Hi, I need help with essay on DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS. Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

DEATH PENALTY FOR TERRORISTS Argument for: Terrorists should be punished to deter future criminal conduct

In all the societies, if a person violates the laws he or she is supposed to be punished. According to Kant, the death penalty is supposed to be administered to prevent future criminal behaviors. He argues that every person is supposed to follow the law regardless of the social status.

Acting to satisfy one’s self-interest is unacceptable

Kant argues that acting to satisfy one’s interest is not acceptable. It is immoral to kill someone to obtain something is not morally upright. If the government decides to kill someone because he or she killed someone else, the action is moral. Terrorists take away the lives of the people. Thus, the government is supposed to protect the lives of the citizens.

Benefits the society as a whole

Utilitarianism believes that capital punishment is morally acceptable, and it benefits the society as a whole. If an action brings happiness to the whole society, then it should be carried out. Utilitarianism also states that if capital punishment causes pain to one person or only a few people in the society, then the action is not immoral. Additionally, utilitarianism aims at society’s happiness and not individual happiness. If capital punishment will bring happiness to the society. Then it should be administered.

The law is supposed to be strictly adhered

Natural laws guide the individual’s behavior. The natural laws are those that are innate. They are the rights that are given to us at birth. The rights are based on principles such as customs, beliefs and expression. If a person commits a crime, the rights are supposed to be adhered. The laws of most of the states’ state that if a person kills, the death penalty is supposed to be administered. Terrorist causes the death of many people. Hence, the death penalty is supposed to be administered.

Argument against:

Punishment and crime are inconsistent with happiness

According to the utilitarian philosophy, laws are supposed to be used so as to maximize the happiness of the society. Punishment and crime, do not bring happiness to the members of the society. Utilitarians have the belief that a crime-free society does not exist. They state that death penalty has consequences for both the society and the offender.

Death penalty does not prevent crime

Additionally, the total good produced through punishment, it is supposed to exceed the total evil. Death penalty will not prevent the terrorists from committing acrime. When one is killed because of terrorists’ activities, it will not prevent the other terrorists from committing a crime.

Rehabilitation would do better

This is another of the utilitarian rationale for punishment. Rehabilitation aims at preventing future crime and giving the offenders ability to succeed within the confines of the law. Through rehabilitation, the offenders learn new ways to compete in the job market.

Life imprisonment is better than death penalty

According to Egoism, all the actions that a person decides to do has its motivation. The primary motivation for committing the criminal activities is self-interest. The terrorists carry out the terrorist activities out of self-interest. In Egoism, life incarceration is supposed to be an alternative to thedeath penalty. Egoism states that both the just and unjust commit crime for self-interest. Thus, death penalty cannot be a solution to eliminate crime especially the terrorists’ activities.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Debating Cinema and Time in film Inception. Paper must be at least 2500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The approach that is given to Inception by Christopher Nolan conforms to the perspective of the theory of Bernani and Dutoit as portrayed in their book,-the approach given by the movie make the possibility of being to be put at great stake. Nolan also in hi movie, inception uses the theory that states that film using the ‘general apparatus’ are predetermined to guarantee production of a subject that dominates an ideology. Throughout the movie, there are breath-taking special effects coupled with unbelievable twists and turns. The film man referred to as Batman: the dark night and the Prestige are rated to be brilliant with the ability to create a world within a world with the masterpiece. Even though it is a little bit difficult to understand the movie, it has managed what very many directors are yearning for. the ability to leave the audience in need of more and continues with the talk about the movies weeks after watching it. There are creative camera works that has been used in the development of the movie and this is what contributes to the peculiarity of the movie. For instance, when Leonardo and his partner Arthur visited Saito with their proposal for a dream to steal, the camera work involved in the scene is one of the very rare uses of 180 degrees. The use of 180 degrees do create the realism that there is a discussion going on while in the real sense it is just the use of two cameras on the opposites to create an impression that there is a discussion taking place. Usually, 180 degrees shot is to make shots that are close up in nature and will allow the audience to construe the characters emotional state and not the entire shooting scene. This camera work was used in the movie to depict the three men sat in a round table discussing. Apart from the 180 degrees rule, the director of the movie also used some other unique styles of expressing the facial expression of two characters talking. this involved the use of ‘shot reverse shot’ which is able to move back and forth between two characters to depict that they are in a conversation. This technique also uses the 180 degrees rule to show a conversation between two people by moving the camera back and forth between the two people so that the audience can connect with the facial reaction of the characters talking (McCormick, 2004). This technique has been perfectly used in the movies where two people are discussing or talking in a way that it brings out the sense of conversation that connects easily with the audience. In the film, most of the shots are long shots, medium shots, and close shots meant to bring in varieties in the movies, this works well in keeping the audience interested about the movies and avoid tension building in the audience since they are fully aware of the happenings. The closes up shots are used particularly when the intended purpose is to depict the facial expression of the audience such as reactions and emotional state. In this case, the close up shots works to pass important information to the audience and about the character of the individuals as well as what they think. Close up shots in this regard can also be used to bring into focus some of the important characters in the movies and to which the audience should pay more attention to and follow because they are

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Define the medical model of health and describe the differences when compared to the social model of health. Paper must be at least 1000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

This health model is based on a medical scientific paradigm that emphasizes a restoration of health to a state of general well-being and the key word is recovery (Lyng, 1990:100).

On the other hand, the social model of health emphasizes the prevention measures that can be made on society as a whole that will promote overall well-being in a certain population by making some changes in the lifestyles of people. In other words, the social model of health looks at the social causes of diseases and examines how the breakdown in social systems can be contributory to the outbreak and spread of diseases (Earle, 2007:55). The large-scale health projects commonly adopted by governments to eradicate certain diseases embrace this social model of health by trying to change a whole citys or even an entire countrys population. This latest concept to sweep among public health policy makers compares societal breakdowns as the primary cause of diseases within society. A good example would be social and economic inequalities which contribute to the poor health of certain segments of society such as ethnic or minority groups which do not have access to proper medical care services.

The medical model of health is concerned mainly with the health of an individual and this is more or less in terms of physical health. This model takes a narrower view of the health of the individual in terms of physiological or biological changes as determined by a diagnosis. On the other hand, the social model of health takes an encompassing view of the health of the entire society and is a multi-disciplinary endeavour ranging from surveillance and detection of diseases in a population (epidemiology) to the promotion of public health through a provision of relevant health advice and timely health information.

As such, the social model of health acquires greater significance in terms of promotion of the economic well-being of a nation as well.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Definition of Post-Modernism. Paper must be at least 500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

The essay “Definition of Post-Modernism” defines and describes postmodernism. It could be asserted that post-modernism encouraged the exploration of answers to various queries, issues, and concerns, beyond what has been universally accepted as truth. Description of the term ‘post-modernism’ was initiated through exploring the meaning of ‘modernism’. As emphasized, modernism “refers to a certain period of western cultural, artistic and sociological history. This period covers the later nineteenth and early twentieth centuries”. The characteristics noted which aptly identifies modernism include: alteration in traditional thinking and exploration of diverse points of views. Likewise, modernism was noted to be “a reaction to the perceived world view of the time and the condition of modern civilization. However, many thinkers and philosophers felt that modernism itself had certain restrictions and that modernistic thought still relied on basic foundational concepts that were tied to the past”. Therefore, the concept of post-modernism evolved from the descriptions noted of modernism and expanded to emphasize non-conformity to anything that is fixed or restricted. There were several characteristics which were noted to assist in describing post-modernism, to wit: rejection of boundaries. and noted concentration on the following: discontinuity, fragmentation, ambiguity. As aptly define, therefore, post-modernism was noted explicitly as “an adventure and an expression of life experience.

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"

Hi, I need help with essay on Deleted order 1111918 bOOK REVIEW OF JIMMY CARTER WHITE HOUSE DIARY. Paper must be at least 1500 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

This personal characteristic is very evident in the book, especially in the parts concerning most of his critics. Carter refers to Scoop Jackson as someone who “acted like an ass”, considers Russell Long as waste of time, and thinks of Helmut Schmidt as a paranoid child respectively (123, 164, 439). In essence, this part of the book makes the reader doubt Carter’s leadership ability as a result of his inability to deal with criticism positively. Reading this part of the book makes it a bit frustrating and one wonders how a president can be that close minded.

It is amazing how a thorough read of the book portrays Carter as a person who is very fond of passing judgments on others yet he cannot stand criticism directed at him. For example, Carter writes that Reagan is the type of person who does not seem to listen to anyone and that his thinking is mostly made up of a few memorized anecdotes and vignettes (513). Carter’s criticism of Begin as an individualistic person also shows how Carter fails to see such traits in himself but is very keen to notice them on others.

In yet another section of the book, the reader is exposed to Carter’s close-mindedness and his inability handle criticism. The two traits are made evident when Carter writes about his poor relationship with the media because he was always cynical and suspicious of the press (528). Carter directly accuses the news media of deliberately giving him negative publicity and fails to give rational explanations as to why he received such unsympathetic press coverage. Instead of admitting his mistakes, Carter claims that the negative press was because of his refusal to provide humorous comments at annual media banquets (529). In a way, reading Carter’s admission of lack of humor in his media banquets reminds the reader of how serious and bring the book is, as it basically lacks

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"