Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words,   describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The   written portion of this assignment should include:

1. Summary of teaching plan
2. Epidemiological rationale     for topic
3. Evaluation of teaching experience
4. Community response to teaching
5. Areas of strengths and     areas of improvement

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA   Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion. 

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Poor Patient Outcome  Relying solely on the classic features of a disease may be misleading. That’s because the clinical presentation of a disease often varies: the symptoms and signs of many conditions are non-specific initially and may require hours, days, or even months to develop.  Generating a differential diagnosis; that is, developing a list of the possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs — is an important part of clinical reasoning. It enables appropriate testing to rule out possibilities and confirm a final diagnosis.     This case portrays a poor patient outcome after a misdiagnosis.  Case scenario  A previously healthy 35-year-old lawyer presents to a primary care office with a chief complaint of chest pain and a non-productive cough. The pain started suddenly 2 hours prior to coming to the office while the patient was sitting at his desk. The patient describes the pain as sharp in nature, constantly present but made worse with inspiration and movement, and with radiation to the base of the neck. His blood pressure in the right arm and other vital signs are normal.  On physical examination the only findings of note are chest wall tenderness and a faint cardiac murmur. The ECG in the office is normal. The patient is observed for an hour in the office and assessed. He is diagnosed with viral pleurisy and sent home on non-steroidal analgesics.  The following day the patient collapses at home and cannot be resuscitated by the paramedic service. An autopsy reveals a Type 1 aortic dissection with pericardial tamponade.  Written Assignment:  Developing a list of possible conditions that might produce a patient’s symptoms and signs is an important part of clinical reasoning. 1.As an NP in primary care what would you have done differently? 2.Discuss the importance of creating a list of differentials for this patient. How could it have changed this outcome?  If a serious diagnosis comes to mind based on a patient’s symptoms: •Ask yourself; Have you considered the likelihood of it and whether it needs to be ruled out by testing or referral? •Because many serious disorders are challenging to diagnose, have you considered ruling out the worst case scenario? •Ask yourself: Do you have sufficient understanding of the clinical presentation to offer an opinion on the diagnosis? •What other diagnosis could it be? How might the treatment to date have altered the patient outcome? •What other diagnostic and laboratory or imaging was needed in order to make a complete differential list?  What support tools would you consider using in helping to create a differential diagnosis list? •Are you familiar with the current clinical practice guidelines for the investigation of a suspected condition such as chest pain?     To view the Grading Rubric for this Assignment, please visit the Grading Rubrics section of the Course Resources.  Assignment Requirements:  Before finalizing your work, you should: •be sure to read the Assignment description carefully (as displayed above); • consult the Grading Rubric (under the Course Resources) to make sure you have included everything necessary; and • Utilize spelling and grammar check to minimize errors.  Your writing Assignment should: •follow the conventions of Standard English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.); • be well ordered, logical, and unified, as well as original and insightful; • display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics; and • use APA 6th Edition format as outlined in the APA Progression Ladder.  How to Submit:

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:

1. A      brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project –      Paper on Diabetes.
2. A      descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention      may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

The practice of health care providers at all levels brings you into contact with people from a variety of faiths. This calls for knowledge and acceptance of a diversity of faith expressions.

The purpose of this paper is to complete a comparative ethical analysis of George’s situation and decision from the perspective of two worldviews or religions: Christianity and a second religion of your choosing. For the second faith, choose a faith that is unfamiliar to you. Examples of faiths to choose from include Sikh, Baha’i, Buddhism, Shintoism, etc.

In your comparative analysis, address all of the worldview questions in detail for Christianity and your selected faith. Refer to Chapter 2 of Called to Care for the list of questions. Once you have outlined the worldview of each religion, begin your ethical analysis from each perspective.

In a minimum of 1,500-2,000 words, provide an ethical analysis based upon the different belief systems, reinforcing major themes with insights gained from your research, and answering the following questions based on the research:

1. How would each religion interpret the nature of George’s malady and suffering? Is there a “why” to his disease and suffering? (i.e., is there a reason for why George is ill, beyond the reality of physical malady?)
2. In George’s analysis of his own life, how would each religion think about the value of his life as a person, and value of his life with ALS?
3. What sorts of values and considerations would each religion focus on in deliberating about whether or not George should opt for euthanasia?
4. Given the above, what options would be morally justified under each religion for George and why?
5. Finally, present and defend your own view.

Support your position by referencing at least three academic resources (preferably from the GCU Library) in addition to the course readings, lectures, the Bible, and the textbooks for each religion. Each religion must have a primary source included. A total of six references are required according to the specifications listed above. Incorporate the research into your writing in an appropriate, scholarly manner.

An abstract is required.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

This is a Collaborative Learning   Community (CLC) assignment.

It is important to promote the   professional role of the nurse to provide health promotion and disease   preventive care. Collaborating with other health care professionals   and consumer groups in the community in redesigning health care can   help meet the goals for Healthy People 2020.

Refer to http://www.healthypeople.gov/ to open the Healthy   People 2020 home page.

1. Select the “Topics & Objectives” tab to access     the 2020 Topics & Objectives – Objectives A-Z page.
2. Select one of the Healthy People “Topic Areas” for     improving health.
3. Submit the proposed area to the     instructor for approval. No group may work on the same focus area as     another group.

Develop a PowerPoint presentation   (15-20 slides) with accompanying speaker’s notes and citations.

For help designing PowerPoint slides, refer to the “Create Your   First Presentation” PowerPoint tutorial, located on the Microsoft website:

https://support.office.com/en-us/article/Create-your-first-presentation-ac88d138-a7a0-402c-b5a5-812641e59c8e?ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US

In the presentation, address the following:

1. State the objective of the presentation.
2. State the     Healthy People 2020 focus area your group has selected and the     rationale for selection of the specific focus area.
3. Explain     how the focus area relates to the individual, the family, and the     community, as well as to all age groups throughout the life   span.
4. Identify ways to enhance or optimize health in the     selected focus area using evidence-based research. A minimum of     three peer-reviewed articles must be utilized.
5. Address the     health disparity among different segments of the population for the     selected focus area.
6. Provide a brief description of at     least two community resources and at least two website resources for     professionals and clients.
7. Provide a brief profile of at     least one health-related organization for the selected focus   area.

APA style is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is   always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of   sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can   be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to   beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for   successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"