I really need these by 1:30 PLEASE!! 

1. All evenue and expense accounts have been closed at the end of the calendar year for Patton co. The income summary account has total debits of $530,000 and total credits of $600,000. As of the same date, owners capital has a balance of $115,000 and owners drawings have a balance of 48,000.

Instructions:

1. Joiurnalize the entries required to complete the closing of the accounts.

2.prepare an owner’s equity statement for the year ended December 31, 2014.

2. Prepare the necessary journal entries to record the following transactins, assuming Dakin Co uses a perpetual inventory system.

a. Purchased $35,000 in merchandise on account terms, 2/10 n/30.

b.returned $700 of damaged merchandise for credit.

c. paid for the merchandise purchased within 10 days.

Answer 1.Income SummaryExpenses 530000530000 RevenueIncome Summary 600000 Income SummaryOwners Capital 70000 Owners CapitalOwners Drawings 48000 Owners Equity StatementBalance at beginning…

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I really really need help with my homework!!! Its mediator, mediation and third variable!  

People who make more money, spend less time socializing with others. Time spent working could be a:a)    mediatorb)    moderatorc)    third-variable responsible for the association

Scenario: Teenagers with higher “screen time”, that is, who spend more time surfing the internet, watching TV or playing computer games risk, perform worse in exams than their peers who don’t, according to research by British scientists.

2. This relation is stronger on those who have lower IQs. Thus, IQ is a:a)    mediatorb)    moderatorc)    third-variable responsible for the association

3. It seems that time in front of a screen impairs teenagers’ reasoning and analytic capacities. This impairment is a:a)    mediatorb)    moderatorc)    third-variable responsible for the association

4. Teenagers from low income level families tend to spend more time surfing the internet, watching TV or playing computer games. Also, teenagers from low income level families tend to perform worse in school than their peers from higher income level families. Family income level would be a:a)    mediatorb)    moderatorc)    third-variable responsible for the association

5. It has been found that conservative college students tend to have more self-control than liberal college students. Past research has established that conservatives endorse a belief in free will more than liberals do. Past research has also established that people who believe in free will tend to have more self-control. Belief in free will is a:a)    mediatorb)    moderatorc)    third-variable responsible for the association

6. People who drive while using their cell phones tend to commit more driving errors. Those who have less experience driving are even more likely to commit driving errors. The moderator in this study is:a)    driving errorsb)    driving experiencec)    using cell phones

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I recently had a question on a test about odds ratios and longs. It went something like this. 

A man wants to borrow money from a bank. His income is 1500 a month and his credit score is 650. Which of the two gives him the best probability and percentage.

e^ =250+3600X1+780X2

0r 

e^ =450+2400X1+850X2

I just want to know if I worked the problem correctly. He did not return the test. I just received a grade.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I regretfully apologize for the extended instruction, but I could not avoid it! 

1. It is important that you learn how to critically review research.  In our society today, we are exposed to so much information and so many studies.  Some of that information is excellent, some is useful, and some is very, very bad.  How can you determine what information is useful and what is dangerous?  One way is to take a course like Critical Thinking; however, the facts that I give you will be outdated all too soon. The most important thing you will learn from this course — and from your college education — is how to evaluate the information critically that is presented to you. Critical thinking involves asking five questions: who, what, when, where, how.

Instructions==> Find and read an article in the media or a video clip that reports the results of a scientific study.  You must include the link to the website. It is essential that the article you review would either arguing for something or presenting a theory or idea with supporting evidence for its claims or conclusion. News items, even if they are about scientific discoveries are not suited for this assignment because news items report the news (naturally) and provide no theory or arguments and supporting evidence that could be criticized based on its strengths/weaknesses. Explanations/educational articles (such as WebMD explaining to us what certain conditions are) not good for our purposes either because they teach us something, telling us what is what and thus do not provide supporting evidence that could be criticized. Teaching/explaining are very different from arguing! Please keep this in mind when you choose an article! Must include citations and references APA format Please follow directions carefully.And attach link to website

1. Discuss how accurately did the mass media report the study? 

Answer the above five questions about the article (Who, What, When, Where, and How). Do NOT use entertainment or sports articles for your review. The articles must be research based and must include claims/conclusions and supporting evidence, which are to be criticized!. You will write a one-page critical review of the article.  The review should answer each of the five questions.  You must cite your source.  If it is a website, please make sure you put the entire web address. Remember you are evaluating critically, not just summarizing. 

• CRITICAL THINKING REVIEW EXAMPLES:
• Critical thinking involves asking five questions – who, when, what, where, how.
• You should organize your paper in the following manner:  
• Your Name      Critical Review
• Author, I. (date of publication). Title of article. Name of Publication, volume #, page #-#.
• OR  
• Author, I. (date of publication if available). Title of article. Retrieved [date accessed] from the World Wide Web: [Web site address]
• Where: Where did this article/Web page appear? Is this reasonable? Is the publishing entity respectable/responsible?  
• Who: Who wrote/published the article/Web page? What are their credentials? Are the credentials appropriate for their argument?
• When: Is this current information? If yes, do you think it will stand the “test of time”? If no, is it outdated or is it classic?  
• What: What argument is/are the author(s) making? Is it logical? Based on what you know, is it reasonable? What evidence is given to support the argument? Can you think of evidence to refute it?
• How: How was the supporting/refuting evidence collected? Is this credible? What kind of evidence do you think needs to be gathered to test the argument? Did the author(s) do this?  
• Summarize the quality of the article (it does not have to be a “good” article in your opinion), and whether you consider this to be a worthwhile and trustworthy article. Did you think it was biased? Could the author have underlying motives? What do you think? Is it valid?
• NOTE: Do not simply answer yes or no to the questions above. Write a thoughtful response to each section.  
• SAMPLE CRITICAL REVIEWS:
• Critical Review 
• Kathleen Doheny, Nov 18, 2010. Mental Illness Affects 1 in 5 Americans. Retrieved on November 26, 2010 from http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/news/20101118/mental-illness-affects-in-in-5-americans 
• Where: The WebMD website provides valuable health information tools for managing health and support to those who seek health information. WebMD provides credible information by board-certified physicians, award-winning journalists, and trained community moderators. WebMD verifies the qualifications of all medical professionals on the site to bring credible information at all times.   
• Who: The article was written by Kathleen Doheny, a Los Angeles-based journalist specializing in health, fitness, and behavior topics. In addition to writing for WebMD, she contributes regularly to other websites and to national magazines such as Los Angeles Times, Shape, Natural Health, Westways, Weight Watchers Magazine, Prevention magazine, Consumers Digest, cancerandcareers.org,and webvet.com. The article was revised by Laura J. Martin, MD, MPH a medical editor for WebMD who is responsible for reviewing WebMD news and feature stories to ensure their medical accuracy. Dr. Martin has many years of experience in the practice of both inpatient and outpatient internal medicine. She has served as a medical educator in the fields of general internal medicine, palliative care, and medical ethics.  
• When: This article seems to be current as it was written on November 18, 2010.  
• What: This report shows the result of a new government survey that indicates that 1 in 5 adult Americans had experienced mental illness in the past year. The information is supported by statistics from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings conducted by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration (SAMHSA). The argument here is that mental health is not considered to be part of health, and people don’t access health for themselves because they don’t appreciate is a disorder. The article intends to encourage people to accept mental illness as part of health and to seek attention for this problem. With the statistic shown I can say that is a great article to show people the facts of Mental illness, and to seek the appropriate help for the disorder. 
• How: The sources for this article were cited. I was able to verify the statistics, and I was able to visit the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) web site, and concluded that the article was well cited, and there are no biases for medications, or treatments. 
• In summary, this is a good tool in regards of knowing some realities of mental disorders, as well as to start helping yourself and others to seek the deserved attention to mental disorders they need. 
• ****************************************************************
• Critical Review
• Lu, S. What’s Wrong with Just One Drink? Why Pregnancy and Alcohol don’t mix. Retrieved 2004 from Prevention Magazine. 
• Where: Prevention Magazine is a magazine that offers information on any kind of health information. It ranges from health, weight loss, fitness, nutrition, beauty, recipes, etc. 
• Who: Stacy Lu is a freelance writer and editor who lives in Allendale, New Jersey. There are no other credentials on this writer. 
• When:  The site has a copyright date of 2004, but was as last updated on 12/9/2004.
• What:  The article talks about why pregnancy and alcohol is bad for you even though you may have some Dr’s that say it’s ok to have one drink. The article is saying it doesn’t matter how far along you are any amount of alcohol is bad for the baby due to the fact that alcohol passes through the placenta to the baby. The argument is valid because it is telling you no matter what stage you’re in during your pregnancy alcohol is bad for you, and it also states the damages alcohol can have on your baby before the baby is born. The evidence is also showing how alcohol can affect a child all the way into their teenage years. The evidence even showed woman that did drink usually delivered smaller babies.  
• How: The evidence was collected by researchers in Pittsburgh and also by a Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic. Stacy did a very good job at backing her information with what the researchers found. 
• Summarize:  In my opinion this article was a very good one. I say this because it actually opened my eyes to different things when it comes to pregnancy. I do not have any children so it’s different for me. All this time I thought it was ok for someone who is pregnant to have one drink, but now I understand why that isn’t ok and how it can harm the baby.  

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

I require the detail answer of 3 questions with section of applicable law/act. of the following case scenario:

Sasha was bank employee with 21 years’ service whose IT role entitled her to virtually unlimited access to confidential documents. One day Sasha decided to access sensitive information concerning priority parking, without permission, to satisfy her curiosity about where she was on the list of the most prized parking stops. As soon as the employer found out about this action, it dismissed Sasha for just cause. Sasha sued the employer for wrongful dismissal, arguing that as a long-service employee with an unblemished work record, dismissing her for just cause for a single, isolated act was a disproportionate response.

1. Did the employer have just cause in your view?

2. If the employer did not have just cause how many weeks’ notice of termination is Sasha entitled to under the ESA? Explain your answer.

3. If the employer did not have cause what do you think that Sasha is entitled to under the common law?

Course: Canadian Employment Law: Laws 6015

Book Reference: Employment Law for Business and Human Resources Professionals, 3rd edition, Kathryn J. Filsinger

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"