•VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs•Heart: RRR, no murmurs
•Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
•Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia
•Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, neg McBurney
•Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained
Assessment:•Chancre
Plan: This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
NOTE: THIS IS THE LINK TO DOWNLOAD THE BOOK:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/3dx3zx
CHECK THE ASSIGNMENT FOR PLAGIARISM
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Healthcare Data Standardization
/in Uncategorized /by developerFor this assignment, you will read a case study that examines issues concerned with data standardization in informatics. Based on the scenario described in the case study, you will create a presentation related to informatics education and training.( See uploaded file.)
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Healthcare Gov Review
/in Uncategorized /by developerAssignment: Healthcare.gov Review
Visit the healthcare.gov website. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. For this assignment, you are to explore the site. Click on the “see topics” link and then scroll down to “See plans and prices” under Health Insurance Basics. Note: pick 3 health plan in my area, so my area code is 78249″
Please list at least three plans available in your area. Discuss the type of plan, the monthly premium charge, and plan deductible. Then comment on whether you think these plans are affordable.
You should submit your assignment via a Microsoft Word document with the title “Three Plans”
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Help 19433357
/in Uncategorized /by developerSee attach for instructions
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Informatics In Healthcare
/in Uncategorized /by developersee uploaded file.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Lab Assignment Assessing The Genitalia And Rectum 19407785
/in Uncategorized /by developerAssignment: Lab Assignment: Assessing the Genitalia and Rectum.
Patients are frequently uncomfortable discussing with healthcare professional’s issues that involve the genitalia and rectum; however, gathering an adequate history and properly conducting a physical exam are vital. Examining case studies of genital and rectal abnormalities can help prepare advanced practice nurses to accurately assess patients with problems in these areas.In this Lab Assignment, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients, as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
To Prepare
Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.Based on the Episodic note case study:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study. Refer to Chapter 3 of the Sullivan resource to guide you as you complete your Lab Assignment.
Search the Walden library or the Internet for evidence-based resources to support your answers to the questions provided.
Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition.
How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
The Lab Assignment
Using evidence-based resources from your search, answer the following questions and support your answers using current evidence from the literature.
Analyze the subjective portion of the note.
List additional information that should be included in the documentation.Analyze the objective portion of the note.
List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
Would diagnostics be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not?
Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient.
Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
Case Study
Subjective:
•CC: “I have bumps on my bottom that I want to have checked out.”
•HPI: AB, a 21-year-old WF college student reports to your clinic with external bumps on her genital area. She states the bumps are painless and feel rough. She states she is sexually active and has had more than one partner during the past year. Her initial sexual contact occurred at age 18. She reports no abnormal vaginal discharge. She is unsure how long the bumps have been there but noticed them about a week ago. Her last Pap smear exam was 3 years ago, and no dysplasia was found; the exam results were normal. She reports one sexually transmitted infection (chlamydia) about 2 years ago. She completed the treatment for chlamydia as prescribed.
•PMH: Asthma•Medications: Symbicort 160/4.5mcg
•Allergies: NKDA
•FH: No hx of breast or cervical cancer, Father hx HTN, Mother hx HTN, GERD
•Social: Denies tobacco use; occasional etoh, married, 3 children (1 girl, 2 boys)
Objective:
•VS: Temp 98.6; BP 120/86; RR 16; P 92; HT 5’10”; WT 169lbs•Heart: RRR, no murmurs
•Lungs: CTA, chest wall symmetrical
•Genital: Normal female hair pattern distribution; no masses or swelling. Urethral meatus intact without erythema or discharge. Perineum intact. Vaginal mucosa pink and moist with rugae present, pos for firm, round, small, painless ulcer noted on external labia
•Abd: soft, normoactive bowel sounds, neg rebound, neg murphy’s, neg McBurney
•Diagnostics: HSV specimen obtained
Assessment:•Chancre
Plan: This section is not required for the assignments in this course (NURS 6512) but will be required for future courses.
NOTE: THIS IS THE LINK TO DOWNLOAD THE BOOK:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/3dx3zx
CHECK THE ASSIGNMENT FOR PLAGIARISM
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Leadership Self Assessment Finding Your Niche
/in Uncategorized /by developer“A leader is not an administrator who loves to run others, but someone who carries water for his people so they can get on with their jobs.”
—Robert Townsend
“Leaders are made, they are not born. They are made by hard effort, which is the price all of us must pay to achieve any goal that is worthwhile.”
—Vince Lombardi
Consider the quotes by Townsend and Lombardi. Since individuals first emerged to take the helm of government, organizations, and people, a major question has been what constitutes an effective leader. In other words, are the core competencies needed to lead in the healthcare field based on innate talent or on skills learned over time? Does this differ for leaders versus managers?
Following in the footsteps of Jim Collins’s seminal publication on leadership, Good to Great (HarperBusiness, 2001), Chip Caldwell & Associates followed up between 2001 and 2002 with the Good to Great in Healthcare Research Project. The group found a number of leadership qualities and skills that differentiated “good” healthcare leaders from “great” healthcare leaders. For this Assignment, you will examine what makes a leader, and complete an assessment to help you identify your strengths and weaknesses as a healthcare leader in order to identify any gaps that will help you in your career.
To prepare for this Assignment:
To complete this Assignment, write a 1 page that identifies the following:
Instruction:
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Leadership Styles And Decision Making
/in Uncategorized /by developerAssignment: Leadership Styles and Decision-Making
We have all been influenced by leaders at some point in our lives. Individuals make decisions in a way that achieves set goals. They demonstrate their leadership when they follow through on those decisions to ensure that they were the right decisions. Individuals show the way when they model to teams and others how to accomplish the tasks at hand. However, leaders vary greatly in their decision-making, in part because of their own particular leadership styles. Similar to emotional intelligence, it is important to be aware of your own leadership style as well as the leadership styles of effective healthcare leaders and managers and how those styles affect decision-making.
To prepare for this Assignment:
By Day 7
Write a 1- to 2-page paper that identifies the following:
Be sure to support your work with specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and additional scholarly sources as appropriate. Refer to the Essential Guide to APA Style for Walden Students to ensure that your in-text citations and reference list are correct
Emotional Intelligence Assessments
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Literature Review The Use Of Clinical Systems To Improve Outcomes And Efficiencies 19191357
/in Uncategorized /by developerIn this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Literature Review The Use Of Clinical Systems To Improve Outcomes And Efficiencies 19191359
/in Uncategorized /by developerIn this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Assignment Literature Review The Use Of Clinical Systems To Improve Outcomes And Efficiencies 19283379
/in Uncategorized /by developerNew technology—and the application of existing technology—only appears in healthcare settings after careful and significant research. The stakes are high, and new clinical systems need to offer evidence of positive impact on outcomes or efficiencies.
Nurse informaticists and healthcare leaders formulate clinical system strategies. As these strategies are often based on technology trends, informaticists and others have then benefited from consulting existing research to inform their thinking.
In this Assignment, you will review existing research focused on the application of clinical systems. After reviewing, you will summarize your findings.
To Prepare:
The Assignment: (4-5 pages)
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:
Resources:
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002
Skiba, D. (2017). Evaluation tools to appraise social media and mobile applications. Informatics, 4(3), 32–40. doi:10.3390/informatics4030032
https://www.healthit.gov/faq/what-electronic-health-record-ehr
https://www.himss.org/library/ehr/
https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201970_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5051_WC/artifacts/USW1_NURS_5051_Dykes.pdfhttps://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201970_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5051_WC/artifacts/USW1_NURS_5051_Dykes.pdf
Rurbic:
In a 4- to 5-page paper, synthesize the peer-reviewed research you reviewed. Be sure to address the following:
· Properly identify 5 peer-reviewed articles selected.
· Summarize each study, explaining the improvement to outcomes, efficiencies, and lessons learned from the application of the clinical system each peer-reviewed article described. Be specific and provide examples.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 77 (77%) – 85 (85%) Good 68 (68%) – 76 (76%) Fair 60 (60%) – 67 (67%) Poor 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"