Need an argumentative essay on Operations Mangement (Five Questions). Needs to be 14 pages. Please no plagiarism.

An organization uses operating performance to attract and retain customers and also serve them in a profitable manner (Hsu, Tan, Kannan &Keong Leong 2009, p. 835). Operations vary in different industries, but in general, they include things like on-time delivery, customer acquisition, running efficiently, and developing new products and services.

According to Barney (1991, p. 56), the internal organization of resources in a firm is the determinant of the firm’s performance and strategy. Barney further defines resources as capabilities, assets, attributes, knowledge and information, and all things that are under control of the firm to enable it implement strategies that aid in improving effectiveness and efficiency. Porter (1996), on the other hand, asserts that the most essential resources are the ones that are hard to imitate, superior in use, more valuable, and difficult to substitute. According to the two authors, a firm’s competitive advantage resides on inherent heterogeneity of strategic resources that are controlled by the firm (Barney 1991, Porter, 1996).

Therefore, failure to strategically integrate operations, finance, and marketing results in a weak and inconsistent company’s strategy, and its execution will be inefficient and flawed. In today’s world operation activities have become the dominant element in planning and management of production capacity (Stevens 2009, p. 5). Whether you are running a manufacturing firm or a service company, the organization deals with issues of what and the amount of production, and means of measuring performance. In many firms, operations are viewed as an identical partner with finance and marketing.

The operations staff of an organization concerns with the planning and management of production capacity, accompanied by production facilities and equipment. Operations gives an

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Opportunity Recognition: A Clearer Understanding. Needs to be 11 pages. Please no plagiarism.

This paper illustrates that academicians are one in saying that opportunity recognition is not limited to one theory or belief, and is, in fact, a confluence of three different views or theories, namely: the Creation theory. the Discovery Theory and the Allocative Theory which are discussed by other experts in their own particular ways and methods of analysis. Opportunity recognition is the ability to discern or identify a premise or an idea that may afford one to gain profit or advantage. G. T. Lumpkin describes it as “the ability to identify a good idea and transforms it into a business concept that adds value and generates revenues”. It is said to be a crucial element in business entrepreneurship and has been the subject of numerous research and theories by business scholars and researchers because of the various arguments and interpretations attributed to it. Opportunity recognition is based on the premise that profitable business is ever present around us, but they are only recognized by people with cognitive, entrepreneurial mindset, that is, people who have the genetic predisposition to recognize opportunities when they see one, because of their inherent, genetic thought processes. These are people who are said to have a business eye and are normally open to new experiences and changes. Opportunity recognition has been given due importance because it is the initial step to entrepreneurship, which is essential in a nation’s whole economic set-up, and is being considered as part of the educational curriculum to assist would-be entrepreneurs to effectively discern these opportunities and chances, which may escape them, if they do not possess the inherent knack for identification and recognition.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Oppression in the Twentieth Century. Needs to be 6 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Much of the definition of oppression is attributed to its nineteenth-century roots. Particularly, the works of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Karl Marx, and John Stuart Mill were pivotal in outlining the systematic nature of oppression, which has tremendous influence in its modern forms. On the one hand, the works and philosophies of Gandhi, de Beauvoir, Malcolm X, among others, have added dimensions to oppression, updating its conception to contemporary twentieth century.

Imperialism and colonization dominated the discourse on oppression especially during the early part of the 20th century. From Africa, Asia to Latin America, there was a wave of liberation movements that demonstrated various experiences of oppression and the attempts to be free from it. One of these experiences is the emergence of conflicts such as World War II wherein colonies were expected to provide warm bodies to fight in the frontlines as well as supply the raw materials and augment the war chest of their masters. The wartime sacrifices underscore a form of oppression that has permeated since the previous century and has spilled over to the 20th. Then, individual experiences amidst the dawn of modernity and the increased contact of people from various part of the globe gave rise to the growth of nationalism. This aspect is highlighted in the case of Gandhi. He is one of the most vocal advocates of decolonization in Asia. Gandhi’s crusade for India’s independence from Britain was inspired by personal maltreatment as he was building his career in Africa as a lawyer. As a non-white person, he experienced being thrown out of first-class train car, barred from certain hotel rooms and beaten for no reason but his color.

Gandhi’s philosophy behind the liberation movement he launched underscored a kind of oppression India experienced in its relationship with Britain.&nbsp.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Options for Lords reform. Needs to be 28 pages. Please no plagiarism.

this initiative there would be only a mere ninety-two hereditary Peers in the House of Lords and that too by election from within the large number of old Hereditary Lords. The House of Lords would then be dominated by appointed Peers and the hereditary Peers a mere rump of their size in days gone by. This situation would only last till the contemplated second phase of reforms of the House of Lords was finalised. It is this second phase of the reform of the House of Lords that becomes significant, for it means choosing from one of the many options that are present for the reform of the House of Lords.

The Saxon Kings in the eleventh century consulted a council called the Witans on important issues. Religious leaders, magnates and ministers of the King attended the Witans. By the thirteenth century the attendance in these councils grew to include representatives of counties, cities and boroughs. However, in a true sense the House of Lords finds in origins in the fourteenth century, when these royal advisers were divided into commoners and lords. (History: How the Lords evolved). Shire and borough representatives were termed as commoners and made up the Commons, while the religious leaders termed Lords Spiritual and the magnates termed Lords Temporal came to be known as the Upper House. Thus two clearly distinct houses came into existence. By the fifteenth century the membership of Lords Temporal started becoming a male domain and hereditary by nature and the role of the monarch in the choice of the members diminishing, as they were summoned by writ. The term peers started being applied to the Lords Temporal and though equal there emerged five ranks namely Duke, Marquess, Earl, Viscount and Baron. The sixteenth century brought changes to the attendance of the Lords Spiritual in the House of Lords. Till 1539 when the suppression of the monasteries took place the Lords Spiritual were made up of bishops, abbots and priors. Subsequent to 1539 only bishops made up the

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Need an argumentative essay on Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Organizations. Needs to be 1 pages. Please no plagiarism.

The article does outline the context in which the modern organizations are built, which includes factors like technology, diversity, and technology. It also gives out the ethical and expected behaviors within the organization. Lastly, the article describes and provides the expected culture which forms the basis of organizational culture which embraces a number of activities, behaviors inside and within the organization.

The individual’s processes involved in the organization involve an outlook of how employees perceive their attitude and personality, how they socialize, other motivational theories that support their activities. Motivation can be classified according to cognitive and behavioral techniques and processes. The work set up should be able to integrate the intrinsic rewards and job designs which will create a positive end result to both the organization and the employee.

Organizational design and change is an important factor to consider in the organization. The structure of the organization operates to influence the communication, allocation of resources, and decision makings. Organizations should establish the mode and structures that need to be followed within and outside the organization. Ways should be established that will help in managing changes that occur during the development process. The way change is integrated into the process is important.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"