4-There are various in which a person can be able to evaluate whether the evidence they have and are using in the practice is true or not. It is always important to evaluate evidence so as to be able to understand what type of information one is using. Two methods that one can be able to use to evaluate evidence in the nursing practice include systematic reviews and meta analyses (Melnyk, 2011). Systematic reviews are a form of literature review that involves the use of systematic methods to be able to collect and analyze secondary information presented in a document. The method involves trying to understand whether the data presented in the source has followed the right steps when being developed. Meta analyses on the other hand is a method through which the researcher is able to evaluate the credibility of data being presented in various quantitative sources. According to research, one cannot be able to use the results of one research activity to implement an intervention. There is need for them to use several sources. Meta analyses allows the research to combine the results of various sources to find the commonality in them.
One of the main difference in both methods is the focus the methods. Meta-analysis focuses on the researcher being able to analyze quantitative data from various sources. Systematic reviews on the other and focus on both qualitative and quantitative data to come up with results (Uman, 2011). The main difference is therefore what type of data each deals with. Systematic reviews follow a certain procedure in order to be able to come up with a result. This is not the same as in the case of meta analyses where the focus is on research results of article that are investigating the same topic. The similarity in both is that they are able to help the researcher to compare various forms of data and come up with a result. They allow the researcher to compare the results of multiple research and studies.
References
Melnyk, B. M., (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Uman L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l’Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, 20(1), 57–59.
5-Two methods of evaluating evidence are Case control study and Systematic Review. In Case control study Researchers choose people with a particular result (the cases) and interview the groups or check their records to ascertain what different experiences they had. They compare the odds of having an experience with the outcome to the odds of having an experience without the outcome. in Systematic Review a critical assessment and evaluation of all research studies that address a particular clinical issue. The researchers use an organized method of locating, assembling, and evaluating a body of literature on a particular topic using a set of specific criteria. A systematic review typically includes a description of the findings of the collection of research studies. The systematic review may also include a quantitative pooling of data, called a meta-analysis.In case studies, the study start with the identification of a group of individuals with a particular health outcome while in stystematic review summarises the results of available carefully designed healthcare studies (controlled trials) and provides a high level of evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. They are both alike because there is always a control group to compare data.
References
Admin. (2013, June 21). Introduction to study designs – case-control studies. Retrieved from https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/epidemiology/practitioners/introduction-study-design-ccs
Nursing: Evaluate Evidence. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://guides.pcc.edu/c.php?g=210096&p=1385961
What is a systematic review? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://consumers.cochrane.org/what-systematic-review
6-A meta-analysis of all well-done studies of a given clinical topic (using participant-level data if available). Define criteria for which of the published studies are actually entered into this meta-analysis (e.g., only randomized blinded trials, or any direct comparison studies, etc.). This represents the reference standard. Limitations of this approach include the lack of agreement on reliable validity standards for meta-analysis and the possibility of incorporation bias due to testing the validity of a subset of evidence using the whole evidence as gold standard. In some instances, a small evidence base (consisting of one or a few well-designed, appropriately powered studies) may be sufficient to reach the most appropriate conclusion.
Systematic Reviews
A literature search could identify and compare the conclusions of different systematic reviews that used different prioritization strategies to address the same clinical question. The advantage of this method is its relative ease of implementation. Provided a reviewer can find published reviews that addressed the same clinical question using different strategies, the comparison of the reviews’ conclusions can be done relatively quickly. Although this would be the least labor-intensive method, it has some drawbacks. First, it may be difficult to identify clinical questions where different systematic reviews used different prioritization strategies. Second, the systematic reviews may have differed in other methodological areas, such as risk-of-bias assessment and strength of evidence assessment, which could then lead to differences in conclusions among reviews.
A reviewer could identify a single existing systematic review, determine its evidence prioritization strategy (by examining the report inclusion criteria), and test other prioritization strategies on the same evidence base, while keeping all other methodology the same. The advantage of this method over the method above is that other methodological aspects of review (e.g., risk-of-bias assessment) would no longer confound the comparison. However, this method is more labor-intensive than the method above, as it requires performing independent research synthesis using the other prioritization strategies
Treadwill, JR; Signh, S; Taliti, R. (2011). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A Framework for “Best Evidence” Approaches in Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56652/
Reply | Quote & Reply
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19189539
/in Uncategorized /by developer4- “The ability to successfully support a cause or interest on one’s own behalf or that of another requires a set of skills that include problem solving, communication, influence, and collaboration (Tomajan, 2012).”
Effective communication is essential in effective advocacy. Tomojan describes a 60 second approach in effective communication when it comes to advocating for a solution to a problem. This sixty-second approach includes the following:
-Share your name, where you work, and the department you are representing
-Describe the issue you are addressing
-Put a human face on your request. Paint a word picture or tell a story.
-Describe what you would like the person or group to do
-Distribute a fact sheet describing your request and including your contact information
Using this approach will grab your audience’s attention and provide all the necessary information in a short amount of time.
Reference:
Tomajan, K. (2012). Advocating for Nurses and Nursing. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing,17(1). doi:10.3912/OJIN.Vol17No01Man04
5-Thank you for sharing. All I can say is wow. Put a human face on your request. Paint a word picture or tell a story. That is so very deep and relatable. This is definetly an advocacy strategy that can create change in the workplace. Great job? Have you ever used an advocacy strategy to create change? If so, when and what was the impact of that. I am interested in hearing how you may have change your facility. Thank you again for sharing some of your findings and insight with the class. Good luck in the rest of the program.
6-A good advocacy strategy is connecting patients to resources. I find this to be one of the most important advocacy strategies that I tend to use on a daily basis. Helping patients find resources inside or outside the hospital to support their well-being can be extremely beneficial to them. Be aware of resources in the community that you can share with the patient such as financial assistance, transportation, patient or caregiver support networks, or helping them meet other needs. Many nurses think of advocacy as the most important role we play in patient care. We need to remember that to best serve patients, we must have our own house in order. That house includes the other healthcare professionals with whom we and our patients interact, as well as the organizations providing those services and the policies and legislation that influence them. As health care systems continue to evolve, patients are relying more and more on guidance from nursing advocates.
I was fortunate enough to attend a conference. At this conference many nurse spoke on different topics and I was able to attend a classs specifically about nurse advocacy and ways to get better at this skill. The class was filled with useful tips and insight. The one thing that stuck out to me the most was the resources. When patients leave the hospital, they no longer have nurses and doctors by their side 24/7 telling them what to do. They need to know where to find the help that they need. Educating them on topics and giving them resources is thought to be one of the best things you can do for a patient upon discharge. I agree with this whole heartedly.
(2018). Nursing Advocate: 5 Ways to Be a Better Advocate. Rx Nurse. Retrieved fom: https://www.nursesrx.com/nurse-news/nursing-advocate-five-ways-to-be-a-better-advocate-for-patients/
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19252107
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-The main problem that is affecting the organization that I work for is the problem of staff shortage. This has resulted in the nurses and other personnel being over worked and in some cases having to work longer hours. However, addressing this problem is proving to be a difficult job as one would think that the organization should just hire new nurses and other staff to solve the problem. However, this has not been a solution to the facility for different issues. One of the main issue that has resulted in the facility being unable to hire more staff is the decrease in finances in the facility (Jones, 2005). Therefore, the facility has been unable to successfully hire new nurses so as to be able to solve the problem of nurse shortage. As time goes, the allocations that are made to the facilities have reduced significantly as well as the decrease in the money that patients are paying as the government aims at providing affordable care.
The first solution to this problem is that the facility should begin by finding a new source of income. This means that the facilities need to engage in extra activities that will ensure that they are able to raise some money (Berent & Anderko, 2011). This money can be used to boost the allocations that they have as well as the money they get from treatments to ensure that they are able to have enough money to ensure that they are able to hire as well as pay more nurses and other workers. Further, facilities need to engage in the process of giving scholarships to nursing students. This will look to support education and training of nurses that will in turn increase the number of nurses in the country. One of the reasons that the facilities have been unable to fill the gap is because there are not enough nurses in the country.
References
Berent, G. R., & Anderko, L. (2011). Solving the Nurse Faculty Shortage. Nurse Educator, 36(5), 203-207. doi:10.1097/nne.0b013e3182297c4a
Jones, D. (2005). California nurse leaders address the state’s nurse shortage. Nurse Leader, 3(1), 46-49. doi:10.1016/j.mnl.2004.11.011
5-Developing a model that there are nurses that are experts in education and research therefore keeping the staff and organization up to date on evidence based practices. Staffing on the floors must be maintained and the funding for the evidence-based practices could be with each specialty such as ICU,ER, Peds, GI, family medicine, etc. Depending on the staffing and patient population there may be a higher demand for more than one evidence-based practice nurse. “Evidence-based health care makes a positive difference for patients and their families; excellence in providing that care is a pressing need. Adoption of evidence-based practice (EBP) leads to important improvements in outcomes for patients and their families as well as for clinicians and organizations. Health care-acquired conditions and complications are reduced, patient symptoms are improved, and cost of care is less.
Building support, however, for nurse-led EBP is a journey of persistence that requires a strategic and multifaceted approach. As part of their daily work and as members of interprofessional teams, nurses can lead the way in advancing EBP. A clear vision, infrastructure, climate, resources, formal reporting, and recognition—discussed below—are essential elements of the journey” (Sigma, 2018).
Sigma. (2018). Journey to evidence-based healthcare. Retrieved from: https://www.reflectionsonnursingleadership.org/features/more-features/journey-to-evidence-based-healthcare
,
6-Pay and benefits are one important factor for many health care organizations especially with budget cuts and higher acuity of patients. Some staff are mandated and burnout occurs causing an increase in staff shortage. How would you see this as a possible solution in your own facility or how likely would you see the ability to implement this intervention into your own facility?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19273389
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-Technology play a very core role in the process of being able to implement projects. Further, through technology, projects can be sustained and maintained so that they are able to be achieved. Through the use of technology, implementation is easier and also more effective. Therefore, one has to look for the best form of technology that can help in the implementation or supporting the project to ensure that the implementation goes as smoothly as possible (Powell-Cope, Nelson, Patterson, 2008). The project that I will be handling looks to establish whether the involvement of healthcare facilities in nursing education can be able to help reduce the shortage of nurses that the country is facing currently. Technology in this project can be used in monitoring whether the involvement of healthcare facilities in nursing education will help to reduce the shortage of nurses in the country.
The best technology to use in the monitoring of the progress of this project is through use of data collection from every facility and the action they are making and the number of nurses it helps to bring to the workforce. The actions that facilities can take are very many, therefore one has to monitor which action results in a higher number of nurses to the workforce. The best action can then be selected through the evaluation and analysis of the data that is collected. However, there are barriers to the use of this technology. One of the barriers is the lack of sufficient information from the facilities on what actions they are taking and the number of nurses they are able to successfully help to bring to the workforce (Powell-Cope, Nelson, Patterson, 2008). Therefore, one of the barrier is the lack of sufficient information to help in monitoring.
References
Powell-Cope G, Nelson AL, Patterson ES. 2008. Patient Care Technology and Safety. In: Hughes RG, editor. Patient Safety and Quality: An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); Apr. Chapter 50. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2686/
Williamson K., Fineout- Overholt E., Kent B., Hutchinson A. & MBioeoth B. (2015). Teaching EBP: Integrating Technology Into AcademicCurricula to Faciltate Evidence- Based Decision Making. World View on Evidence-Based Nursing. Fourth Quarter. Retrieved from.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20456725
5-The use of technology is very necessary in this time and age. As healthcare continue to grow and improve, so do the use of technology need to change to improve the implementation process and the outcomes of EBP projects. In my project, I am going to be using the Electronic Health Record to collect useful data for my project. Accessing the HER will give me an overview of useful information about patient safety, evaluating care quality, maximizing efficiency, and measuring staffing needs (ANA, 2015) which are some of the issues related to fall. I will also implement the use of Information and Communication Technology to access adequate EBP evidence that pertain to my project. ICT will enable me to obtain lots of relevant information through the internet on my project.
Reference
American Nurses Association [ANA](2015.). Health Information Technology, Patient Safety, and Professional Nursing Care Documentation in Acute Care Settings. Retrieved from http://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Vol-20-2015/No2-May-2015/Articles-Previous-Topics/Technology-Safety-and-Professional-Care-Documentation.html
6- it sounds like you are doing a qualitative research project and with that you will need the internet to gather material related to your study. The use of technology is essential for EBP as it help us learn new things through different ways. Before online and distant learning was not possible, today students are able to study anywhere anytime. Also we needed to go to the hospital for every little thing so the doctor or nurse can check us out; but today we can do everything in the comfort of our homes. This is amazing and I am looking forwards to see what the future holds for nursing with technology.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19261203
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-There are various in which a person can be able to evaluate whether the evidence they have and are using in the practice is true or not. It is always important to evaluate evidence so as to be able to understand what type of information one is using. Two methods that one can be able to use to evaluate evidence in the nursing practice include systematic reviews and meta analyses (Melnyk, 2011). Systematic reviews are a form of literature review that involves the use of systematic methods to be able to collect and analyze secondary information presented in a document. The method involves trying to understand whether the data presented in the source has followed the right steps when being developed. Meta analyses on the other hand is a method through which the researcher is able to evaluate the credibility of data being presented in various quantitative sources. According to research, one cannot be able to use the results of one research activity to implement an intervention. There is need for them to use several sources. Meta analyses allows the research to combine the results of various sources to find the commonality in them.
One of the main difference in both methods is the focus the methods. Meta-analysis focuses on the researcher being able to analyze quantitative data from various sources. Systematic reviews on the other and focus on both qualitative and quantitative data to come up with results (Uman, 2011). The main difference is therefore what type of data each deals with. Systematic reviews follow a certain procedure in order to be able to come up with a result. This is not the same as in the case of meta analyses where the focus is on research results of article that are investigating the same topic. The similarity in both is that they are able to help the researcher to compare various forms of data and come up with a result. They allow the researcher to compare the results of multiple research and studies.
References
Melnyk, B. M., (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Uman L. S. (2011). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l’Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, 20(1), 57–59.
5-Two methods of evaluating evidence are Case control study and Systematic Review. In Case control study Researchers choose people with a particular result (the cases) and interview the groups or check their records to ascertain what different experiences they had. They compare the odds of having an experience with the outcome to the odds of having an experience without the outcome. in Systematic Review a critical assessment and evaluation of all research studies that address a particular clinical issue. The researchers use an organized method of locating, assembling, and evaluating a body of literature on a particular topic using a set of specific criteria. A systematic review typically includes a description of the findings of the collection of research studies. The systematic review may also include a quantitative pooling of data, called a meta-analysis.In case studies, the study start with the identification of a group of individuals with a particular health outcome while in stystematic review summarises the results of available carefully designed healthcare studies (controlled trials) and provides a high level of evidence on the effectiveness of healthcare interventions. They are both alike because there is always a control group to compare data.
References
Admin. (2013, June 21). Introduction to study designs – case-control studies. Retrieved from https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/e-learning/epidemiology/practitioners/introduction-study-design-ccs
Nursing: Evaluate Evidence. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://guides.pcc.edu/c.php?g=210096&p=1385961
What is a systematic review? (n.d.). Retrieved from https://consumers.cochrane.org/what-systematic-review
6-A meta-analysis of all well-done studies of a given clinical topic (using participant-level data if available). Define criteria for which of the published studies are actually entered into this meta-analysis (e.g., only randomized blinded trials, or any direct comparison studies, etc.). This represents the reference standard. Limitations of this approach include the lack of agreement on reliable validity standards for meta-analysis and the possibility of incorporation bias due to testing the validity of a subset of evidence using the whole evidence as gold standard. In some instances, a small evidence base (consisting of one or a few well-designed, appropriately powered studies) may be sufficient to reach the most appropriate conclusion.
Systematic Reviews
A literature search could identify and compare the conclusions of different systematic reviews that used different prioritization strategies to address the same clinical question. The advantage of this method is its relative ease of implementation. Provided a reviewer can find published reviews that addressed the same clinical question using different strategies, the comparison of the reviews’ conclusions can be done relatively quickly. Although this would be the least labor-intensive method, it has some drawbacks. First, it may be difficult to identify clinical questions where different systematic reviews used different prioritization strategies. Second, the systematic reviews may have differed in other methodological areas, such as risk-of-bias assessment and strength of evidence assessment, which could then lead to differences in conclusions among reviews.
A reviewer could identify a single existing systematic review, determine its evidence prioritization strategy (by examining the report inclusion criteria), and test other prioritization strategies on the same evidence base, while keeping all other methodology the same. The advantage of this method over the method above is that other methodological aspects of review (e.g., risk-of-bias assessment) would no longer confound the comparison. However, this method is more labor-intensive than the method above, as it requires performing independent research synthesis using the other prioritization strategies
Treadwill, JR; Signh, S; Taliti, R. (2011). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. A Framework for “Best Evidence” Approaches in Systematic Reviews. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56652/
Reply | Quote & Reply
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19279183
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-Proposed solutions to my project will be to revise post fall debriefing- such as doing a fall huddle to analyzed the fall and educate staff on what to do. Post fall huddle should be conducted after a fall as soon as possible involving all staffs and even the patient to debrief on the what, how and why and see how similar incident can be avoided (SE Alert, 2015) Next will be to increase number of staff at certain time of the day such as the noon to bedtime time because that is when patient get agitated more. Increasing staff will reduce the nurse to patient ratio and will enable staff to take care of patient properly and will reduce falls. Incorporate physical therapy or restorative therapy on the patient daily schedule to build their strength. Staffs need to do hourly rounding at night to take care of toileting and hydration needs.
After talking to some of the nurses, so far we have implement a 4 to 6hrs shift in the late afternoon to have an extra help for the patients and that is helping. Staff is able to walk with patient in and around the unit when they want to and they don’t feel like they are secluded in a particular spot. We have also educated CNA’s to do hourly rounding especially at night. This facility is alarm free which I get the reason why. Alarms can wake up others who might be sleeping and will increase agitation and confusion at night. For this reason, hourly rounding is necessary to make sure patients are in bed and safe. Families are appreciating the new process and I think it is going to help a long ways if it is fully implemented.
Reference
SE Alert (2015) Preventing falls and fall-related injuries in health care facilities: A complimentary publication of The Joint Commission Issue 55. Retrieved from https://www.jointcommission.org/assets/1/18/SEA_55.pdf
5-The current perspective and direction from the context of the nursing environment are to improve cleanliness from a medical perspective. Patients need to have the safest environment in which they can recuperate. It is imperative to ensure that nurses maintain hand cleanliness to avoid the spread of diseases from one patient to the next (Papanicolas et al., 2017). It is also critical to provide their sanitation because this pans out well for them from the context of the medical care environments. Nurses who ensure cleanliness have the propensity of increasing the overall outlook from the context of patients because they get to understand the medical care environment as a place they should visit whenever they have problems. They can also recommend a solution to their friends and family for similar results.
References
Papanicolas, I., Figueroa, J. F., Orav, E. J., & Jha, A. K. (2017). Patient hospital experience improved modestly, but no evidence Medicare incentives promoted meaningful gains. Health Affairs, 36(1), 133-140.
Reply | Quote & Reply
6-My proposed solution involves extensive education that is personalized and individualized to each family or parent/child unit. This can vary depending on many different things such as perception of childhood obesity and the diseases that go with it, economic status, and other unforeseen circumstances that are as unique as the individuals themselves. When I started this project my plan was to make a pamphlet that was very brief and uniform. I am finding out that this method, albeit easier, would not address the needs of obese chidlren and their families and not accomplish what I am trying to get done. Personalized learning presents the opportunity to shift education by tailoring the learning experience to an individual’s needs and interests while helping them gain the knowledge, skills and experiences they need to succeed in college and career (Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G., 2015).
References
Willingham, D. T., Hughes, E. M., & Dobolyi, D. G. (2015). The Scientific Status of Learning Styles Theories. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/009862831558950
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19294199
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-Clinical significance refers to that ability displayed by a treatment to enable a patient return to his or healthy state of body functioning. However, it differs from statistical significance in a sense that it is more objective i.e. it determines whether the prescribed treatment was able to achieve the intended purpose (Sedgwick, 2014). Statistical significance, though a determinant that was only used sometimes back is expressed as a variable meaning that it is never exact on whether the treatment recommended is going to restore a patient’s normality. It operates on the principle of probability.
The ultimate aim of the evidence-based practice project is to bring forth positive outcome. Incorporation of clinical significance can prove to be of great help in achieving this. Carrying out a clinical interpretation in the entire research process will be fundamental in ensuring that patient’s safety, as well as efficacy need, is put into consideration when it comes to decisions made. This will significantly enhance positive outcomes of the research work.
A critical evaluation of the research project by clinicians so as to qualify internal as well as external validity will trigger positive results. The employment of all these aspects of clinical significance will see to it that Evidence-based practice project becomes not only meaningful but also helpful to those seeking medical solutions to their unhealthy conditions.
References
Sedgwick, P. (2014). Clinical significance versus statistical significance. BMJ, 348, g2130-g2130. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2130
5-According to my memory about statistics, statistical significance is a result that is not attributed to chance. Meaning that the null hypothesis is true. Using p-value of less than 0.05 shows the rejection of the null hypothesis- a significant difference exists.
“Clinical significance is the practical importance of the treatment effect, whether it has a real, palpable, noticeable effect on daily life (Leyva De Los Rios, 2017).” It is the difference in patient care outcome.
We can use statistical significance in results for evidence-based practice. Then use the clinical significance to improve the patient care outcome. Collecting articles showing a significant difference in positive outcomes of care will be supporting evidence for the proposed project for a change of practice.
Leyva De Los Rios, C. (2017). Statistical significance vs. clinical significance. Retrieved from
https://www.students4bestevidence.net/statistical-significance-vs-clinical-significance/
6-understanding the statistics is very important in nursing. Learning how to measure outcomes in clinical practice is important. Collecting evidence-based practices is one thing, but collecting results from the outcomes is different. For example, evaluating how our practice affects pts is measured differently I think. We would have to create charts to show the improvement, right? Did your co-workers do a project like this yet?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19294201
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-Clinical significance refers to that ability displayed by a treatment to enable a patient return to his or healthy state of body functioning. However, it differs from statistical significance in a sense that it is more objective i.e. it determines whether the prescribed treatment was able to achieve the intended purpose (Sedgwick, 2014). Statistical significance, though a determinant that was only used sometimes back is expressed as a variable meaning that it is never exact on whether the treatment recommended is going to restore a patient’s normality. It operates on the principle of probability.
The ultimate aim of the evidence-based practice project is to bring forth positive outcome. Incorporation of clinical significance can prove to be of great help in achieving this. Carrying out a clinical interpretation in the entire research process will be fundamental in ensuring that patient’s safety, as well as efficacy need, is put into consideration when it comes to decisions made. This will significantly enhance positive outcomes of the research work.
A critical evaluation of the research project by clinicians so as to qualify internal as well as external validity will trigger positive results. The employment of all these aspects of clinical significance will see to it that Evidence-based practice project becomes not only meaningful but also helpful to those seeking medical solutions to their unhealthy conditions.
References
Sedgwick, P. (2014). Clinical significance versus statistical significance. BMJ, 348, g2130-g2130. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2130
5-According to my memory about statistics, statistical significance is a result that is not attributed to chance. Meaning that the null hypothesis is true. Using p-value of less than 0.05 shows the rejection of the null hypothesis- a significant difference exists.
“Clinical significance is the practical importance of the treatment effect, whether it has a real, palpable, noticeable effect on daily life (Leyva De Los Rios, 2017).” It is the difference in patient care outcome.
We can use statistical significance in results for evidence-based practice. Then use the clinical significance to improve the patient care outcome. Collecting articles showing a significant difference in positive outcomes of care will be supporting evidence for the proposed project for a change of practice.
Leyva De Los Rios, C. (2017). Statistical significance vs. clinical significance. Retrieved from
https://www.students4bestevidence.net/statistical-significance-vs-clinical-significance/
6-understanding the statistics is very important in nursing. Learning how to measure outcomes in clinical practice is important. Collecting evidence-based practices is one thing, but collecting results from the outcomes is different. For example, evaluating how our practice affects pts is measured differently I think. We would have to create charts to show the improvement, right? Did your co-workers do a project like this yet?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19302789
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-One potential barrier to the success of my projet will be being able to keep children and their parents and caregivers is keeping them engaged long enough to see positive changes. Weight loss and management is a process and keeping with it can be trying. One way to combat this would be to check in periodically to provide encouragement and assess progress. A lack of trust in the process or not fully understanding the EBP can hinder healthcare professionals from continuing to adhere to the practice (Spallek et al., 2010).
References
Spallek, H., Song, M., Polk, D. E., Bekhuis, T., Frantsve-Hawley, J., & Aravamudhan, K. (2010). Barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: A survey of early adopters. J Evid Based Dent Pract., 195-206
5-Two potential barriers that might prevent the EBP change proposal from continuing to obtain the same required results are patients’ culture. Many times, nurses take for granted the patients culture and beliefs. For example, in the Hispanic culture, men are considered weak if they asked for assistance; this can increase patient falls rates. An additional barrier will be an Asian postpartum woman, who believes she needs to stay in bed rest for the first 40 days, making her a higher risk for falls, due to muscle weakness as well as prone to blood clots.
Another factor that will impact the EBP change proposal is the staff knowledge toward fall and safety precautions. Safety education has a substantial impact on patients’ and staff safety. Strategies to overcome these barriers would be patient and staff education and identifying patient culture barriers.
6-To continue to impact outcomes over time in ensuring practice change is making sure nursing educators or clinicians should inform the families of the right time and ways to take the drugs, and how to monitor the blood sugar. The family members or patients themselves should be taught how to make detailed record every time after testing blood sugar. For patients that are on long term medications , they should be taught and encouraged to take insulin subcutaneous injections on time, to avoid elevated blood glucose and problems such as ketoacidosis due to belated drug use. Secondly , dietary education is considered for specific and individualized regimen for each patient . The patients with their families are informed of the importance of eating right in the whole process of treatment which will be achieved by following advice of nutritionists and cultivating a good dietetic habit. The concerns or barriers such as not taking drugs timely, healthy diets, keeping exercises, testing and recording the level of blood glucose are barriers that may prevent EBP change proposal. Periodic telephone follow-up should be made during 3 months after discharge from the hospital to explore the effects of family rehabilitation on patients especially children that are impacted by the disease.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Answer Based On These Answers As They Are Listed Each One Must Be Answered In Apaform And Not Less Than 150 Words 19307341
/in Uncategorized /by developer4-The BSN prepared RN has a research knowledge base that pushes critical thinking and process improvements and change. Challenging policies in place and ensuring the pediatric clinic I work in is using the most up to date and best practices when caring for patients is one of my goals. It is also important o me to educate staff on the changes including providers and nurses. Thus far, they have been receptive to change and I have had little push back. There are a few staff members that continuously challenge me and my research but it helps me gain more knowledge and to show professionalism and integrity to staff when dealing with conflict and change. Knowing that a BSN prepared RN is leading the pediatric clinic is comforting to the providers and staff within the clinic and there is a lot of trust instilled in the advocacy to our patients by practicing with EBP. The BSN prepared RN has the research to become even more innovative with new health care strategies.
5-Evidence-based practice (EBP) is an essential component of the practice of a bachelor of science in nursing student because EBP involves thorough investigation in the treatment of a patient. EBP involves taking into account references of the patient and combines it with the knowledge of the doctor in order to facilitate delivering maximum positive results. An objective of EBP is to avoid the use of unnecessary healthcare procedures and making decisions based on the available body of facts. EBP plays a major role in improving the standard of treatment given to patients.
When placing a nasogastric tube for feeding, it is important to determine its position by testing the pH of the aspirate to determine whether the tube has been placed in the correct position. Through this practice, it can be confirmed hat the tube has been placed in the gastric pathway and not in the respiratory pathway, which greatly reduces the incidence of pneumonia.
6-yes BSN prepared nurses use more critical thinking in processes and procedures. It is encouraging to work with management that supports your views. It also builds confidence in what you do and will encourage you to do more. Challenges from co-workers are inevitable especially when you are trying to change the old ways of doing things. No everybody like change and not everybody is comfortable dealing with change. Thanks for sharing your posts.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
2 Please Follow The Instructions Below 19174811
/in Uncategorized /by developerWhat is the difference between a DNP and a PhD in nursing? Which of these would you choose to pursue if you decide to continue your education to the doctoral level?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"