Respond to the post bellow, using one or more of the following approaches:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own review of the literature in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from the readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Data Collection
Data collection methods vary greatly depending on the research question and the type of participants, regardless of chosen methodology, data collection must be rigorously executed to produce high-quality data. Similarly, instruments to collect data must provide accurate, concise, and provide quantifiable data from which clinical meaning can be extrapolated and subsequently applied to effect improvements in practice. In this case, research aims to assess patient satisfaction, from the patient’s perspective. Polit & Beck (2017), report that structured self-report instruments are widely used by nurse researchers, and are typically formatted as either questionnaires or interviews. Surveys provide several advantages. In comparison to interviews, they are cost-effective, maintain the anonymity of respondents, mitigate interviewer bias, and can be easily administered using computer technology. Disadvantages to surveys include low response rates; typically around 50%, exclusion of certain populations such as the elderly and children, questions may lack depth, or be ambiguous or confusing causing respondents to skip them altogether (Polit & Beck, 2017)
Survey Instrument
Low response rate remains a primary barrier in survey administration and efficacy. However, when surveys are personally distributed in a particular setting, in this case, the primary care clinic, response rates are significantly higher. Moreover, the personal nature of a survey tool being directly distributed to respondents has a positive effect on participants (Polit & Beck, 2017). Keough and Tanabe (2011) contend that although the data collected through surveys is not as scientific as data obtained through experimentation, it is nonetheless important and informs nursing practice. Because the clinic is interested specifically interested in understanding the patients’ point of view, I assert that a self-report survey tool should be designed using a Likert-type rating scale. The range of responses available to the participants provides greater insight compared to a simple closed-ended question. Moreover, rating scales are easy to complete and are also efficient. However, because people may misunderstand the concept of the Likert Scale, instructions and statements should be clear and concise (Polit & Beck, 2017).
Sampling Methodology and Participant Selection
I would employ a consecutive sampling methodology; this includes recruiting all accessible and eligible participants over a pre-determined time-period (Polit & Beck, 2017). There is no specific formula for sample size. Martínez-Mesa, Bastos, Bonamigo, and Duquia (2014) assert that sample size can be thought of in tiers. The largest tier represents the entire population; in this case, 10,000 patients. The target population is the portion of the total population who are of interest to the study. In this case, we would exclude very small children or patients who are cognitively impaired. Finally, the study population includes those who will be included in the research (Martínez-Mesa, Bastos, Bonamigo, & Duquia, 2014).
To optimize response rates, and to increase validity and reliability, the survey will be administered in quarterly increments over a year. Therefore, the target population will be all 10,000 patients. Of the target population, it would be reasonable to assume that some patients will not want to fill out the questionnaire and that others will be excluded. The study population will aim to include 7,500 patients. All eligible participants will be asked to fill out a paper and pencil, self-administered, survey when they check into the clinic for an appointment. This will allow adequate time for participants to complete the survey before seeing their provider. Results will be calculated every quarter and once at the end of the year for comparison. This schedule will facilitate detection of variations in patient satisfaction throughout the year, and help to identify specific variables such as inadequate staffing that contributed to the results.
Survey Questions
Participants will be asked to rate declarative statements using will be using the Likert rating scale. A bipolar continuum will assess varying degrees of satisfaction to the statements regarding patient satisfaction. The participants will be asked to rate the following items:
1.) 1. Convenience of office hours:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
2.) 2. Ease of making an appointment:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
3.) 3. Promptness in seeing your provider:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
4.) 4. Friendliness of staff:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
5.) 5. Clarity of medical instructions provided:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
6.) 6. Overall comfort of the office:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
7.) 7. Help provided understanding insurance coverage:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
8.) 8. Answers provided to address questions:
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Fair
- Poor
9. My overall satisfaction is:
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Fair
- Poor
10. Likeliness to recommend the clinic to others:
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Fair
- Poor
The statements are brief, clear, and each statement identifies just one issue. The rating scale is reflective of satisfaction rather than agreement or importance.
Reliability and Validity
With regard to validity, it is important to consider the content of the survey. Items should be relevant, comprehensive, and balanced (Polit & Beck, 2017). I believe the statements chosen address the components of content validity. Internal validity of the survey tool is enhanced through content validity and further enhanced by the anonymous nature of the self-administered survey tool provided by office personnel. The external validity is strengthened by the size of the study population, and the quarterly implementation which provides data for comparison. The quarterly administration schedule will also provide statistical validity.
Reliability concerns consistency over time (Polit & Beck, 2017). This can be challenging when measuring patient satisfaction. Patients may be more or less satisfied from day to day. Test reliability occurs with the “administration of the same measure to the same people on two occasions” (Polit & Beck, p. 303, 2017). Internal consistency occurs when the same person provides the same results (Polit & Beck, 2017). Because participants will visit the clinic multiple times during the year, they will fill out the survey more than once, thereby strengthening test reliability and internal consistency. If a sample is homogenous, reliability is decreased (Polit & Beck, 2017). This survey will be administered to a diverse group, increasing reliability. Because patient satisfaction is an essential quality metric, its importance should not be underestimated. The utilization of a self-administered survey tool on a rolling quarterly basis is cost-effective and reliable.
References
Keough, V., & Tanabe, P. (2011). Survey research: An effective design for conducting nursing Research. Journal of Nursing Regulation,1(4), 37-44. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201950_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5052/readings/USW1_NURS_5052_Keough 2011.pdf.
Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D. A., Bastos, J. L., Bonamigo, R. R., & Duquia, R. P. (2014). Sample size: how many participants do I need in my research?. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 89(4), 609–615. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Instruct
/in Uncategorized /by developerGreat discussion on HIV & inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The two major phenotypes of inflammatory bowel disease are ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. IBD is influenced by a complex interplay of genetics and immunologic factors. However, the exact etiology is unknown. Research on IBD includes focus on particular gut proteins and immune cells that are recruited to the gut. Stem cell research is a focus as well. What role does genetics play in the development of these disorders?
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Irynne
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days who chose a different national healthcare issue/stressor than you selected.
Explain how their chosen national healthcare issue/stressor may also impact your work setting and what (if anything) is being done to address the national healthcare issue/stressor.
Main Post
Nurses play an integral role in the provision of quality health care. In addition, nurses make up for the largest section of the health profession (Haddad & Toney-Butler, 2019). According to the study conducted by Zhang, Tai, Pforsich, & Lin in 2018, there will be a shortage of 154,018 RNs by 2020 and 510,394 RNs by 2030. Nursing shortage is a healthcare issue that could potentially impact the delivery of care and increase medical errors. Some of the factors contributing to nursing shortage are aging RN workforce, the growing elderly population, nurse burnout, high turnover, inequitable distribution of the workforce, and violence in healthcare setting (Haddad & Toney-Butler, 2019; Sawaengdee, et al., 2016).
Nursing shortage is an on-going issue in my organization. I am currently working as an Operating Room Nurse in Florida under the Colorectal and Minimally-invasive surgery service. In the OR, nurses usually work with a specific service to ensure that the individual needs of the surgical team and the patients will be met based on the knowledge and expertise of the nurses in the service. During the past few months, there was a steady increase in the number of nurses leaving the department. Remaining nurses are now forced to take on a different service every day and stay extra hours after shift to meet the OR cases demand. Although nurses were exposed to different services during the orientation period of 6 months, the unfamiliarity to different cases and surgeons alongside work burnout could potentially lead to errors, longer turnover time, and poor outcomes.
Management are actively responding to nursing shortage by hiring new graduates and providing incentives for staying after shifts and for picking up extra days to work. Nursing residency program (NRP) is now being offered to new graduate nurses (NGNs) to solve the issue of nursing shortage and to increase nursing retention. In a study conducted by Ackerson & Stiles (2018), shows that NRP in acute care settings are successful in retaining NGNs, which decreases organizational costs. In relation to picking up extra hours of work, nurses are allowed to leave early when all the cases for the day are done before their shift ends to prevent nurse burnout.
References:
Ackerson, K. & Stiles, K. A. (2018). Value of Nurse Residency Programs in Retaining New Graduate Nurses and Their Potential Effect on the Nursing Shortage. J Contin Educ Nurs, 49(6), 282-288. Doi: 10.3928/00220124-20180517-09
Haddad, L. M. & Toney-Butler, T. J. (2019). Nursing Shortage. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing. PMID: 29630227
Sawaengdee, K., Tangcharoensathien, V., Theerawit, T., Thungjaroenkul, P., Thinkhamrop, W., Prathumkam, P., . . . Thinkhamrop, B. Thai nurse cohort study: cohort profiles and key findings. BMC Nurs, 15(10). PubMed: 26893589
Zhang, X., Tai, D., Pforsich, H., & Lin, V. W. (2018). United States Registered Nurse Workforce Report Card and Shortage Forecast: A Revisit. American Journal of Medical Quality, 33(3), 229 -236. Doi: 10.1177/1062860617738328
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jame Foundat
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE
If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look.
Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html
MAIN POST
Online learning has become more mainstream and is now providing higher education opportunities to those who would not have had access in the past. Online success comes from planning out your week and then accomplishing it. For me, I set aside time on Monday and Wednesday. These days are my weekly off days that I set up with my OR director before school started. Involving my director and manager lets them know what my goals are and how they can help me achieve them.
Planning/Time Management
When I plan out my “school day”, I start with what time I am waking up, I incorporate breakfast, and dropping the little girl off at VPK, as well as gym time. My day starts at 0530 and “class” begins around 0730-0745. Mondays are dedicated to reading and initial discussion post’s. If I can post a discussion with time to spare I will start thinking of ideas for my response post. Wednesday’s are dedicated review days and responding to posts. Thursday and Friday, for me, seem to be review of material and discussion post. These days tend to be later in the night since I get off at 1900. So, I set aside and hour and a half of “school-time” on those nights. The main thing to understand about planning and time management with online learning is this; you can’t expect to achieve a goal without preparation.
Communication/ Technology use
Temeka Johnson states in the academic guide” Walden offers a very user-friendly environment for the students to stay connected–to get connected and stay connected”. Communication is so vital for achieving online success. Walden is connected, they have provided you a way to access information 24-7. There is the Facebook groups and pages for each class, there is the chat support on the main page of the student portal. Walden has also given you a link for FAQ’s. In my opinion they have thought about everything. With everything that Walden offers, the ease of accessing information is due to use of modern technology. Jeffrey Bodimer states in the academic guide, “I mean, it’s technology, you’re not going to break it. You know, it’s not going bite you. You just simply have to get in and play around with it. Do the pointing, do the clicking. Post something incorrectly. You know, make the mistake. Don’t be afraid of making of making the mistake.”
Walden University has given us a solid platform to jump from. The tools of success have been handed to you as well as the instructions on how to use them. Take the time to plan out future, communicate with your instructors and fellow students, and use the technology provided to make those plans a reality.
References
Gerr, M. (2018). Walden SRO: Creating a Technology Backup Plan. [online] Academicguides.waldenu.edu. Available at: https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/ld.php?content_id=2828215 [Accessed 3 Dec. 2018].
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post James Fg
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE:
If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look:
Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html
Main Post
My experience with using Grammarly and Safe Assign were not as daunting as I expected. Grammarly is an app-based program that can be attached to Office 365 and Firefox. The link for Grammarly was found on the academic guides page. I used the site search box to find the app’s location. From there it was as easy as following directions and downloading the app. I copy and pasted the paraphrased assignment and received an 83/100 for performance. Other scores given were for word and sentence length, those scores were a 4.9 and a10.9. The only issue found was the “Go Premium” offer that was $11.99 a month or $139.95a year. There will not be a subscription ordered. Grammarly will be used in my Word program on a trial basis. It can’t hurt to see what needs to be fixed in real time. Another academic integrity tool is Safe Assign. This tool is defined in the academic answers portion of the academic guide by stating, “SafeAssign is a tool that helps students prevent plagiarism and aids in identifying opportunities to add properly cited sources rather than just paraphrasing.” (Walden, 2011) Finding Safe Assign in Blackboard was very easy. It is in the toolbar on the bottom left-hand side of the page. Once on the site, it is as easy as browsing your computer for the document and simply upload it. The only issue I have with Safe Assign is it is not in real time, you must wait for the site to review your work then make the changes needed. In my opinion, Grammarly is a better tool for writing and having a real-time view of the paper being written.
A resource that I would recommend is the Online Writing Lab (OWL). It is the base from where the American Psychological Association (APA) is explained in detail. In the APA overview and workshop section of the OWL, it states, “Establish your credibility or ethos in the field by demonstrating an awareness of your audience and their needs as fellow researchers.” (Purdue Writing Lab, 2018) This is why we should use APA when scholarly writing. Credibility is key when writing anything at a master’s level. When using APA, we research ideas and information from scientific journals, and at the same time distribute that knowledge in the form of scholarly writings. Using the OWL for any APA formatting question creates a solid base for building an educational publication to be reviewed by your peers. (APA, 2010, pg.9)
Grammar in its basic form decides how a writer will be received by the reader. Incorrect grammar sidetracks the reader from the tone an author has set. A format that I constantly work on is the use of parallel construction. On page 84 of, the “Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.)” parallel construction is covered. This is two ideas covered in a sentence that will improve the reader’s comprehension. (APA, 2010, pg.84) Another format important to consider is the explanation of abbreviations. Abbreviations in scientific writing are used to shorten long drawn out titles. The key in using abbreviations is to initially explain what the abbreviation is and use it at least four times. There is a balance that must be attained. Using too many abbreviations jumbles up the sentence and make it difficult to read, but not using enough causes the reader to lose interest with repetitive phrasing. (APA, 2010, pg.106-107)
References
American Psychological Association. (2010, pg.9,84). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Purdue Writing Lab. (2018). APA Style Introduction // Purdue Writing Lab. [online] Available at: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/apa_style/apa_style_introduction.html [Accessed 10 Dec. 2018].
Walden University. (2012d). Walden University: APA style. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/APA.htm
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post James G
/in Uncategorized /by developerI need a positive argument based in this discussion question. Respond to this argument in one or more of the following ways:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
My Goals and Walden University Vision and Mission
In 2011 I graduated from Nursing School. I knew I wanted work in the Emergency Department. I had finished my practicum in an ED and was slotted to be hired once I passed my NCLEX. As life would have it, I wouldn’t be able to take that job until year later. In the meantime, I toughed it out as a floor nurse, and honed my skills. I knew that floor nursing was not in my 10-year plan, so I made it a point to get all the experience I could to prepare myself for a career as a nurse. My journey since becoming an RN has been an amazing one. I have completed Critical Care fellowships, worked beside some of the finest physicians, and now with all my experiences, I need to become a Nurse Practioner. I am currently working in the Operating Room and have absolutely fallen in love with Orthopedics. Becoming an Orthopedic Nurse Practioner will allow me to treat patients in clinic as well as assist the surgeon to increase mobility in those requiring surgery.
I found Walden University during a school fair at my current hospital. I spoke with a representative who, in my opinion, made the choice very easy. I did research other online programs, but I always came back to Walden University. The ability for me to attend a program and still be able to work full time was a must. I felt like this University had my best interest in mind after reading the School of Nursing’s (SON) vision and mission statement. The mission statement states “Walden University provides a diverse community of career professionals with the opportunity to transform themselves as scholar-practitioners so that they can effect positive social change.” (Walden University, 2011a) I feel as though Walden University will assist me to be in control my transformation from Registered Nurse to Nurse Practioner.
Incorporation of Social Change
Everyday our society experiences change whether swift or gradual. I want to promote positive social change by integrating Walden University’s views with my own. “Positive social change results in the improvement of human and social conditions.” (Walden 2011b, para.1) I want to be part of that change, I want to be part of the improvement, I want to use my knowledge and experience to help improve the way we live together as human beings. I feel like Walden University will provide me with the tools needed to make this vision a reality.
References
Walden University. (2011a). About the school. Retrieved from
http://www.waldenu.edu/Colleges-and-Schools/College-of-Health-Sciences/15863.htm
Walden University. (2011b). Vision, mission, and goals. Retrieved from
http://catalog.waldenu.edu/content.php?catoid=21&navoid=2450
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jenif Holl Policy And Advocacy
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE:
If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look.
Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html
MAIN POST
Nursing leaders such as clinical directors must stay on top of the latest findings to keep their nursing staff up to date with new evidence-based practices. My clinical director is over the Emergency Room and has many roles to keep the ER running. As a leader, she is constantly trying new things for patients and the ER. Clinical Directors are responsible for building and keeping an atmosphere that supports staff (Knickman & Kovner, 2015). My Clinical Director wants employees to be involved in decision making in the ER. Several years ago, she got approval by upper management to start Shared Governance Committee. Shared Governance is designed to involve nurses in their practice to make decisions about their work (Bieber & Joachim, 2015). I did my two-year term and enjoyed helping to better our ER. Employees feel that their opinions are validated. As a committee, we have established new processes for the ER. It is imperative for the clinical director to be a team player. The hospital where I work is a teaching hospital. We are constantly trying new ER processes, such as patient flow and new processes in regard to patients with myocardial infarctions, strokes, and sepsis. Our clinical director advocates for new procedures. She stays current on the latest nursing standards. She is always looking for ways to help nurses to ease stress on their daily workload. Shared Governance structure is set up to repair clinical problems and build leadership skills (Gordon, 2016).
References
Bieber, P., & Joachim, H. (2016, February 14). Shared Governance: A Success Story. Ebsco, 62-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2015.09.011
Gordon, J. N. (2016). Empowering Oncology Nurses to Lead Change Through Shared Governance Project. Ebsco, 688-690.
Knickman, J. R., & Kovner, A. R. (Eds.). (2015). Health care delivery in the united states (11th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jennifer Br
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use at least 3 references
Health care Challenges in Africa
Africa faces a burden of communicable and non-communicable diseases. On March 23, 2014, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported cases of Ebola Virus Disease in the forested rural area of Southeastern Guinea. A research done by Olu, Petu, Ovberedio & Muhongerwa, 2017 states that the 2014/2015 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa infected more than 28,000 persons out of which 11,000 died. At the height of this outbreak, a considerable load of cases and their contacts overwhelmed the response capacity of the principally affected countries namely Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. When this outbreak happened, the affected states didn’t have experience or tools to identify cases and limit the spread of the disease rapidly. Cost-effective interventions and medical access would have reduced the number of people infected during the epidemic/outbreak, but coverage is too low due to the health care system. These challenges relate to the leadership in Africa countries, health workforce, and medical products.
Challenges and the way forward
All countries suffer from problems of coordination among hospitals and community-based services (Knickman & Knover, 2015, Chapter 4). One challenge is accessing, which is still the greatest challenge to health delivery in Africa. Fewer than 50% of Africans have access to modern health care facilities. Many African countries spend less than 10% of their GDP on healthcare. Secondly, shortages of trained health care professionals from Africa because many of them prefer to live in places like the United States and Europe. There is also the increase in communicable and non-communicable disease such as AIDS, malaria, hypertension, which are increasing in the middle-class and the poor increases. I think the government is responsible for ensuring that everyone has access to healthcare. However, I don’t believe that healthcare is a public good that is the sole responsibility of the government in Africa. There should be an opportunity for entrepreneurs to enter the health delivery space in Africa to provide healthcare to the middle class and the working poor. African Counties need to embrace technology to close health care gap and private-public partnership in the health care system. In 2007, Becton, Dickinson, and Company (BD) and the US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) entered into a public-private sector partnership focused on laboratory-system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (Cohen, 2016). This partnership is now known as “Labs for Life” was formed to help the people in low resource countries in Africa living with AIDS access to antiretroviral therapy.
According to Hader (2016),
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) align public and private needs around mutual goals to move vital projects forward. When PPPs work to strengthen the critical link in the healthcare system, such as laboratory networks, as demonstrated in this supplement by authors from the International Laboratory Branch at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), in-country officials from the respective CDC and Ministries of Health, implementing partners, and Becton, Dickinson, and Company (BD), they significantly change the landscape of healthcare and patient outcomes.
Cognizant of the challenges mentioned above, the 46 Ministers of Health from the African Region adopted and signed the Ouagadougou Declaration that proposes ways of addressing health system challenges. The Ouagadougou Declaration urges Member States to update their national health policies and plans according to the primary health care (PHC) approach; promote inter-sectorial collaboration and public-private partnership to address broad determinants of health; improve health workforce production and retention; set up mechanisms for increasing availability and accessibility of essential medicines, health technologies and infrastructure; strengthen health information systems; develop and implement strategic health financing policies and plans; promote health awareness and build behavioral change capacities among communities.
Summary
Efficient health interventions are available to help with the health care problems in Africa. Unfortunately, health systems are too weak to adequately and equitably deliver those interventions to people who need them. As nurses, we need to reach out to the health care teams and organizations in Africa to speak up for the population. Join International health organizations and write letters to the policymakers in countries in Africa. Let our voice be heard through international media to help curtail this problem. We need to make it a global problem and advocate for this population so they can have good health care and access to medical care by involving policymakers and legislators in their respective countries.
References
Cohen, G. (2016). Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Meeting Healthcare Challenges in Africa: A Perspective From the Private Sector. The Journal Of Infectious Diseases, 213 Suppl 2, S33. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv578
Ebola: 2014 Outbreak in West Africa. (2014). Congressional Research Service: Report, Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=98496602&site=eds-live&scope=site
Hader, S. L. (2016). Role of Public-Private Partnerships in Meeting Healthcare Challenges in Africa: A Perspective From the Public Sector. The Journal Of Infectious Diseases, 213 Suppl 2, S34. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1093/infdis/jiv575
Knickman, J. R., & Knover, A. R. (2015). Health Care Delivery in the United States (11th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company
Olu, O., Petu, A., Ovberedjo, M., & Muhongerwa, D. (2017). South-South cooperation in Africa: experiences, challenges and a call for concerted action. Pan African Medical Journal , 28 , 1-7. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.11604/pamj.2017.28.40.12201
The Ouagadougou Declaration. (2002). Africa News Service. Retrieved from https://ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgov&AN=edsgcl.89001532&site=eds-live&scope=site
World Health Organization: Strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: World Health Organization’s framework for action Geneva. Retrieved from http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/strategic_plan_strengthening_health_system
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jennifer
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to this post with a positive response :
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, evidence or research.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own research in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Use references
EXAMPLE OF A REFERENCE:
If you cannot locate a doi number, this is how the reference should look:
Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing, 43(4). Retrieved from https://www.pediatricnursing.net/issues/17julaug/abstr5.html
MAIN POST
Our healthcare needs an update on how we pay for our treatments. There are four ways to pay for insurance in the United States. The way we pay for our healthcare is Medicare, Medicaid, Private insurance, or out of pocket (Laureate, 2012). My parents are from the Baby Boomer generation and they are living longer than their parents. Insurance companies whether private or government inform doctors to push patients through healthcare as fast as possible to cut down costs (Laureate, 2012). I have seen working in the emergency room this does not work. Patients are returning to the ER due to insurance not paying for them to stay longer. These patients are sicker on their second admit. This is doing a disservice to patients and causing our patients to think we are in it for money and not to help people.
As healthcare provider, we took an oath to do no harm to patients while they are in our care. I am not a fan of drug companies over pricing medications for the sole purpose to get rich. Walgreens is in a class action lawsuit and accused of overpricing generic medications to patients (Berman & Shapiro, 2017). There should be a better way to regulate and prevent this if the accusation is true. In the case of Provenge, medication for prostate cancer, these patients should have the choice to use it. If it was your own family member you would want as much time as possible to spend with them. Studies show that this medication will extend life by at least four months (Stein, 2010). There has to be a better way to deliver this medication in a cheaper way.
Another option is to bypass our drug company in the United States all together. Canada’s online pharmacies were lower than our Medicare drug coverage (Sean, Young, Na-Eun, Andy, & Jongwha, 2017). I have had patients in the Emergency room who had prescription bottles from Canada and they stated it was the only way they could afford their prescriptions.
References
Laureate Education (Producer). (2012c). Healthcare economics and financing. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Stein, R. (2010), November 8). Review of prostate cancer drugs Provenge renews medical cost-benefit debate. The Washington Post. Retreived from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2010/11/07/AR2010110705205.html
Berman, H., & Shapiro, S. (2017, August 7). Hagens Berman: Walgreens Sued for Alleged Hidden Generic Drug Overpricing Scheme with PBMs. Ebsco. Retrieved from ezp.waldenulibrary.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bwh&AN=bizwire.c80109270&scope=site
Sean, K., Young, R., Na-Eun, C., Andy, K., & Jongwha, C. (2017). Prescription Drug Price
Paradox: Cost Analysis of Canadian Online Pharmacies versus US Medicare Beneficiaries for
the Top 100 Drugs. Ebsco, 37, 957-963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-017-0556-6
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jessica 19196385
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond to the post bellow, using one or more of the following approaches:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Offer and support an alternative perspective using readings from the classroom or from your own review of the literature in the Walden Library.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from the readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Data Collection
Data collection methods vary greatly depending on the research question and the type of participants, regardless of chosen methodology, data collection must be rigorously executed to produce high-quality data. Similarly, instruments to collect data must provide accurate, concise, and provide quantifiable data from which clinical meaning can be extrapolated and subsequently applied to effect improvements in practice. In this case, research aims to assess patient satisfaction, from the patient’s perspective. Polit & Beck (2017), report that structured self-report instruments are widely used by nurse researchers, and are typically formatted as either questionnaires or interviews. Surveys provide several advantages. In comparison to interviews, they are cost-effective, maintain the anonymity of respondents, mitigate interviewer bias, and can be easily administered using computer technology. Disadvantages to surveys include low response rates; typically around 50%, exclusion of certain populations such as the elderly and children, questions may lack depth, or be ambiguous or confusing causing respondents to skip them altogether (Polit & Beck, 2017)
Survey Instrument
Low response rate remains a primary barrier in survey administration and efficacy. However, when surveys are personally distributed in a particular setting, in this case, the primary care clinic, response rates are significantly higher. Moreover, the personal nature of a survey tool being directly distributed to respondents has a positive effect on participants (Polit & Beck, 2017). Keough and Tanabe (2011) contend that although the data collected through surveys is not as scientific as data obtained through experimentation, it is nonetheless important and informs nursing practice. Because the clinic is interested specifically interested in understanding the patients’ point of view, I assert that a self-report survey tool should be designed using a Likert-type rating scale. The range of responses available to the participants provides greater insight compared to a simple closed-ended question. Moreover, rating scales are easy to complete and are also efficient. However, because people may misunderstand the concept of the Likert Scale, instructions and statements should be clear and concise (Polit & Beck, 2017).
Sampling Methodology and Participant Selection
I would employ a consecutive sampling methodology; this includes recruiting all accessible and eligible participants over a pre-determined time-period (Polit & Beck, 2017). There is no specific formula for sample size. Martínez-Mesa, Bastos, Bonamigo, and Duquia (2014) assert that sample size can be thought of in tiers. The largest tier represents the entire population; in this case, 10,000 patients. The target population is the portion of the total population who are of interest to the study. In this case, we would exclude very small children or patients who are cognitively impaired. Finally, the study population includes those who will be included in the research (Martínez-Mesa, Bastos, Bonamigo, & Duquia, 2014).
To optimize response rates, and to increase validity and reliability, the survey will be administered in quarterly increments over a year. Therefore, the target population will be all 10,000 patients. Of the target population, it would be reasonable to assume that some patients will not want to fill out the questionnaire and that others will be excluded. The study population will aim to include 7,500 patients. All eligible participants will be asked to fill out a paper and pencil, self-administered, survey when they check into the clinic for an appointment. This will allow adequate time for participants to complete the survey before seeing their provider. Results will be calculated every quarter and once at the end of the year for comparison. This schedule will facilitate detection of variations in patient satisfaction throughout the year, and help to identify specific variables such as inadequate staffing that contributed to the results.
Survey Questions
Participants will be asked to rate declarative statements using will be using the Likert rating scale. A bipolar continuum will assess varying degrees of satisfaction to the statements regarding patient satisfaction. The participants will be asked to rate the following items:
1.) 1. Convenience of office hours:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
2.) 2. Ease of making an appointment:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
3.) 3. Promptness in seeing your provider:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
4.) 4. Friendliness of staff:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
5.) 5. Clarity of medical instructions provided:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
6.) 6. Overall comfort of the office:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
7.) 7. Help provided understanding insurance coverage:
o Excellent
o Very Good
o Good
o Fair
o Poor
8.) 8. Answers provided to address questions:
9. My overall satisfaction is:
10. Likeliness to recommend the clinic to others:
The statements are brief, clear, and each statement identifies just one issue. The rating scale is reflective of satisfaction rather than agreement or importance.
Reliability and Validity
With regard to validity, it is important to consider the content of the survey. Items should be relevant, comprehensive, and balanced (Polit & Beck, 2017). I believe the statements chosen address the components of content validity. Internal validity of the survey tool is enhanced through content validity and further enhanced by the anonymous nature of the self-administered survey tool provided by office personnel. The external validity is strengthened by the size of the study population, and the quarterly implementation which provides data for comparison. The quarterly administration schedule will also provide statistical validity.
Reliability concerns consistency over time (Polit & Beck, 2017). This can be challenging when measuring patient satisfaction. Patients may be more or less satisfied from day to day. Test reliability occurs with the “administration of the same measure to the same people on two occasions” (Polit & Beck, p. 303, 2017). Internal consistency occurs when the same person provides the same results (Polit & Beck, 2017). Because participants will visit the clinic multiple times during the year, they will fill out the survey more than once, thereby strengthening test reliability and internal consistency. If a sample is homogenous, reliability is decreased (Polit & Beck, 2017). This survey will be administered to a diverse group, increasing reliability. Because patient satisfaction is an essential quality metric, its importance should not be underestimated. The utilization of a self-administered survey tool on a rolling quarterly basis is cost-effective and reliable.
References
Keough, V., & Tanabe, P. (2011). Survey research: An effective design for conducting nursing Research. Journal of Nursing Regulation,1(4), 37-44. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/201950_27/MS_NURS/NURS_5052/readings/USW1_NURS_5052_Keough 2011.pdf.
Martínez-Mesa, J., González-Chica, D. A., Bastos, J. L., Bonamigo, R. R., & Duquia, R. P. (2014). Sample size: how many participants do I need in my research?. Anais brasileiros de dermatologia, 89(4), 609–615. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143705
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"
Post Jessica D
/in Uncategorized /by developerRespond using one or more of the following approaches:
Ask a probing question, substantiated with additional background information, and evidence.
Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
Validate an idea with your own experience and additional sources.
Make a suggestion based on additional evidence drawn from readings or after synthesizing multiple postings.
Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional strategies for addressing barriers to EBP based on readings and evidence.
INITIAL POST
Evidence-based practice is the standard that guides clinical practices within the nursing profession. Adams (2010) asserts that evidence-based practice “is defined as the integration of best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values to facilitate clinical decision making” (Adams, 2010, p. 274). Polit and Beck (2017) maintain that there is no consensus about what does or does not constitute evidence. There are, however, agreed upon sources of evidence which exist within a hierarchy. Systematic reviews are at the pinnacle because information is derived from multiple sources. Randomized controlled trials are next, followed by cohort studies, single case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, qualitative studies, and finally expert opinion reports. Knowledge translation is the process of using evidence to evoke systemic change within the clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2017).
Managing Delirium
While working on a busy surgical floor, I was caring for a confused, combative, elderly patient with a urinary tract infection who had fallen and broken her hip. During report, the night shift nurse told me that she gave the patient multiple doses of haloperidol and lorazepam which were ineffective. The patient continued to be confused and agitated, and because she was a danger to herself by continually trying to get out of bed, the night shift nurse obtained an order for soft restraints. Springer (2015) contends that the nurse should determine if the utilization of restraints is appropriate based on the patient’s current behavior, and should only be used when all other options such as distraction and de-escalation are exhausted (Springer, 2015). Because I was not there, I must assume that the nurse used evidence-based practice to decide that the restraints were necessary.
When I went in to assess the patient, she was sleeping; and in my professional opinion, the restraints were no longer appropriate. I removed the soft restraints and put the patient on one to one observation with a nursing assistant. Not long into the shift, the light for that room came on, and I heard staff in the patient’s room yelling. I walked in to find the patient screaming and striking the nursing assistant as he was attempting to change the patient. It was clear that the patient was still experiencing acute delirium. However, the television was on, the blinds were open, and every light in the room was on. Instead of using a chemical or physical restraint, I turned off the television, lights, and closed the blinds. I sat down beside the patient, spoke softly and attempted to reorient her. Although she was still confused, she was calm.
Bull (2015) asserts that nursing interventions to manage delirium include providing a therapeutic environment, frequent re-orientation, anticipating the patient’s needs, ensuring sensory assistance devices such as glasses or hearing aids are in use, observing the patient’s response, and proceeding accordingly. Non-invasive interventions should be exhausted prior to restraining a patient chemically or physically (Bull, 2015). In this case, the patient responded to non-invasive interventions. I continued to use the one to one observation to ensure safety throughout the shift but did not need to escalate to using chemical or physical restraints. By implementing evidence-based practice, I kept the patient safe without using restraints.
Background and PICOT Question
Background questions are broad, generalized questions that focus on a clinical issue (Polit & Beck, 2017). In this case, my background questions would be: what is delirium? And, what causes delirium? The acronym PICOT (population, intervention, comparison, outcome, and time) is a format used to create a research question with the subsequent goal of finding evidence-based solutions to implement into clinical practice (Polit & Beck, 2017). My PICOT question is: in delirious patients (population), what are the effects of non-invasive management techniques (intervention), compared to restraints (comparative intervention), on patient experience (outcome) and does either intervention increase or decrease the recovery period (time)?
Organizational Critique
I work as a float nurse in my organization, with previous experience in critical care. As a float nurse, I have a unique perspective on organizational culture because I work in multiple units. Overall, my organization does facilitate a culture of safety that promotes an environment where nurses learn from mistakes and do not place blame on one another. Written policies and procedures are easily accessible on the intranet. Moreover, my organization utilizes nursing shared governance which has a special committee devoted to practices and standards. Nurses are encouraged to bring practice issues to members of shared governance, and clinical practices are continually being updated and reviewed. If a nurse has an immediate question about a clinical practice situation, Clinical Nurse Specialists are available as a resource in addition to written policies and procedures.
Organizational Barriers
Majid et al. (2011) report that most nurses have positive attitudes about evidence-based practice. However, some barriers which reduce the utilization of evidence-based practice include inadequate time to learn and implement evidence-based practice; nurses lack understanding of statistical terminology and research jargon, and technological deficiencies which inhibit informational searches (Majid et al., 2017). I believe that inadequate time is the primary barrier to evidence-based practice implementation within my organization. Time is finite, and working 12-hour shifts means nurses do not want to stay in late or come in early for any type of training. I propose that team nursing would provide individual nurses with the opportunity to attend training during regular working hours. Dickerson and Latina (2017) maintain that team nursing is the practice of nurses working in pairs to deliver patient care. A pair of nurses make up a team; both nurses get report on all patients shared by the team, Then, when one nurse needs to step away for a break, or in this case for training, their partner is already ready to take care of their patients.
References
Adams, J. S. (2010). Utilizing evidence-based research and practice to support the infusion alliance. Journal of Infusion Nursing,33(5), 273-277. doi:10.1097/nan.0b013e3181ee037e
Bull, M. J. (2015). Managing delirium in hospitalized older adults. American Nurse Today,10(10). Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/managing-delirium-hospitalized-older-adults/.
Dickerson, J., & Latina, A. (2017). Team nursing. Nursing,47(10), 16-17. doi:10.1097/01.nurse.0000524769.41591.fc
Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y., Chang, Y., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2011). Adopting evidence-based practice in clinical decision making: Nurses perceptions, knowledge, and barriers. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA,99(3), 229-236. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing research generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer.
Springer, G. (2015). When and how to use restraints. American Nurse Today,10(1). Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/use-restraints/.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"