Need an argumentative essay on POLICY MAKING IN THE UK. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

nd its prevention were recognized a hundred years ago, political concern and legal steps to stop this problem started from the 1950s (Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000). It has become an acute problem nowadays because Smoking remains the main cause of preventable disease and premature death in the UK. In England alone, over 80,000 deaths per year are due to smoking and about 8.5 million people still smoke in England today. (dh.gov.uk). In the case of UK, the anti-tobacco strategy is carried as a cross-government initiative involving a variety of departments and agencies. The Health Department has the overall responsibility for the delivery of anti-tobacco strategy through formulation of strict laws. UK government formulated its anti-tobacco policy to the extent that it did not want young people to be exposed to tobacco promotions and advertisements and importantly wanted to make it difficult for the young people to get hold of tobacco and tobacco related product of cigarette. As far as the promotions and advertisements are concerned, the UK government believes that if children or young people are not exposed to it, it will not create an urge among them to smoke. Tobacco policy currently rests on claims: tobacco advertising and promotion are the major reasons why young people begin to smoke. so all forms of tobacco advertising and promotion, including tobacco displays, should be banned. (Basham).

As part of the anti-tobacco policy, the government came up with the Health Bill 2009. The key proposals in the bill are the need for the commercial shops to remove tobacco displays and importantly restrict the sale of cigarettes from vending machines. Removing tobacco displays will in a way prevent prospective children and young people from being exposed to the promotions and will also support smokers who want to quit as displays prompt impulse purchases undermining efforts to give up. (dh.gov.uk). Also, the proposal to restrict or even ban the sale of cigarettes from the

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Political and economic concerns in global expansion of the firm. Needs to be 3 pages. Please no plagiarism.

For example, these domestic forces are extremely powerful in advance / developed nations unlike in developing nations where enterprises are blatantly involved in employing child labor, use of unethical practices and irresponsible production methods to maximize their wealth and rate of return.

The first major factor that have to be taken into account by strategic planners and top executives of a business entity when going global is accurate analysis of international business environment. Indeed, economic recession and turmoil followed by credit crunch also hampers growth and expansion of host nation’s economy. For instance, the host nation is also dependent on other developing and advance world economies for foreign trade. however, lower aggregate consumption and output reduces trade and commerce activities in such nations that later adversely impacts chosen host country’s markets. In simple words, the recession results in unemployment, poverty and low purchasing power that aggravates business scenario in chosen markets. (Daft, 2009)

The second major factor is exchange rate fluctuations of host nation’s currency. Indeed, the frequent undervaluation or overvaluation of currency due to lack of appropriate foreign reserves from foreign trade may lead to exchange losses at the time of conversion. For example, if currency of Japan is undervalued against home country’s (USA) currency at the time of investment ($1 = 90 Yen), it is beneficial for a foreign nation to invest in an economy because more monetary units are received from exchange. Nevertheless, after the formation of business subsidiary if currency undervalues further ($1 = 95 Yen), it would lead to exchange losses when subsidiary firm will opt to transfer profits back to USA. In contrast, if Japanese Yen appreciates and become stronger ($1 = 80 Yen) then US firm will be advantaged

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Political broadside detailing your objections to new Constitution. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

A state should be allowed to ratify a proposed federal constitutional amendment. The process of ratification may be very complex when it comes to being practiced all over the country, but in a state scenario, the ratification convention method is a bit less complex in comparison.

The new constitution was suggested when the war was over, and the United states was said to be one of the sovereign states that has in place a weak central government. The new constitution proposes a bicameral legislature. This is a legislative branch that comprises of two chambers. Here, each state would represented depending on the number of inhabitants that exist in their state. This meant that large states would have more representatives than small states. The constitution also stated that the members of the legislature would be elected by the citizens, and the executive selected by the legislative branch. The terms of office in the constitution were not specified (Kelly, 2005).

Ratification of the constitution would give only one political party the authority to suppress the rights of the minority. This would not be fair to the minority groups in several states that have a greater population of minorities than other states. The constitution would also allow the larger states to rule over the smaller states in situations of democratic responsiveness not only at the state level, but also at the national level. According to the new constitution, the number of representatives in the legislature is dependent on the inhabitants. Larger states would, therefore, have more representation in the legislature as compared to the smaller states. The constitution is, therefore, set up in a particular way whereby, the larger states get to dominate. This brings about the strong need for an amendment of such a proposed constitution.

Every state needs to have equal representation in the

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Political science; Multicultural Nature;The book Privilage, Power, and Difference and the movieCrash. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

However they can also be part of the solution as man has the potential to solve these problems. The central theme of the book can be summed up by this sentence in his book: “The trouble that surrounds difference is really about privilege and power – the existence of privilege and the lopsided distribution of power that keeps it going.

“(Allan Johnson 2001) According to Johnson all individuals confront issues of difference and privilege often causing fear and discomfort in people. Johnson also believes that differences in class have tremendous effect on peoples lives. But class is different from gender or race or ethnicity or sexual orientation. He believes that people have the potential to change the class to which they belong but the other differences are difficult to change because they are associated with birth. People are generally classified on the basis of their physical attributes and appearances. Class differences are a result of capitalism. The cause of modern racism is primarily economic. Racism is a problem that affects all white people. Only the degree varies depending on their social class. The advantage of being white is likely to be more significant for the lower working-class than for whites belonging to the middle and upper classes. Social issues are prevalent because of the existence of privilege and misuse of power by people. Privilege creates inequality. People of all groups must work together to change this inequality. People dont want to discuss words such as “privilege,” “racism,” and “oppression.” According to Johnson these words must be discussed openly and a collective effort must be made to resolve these issues. All feelings of blame, guilt, shame should be set aside and our focus must be on the dire need to change.

In the movie Crash the director Haggis weaves several stories around incidents that happen during two days in Los Angeles. The stories revolve around a group of strangers who clash

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Political Science Questions and Answers. Needs to be 3 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Using the concepts of competition and socialization to anchor your analysis, explain what Waltz means when he writes that a structure “may designate a compensating device that works to produce a uniformity of outcomes despite the variety of inputs.” The implication by Waltz is that structure within the global system always focuses on maintaining their outcomes within constricted margins no matter the inputs to them. This is possible due to socialization factors and competition. Socialization results from differences in societies that arise from informal and impulsive techniques applied in the definition of conduct norms. Consequently, the resulting norms control the group members and this discharges diversity and heartens homogeneity. Conversely, competition defines organization where the outcomes facilitate the selection of behavior, where the least successful conducts leave the global system and the triumphant institutes set the pace imitated by others. Q.3. what are the core assumptions of realism, according to Gilpin? How and WHY do Mearshimer’s assumptions differ?

Guzzini reveals Gilpin’s five assumptions: the global system is stable provided no nations attempt changing it. states challenge the system where the benefits arising outdo the expenses incurred. nations seek to system change through economic, politica, and territorial growth up to the point of equilibrium or excess on marginal costs of continued change compared to marginal benefits. the attainment of equilibrium between benefits and costs resulting from additional change and growth causes faster increment in econiomic cost to sustain the status compared to the financial ability to support th status. and failure to resolve unequity causes system changes settles for a novel equity reflection .

While Gilpin’s assumptions focus on the system systematic, and interaction changes within the global system, Mearshimer’s assumptions focus on factors contributing to the endless competition for security amongst nations. Additionally, Mearsheimer argues that given that powerful states operate anarchic environment, they feat and distrust each other leaving each to worry about the objectives of the other on security. Q4. Compare how Lebow and Waltz explain the nature of order and its relevance to the behavior of states on the world stage

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"