home work I need help here is the topic
Facts
One night, Trent DiGiuro, a student athlete at the University of Kentucky, was sitting in a chair on the front porch of his residence celebrating his twenty-first birthday with friends when he was shot and killed. Fragments of the bullet were recovered from DiGiuro’s body, and a firearms expert discovered that the bullet had been fired from a .243-caliber rifle.
Six years elapsed after the murder, which was not solved. At that time, Shane Layton Ragland’s ex-girlfriend informed the police that Ragland confessed to her that he killed DiGiuro because DiGiuro had caused Ragland to be blackballed by a college fraternity. The witness also told police that Ragland had shown her the rifle he had used to shoot DiGiuro and that he told her he hid the rifle at his mother’s residence. Pursuant to a search warrant, the police recovered a Wetherby Vanguard .243-caliber rifle from Ragland’s mother’s residence with three unspent .243-caliber bullets in the chamber. A police metallurgist fired several recovered bullets and found that they were indistinguishable in metallurgical composition with the bullet that had killed DiGiuro. Ragland was taken into police custody, was interrogated and answered police questions until he eventually asked for an attorney. Ragland stood trial for the murder of Trent DiGiuro. After substantial evidence was produced, including the statements made by Ragland to the police during his interrogation, Ragland was convicted by a jury of murder and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Ragland appealed, asserting that the statements he made during the interrogation should have been suppressed because he (1) received an inadequate Miranda warning, (2) never waived any of his Miranda rights, and (3) asserted the right to counsel.
Issue
Was defendant Ragland properly given his Miranda rights?
Language of the CourtAfter obtaining preliminary identification information, Sergeant Barnard of the Lexington police, the lead interrogator, advised appellant of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona.Miranda does not require a “talismanic incantation” as long as the warnings adequately advise the suspect of his Miranda rights. Nor do the warnings have to be in writing, much less audiotaped or videotaped. The trial court’s finding that appellant voluntarily waived his Miranda rights was supported by substantial evidence.Later in the interrogation, appellant did request an attorney, and the trial court properly suppressed any statements he made after that request.Decision
The supreme court of Kentucky held that appellant Ragland had been read his Miranda rights properly and had waived his right to an attorney. Thus, any statements he made during the interrogation, up until the time he clearly asked for an attorney, constitutes evidence that was properly admissible at his trial.
Note
- Trent’s father, Michael DiGiuro, on behalf of his son’s estate, filed a civil lawsuit for the tort of wrongful death against Ragland. After a jury trial and appeal, DiGiuro was awarded $3,341,708 in compensatory damages and $30,000,000 in punitive damages against Ragland.
Ethics Questions
- Do you think that Ragland understood his Miranda rights when he answered the interrogators’ questions? Do you think many suspects answer questions during interrogation when they should have pleaded the Fifth Amendment privilege to avoid incriminating themselves and demanded a lawyer? What have you learned from this case?
Attorney-Client and Other Privileges
To obtain a proper defense, an accused should tell his lawyer the truth so that the lawyer can prepare the best defense she can for him. However, the accused must be able tell his attorney facts about his case without fear that the attorney will be called as a witness against him. This information is protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege , which is recognized by the Fifth Amendment. Either the client or the attorney can raise this privilege. For the privilege to apply, the information must be told to the attorney in his or her capacity as an attorney and not as a friend or neighbor or such.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home Work Acct Problems Emron Company Owns A 100 Interest In The Common Stock Of
/in Uncategorized /by developerHome Work Acct Problems:3. Emron Company owns a 100% interest in the common stock of the Dietz Company. On January 1, 20X2, Emron sold Dietz a fixed asset that Dietz will use over a 5-year period. The asset was sold at a $5,000 profit. In the consolidated statements, this profit willa.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home Work Acct Problems Schiff Company Owns 100 Of The Outstanding Common Stock
/in Uncategorized /by developerHome Work Acct Problems:1.Schiff Company owns 100% of the outstanding common stock of the Viel Company. During 20X1, Schiff sold merchandise to Viel that Viel, in turn, sold to unrelated firms. There were no such goods in Viel’s ending inventory. However, some of the intercompany purchases from Schiff had not yet been paid. Which of the following amounts will be incorrect in the consolidated statements if no adjustments are made?a.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home Work Help 4
/in Uncategorized /by developerHome work help
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home Work I Need Help Here Is The Topic Discuss How The Legal Concepts In The Se
/in Uncategorized /by developerhome work I need help here is the topic
Facts
One night, Trent DiGiuro, a student athlete at the University of Kentucky, was sitting in a chair on the front porch of his residence celebrating his twenty-first birthday with friends when he was shot and killed. Fragments of the bullet were recovered from DiGiuro’s body, and a firearms expert discovered that the bullet had been fired from a .243-caliber rifle.
Six years elapsed after the murder, which was not solved. At that time, Shane Layton Ragland’s ex-girlfriend informed the police that Ragland confessed to her that he killed DiGiuro because DiGiuro had caused Ragland to be blackballed by a college fraternity. The witness also told police that Ragland had shown her the rifle he had used to shoot DiGiuro and that he told her he hid the rifle at his mother’s residence. Pursuant to a search warrant, the police recovered a Wetherby Vanguard .243-caliber rifle from Ragland’s mother’s residence with three unspent .243-caliber bullets in the chamber. A police metallurgist fired several recovered bullets and found that they were indistinguishable in metallurgical composition with the bullet that had killed DiGiuro. Ragland was taken into police custody, was interrogated and answered police questions until he eventually asked for an attorney. Ragland stood trial for the murder of Trent DiGiuro. After substantial evidence was produced, including the statements made by Ragland to the police during his interrogation, Ragland was convicted by a jury of murder and was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Ragland appealed, asserting that the statements he made during the interrogation should have been suppressed because he (1) received an inadequate Miranda warning, (2) never waived any of his Miranda rights, and (3) asserted the right to counsel.
Issue
Was defendant Ragland properly given his Miranda rights?
Language of the CourtAfter obtaining preliminary identification information, Sergeant Barnard of the Lexington police, the lead interrogator, advised appellant of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona.Miranda does not require a “talismanic incantation” as long as the warnings adequately advise the suspect of his Miranda rights. Nor do the warnings have to be in writing, much less audiotaped or videotaped. The trial court’s finding that appellant voluntarily waived his Miranda rights was supported by substantial evidence.Later in the interrogation, appellant did request an attorney, and the trial court properly suppressed any statements he made after that request.Decision
The supreme court of Kentucky held that appellant Ragland had been read his Miranda rights properly and had waived his right to an attorney. Thus, any statements he made during the interrogation, up until the time he clearly asked for an attorney, constitutes evidence that was properly admissible at his trial.
Note
Ethics Questions
Attorney-Client and Other Privileges
To obtain a proper defense, an accused should tell his lawyer the truth so that the lawyer can prepare the best defense she can for him. However, the accused must be able tell his attorney facts about his case without fear that the attorney will be called as a witness against him. This information is protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege , which is recognized by the Fifth Amendment. Either the client or the attorney can raise this privilege. For the privilege to apply, the information must be told to the attorney in his or her capacity as an attorney and not as a friend or neighbor or such.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home Work Question Due Monday 06 24 2013 Page 2 Question 2 2 Essays 30 Points
/in Uncategorized /by developerHome Work QuestionDue Monday 06/24/2013Page 2 Question 2 – 2 essays, 30 points each. TCO E and H. A private high school hires a new superintendent, George Forester. The school is owned by a local Lutheran church and is run by a board of directors chosen by church members. Supt. Forester shows up for his first day of work and sends a memo via intercompany mail to all teachers: Dear Staff: There is a new sheriff in town – and it is me. As your new leader, I am implementing a dress code that includes no slacks or shorts for women and no earrings for male teachers. Men shall all be clean shaven. Violators will be docked 1 week’s pay; second offenses will result in a 1 week suspension without pay and third offenses, dismissal. All teachers will address me as “Pastor Forester” or “Amen, Pastor Forester.” Teachers who fail to abide by these dictates will be docked two points on their annual evaluations. Amen, Pastor Forester.” That day, one teacher, Anna Seenandfeld has a birthday party at the school, having just turned 40. Her frown at the party shows everyone she is not happy about her party. Pastor Forestor had bought black balloons for her and jokes with the other teachers about the “over the hill” teacher. The next day, Pastor Forester goes into the teacher’s lounge and calls all nontenured teachers into his office. He tells them that he has assigned himself to be their mentoring teacher and that effectively immediately they will be evaluated weekly. One teacher, Anna Seenandfeld, begins to cry. Another teacher, Andy DuFrane, rolls his eyes and says, “God! These menopausal women should not be allowed around our students.” Pastor Forester goes to Anna and hugs her, offering her a tissue. He pats her gently on the behind and whispers, “Act your age, please.” When she forcefully pulls away from him, Pastor Forester assigns her to work Saturday detention for the next 3 weeks to “toughen her up.” A pregnant P.E. teacher, Lisa Ready, is reassigned by Pastor Forester to a math position (even though she has only three credits in math) because Pastor Forester says this position is “less strenuous for a pregnant lady.” On the third week of detention duty, a student stabs Anna, wounding her severely. Although she survives and recovers, she loses one kidney as a result of the injury. The school doesn’t offer health insurance, and Anna incurs over $55,000 for her hospital bills; the student (and his family) is insolvent. One month later, a parent complains about his student being unable to succeed in his math course due to the teacher’s (Lisa’s) incompetence, Pastor Forester fires Lisa Ready for her inability to perform her job. Pastor Forester tells Lisa in front of her class of students, and then walks her out of the building; 2 hours later, Lisa goes into premature labor and delivers her first son, who has severe health issues as a result of being premature. The baby’s doctor states the cause of early labor as being from “intense duress and undue stress.” Lisa’s husband’s health insurance covers all of the costs of the birth and the baby’s care. Pastor Forester is really not a pastor. His real name is Jerry Birches, a parolee with convictions for child molestation. His parole agreement prohibits him being closer than 1,000 feet to any school. In order to cut costs, the school had stopped doing background checks on new employees, and this slipped through the cracks. This comes to the attention of the school board, and the president of the board of directors immediately fires Pastor “Jerry Birches” Forester and notifies his parole officer of the violations. Pastor Forester claims the board knew about his background because one member of the board (his aunt Theresa) knew the truth. ————————————————- Top of Form Time Remaining: 1. TCO E. Pastor Forester claims his firing was illegal because it was based on his being a convicted felon. His contract with the school provides him with defense coverage for any acts he takes while working for the school. Anna and Lisa sue Pastor Forester and the school for sexual harassment and discrimination, and Pastor Forester requests the school pay for his defense. Discuss whether Anna and Lisa will be successful in their claim of sexual harassment and discrimination against the school and Pastor Forester. Discuss whether the school illegally fired Pastor Forester. Will the school have to pay for the pastor’s defense? Analyze and defend your answer.(Points: 30) 2. TCO H, E. It was actually in the discovery portion of the injury lawsuit that Pastor Forester’s true background came to light. The convict, Birches, claims the knowledge of his aunt should be imputed to the entire board of directors. Three parents have alleged that their children are now seeing therapists due to abusive comments Birches made to them at various times during his time in the school.The board immediately convenes and discusses “damage control.” The board knows you took a law and ethics course recently and asks you to write it a memo of what liability it has in this case. List the elements of any tort you believe the school may be liable for and what defenses you may have. Include in your memo whether Aunt Theresa’s knowledge will be imputed to the entire board. If so, under what statute, rule, case, or federal law do you base your decision?(Points: 30) |
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Home X Projex X Texti X P Cs 8 X Sectic X Lab07 X Pstat X Ucsb X Theko X G Cons
/in Uncategorized /by developerHello, I need the full code for this project in python programming. All of the instructions and required code are in these images
Home Xprojex xTEXTI XP CS 8 ( Xsectic xlab07 xPstat X () ucsb- xtheko XG Consi xC Get H XC PYTH X M Comp XC Q7 Pa x+OXChttps://ucsb-cs8.github.io/w19-matni/lab/project01/*:Instructions to studentsThe key learning goals are:using functions as building blocks in more complex compositions. using loops to perform repetitive tasks. using randomization to create variety and controlled chaos in drawingsapplying concepts learned in previous labs about creating and using modules. pair programming is recommended for this project, but not mandatoryWhat you’ll be drawingIn this lab you will use the basic shapes that you created in lab03 as building blocks to create the following forest scene!TRTo create this scene you will implement the following functions:O Type here to searchEtRA3:52 PM3/10/2019
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Homeostatic Regulation Relies On The Specific Activity Under Investigation Both
/in Uncategorized /by developerHomeostatic regulation relies on:
the specific activity under investigation
both negative and positive feedback
the magnitude of the stimulus and response
positive feedback
negative feedback
NOTE: The answer is NOT negative and positive feedback
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Homepage Southern New Ham X Codio Numeric And String Exprx G
/in Uncategorized /by developerCan someone explain my error? I can’t figure out what variable. I am missing
Homepage – Southern New Ham xCodio – Numeric and String ExprxGhttps://codio.com/dlopez7/numeric-and-string-expressions:5c1711cbab68f03457dca422:KxGhUkEjGJW6/tree/challenges%2Fescape.pyXCodioProiFileEditFindViewescape.pyToolsEducationHelpNode versionProject Index (static)AGOConfigure….5. 1. Challenge# Input from the command lineDLOPEZ7mimport sysname1- sys . argv[1]Collapse )Escapingname2:name1- sys . argv [2=( ‘Dametresname2 = ( ‘Daijah’ )5. 1. Challengestr (name1+1 + name2)Dametres – ( ‘Dametres ‘s donen and Daijah’s done’input (Dametresand where name1 and name2 are replaced with the inputYour code goes herestringImportant: getting spaces right is really important here. Don’tadd any extra spaces by mistake.Program OutputTraceback imFile "escape.py". line 10. inast)input/Dametres)EOFError: EOF when reading a lineProgram Failed for Input: 1 2Expected Output: 1’s doneand 2’s doneYour Program Output: Dametresand Dalian’s done10:5)PythonO Type here to search8:35 PM1/2/2019
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Homestyle Is An Online Retailer Of Home Accessories For Every Room In The Home
/in Uncategorized /by developer36
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Hometown Bank Has Loaned 1 000 000 To Aquataste To Purify Bottle And Market Stor
/in Uncategorized /by developerHometown Bank has loaned $1,000,000 to AquaTaste to purify, bottle, and market store-bought drinking water from the Ohio River. AquaTaste has put up its purification equipment as collateral. If you were the loan officer for Hometown, describe how you would go about protecting the Bank’s investment using Article 9 of the UCC. Note that there are two main steps. Explain how you would complete each step.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"