Just as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation results described in Chapter 8 of Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, or in the optional resources. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study located in this week’s resources..
By Day 3
Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results. Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information. Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.
Reading Required
(Google Books-free chapter 8)
Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work” (pp. 167–207)
Plummer, Sara-Beth, Sara Makris, Sally Brocksen. Social Work Case Studies: Concentration Year. Laureate Publishing, 10/21/13. VitalBook file.
Social Work Research: Qualitative Groups Page 68-69
A focus group was conducted to explore the application of a cross-system collaboration and its effect on service delivery outcomes among social service agencies in a large urban county on the West Coast. The focus group consisted of 10 social workers and was led by a facilitator from the local office of a major community support organization (the organization). Participants in the focus group had diverse experiences working with children, youth, adults, older adults, and families. They represented agencies that addressed child welfare, family services, and community mental health issues. The group included five males and five females from diverse ethnicities.
The focus group was conducted in a conference room at the organization’s headquarters. The organization was interested in exploring options for greater collaboration and less fragmentation of social services in the local area. Participants in the group were recruited from local agencies that were either already receiving or were applying for funding from the organization. The 2-hour focus group was recorded.
The facilitator explained the objective of the focus group and encouraged each participant to share personal experiences and perspectives regarding cross-system collaboration. Eight questions were asked that explored local examples of cross-system collaboration and the strengths and barriers found in using the model. The facilitator tried to achieve maximum participation by reflecting the answers back to the participants and maintaining eye contact.
To analyze the data, the researchers carefully transcribed the entire recorded discussion and utilized a qualitative data analysis software package issued by StatPac, which offers a product called Verbatim Blaster. This software focuses on content coding and word counting to identify the most salient themes and patterns.
The focus group was seen by the sponsoring entity as successful because every participant eventually provided feedback to the facilitator about cross-system collaboration. It was also seen as a success because the facilitator remained engaged and nonjudgmental and strived to have each participant share their experiences.
In terms of outcomes, the facilitator said that the feedback obtained was useful in exploring new ways of delivering services and encouraging greater cooperation. As a result of this process, the organization decided to add a component to all agency annual plans and reports that asked them to describe what types of cross-agency collaboration were occurring and what additional efforts were planned.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answer The Question Please Number The Question Hcs 335biomedical Ethical Is
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust answer the question please number the question HCS/335
Biomedical Ethical Issues Resource
1-After exploring these biomedical issues for this learning activity, what impact will they have on you as a healthcare administrator/manager and what is their ethical impact on society as a whole?’’
Subject Research Resources
Review the following resources on human subject research from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services:
The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (‘Common Rule’)
Revised Common Rule
2-As a healthcare administrator/manager, you may oversee an IRB committee for your employer or you may be asked to give permission to researchers to conduct research in your facility. What do you need to know to ensure the protection of human subjects in research projects?
Informed Consent and Advance Directives Resources
Review the following resources on informed consent and advance directives:
3-After reading the resource information, how will you ensure legal and ethical consent for patients in your role as a healthcare administrator/manager and how will address issues related to advanced directives?
4-What happens when a patient is unable to give consent and a legal next of kin cannot be located as in emergency situations?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answer The Two Question Please Number The Answer Https Www Nursingworld Org
/in Uncategorized /by developerJUST ANSWER THE two QUESTION PLEASE NUMBER THE ANSWER.
https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/nursing-excellence/ethics/code-of-ethics-for-nurses/coe-view-only/
1- After reading the Code of Ethics for Nurses, how can you use the Code to enhance ethical behavior in the workplace? Is anything missing from the Code? What guidance does the Code offer when an ethical decision is at hand? How does the Code relate to the ethical principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence? What other professional codes of ethics might be helpful in the workplace? Who regulates the behavior of nurses in the workplace?
Explore the AMA Code of Medical Ethics page on the American Medical Association (AMA) website.
https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/ethics
2- After reading the AMA Code of Ethics, how can you use the Code to enhance ethical behavior in the workplace? Do you see behaviors of physicians in your workplace that tell you they abide by this Code? How does the Code relate to the ethical principles of autonomy, justice, beneficence and non-maleficence? Who regulates the behavior of physicians in the workplace?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just Answers These Question Based On The Project Make The Answers Short As Can A
/in Uncategorized /by developerjust answers these question based on the project
make the answers short as can as you could
QUALITATIVE. These are intentionally open-ended. In “real life” an interviewer would be mostly looking for a thoughtful (rather than a canned) response.
QUANTITATIVE. These questions will be scored on “correctness” based on the analysis you provided in Part 2.
Simple Regression:
Multiple Regression
Summary Questions
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As An Example
/in Uncategorized /by developerI just need examplesplease help fill out this learning team charter. I have attached the one that we used at the beginning. Just as an example.Learning Team Charter As your Learning Team has worked together, you have had the opportunity to communicate, to make decisions, to face conflict, and to pursue the goals.1.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As In Needs Assessments Interviews And Focus Groups Are Common Tools For Ob 1
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation results described in Chapter 8 of Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, or in the optional resources. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study located in this week’s resources..
By Day 3
Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results. Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information. Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.
Reading Required
(Google Books-free chapter 8)
Dudley, J. R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.) Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books.
Chapter 8, “Improving How Programs and Practice Work” (pp. 167–207)
Plummer, Sara-Beth, Sara Makris, Sally Brocksen. Social Work Case Studies: Concentration Year. Laureate Publishing, 10/21/13. VitalBook file.
Social Work Research: Qualitative Groups Page 68-69
A focus group was conducted to explore the application of a cross-system collaboration and its effect on service delivery outcomes among social service agencies in a large urban county on the West Coast. The focus group consisted of 10 social workers and was led by a facilitator from the local office of a major community support organization (the organization). Participants in the focus group had diverse experiences working with children, youth, adults, older adults, and families. They represented agencies that addressed child welfare, family services, and community mental health issues. The group included five males and five females from diverse ethnicities.
The focus group was conducted in a conference room at the organization’s headquarters. The organization was interested in exploring options for greater collaboration and less fragmentation of social services in the local area. Participants in the group were recruited from local agencies that were either already receiving or were applying for funding from the organization. The 2-hour focus group was recorded.
The facilitator explained the objective of the focus group and encouraged each participant to share personal experiences and perspectives regarding cross-system collaboration. Eight questions were asked that explored local examples of cross-system collaboration and the strengths and barriers found in using the model. The facilitator tried to achieve maximum participation by reflecting the answers back to the participants and maintaining eye contact.
To analyze the data, the researchers carefully transcribed the entire recorded discussion and utilized a qualitative data analysis software package issued by StatPac, which offers a product called Verbatim Blaster. This software focuses on content coding and word counting to identify the most salient themes and patterns.
The focus group was seen by the sponsoring entity as successful because every participant eventually provided feedback to the facilitator about cross-system collaboration. It was also seen as a success because the facilitator remained engaged and nonjudgmental and strived to have each participant share their experiences.
In terms of outcomes, the facilitator said that the feedback obtained was useful in exploring new ways of delivering services and encouraging greater cooperation. As a result of this process, the organization decided to add a component to all agency annual plans and reports that asked them to describe what types of cross-agency collaboration were occurring and what additional efforts were planned.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As In Needs Assessments Interviews And Focus Groups Are Common Tools For Ob
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as in needs assessments, interviews and focus groups are common tools for obtaining information about the processes involved in the implementation of programs. Process evaluation should include specifics about purpose, questions which the evaluation will address, and methods that social workers will use to conduct evaluations.
Review the many examples of process evaluation ATTACHED. Select an example of a process evaluation that produced valuable information. Compare the description of those results with the Social Work Research Qualitative Groups case study ATTACHED.
Post a description of the process evaluation that you chose and explain why you selected this example. Describe the stage of program implementation in which the evaluation occurred, the informants, the questions asked, and the results. Based upon your comparison of the case study and the program evaluation report that you chose, improve upon the information presented in the case study by identifying gaps in information. Fill in these gaps as if you were the facilitator of the focus group. Clearly identify the purpose of the process evaluation and the questions asked.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As Individuals Have No Ethical Obligation To Contribute To Charity Or To Do
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as individuals have no ethical obligation to contribute to charity or to do volunteer work in their
community, business has no ethical obligations to serve wider social goods. But, just as charity is a good thing and something that we all want to encourage, business should be encouraged to contribute to society in ways that go beyond the narrow obligations of law and economics. Identify the model of CSR that reflects this line of thought>
A) Integrative model
B) Stakeholder theory
C) Philanthropic model
D) Social web model
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As Office Politics Is A Common Theme In Movies And Tv There Are A Surprisin
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as office politics is a common theme in movies and TV, there are a surprising number of video games with an office politics theme. Search on “office politics games,” “office simulators” or similar searches and see if you find any games that look interesting or are relevant to this module. Some of these games are even available for free—special kudos to any of you who try the game out yourselves. But at least include a short description of the game you found and a link to a video or webpage that illustrates the game.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As Other Areas Of Need And At Risk Populations Require Additional Resources
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as other areas of need and at-risk populations require additional resources and support, so do couples and families. As a helping professional, you will be required to be aware of and be able to evaluate the mental health services provided in your community, from treatment to primary preventative interventions.
For this Assignment, select one issue from the following list:
Identify a resource in your own community that provides primary, secondary, and tertiary services or resources for the issue you selected. Then, consider any gaps that may exist and how you might address them.
The Assignment (2–3 pages)
Support your Assignment with specific references to all resources used in its preparation. You are asked to provide a reference list for all resources, including those in the resources for this course.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Just As We Had 3 Versions Of The T Test 1 Sample 2 Sample With And Without Equal
/in Uncategorized /by developerJust as we had 3 versions of the t-test (1 sample, 2 sample (with and without equal variance), and paired; we have several versions of ANOVA – single factor, factorial (called 2-factor with replication in Excel), and within-subjects (2-factor without replication in Excel). What examples (professional, personal, social) can you provide on when we might use each type? What would be the appropriate hypotheses statements for each example?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"