Need an argumentative essay on Personality development. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Download file to see previous pages…

Although there are numerous institutions that establish the ethical standards for us, yet religion happens to be the most important and dominating institution amongst all of them. This is so because the level of seriousness with which we understand and try to implement the religious teachings in our lives is second to no level of seriousness that we maintain toward such other institutions as laws and regulations. Religion guides us in every matter of life from birth till death. It teaches us how we have to lead our lives and what approach should we develop in our life toward others as well as the various challenges that we encounter in the life. “In orthodox Christianity, one’s faith can help them through the stressors of life. It allows them to see a different perspective and continue to have faith in something greater than they are” (Taylor). We tend to deal with others in due accordance with our religious teachings so that we execute the behaviors that are appreciated by our religion and do not execute the behaviors that are condemned by our religion. Over the passage of time, these behaviors become our habits and become fundamental features of our personalities. The role of culture in shaping our personalities The culture we live in affects our personalities a lot. This is why people living in a certain countries are said to have common personalities. We can easily access literature demonstrating how Germans are very particular about the deadlines in business and how Indians are very hospitable towards the guests. For example, “Since Germans respect schedules and deadlines, it is not unusual for managers to expect people to work late and even give up weekends in order to meet target deadlines” (Payne). These notions develop about people belonging to particular countries because of the influence of cultures of their homelands on their personalities. Our personalities change as we move from one culture into another. First, we experience a culture shock, but gradually, we merge into the new culture, thus getting our personalities modified. The impact of our experiences on our personalities Every individual thinks about things differently because he/she has had a different experience with the thing in life in the past. Basically, when we live in a setting where certain activities are against are norms but they are practiced quite frequently, we tend to develop an indifference to them and they do not affect us much. On the other hand, when we are in a locality where such activities are condemned, we show a very strong reaction to it when such activities occasionally happen. For example, heterosexual people are not much affected by gay marriages happening around them in countries where gay marriages are legal, but the same cannot be said for the heterosexual people in countries where gay marriages are condemned. Likewise, an individual who has had faithful friends in the past tends to trust anybody in life whereas people who have been cheated upon by friends in the past do not trust others easily. Our perceptions about things are shaped by the kind of experience we have had with them. However, such perceptions are very flexible because we do not have the same experience with a certain thing every time we encounter it. As we learn more, and experience differently, so do our perceptions modify.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Personality Theory Blog. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism.

In a broader context, this distinction can be based on two major categories. the approach that falls under the category of consistency (where personality is a fixed idea), and those strategies that focus on change (where personality is a fluid concept) (Larsen, 1989). Obviously such an oversimplification does not quantify every aspect of personality theory but it does give an overview how personality theories can be categorized.

For instance, Lewis Goldberg proposed the big five personality theory model, which incorporates the compares and methodology. The big five model primarily depends on the study of natural languages. Big five model has been developed in view of partially independent course in the questionnaire domain. lexical studies give the most convincing evidence supporting the big five model.

For instance, the big five model can be carried out to the personality questionnaire in which the items from the population of phrases and sentences is used. However, the sampling strategy can be problematic because an infinite population cannot be represented in the sample (Goldberg, 1996). Therefore to represent the sampling of personality descriptive terms, especially the adjectives might call for representing sampling of personality attributes (Goldberg, 1996). This is a psychometric a rationale which is consistent with the lexical hypothesis. that the most distinctive and widespread phenotypic attributes get encoded as single words in the concept reservoir of language, and the degree of representation of equality in terms of words corresponds to the importance of the attribute (Goldberg, 1996). The expert personality attribute distinctions can go beyond the emphasized transactions expressed in everyday language. Hence, the representation or the sampling through lexical approach can give the necessary features for an optimal representation of personality traits.

An interesting take from the big

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Phantom Limb. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

The pain is usually for a short time and reduces over time as the patient comes to terms with their condition.

The Phantom Limb syndrome is a psychological condition since the pain that the patient feels is actually from a non existing limb. The condition has existed for a long time and several measures have been put in place to help patients. Some of the medical procedures over the years aimed at treating phantom limbs have resulted in failures (Boatright, 2010). Most patients with phantom limb syndrome are often convinced that the limb still exists and even feel like picking up things using the amputated limb. They often use gestures while they are talking as if they still have the limbs. They often feel twitches and itches in the amputated arms. The individuals born without limbs often have a different sensation known as phantom pain, which also affects paralyzed people. This occurs when the nerves that would innervate missing limbs start to cause severe pain.

As a neuropsychologist, it is common to encounter clients with phantom limbs. This patient for instance, is a war veteran from Afghanistan who lost her left limb during her career. She has been experiencing phantom limb syndrome after her left arm was amputated and has been feeling cramps around the area. One of the neurological theories explaining the cause of phantom limbs is the suggestion that it occurs as a result of irritation from nerve endings in the amputated limb called neuromas (Halligan, 2002). The nerve endings become inflamed and send anomalous signals to the brain, which are interpreted as pain. Treatments based on this theory have often led to failures. A neurologist Ramachandran developed the theory that phantom limbs occur as a result of ‘cross-wiring’ in the somatosensory cortex located in the post-central gyrus (Halligan, 2002).

The mirror neurons

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Philosophy 1. Needs to be 5 pages. Please no plagiarism.

That is deductive argument. However, if the process were done backward, then that would be inductive argumentation.

There are three perennial issues philosophy has always been concerned and trying to resolve until now. The first issue is the meaning of life, which philosophy tries to find value and reason, or purpose, for one to exist. The next issue is the origin of life, which philosophy searches for understandable answers as to where do all life and existence begin or come from. The last issue is the question of reality. Philosophy seeks to understand whether what we know and experience with our perception actually exists, not merely appears.

The cosmological argument for the existence of God states that the world or the cosmos most probably had a creator, a first cause, an unmoved mover who created everything that exist, which is attributed to God. On the other hand, the ontological argument would infer God’s existence through the a priori way of reasoning, wherein the human person can grasp the concept of a God, thus, there must be a God.

The four ethical systems are the Aristotelian Golden Mean, Confucian Golden Rule, Natural Law Ethics and Kantian Categorical Imperative. The Aristotelian Golden Mean is all about doing things in balanced measure, never doing any act that is too much or too less but doing what is just enough. The Confucian Golden Rule speaks of doing what is right to others if one were to expect good from others as well. The Natural Law Ethics rules that since nature and the universe moves in an orderly manner, we must act in accordance as such. The Kantian Categorical Imperative asserts that an individual’s morality is absolute and unconditional in any circumstances

The Western view of evil is that the existence of Evil is the absence of what is good. That means, an action that is void of any good

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"