concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources

Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources

Response is written in Standard Edited English
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed

Few or no credible sources are cited
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective  

Response to faculty questions are missing

No credible sources are cited
   Feedback:     Second Response:
Timely and full participation           Points:       
Points Range:    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely and full participation

Posts  by due date
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

NA
   Feedback:           Points:       
Points Range:    0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirement for full participation
   Feedback:   
Show DescriptionsShow Feedback
Main Posting:
 Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance44 (44%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.  

supported by at least 3 current

credible sources
Excellent Performance40 (40%) – 43 (43%)
Responds to the discussion question(s)

is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth  

supported by at least 3 credible references
Competent Performance35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the discussion question(s)

is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth

supported by at least 3 credible references
Proficient Performance31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s)

one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed

is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis  

somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

post is cited with  fewer than 2 credible references
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s)

lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria

lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis  

does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

contains only 1 or no credible referencesFeedback:

Main Posting:
Writing–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors

Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Excellent Performance5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)
Written clearly and concisely

May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Competent Performance5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style
Proficient Performance4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)
Written somewhat concisely

May contain more than  two spelling or grammatical errors

Contains some APA formatting errors
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 4 (4%)
Not written clearly or concisely

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleFeedback:

Main Posting:
Timely and full participation–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely and full participation

posts main discussion by due date
Excellent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Competent Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Proficient Performance0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
NA
Room for Improvement0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirement for full participationFeedback:

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.–Levels of Achievement:Outstanding Performance9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

responds to questions posed by faculty

the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives
Excellent Performance8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings
Competent Performance7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting
Proficient Performance6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic

 

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!"