Week 3 Assignment 18822325

/in /by

 Details:

Write a 1,200-1,500 word analysis of “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy.” In light of the readings, be sure to address the following questions:

  1. Under the Christian narrative and Christian vision, what sorts of issues are most pressing in this case study?
  2. Should the physician allow Mike to continue making decisions that seem to him to be irrational and harmful to James?
  3. According to the Christian narrative and the discussion of the issues of treatment refusal, patient autonomy, and organ donation in the topic readings, how might one analyze this case?
  4. According to the topic readings and lecture, how ought the Christian think about sickness and health? What should Mike as a Christian do? How should he reason about trusting God and treating James?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

PHI-413V-RS-T3CaseStudy.docx 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Assignment 19285109

/in /by

Assignment Content

  1.    Write a paper that provides an update on the progress of your capstone project.

    Discuss the following in your brief paper:

    • How is your employer responding to your project?
    • Review your experiences of your Gemba Walk.
    • What internal and external data sources have you identified?
    • What successes and challenges have you encountered requesting or accessing data?
    • How is the data helping to narrow down to a viable, short-term executable project?
    • What other challenges are you encountering?
    • What are you doing to work around the challenges?
    • Cite and reference any resources you may have used.

      Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

      Submit your assignment. For additional help, check out the ULTRA: Access your assignments page. 

  • My assignment is attached to the question. 
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Assignment 6005

/in /by

 My Drug is  penicillin  

Please do not copy charts/drug information directly from sources. Put them in your own format. I have included a sample chart that I used in the past.  Feel free to use or modify based on your learning needs. The left side of the chart includes what students need to know about the medication.  On the right side, place the information that you retrieve there. For any references that you use, make sure that they are evidence-based and current.  

Medication 

Put Medication Name Here—i.e.                      penicillin 

Classification

Mechanism of Action

Side Effects

Adverse/Life Threatening Side Effects

Are there any lab values to monitor with this medication? How often should the labs be monitored?

Drug-Drug Interactions (include herbal, over-the-counter, and prescription meds)

Patient Education 

Any additional information related to medication

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Case Study 1 19179175

/in /by

  

In a short essay (500-700 words), answer the Question at the end of Case Study 1. 

Cite references to support your positions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite

RUBRIC

1. Identification of anemia classification and rationale is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. 40%

2. Explanation of patient diagnosis uses outside sources and/or medical and nursing references to support conclusions and is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. 40%

3. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5%

4. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless 5%

5. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. 5%

6. All format elements are correct. 2%

7. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 3%

CASE STUDY IS ATTACHED

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Case Study 2

/in /by

  

In a short essay (500-700 words), answer the Question at the end of Case Study 2. 

Cite references to support your positions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite

RUBRIC

1. Description of your approach to care is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. 20%

2. Recommendation of a treatment plan is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of insight and/or reflection. 20%

3. Description of a method for providing both the patient and family with education is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. 20%

4. A teaching plan is offered in detail, while demonstrating evidence of deeper insight and/or reflection. 20%

5. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. 5%

6. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. 5%

7. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English 5%

8. All format elements are correct. 2%

9. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. 3%

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Contemporary Issue Position Essay Ethics

/in /by

Choose a case from the AMA Journal of Ethics Case Index   https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/cases   and take a position. For this assignment you will evaluate the ethical arguments for or against the issue. Identify the potential legal arguments (consider current federal guidelines), indicate any potential professional code conflicts you foresee, and support your position with an explanation of your own ethical/moral foundation.

In your 2-3 page paper:

  • Identify the issue and state your ethical position.
  • How might this scenario play out or impact you in your role as a nurse practitioner? 
  • Defend your position with legal, ethical, and professional evidence.
  • As part of your position, propose strategies and solutions for addressing the issues.
  • What other ethical issues does this case bring to light, if any?

Support your position with at least one scholarly source (it may be your text).  Be sure to cite the article you choose, use APA format, and include a title page and reference page.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Course Project Topic Selection

/in /by

 

Required Resources
No specific resources are required for this activity. Conduct general research and/or skim the textbook to help you select a topic.

Introduction
You will work on a research project for the duration of this course that you will deliver as a presentation in Week 8. For this project, select a person whom you believe had a significant influence (positive or negative) on a movement for social, economic, and/or political change in the 20th and 21st centuries. Explore and address the following in your project:

  • Summarize the person’s ideas.
  • How did the ideas or changes affect the establishment and status quo?
  • What was the context in which this person proposed ideas/change?
  • How did the government or the people respond to the ideas/change?
  • What sort of following or support did he/she have?
  • How have the ideas/actions of the person influenced contemporary cultures and ideas?

For the final presentation, make sure to go beyond the surface information and go into depth about the person you are researching.

Here is a brief breakdown of the project so that you can plan your time in the course:

Week

Task

Week 3

Topic Selection

Week 5

Annotated Bibliography

Week 6

Script

Week 8

Presentation

Instructions
For the assignment this week, address the following:

  • State the topic.
  • For the stated issue, identify at least three (3) aspects of the issue that you think you will likely develop in your presentation. Briefly state why you have chosen each aspect.

You are not confined to three aspects only, but you must develop at least three. As you develop your presentation, you may find other aspects that you deem more relevant, and you may add or substitute those.

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 1-2 paragraphs
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page (as needed)
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Critical Appraisal Of Practice Guidelines

/in /by

  

While there are several tools to critically appraise practice guidelines, the most comprehensively validated appraisal tool is the AGREE II Instrument. The AGREE II Instrument can be used by individual practitioners to critically appraise health guidelines and by decision makers to inform policy decisions. The purpose of the AGREE II Instrument is to provide a framework to:

  1. Assess      the quality of guidelines.
  2. Provide      a methodological strategy for the development of guidelines.
  3. Inform      what information and how the information ought to be reported in      guidelines.

Overall assessment includes rating the overall quality of the guideline and whether the guideline would be recommended for use in practice.
 

Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 7 (Strongly Agree). A score of 1 is given when there is no information on that item or if it is poorly reported. A score of 7 is given if the quality of reporting is excellent and when full criteria have been met (Score explanations found in the AGREE II-GRS Instrument).
 

A quality score is calculated for each of the six domains, which are independently scored. Domain scores are calculated by summing up all the scores of the items in the domain and by scaling the total as a percentage of the maximum possible score for that specific domain.

For this assignment, you will choose a guideline and assess the overall quality and whether the guideline would be recommended for use in practice.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of this assignment:

  • Download      the AGREE II instrument.
  • Doctoral      learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The      APA Style Guide is located in the      Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
  • This      assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the      expectations for successful completion.
  • You      are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Directions:

Perform the following tasks to complete this assignment:

  1. Using      the AGREE II instrument as your guide, create a table that discusses a      practice guideline in which you might have questioned the recommendations.      (Note: You may be able to copy and paste the instrument into a new Word      document and complete the information.)
  2. Each      domain must have its own cell (similar to the one shown in the manual) and      add domain scores and an overall guideline assessment. Be sure to include      comments and additional considerations that influenced your rating      decision and cite any sources used.

3. Apply Rubrics

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Discussion 1 Ethics 19488087

/in /by

Collapse          

Discuss the potential controversy when considering a patient’s right to know whether a caregiver has AIDS, and the caregiver’s right to privacy and confidentiality. 

Consider the following: A physician cut his hand with a scalpel while he was assisting another physician. Because of the uncertainty that blood had been transferred from the physician’s hand wound to the patient through an open surgical incision, he agreed to have a blood test for HIV. His blood tested positive for HIV and he withdrew himself from participation in further surgical procedures.

Discuss the ethical and legal issues.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW

Week 3 Discussion 1 Ethics

/in /by

Collapse          

Discuss the potential controversy when considering a patient’s right to know whether a caregiver has AIDS, and the caregiver’s right to privacy and confidentiality. 

Consider the following: A physician cut his hand with a scalpel while he was assisting another physician. Because of the uncertainty that blood had been transferred from the physician’s hand wound to the patient through an open surgical incision, he agreed to have a blood test for HIV. His blood tested positive for HIV and he withdrew himself from participation in further surgical procedures.

Discuss the ethical and legal issues.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
ORDER NOW