Jack Devereux is a manager for Company XYZ. He has been with the company for about seven years and was recruited from Company XYZ’s main competitor. Jack is a forward-thinking individual and wants to figure out ways to help retain “star” employees. He is noticing that many of his better employees have left the company because of better job offers. He decides that it is time to have a serious conversation with his employees.

After holding a town hall meeting with his employees, he learns that employees feel that they are being micro-managed and that they are being overworked. One employee mentions that she does not agree with the “zero tolerance for cyberloafing” policy and that several of her colleagues left this company because of this unnecessary policy. Cyberloafing is a term used to describe the actions of employees who use their Internet access at work for personal use while pretending to do legitimate work. Jack didn’t think his “zero tolerance for cyberloafing” policy was such a bad idea when it was first implemented a year ago. After the meeting, Jack shares the newly revealed information with the CEO who asks him to consider revisiting the policy. Jack is hesitant about revising the policy for a number of reasons.

Jack decides to call his old college Business Professor and discuss this issue affecting retention levels. His old college professor is disappointed with the zero tolerance for cyberloafing policy. He explains, “Employees deserve some autonomy at work.” Jack thanks him for his time and decides to consider all feasible options.

Once you have finished reading about this topic and reviewing the background materials, please write a 2- to 3-page paper (either in essay format or Q & A format) addressing the following questions:

1. From an employee’s perspective, what are the pros and cons to cyberloafing while at work? From a management perspective, what are the pros and cons to cyberloafing while at work?
2. Should Jack consider revising the current policy? Should a policy be changed once it is implemented? Will he be sending mixed messages to his employees?
3. Should all policies be revisited from time to time to see if they are relevant and practical? If so, how often?
4. Do you agree that employees deserve some autonomy at work? Do you think retention levels will improve if employees have more autonomy? Justify your response.
5. If employees have time for cyberloafing, does that mean that they need more work to do? Should managers conduct a work flow analysis? What are some options?
6. As a future manager, discuss your internet-usage policy in detail so there is no confusion among the employees.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Jack Jones, the materials manager at Precision Enterprises, is beginning to look for ways to reduce inventories. A recent accounting statement shows the following inventory investment by category: raw materials, $3,129,500; work-in-process, $6,237,000; and finished goods, $2,686,500. This year’s cost of goods sold will be about $32.5 million. Assuming 52 business weeks per year, express total inventory as

1. Weeks of supply
2. Inventory turns

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Jack Smith the Real Estate Developer

Jack Smith is a real estate developer. He develops residential townhouses in the Dandenong local area. He purchases a large block of land for $2 million and plans to build 50 townhouses on the block at a considerable profit. But Dandenong Council denies his development application on the basis of a road widening proposal that will substantially reduce the size of the block of land. This road widening proposal reduces the value of the block of Jack Smith’s land to $1 million.

Jack Smith obtained a council certificate from Dandenong Council before he purchased the block of land. He reviews the information in the certificate. If the block of land had been subject to a road widening proposal then it should have been disclosed by Dandenong Council in the certificate. There is no such disclosure in the certificate. As Jack Smith didn’t bother to read the certificate before he purchased the land, he is relieved to find the council has made this 

mistake. He secretly knows that if Dandenong Council had been careful and included the road widening disclosure in the certificate, he would not have seen it and gone ahead with the land purchase anyway.

Jack Smith now wants to sue Dandenong Council in negligence for economic loss. Dandenong Council claims that negligence only applies to physical actions, not written words, and is only applicable to physical damage to people or their property, not economic loss.

Advise Jack Smith according to IRAC method

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Cite a minimum of two scholarly sources Point of Sale SystemIdentify some advantages and disadvantages of investing in a Point of Sale (POS) system tomanage the sales and revenue processes.This is a computerized network that is always…

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"