In any group setting, each member has a set of assumptions and biases regarding how groups interact as well as preconceived notions of expected individual roles and behaviors. Leaders have an obligation to recognize their own biases and to observe individuals and group dynamics as objectively as possible. Take the opportunity in this Critical Thinking Assignment to practice objectivity in research.

1. This Critical Thinking Assignment culminates in the form of a management report* based on data from your own observational research of a group or team with which you have frequent interaction. [NOTE: if you are unable to physically access a location for observational research or to conduct such observations in general, you may complete this assignment by doing one of the following: a) enlisting the support of another person who can help you interpret the group; b) write a paper on the best practices to employ, using a group scenario that you construct and describe. Address all the questions and requirements in the regular assignment; or c) ask a group if you may observe them using SKYPE or FaceTime, for example. Reach out to your instructor for more assistance]
2. To prepare for the observational research, Western (2013) [required reading] suggests that observers work to set aside any preconceived notions of what might be discovered.  Western uses the term “follow the actors” to describe how an objective observer strives to follow the leads of the group members rather than assuming what might be involved.  Also, look beyond the human actors to note the role of non-human elements of the setting.
3. Observe the group and answer the following:
   • Who is sitting at the leadership table and who is absent?
   • Whose voices are heard and whose aren’t, and why?
   • Whose values and interests are being represented?
   • Is there leadership that goes unnoticed?
4. Once the observations are completed, prepare the data for analysis. You might define categories or identify themes based on what was recorded.  Then, analyze the data according to two or three leadership theories from this weeks required readings and lecture.  Gather additional scholarly literature related to your findings and the associated theories. 
5. Prepare a management report for a hypothetical audience of managers that have a stake in the observed group’s success.

The management report:

Include five (5) sections within a maximum of five pages (in addition to the required title and reference pages and appendices). The report sections include:

1. The Introduction of your investigation, including a statement about why the research is important (remember your audience!)
2. A description of how you collected the observational data, prepared these data, and analyzed for results. Explain why these methods are appropriate (support with scholarly sources)
3. A literature review of the two associated theories
4. A discussion of the results and how the managers might use the findings to promote group or team effectiveness
5. A summary of the investigative process and a closing statement of what you, the researcher, learned from the study.
   • Use appendices to include raw data, data preparation worksheets, or analytic tools. 
   • Include associated citations and reference page.
   • Format your entire report according to APA. 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In APA format, respond to the questions in Part 1. In MS Excel, complete the exercises in part 2.

Part 1

1. What is operations management in health care?

2. How is health care representative of a system?

3. What are the five key goals of operations managers?

4. Does operations management affect a hospital’s competitive advantage?

5. What are three of the key trends affecting hospital operations?

6. Who is considered the “father” of scientific management?

7. How are decisions made in organizations?

Part 2

1. Assume that a project has an expected total duration of 25 days, but several optimistic employees feel that it can be completed in as little as 18 days, while others expect it to take nearly 40 days. Using program evaluation and review technique calculations, what is the project duration to be used in project Gantt charts and other tracking tools?

2. If a critical path method calculation of project duration was 25 days, how does the program evaluation and review technique calculation in Question 1 compare?

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In approximately 300-400 words, please address the following instructional prompts:

• Select and describe two of the models discussed in this week’s materials (for example, Bar-On Mixed Model and Ability Model)
  • model 1
  • model 2
• Discuss the strengths and limitations of each of these models–Identify 2 strengths and 1 limitation for each.
  • Two strengths and one limitation for model 1
  • Two strengths and one limitation for model 2

**Properly cite at least one of the articles provided in the “readings” section this week to support your answer. Use APA format to cite the source.

For support in APA formatting, please visit the Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL) (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

Professionalism of the product: inclusive of proper grammar & syntax, appropriate word count, and accuracy of spelling. Please number/letter each response so that it is clear which instructional prompt you are addressing in your document.

The Bar-On model of EI

Bar-On, R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, supl., 13-25. (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

The Trait emotional self-efficacy model 

Trait Emotional Intelligence Powerpoint Presentation by Petrides (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

View Website

To learn more about the Bar-On model visit Reuvon Bar-on’s website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

To learn more about Goleman’s model visit Daniel Goleman’s website (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In approximately 300 words, each question below. 

Use of proper APA formatting and citations is required. 

If supporting evidence from outside resources is used proper citation is required. 

Your submission should largely consist of your own thoughts and ideas but may be supported by citations and references. 

Question:1 

What differences and similarities would be present in user account life cycle management for a company with 50 employees versus a company with 5,000 employees? 

Question:2 

In your own words, explain how threat modeling a system can help with development of realistic and meaningful security requirements.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

In april 2003, analysts at Morgan Stanley and prudential has set 12-month TARGET PRICES OF $106 AND $108 FOR THE FIRMS EbAY. AT THT TIME, EbAY’S STOCK WAS $89.22 AND THE CONSENSUS FORECAST FOR EbAY’S WAS 1.45. SUBSEQUENTLY, EbAY SPLIT ITS STOCK TWO-FOR-ONE. iTS ACTUAL eps TURNED OUT TO BE $0.82 (POSTSPLIT, CORRESPONDING TO $1.64 ON A PRESPLIT BASIS), AND ON APRIL 30, 2004, EbAY STOCK PRICE CLOSED ABOVE $82 ($164 ON A PRESPLIT BASIS), AND THE CONSENSUS ANALYST EPS FORCAST FOR THE SUBSEQUENT 12 MONTHS WAS $1.18 (POSTSPLIT). DISCUSSS WHETHER THE STOCK OF EbAY WAS EFFICIENTLY PRICED IN APRIL 2003.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"