1. In “B only if A,”
2. (a) A provides a necessary condition for B.
3. (b) B provides a sufficient condition for A.
4. (c) A provides a sufficient condition for B.
5. (d) A provides both a necessary and sufficient condition for B. (e) a and b
6. Suppose that person O and person P both belong to the same culture. Suppose that O thinks that

homosexuality is morally impermissible whereas B says that homosexuality is morally permissible. According to cultural ethical relativism, the way to decide who wins the disagreement between A and B is simply to conduct a poll: if the majority of people in that culture agree with O, then O is right.—T or F?

19. Ethical Nihilism is the view that most ethical statements are difficult to prove or disprove.—T or F?

20. Cultural ethical relativism is the descriptive doctrine that customs vary from society to society.—T or F?

21. Should members of my culture impose its values on another culture? How will a consistent cultural ethical relativist answer this question?

(a) It is wrong for my culture to impose its own value on other cultures.

(b) It is wrong for my culture to impose its own values on other cultures even when those other cultures value committing atrocities.

(c) It is permissible for my culture to impose its own values on other cultures so long as those other cultures value committing atrocities.

(d) It is permissible for my culture to impose its own values on other cultures so long as it is done without military force.

(e) It is permissible for my culture to impose its own values on other cultures so long as my culture says that it is permissible.

22. Which form ethical relativism says that the following statement is false: “considered independent from anyone’s say-so, the actions of necrophiliac serial killer Ed Kemper are neither morally wrong nor morally right.”

1. (a) Personal ethical relativism but not cultural ethical relativism and divine command theory
2. (b) Cultural ethical relativism and divine command theory, but not personal ethical relativism
3. (c) All the forms of ethical relativism
4. (d) None of the forms of ethical relativism
5. (e) None of the above

23.

1. Ethical relativism agrees with ethical realism that there are ethical truths—T or F?
2. What is a common ethical-egoist reason why it is typically bad to harm others? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

in bargaining. As part of our discussion, we will consider theefficacy of the strike and lockout as economic weapons to help forceparties into reaching an agreement.

To help resolve impasse, parties have turned toward mediation andfact-finding as techniques to help find common ground for agreements.Both mediation and fact-finding involve the use of a neutral thirdparty to help the union and management reach an agreement. Neitherprocess, however, can force a party into accepting specified termswithin the agreement. Interest arbitration, however, can resolve theimpasse by permitting the neutral party to make the decision on theterms of the agreement. [The use of arbitration to resolve grievancesthat arise as a result of alleged violations of the agreement ordisagreement regarding the interpretation of the language in theagreement is well accepted in the U.S. system of labor relations. Thistype of arbitration is referred to as grievance arbitration.] However,in the private sector, we do not see the parties frequently usinginterest arbitration as a means to resolve an impasse.

In your initial post please address the following:

Why is interest arbitration used so infrequently in the private sector? 

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In being cognizant of Dale Alleman v. Brett J. Kitson, 341 Fed. Appx. 234 (7th Cir. 2009) for evaluating a fictitious bankruptcy case involving the following circumstance involving a debtor (Jacob) seeking to discharge the debt:  During Jacob’s bankruptcy proceeding, he was asked whether he had ever been sued. Jacob responded that he had not. However, does that apply even if the information that was lied about turned out to be irrelevant ?  In fact, Jacob had once been sued for intentional infliction of emotional distress after a rather embarrassing incident that Jacob would rather not discuss. Therefore, he lied about never having been sued. It turns out that Jacob’s referenced suit had been settled early in the case and the whole incident was many years ago and has no financial impact whatsoever on Jacob today. Jacob’s debts were discharged in bankruptcy after the proceeding. 

In being mindful of the applicable codes, rules or regulations on this matter, can the creditors of the bankruptcy case or the trustee want the discharge to be revoked because of Jacob’s lie ?

Feel free to express yourself with as much relevant detail as possible.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In bin A, 40% of the marbles are red. In bin B, 52% of the marbles are red. You select a simple random sample of 30 marbles from bin A and 40 marbles from bin B. What is the probability that the proportion of red marbles in A is greater than B

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In ‘Black Men in Public Spaces’ essay:

Staples,like Patricia Williams in’The Death of the Profane'(pp.261-65)in the Norton reader book,writes about this “rage” at being mis preceived because of his race.Compare their reactions and responses:what do they have in common and where do they differ?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"