to Prepare:

• Consider your goals for academic accomplishments while a student of the MSN program. 
• Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this week. 

The Assignment:

• Identify and describe at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program
• Identify and describe at least three professional resources that can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or your specialty in particular
• Explain how you intend to use these resources, and how they might benefit you academically and professionally.

       

  Rubric Detail  

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. 

Content

    

Name: NURS_6002_Week_2_Assignment_Rubric

 

   

• Grid View 
• List View 

     Excellent   Good   Fair   Poor       Continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development  Plan by appending the original document you began in Week 1 to develop  the second component: academic resources and strategies. To do this:

·   Identify and describe at least three academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.          Points Range:     23 (23%) – 25 (25%)   The response clearly identifies and  accurately describes in detail at least three academic resources or  strategies that can be applied to the MSN program.        Points Range:     20 (20%) – 22 (22%)   The response partially identifies  and partially describes at least three academic resources or strategies  that can be applied to the MSN program.        Points Range:     18 (18%) – 19 (19%)   The response vaguely identifies and  vaguely describes at least two academic resources or strategies that  can be applied to the MSN program.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 17 (17%)   The response only vaguely and  inaccurately identifies one academic resource or strategy or the three  academic resources or strategies that can be applied to the MSN program  are vague and inaccurate, or is missing.     ·   Identify and describe at least three professional resources that  can be applied to success in the nursing practice in general or your  specialty in particular.          Points Range:     23 (23%) – 25 (25%)   The response clearly identifies and  accurately describes in detail at least three professional resources  that can be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a  specialty.        Points Range:     20 (20%) – 22 (22%)   The response partially identifies  and partially describes at least three professional resources that can  be applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty.        Points Range:     18 (18%) – 19 (19%)   The response vaguely identifies and  vaguely describes at least two professional resources that can be  applied to success in nursing practice in general or in a specialty.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 17 (17%)   The response only vaguely and  inaccurately identifies and vaguely describes one professional resource  or the three professional resources that can be applied to success in  nursing practice in general or in a specialty are vague and inaccurate,  or is missing.     ·   Explain how you intend to use these resources, and how they might benefit you academically and professionally.          Points Range:     32 (32%) – 35 (35%)   Response clearly and thoroughly  explains in detail the intended use of these resources, including a  detailed explanation of how they might be beneficial academically and  professionally.        Points Range:     28 (28%) – 31 (31%)   Response explains the intended use  of these resources, including an explanation of how they might be  beneficial academically and professionally.        Points Range:     25 (25%) – 27 (27%)   Explanation of the intended use of  these resources, including an explanation of how they might be  beneficial academically and professionally is vague or inaccurate.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 24 (24%)   Explanation of the intended use of  these resources, including an explanation of how they might be  beneficial academically and professionally is vague and inaccurate, or  is missing.     Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph and Sentence Structure:

Paragraphs  make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically,  and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully  focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.  A  clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided  which delineates all required criteria.          Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.        Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.     

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.        Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.      

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)   Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.   Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation          Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)   Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.        Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)   Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.        Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)   Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)   Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.   Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows  correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins,  indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text  citations, and reference list.          Points Range:     5 (5%) – 5 (5%)   Uses correct APA format with no errors.        Points Range:     4 (4%) – 4 (4%)   Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.        Points Range:     3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)   Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.        Points Range:     0 (0%) – 3 (3%)   Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.         Total Points: 100         

Name: NURS_6002_Week_2_Assignment_Rubric

 

        

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Open to read the attached file…

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

  

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 3: Strategies to Promote Academic Integrity and Professional Ethics

Nurse-scholars have a significant obligation to their community as well. Their work must have academic and professional integrity. Their efforts are designed to add to the body of knowledge, advance the profession, and ultimately help in the care of patients. Work that lacks integrity is subject to quickly erode…or worse.

Fortunately, there are strategies and tools that can help ensure integrity in academic and professional work. This Assignments asks you to consider these and how you might apply them to your own work.

In this Assignment you will continue developing your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan by appending the original document you began in the previous assignment.

To Prepare:

· Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources for this week in support of academic style, integrity, and scholarly ethics.

· Also reflect on the connection between academic and professional integrity.

The Assignment:

Part 3, Section 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and Professional Integrity

Using the Academic and Professional Success Development Template you began in Week 1 and continued working on in Week 2, write a 2- 3-paragraph analysis that includes the following:

· Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between academic integrity and writing.

· Clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship between professional practices and scholarly ethics.

· Accurately cite at least 2 resources that fully support your arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.

· Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the product.y

Clearly and accurately describe in detail how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity. Include sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were utilized to improve responses.

Part 3, Section 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work

Expand on your thoughts from Section 1 by:

· Clearly identifying and accurately describing strategies you intend to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout your career.

· Include a clearly developed review of resources and approaches you propose to use as a student and a professional.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

   

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

 

Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection Between Academic and   Professional Integrity Using the Academic and Professional Success   Development Template you began, write a 2-3 paragraph analysis that includes   the following:
 

·   Explanation for the relationship between   academic integrity and writing.
·   Explanation for the relationship between   professional practices and scholarly ethics.
·   Cite at least 2 resources that support your   arguments, being sure to use proper APA formatting.
·   Use Grammarly and SafeAssign to improve the   product. Include sufficient evidence that these tools were utilized in   explanation on how these tools contribute to academic integrity.

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

The response clearly   and accurately explains in detail the relationship between academic integrity   and writing.
 

  The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the relationship   between professional practices and scholarly ethics.
 

  The response accurately cites at least two resources that fully support the   arguments explained.
 

  The response clearly and accurately describes in detail how Grammarly,   SafeAssign, and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including   sufficient evidence that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the   responses provided.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

The response   partially explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.   The response partially explains the relationship between professional   practices and scholarly ethics.
 

  The response partially cites at least two resources that partially support   the arguments explained.
 

  The response partially describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and paraphrasing   contributes to academic integrity, including some evidence that Grammarly and   SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

The response vaguely   explains the relationship between academic integrity and writing.
 

  The response vaguely explains the relationship between professional practices   and scholarly ethics.
 

  The response vaguely or inaccurately cites at least two resources that   vaguely support the arguments explained.
 

  The response vaguely or inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign, and   paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including vague evidence that   Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

The response   explaining the relationship between academic integrity and writing is vague   and inaccurate, or is missing.
 

  The response explaining the relationship between professional practices and   scholarly ethics is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
 

  The response inaccurately cites at least two resources that inaccurately   support the arguments explained, or is missing.
 

  The response vaguely and inaccurately describes how Grammarly, SafeAssign,   and paraphrasing contributes to academic integrity, including no evidence   that Grammarly and SafeAssign were used to improve the responses provided.

 

Part 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
 

Expand on your thoughts from Part 1 by:
 

·   Identifying and describing strategies you intend   to pursue to maintain integrity and ethics of your 1) academic work while a   student of the MSN program, and 2) professional work as a nurse throughout   your career. Include a review of resources and approaches you propose to use   as a student and a professional.

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

The response clearly   identifies and accurately describes in detail strategies intended to pursue   to maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program   and in professional work as a nurse.
 

  The response clearly reviews and accurately proposes in detail resources and   approaches to use as a student and professional.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

The response   partially identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain   integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in   professional work as a nurse.
 

  The response partially reviews and proposes resources and approaches to use   as a student and professional.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

The response vaguely   identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to maintain integrity   and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and in professional work   as a nurse.
 

  The response inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources and   approaches to use as a student and professional.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

The response vaguely   and inaccurately identifies and describes strategies intended to pursue to   maintain integrity and ethics of academic work while in the MSN program and   in professional work as a nurse, or is missing.
 

  The response vaguely and inaccurately reviews and vaguely proposes resources   and approaches to use as a student and professional, or is missing.

 

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and   Organization:
 

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed   ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are   carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.   A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided   which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
 

  A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is   provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of   the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is   brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79%   of the time.
 

  Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off   topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and   sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60%   of the time.
 

  No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

 

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct   grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2)   grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5)   grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s   understanding.

 

Written Expression and Formatting –
 

The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings,   font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers,   parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA   format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2)   APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several   (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5)   APA format errors.

 

Total   Points: 100

          

Name: NURS_6002_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of others but relies on it.

Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of previous research. Research analysis skills are therefore critical tools for your toolbox.

In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research using a tool helpful for analysis.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this Module’s Learning Resources in support of locating and analyzing research.

 Read one peer-reviewed research article focused on a topic in your specialty field that interests you.

Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of theories/concepts described by the article.

The Assignment:

Using the “Module 4 | Part 4” section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

Your topic of interest:  The effect of anxiety and depression on completion/withdrawal status in patients admitted to substance abuse detoxification program.

 References

Araujo, L., Goldberg, P., Eyma, J., Madhusoodanan, S., Buff, D. D., Shamim, K., & Brenner, R. (1996). The effect of anxiety and depression on completion/withdrawal status in patients admitted to substance abuse detoxification program. Journal Of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13(1), 61–66. Retrieved from https://search-ebscohost-com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=mnh&AN=8699544&site=ehost-live&scope=site

A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along  A correctly formatted APA citation of t 

• A correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.
• Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.
• Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template
• Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.
• Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:
  • Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.
  • Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
  • Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.he article you selected, along with link or search details.

Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Analysis of the article using the “Research Analysis Matrix” section of the template

Write a 1-paragraph justification stating whether you would recommend this article to inform professional practice.

Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Module 1 Assignment, which was built from the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template.The effect of anxiety and depression o K., & Brenner, R. (1996). The effect of anxiety and depression on completion/withdrawal status in patients admitted to substance abuse detoxification program. Journal Of Substance Abuse Treatment, 13(1), 61–66. Retrieved from https://&AN=8699544&site=ehost-live&scA correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"