·         

o   “Profile:  Nzinga Mbemba (Affonso I) of Kongo”

o   “Profile:  Olaudah Equiano”

o   “Profile:  Ayuba Suleiman Diallo of Bondu”

o   “Profile:  Anthony Johnson”

o   “Profile:  Elizabeth Freeman”

·        Read the profile carefully.

·        Write a brief review of the profile. Include the following elements:

o   A brief summary of the profile [1 paragraph]

o   A brief discussion addressing the following question: What does the individual’s life story teach us about the time period in which he or she lived? [1 to 2 paragraphs]

o   A brief discussion addressing the following questions: What aspects of the individual’s life story speak to you? Is there a moral to the story that might be relevant to modern society? [1 paragraph]

·        Your review should be approximately 225 words long (225 words=approximately 1 page, double spaced).

·        Include your name and the title of the profile. Cite all quotes.

Read Chapters 1- 5 and pay particular attention to the section called “VOICES: Boston Slaves Link Their Freedom to American Liberty” in Chapter 4. Once all reading is complete, respond to the following:

·        What is the object of this petition?

·        What Enlightenment principles does the petition invoke?

·        What is the significance of the slaves’ vow to go to Africa if freed?

You are required to submit an initial posting that addresses the items above. You are also expected to respond to the posting of at least one other student. Your response should address why you agree/disagree with their posting.  

Required Text Book: Hine, D., Hine, W., & Harrold, S. The African-American Odyssey 6th edition

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

History and Evolution of Freudian Theory Understanding Freud’s ideas regarding the unconscious mind is foundational to developing a theoretic understanding of human behavior. However, for the doctora

History and Evolution of Freudian Theory 

Understanding Freud’s ideas regarding the unconscious mind is foundational to developing a theoretic understanding of human behavior. However, for the doctoral learner to adequately explore the field of psychology, it is important to understand what motivated these Neo‐Freudian theorists to propose alternative perspectives and how their differing ideas advanced the field of psychology. Building from the outline you submitted in Topic 2, you will further explore the history and evolution of Freudian theory and the rise of Neo‐Freudian ideas.

General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

• Refer to the outline you submitted in Topic 2 and any related comments or feedback from your instructor.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• Refer to Chapters 2‐4 of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.) for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
• This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in‐text citation from each source be included.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Directions:Using the outline from Topic 2 as a starting point along with instructor feedback from the outline submission, write a paper (1,500‐1,750 words) in which you discuss the history and evolution of Freudian theory. Include the following in your paper:

1. A discussion of the history of and concepts originating in the first 10 years of Freudian theory. This is based on your first major heading and the related subtopics and details of your Topic 2 outline.
2. A discussion of the concept and history of Freudian psycho‐sexual development. This is based on your second major heading and the related subtopics and details of your Topic 2 outline.
3. A discussion of the concept and development of Freud’s structural model.
4. A discussion of how Freudian theory aligns or contrasts with elements of culture and the Christian worldview.
5. A discussion of how the contrasts identified above highlighted problems with Freudian theory leading to the development of Neo‐Freudian theories and a further evolution of the field of psychology.

RUBRIC

Maximum Points: 230.0

Ensure you review the format and headers below and model your paper in accordance. Failure to follow these guidelines will result in a 0 in the Instructor Integration portion of the rubric. You may exceed the word count at no penalty. If, however, you go below the word count a penalty will be incurred.

The M4 paper should include the following headers

Introduction (set the tone for the paper in strong scholarly language. Do NOT use questions in the introduction; instead frame strong, scholarly statements and develop a thesis statement relative to the assignment intent. Do NOT write in first or second person voice. Do NOT introduce articles. The paper is not about articles; instead, it is about the derived, holistic themes after several weeks of reading.)

Common Themes In Reviewed Articles (A theme is something that is present in at least three of the articles. For each individual theme, at least three of the articles must be cited to show that the theme emerged in the majority of reading. Failure to cite at least three articles per theme will result in lost points and does not constitute a themed topic. Do NOT write “theme 1,2,3” in your paper; instead you should give each theme a specific name.)

The First 10 years (refer to rubric item)

Psychosexual Development

Freud’s Stuctural Model

Discussion (here you cover items 4 and 5 from the instructions. You may use subheaders if you like – the choice is yours.)

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

History and Philosophy of Sport Dr. Michele K. Donnelly SPAD 35065 Spring 2019

Identifying Your Personal Philosophy (15% of your course grade)

This assignment is due in class on Wednesday, February 20.

Assignment this paper is to focus on your own personal philosophy, and how your philosophy informs your beliefs about sport. The content should be personalized to be meaningful to you, while also using the formal philosophies that we have studied. Your explanation of your philosophy should be related to your particular interest in sport (for example, from a perspective focused on marketing, exercise science, athletic training, physical education, coaching, etc.; your current position or a position you aspire to hold). 

“One of the main goals of philosophy is to clarify and help people sort out their beliefs so that the behavior which stems from those beliefs is sound and consistent” (Thomas, 1983, p. 19).

this paper needs to address the formal philosophies we have studied in the course. Specifically, given the different views presented by the formal philosophies we study, how do you make sense of life, and of sport? What makes us human and gives life meaning? This should be about your individual beliefs as they relate to these formal philosophies, i.e., which formal philosophical perspective most closely reflects your personal philosophy?

Your paper will include your metaphysical, ontological, and epistemological positions. Essentially, you are placing yourself and your beliefs in the bigger picture of human thought. Use the course materials about formal philosophies (e.g., classical humanism, Cartesian philosophy, pragmatism, existentialism, philosophy of science, sacred circle) to think about your own beliefs and how you understand the world, your place in the world, and how this influences your beliefs about sport. 

Purpose When you have completed this assignment, you will have firsthand experience with philosophy. We all operate using a particular set of beliefs. This assignment gives you the opportunity to think explicitly about what your beliefs are, and to articulate those beliefs using the language of philosophy. This assignment contributes to your ability to understand and express your philosophical beliefs, as well as to understand the philosophical positions of others. In addition, you will improve your academic writing skills.

Tyler Bartell

Professor Donnelly

History and Philosophy of Sport

02/25/2019

Personal Philosophy

           To explain my personal philosophy, I must first state the fact that I am a metaphysical dualist and I believe that ideas are more real than matter, but still place some value on the body, and not ll of it on the mind. Throughout this paper I intend on looking at my personal philosophy through the eyes of coach, to better integrate the ideas behind sport and philosophy and how they relate. With coaching being something, I have done before, it gives a chance to reflect on my experience and allows me to understand why I mad the decisions I made more.

           First, I would like to look at my ontological position. I believe my ontological position is from a dualist perspective, with mind being the most important part of a human being; however, still placing some value on the body. The mind, I believe, is also the source that provides the most accurate representation of reality, because the body senses, with things like morphine can be tricked much easier than the mind can. As a coach, I prefer my players to do their part of watching film and creating a strategy for a game, rather than players that just go out and play. I am of the belief that the reality of a sports game is focused more through the mind rather than the body. Of course, the goal of every game is winning right? Now which player would be better suit for winning? The one that just goes out and feels the game out with their body and sense? Or the one that focuses on watching film and creating strategies?

           This brings me into my next point, which is identifying my epistemological position. I believe my epistemological position is that we acquire knowledge through intellectual activity. With evidence such as learning through a classroom setting, for all Untied States schools. In sports however, it is a coach teaching the mind of his players so that they can perform during game. That is why there is half time speeches in some sports, it is addressing the issue and teaching players how to solve it. With the idea that training the mind will then translate to the body to get the body to do what the coach and player wants it to do.

The first page is the writing assignment requirements and the second page is what I have so far. I need help with proofreading what I have so far. I also need help extending the length of my paper, by better explaining my ontological and epistemological positions.

Here is the feedback from my professor so far…”

The example you use for your ontological position is incomplete. What are you describing here? How does it demonstrate your ontological position? Also, you never explain what an ontological position is, and you are missing citations throughout your paper.” I also believe the same thing applies to my epistemological position. I just really need help better explaining everything and I am not quite sure how to do that.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

History assignment … Explain in at least 8 sentences. Why has the Arab-Israeli conflict been so persistent? What religious and cultural factors have contributed to the persistent state of unrest in the Middle East and, in particular, in the Holy Land?

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

History has shown that project team members often question whether they can trust their project team leaders’ technical expertise. Suggest two actions that a new project team leader should take to address such concerns.Recommend three actions that the project leader should take in order to identify and understand the technical challenges and issues facing the project. Next, prioritize the three actions, from most important to least important. Support your answer with evidence or examples

It is true that now days, we are living in a competitive world where the most of the companiesare handling project based jobs. There is no doubt that it is the best way for handling the work…

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"