Just as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation results described in Chapter 8 of Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, or in the optional resources. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study located in this week’s resources..
By Day 3
Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results. Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information. Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.
Reading Required
(Google Books-free chapter 8)
Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work” (pp. 167–207)
Plummer, Sara-Beth, Sara Makris, Sally Brocksen. Social Work Case Studies: Concentration Year. Laureate Publishing, 10/21/13. VitalBook file.
Social Work Research: Qualitative Groups Page 68-69
A focus group was conducted to explore the application of a cross-system collaboration and its effect on service delivery outcomes among social service agencies in a large urban county on the West Coast. The focus group consisted of 10 social workers and was led by a facilitator from the local office of a major community support organization (the organization). Participants in the focus group had diverse experiences working with children, youth, adults, older adults, and families. They represented agencies that addressed child welfare, family services, and community mental health issues. The group included five males and five females from diverse ethnicities.
The focus group was conducted in a conference room at the organization’s headquarters. The organization was interested in exploring options for greater collaboration and less fragmentation of social services in the local area. Participants in the group were recruited from local agencies that were either already receiving or were applying for funding from the organization. The 2-hour focus group was recorded.
The facilitator explained the objective of the focus group and encouraged each participant to share personal experiences and perspectives regarding cross-system collaboration. Eight questions were asked that explored local examples of cross-system collaboration and the strengths and barriers found in using the model. The facilitator tried to achieve maximum participation by reflecting the answers back to the participants and maintaining eye contact.
To analyze the data, the researchers carefully transcribed the entire recorded discussion and utilized a qualitative data analysis software package issued by StatPac, which offers a product called Verbatim Blaster. This software focuses on content coding and word counting to identify the most salient themes and patterns.
The focus group was seen by the sponsoring entity as successful because every participant eventually provided feedback to the facilitator about cross-system collaboration. It was also seen as a success because the facilitator remained engaged and nonjudgmental and strived to have each participant share their experiences.
In terms of outcomes, the facilitator said that the feedback obtained was useful in exploring new ways of delivering services and encouraging greater cooperation. As a result of this process, the organization decided to add a component to all agency annual plans and reports that asked them to describe what types of cross-agency collaboration were occurring and what additional efforts were planned.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Jury Selection One Study Of Grand Juries In Alameda County California Compared T
/in Uncategorized /by developerHello, could I be given full ap solutions to these four questions?
1. Jury Selection One study of grand juries in Alameda County, California, compared the demographiccharacteristics of jurors with the general population, to see if jury panels were representative. Theresults for age are shown below. The investigators wanted to know if the 66 jurors were selected atrandom from the population of Alameda County. (Only persons over 21 and over are considered; thecounty age distribution is known from Public Health Department data.) The study was published in theUCLA Law Review. -El__—-_me__—-_REE-EEI-_—-_ Do we have evidence that grand juries are selected at random for the population of AlamedaCounty?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just 4 Questions And Find Answer Online
/in Uncategorized /by developerHere are the websites for a few of the government agencies that are responsible for collecting data and making economic policy:
https://www.commerce.gov/
https://www.bls.gov/
https://www.cbo.gov/
https://www.federalreserve.gov/
look up all the above websites listed and complete the following question(about 2 pages)
a) What recent economic trends or issues are addressed there?
b) Select ONE economic issue from each website listed above.
c) Explain each economic issue in 6 to 10 sentences.
d) Please cite the source for each economic issue.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just 500 Words No Worries About Spelling Errors This Is A Lecture Video Https Us
/in Uncategorized /by developerjust 500 words no worries about spelling errors
This is a Lecture video
https://us-lti.bbcollab.com/collab/ui/session/playback
https://us-lti.bbcollab.com/collab/ui/session/playback
https://art21.org/watch/art-in-the-twenty-first-century/s5/julie-mehretu-in-systems-segment/ this is Julie Mehretu
https://art21.org/watch/art-in-the-twenty-first-century/s5/doris-salcedo-in-compassion-segment/ and this is Doris Salcedo
video lectures on Line, Shape and Space. You’ve also viewed the approx. 12 minute video segments on Vija Celmins, Doris Salcedo, and Julie Mehretu. I think of their work as mostly playing with the idea of Space – but in very different ways.
For this Discussion, you’ll be writing about the work of two of these artists and commenting on two of your teammates responses.
Answer the following questions (MINIMUM OF 500 WORDS)
1) Which artist’s work did you find most interesting? Why?
2) How did her work relate to the ideas of Shape or Space in Chapter 4? Both in technical terms, but also conceptually.
Be specific here by using vocabulary from the textbook. I’m looking for you to be able to apply the language and concepts from the book to the specific works shown in the videos. Can you expand on the just the actual presence of shape and space and apply these formal elements to their main concept? Make sure you cite specific works from the video.
3) How did her work relate to the ideas of Line in Chapter 3? Both in technical terms, but also conceptually.
Again, be specific by using the terminology from the textbook. Also, see if you can push the formal element of line to apply to the main concept of the artist.
4) Compare your answers to questions 1 – 3 with one of the other two artists. Did this other artist use Shape, Space, or Line differently? How?
Make sure you cite specific works from the video.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just A Template For A Guide I Have All The Information That I Will Put In Myself
/in Uncategorized /by developerI was wondering if you could create a template for an accounting theory assignment that I have. Just a template for a guide. I have all the information that I will put in myself. It needs to be done as a spreadsheet in excel. This is what needs to be included. Especially a sheet for inventory. Thank you in advance!
Prepare all journal entries to record the information for 2018. Prepare all adjusting journal entries as necessary Prepare an adjusted Trial Balance as of December 31, 2018 Prepare an income statement, statement of retained earnings and a balance sheet as of December 31, 2018 Prepare a cash flow statement, using the indirect method, for the year ended December 31, 2018 Close all accounts as necessary and prepare a post-closing Trial Balance Please include a sheet on how you calculated your adjusting Journal entries and inventory
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just After Reviewing A Large Stack Of Catalogs Strawberry Hill Gallery Has Brain
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust after reviewing a large stack of catalogs, Strawberry Hill Gallery has brainstormed a list of possible new products. They will now begin the first idea-reducing stage called ________ to arrive at a realistic number to purchase for resale.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answer The Question Please Number The Question Hcs 335biomedical Ethical Is
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust answer the question please number the question HCS/335
Biomedical Ethical Issues Resource
1-After exploring these biomedical issues for this learning activity, what impact will they have on you as a healthcare administrator/manager and what is their ethical impact on society as a whole?’’
Subject Research Resources
Review the following resources on human subject research from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services:
The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’)
Revised Common Rule
2-As a healthcare administrator/manager, you may oversee an IRB committee for your employer or you may be asked to give permission to researchers to conduct research in your facility. What do you need to know to ensure the protection of human subjects in research projects?
Informed Consent and Advance Directives Resources
Review the following resources on informed consent and advance directives:
3-After reading the resource information, how will you ensure legal and ethical consent for patients in your role as a healthcare administrator/manager and how will address issues related to advanced directives?
4-What happens when a patient is unable to give consent and a legal next of kin cannot be located as in emergency situations?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answer The Two Question Please Number The Answer Https Www Nursingworld Org
/in Uncategorized /by developerJUST ANSWER THE two QUESTION PLEASE NUMBER THE ANSWER.
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/coe-view-only/
1- After reading the Code of Ethics for Nurses, how can you use the Code to enhance ethical behavior in the workplace? Is anything missing from the Code? What guidance does the Code offer when an ethical decision is at hand? How does the Code relate to the ethical principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence? What other professional codes of ethics might be helpful in the workplace? Who regulates the behavior of nurses in the workplace?
Explore the AMA Code of Medical Ethics page on the American Medical Association (AMA) website.
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics
2- After reading the AMA Code of Ethics, how can you use the Code to enhance ethical behavior in the workplace? Do you see behaviors of physicians in your workplace that tell you they abide by this Code? How does the Code relate to the ethical principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence? Who regulates the behavior of physicians in the workplace?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answers These Question Based On The Project Make The Answers Short As Can A
/in Uncategorized /by developerjust answers these question based on the project
make the answers short as can as you could
QUALITATIVE. These are intentionally open-ended. In “real life” an interviewer would be mostly looking for a thoughtful (rather than a canned) response.
QUANTITATIVE. These questions will be scored on “correctness” based on the analysis you provided in Part 2.
Simple Regression:
Multiple Regression
Summary Questions
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As An Example
/in Uncategorized /by developerI just need examplesplease help fill out this learning team charter. I have attached the one that we used at the beginning. Just as an example.Learning Team Charter As your Learning Team has worked together, you have had the opportunity to communicate, to make decisions, to face conflict, and to pursue the goals.1.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As In Needs Assessments Interviews And Focus Groups Are Common Tools For Ob 1
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation results described in Chapter 8 of Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, or in the optional resources. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study located in this week’s resources..
By Day 3
Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results. Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information. Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.
Reading Required
(Google Books-free chapter 8)
Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work” (pp. 167–207)
Plummer, Sara-Beth, Sara Makris, Sally Brocksen. Social Work Case Studies: Concentration Year. Laureate Publishing, 10/21/13. VitalBook file.
Social Work Research: Qualitative Groups Page 68-69
A focus group was conducted to explore the application of a cross-system collaboration and its effect on service delivery outcomes among social service agencies in a large urban county on the West Coast. The focus group consisted of 10 social workers and was led by a facilitator from the local office of a major community support organization (the organization). Participants in the focus group had diverse experiences working with children, youth, adults, older adults, and families. They represented agencies that addressed child welfare, family services, and community mental health issues. The group included five males and five females from diverse ethnicities.
The focus group was conducted in a conference room at the organization’s headquarters. The organization was interested in exploring options for greater collaboration and less fragmentation of social services in the local area. Participants in the group were recruited from local agencies that were either already receiving or were applying for funding from the organization. The 2-hour focus group was recorded.
The facilitator explained the objective of the focus group and encouraged each participant to share personal experiences and perspectives regarding cross-system collaboration. Eight questions were asked that explored local examples of cross-system collaboration and the strengths and barriers found in using the model. The facilitator tried to achieve maximum participation by reflecting the answers back to the participants and maintaining eye contact.
To analyze the data, the researchers carefully transcribed the entire recorded discussion and utilized a qualitative data analysis software package issued by StatPac, which offers a product called Verbatim Blaster. This software focuses on content coding and word counting to identify the most salient themes and patterns.
The focus group was seen by the sponsoring entity as successful because every participant eventually provided feedback to the facilitator about cross-system collaboration. It was also seen as a success because the facilitator remained engaged and nonjudgmental and strived to have each participant share their experiences.
In terms of outcomes, the facilitator said that the feedback obtained was useful in exploring new ways of delivering services and encouraging greater cooperation. As a result of this process, the organization decided to add a component to all agency annual plans and reports that asked them to describe what types of cross-agency collaboration were occurring and what additional efforts were planned.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"